SNAPSHOTS FROM THE FAIL: Philosopher visits NPR!

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017

Part 3—Masterful incoherence:
For years, we've wandered in the world's deserts, searching for the "philosophers," hoping to hear their voices.

We've wondered if any such people exist, even if there is any such subject. (For Professor Horwich's ruminations on the latter question, see his 2013 post at the New York Times blog, The Stone, an offshoot of The Opinionator.)

For many years, we've even blamed the "philosophers" for the fail. This dates to Campaign 2000,a twenty-month journalistic gong show built upon fanciful paraphrase.

For starters, let's be fair! You simply can't have journalism without the use of paraphrase. Indeed, you can't have human discourse of any kind without use of this ubiquitous, everyday human tool.

That said, paraphrase is powerful. In the hands of a "journalist," it lets the scribe substitute his account of what a politician has said for the politician's actual statement—for the statement-in-itself.

Realistically, you can't discuss the world without employing paraphrase. But as we told you long ago, the power to paraphrase is also the power to spin:

You get to say what the candidate said. Never mind what he actually said!

Back to that ancient campaign! For twenty months, the nation's "journalists" kept inventing ridiculous statements, which they kept attributing to a certain targeted candidate. They hated him because his principal sponsor had received ten acts of oral sex, and sadly enough, they hadn't.

Like prophets in the desert lands hoping to hear the voice of God, we waited for the nation's logicians to address this runaway conduct. We'd have done substantially better hoping to hear from Godot!

Our campuses are crawling with people who claim to be philosophers and/or logicians. But none of them spoke during that campaign, raising an ancient question:

Are these life-forms actually human? Could it be that they're simply jokes of the Olympian gods? Could they even be misprogrammed cyborgs, not unlike Yul Brynner's cowboy in the feature film, Westworld?

Do our "philosophers" really exist? Or have we been abandoned? Last Wednesday, the ancient question came center stage when Professor Appiah, the "house philosopher" of the New York Times, visited The Brian Lehrer Show, an officially brainiac Gotham-based NPR program.

How ironic! We were attracted to this particular program by a summary of the discussion on the New York Timers' reimagined page A3, which bears this controversial motto:
You are the dumbest people on Earth.
We at the Times want to serve you.
Last Thursday, page A3 recommended Appiah's appearace with Lehrer. And its summary quoted Professor Appiah making intriguing remarks!

In fairness, it quoted him referring to "fallibilism;" this was a dangerous warning sign, acceptance of jargon-wise. But good lord! The summary also quoted the philosopher telling the journalist this:
APPIAH (8/23/17): I think that they're a response to the fact that we are very cognitively limited. We're better at this than any other creature on the planet, so we notice our superiority, but we should also recognize the way we fall far below many reasonable aims that you might have for being able to think reliably about the world. We're not very good at that.
No clear antecedent was offered for "they're." But that's very much the way the new page A3 rolls!

At any rate, say what? We humans "are very cognitively limited?" We're not very good at being able to think reliably about the world? These strike us as very important ideas—and these ideas are rarely offered to us, the self-impressed "rational animals."

Hungrily, we played the audiotape of Appiah's 21-minute chat with Lehrer. When we did, the analysts gnashed their teeth, convinced again that human life is a joke played upon us by the gods, just as sacred Homer repeatedly said.

Could it be that Lehrer and Appiah are really misfiring machines? Could they be mere apparitions, play-acted by the gods?

Surely, no one could doubt these possibilities after reviewing those 21 minutes, especially to the first ten. The colloquy started with Lehrer seeming to summarize the basic thrust of the philosopher's new book:
LEHRER: His new book is called As If: Idealization and Ideals, and it looks at the idea that our best chance of understanding society is to be open to a range of imperfect descriptions of the world to create something close to truth.
Say what? This new book provided the rationale for Appiah's appearance as a guest. That said, our analysts' eyes began to tear up as Lehrer provided that capsule.

"Our best chance of understanding society is to be open to a range of imperfect descriptions of the world to create something close to truth?" How could so insipid a premise possibly provide the spine for a leading "philosopher's" book?

Perhaps Appiah could answer that question. Lehrer never asked.

In the moment, we told our young analysts that they may have misheard what the journalist said. But then, minutes later, he hauled off and said it again:
LEHRER: At the core of your book is the idea of "strategic untruth," as you put it, the idea that our best chance of understanding the world is to be open to a range of imperfect descriptions of the world to create something close to truth.
By now, it was clear; the journalist was reading from a press kit. Also, what he was reading seemed to make no earthly sense.

"We should be open to a range of imperfect descriptions?" In what way would any sane person disagree with that?

This obvious question never arose during the day's discussion. Instead, the journalist acted as if some potent new bromide was being expressed—and the philosopher was soon advancing the puzzling claims about Donald J. Trump which we cited in Tuesday's report:
APPIAH (8/30/17): It's true that almost everything the current president says is strictly speaking false. But a lot of it is false in the mode of hyperbole, and I don't think we should object to those ones. We shouldn't object to the ones where he's overstating the case. People overstate the case all the time!

LEHRER: Didn't he use a phrase like that in his book, The Art of the Deal? Your phrase [in the book As If] is "strategic untruth," that so many people employ as a method of dealing with reality. And I think he said "strategic hyperbole," or something like that?

APPIAH: Yes, he did, yes. So that's overstatement. So we should expect him to overstate...
We should expect him to overstate! Twenty years ago, he said he likes to overstate in his ridiculous book!

"Another machine seems to be misfiring," one the youngsters mordantly said. Glumly, she hurled her pencil down, then stared off into space.

It was hard to say she was wrong! Seven minutes into this chat, the leading philosopher had seemed to say this:
Almost everything Donald Trump says is false. But we shouldn't complain about that! He said that's the way he rolls!
Seven minutes into the program, the analysts began to sense that something was badly wrong. The philosopher was making peculiar remarks. The journalist wasn't seeming to notice.

Our thoughts turned to the secrets revealed by glorious Homer. Beyond that, we thought of the way no logician spoke up during those years of bad paraphrase. We pictured Yul Brynner at the Westworld resort, firing his gun at the guests!

The youngsters were hurling their pencils down and shoving their iPads away. But the proof of their hypothesis—Appiah and Lehrer are jokes of the gods—would only come when the famous philosopher discussed that challenging road in Princeton, the road by the railroad tracks.

Tomorrow: Comical world-class incoherence, evoking our ongoing fail

12 comments:

  1. Bob's skin and rancor are impossible to hurt or help but certainly is in the end the order of the day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob rightly mocks the paraphrase:

    "Almost everything Donald Trump says is false. But we shouldn't complain about that! He said that's the way he rolls!"

    But, there's another possible paraphrase that makes more sense:

    "Almost everything Donald Trump says is false, and we should complain about that. But we shouldn't take this practice as evidence of mental illness. It's a long-standing, acknowledged behavior, which has generally been effective for Trump."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look what the cat dragged in.

      Delete
    2. DinC:

      When Donald Trump states repeatedly in his speeches that he knows he is so smart because his uncle was a professor at MIT, how do you interpret those statements? What do you think they tell you about Donald Trump?

      When Donald Trump states repeatedly that the rain stopped just before his Inaugural address (possibly miraculously, according to him), and then you go and watch the video of his Inaugural address and it is clearly raining throughout most of it, how do you interpret those statements by Donald Trump? What do you think they tell you about Donald Trump?

      Delete
    3. Trump's lies tell me nothing about Trump, but they tell me tons about the gullibility of Conservative voters.

      Delete
    4. hardindr -- those statements tell me that we cannot rely on the accuracy of things Trump says, particularly when those statements are exaggerations or secondary details. Most politicians lie, but Trump lies much more than the others. He lies even when he apparently has nothing to gain by lying (such as whether it was raining.)

      However, his supporters know how to decode his exaggerations. E.g., when he says he'll build a wall and make Mexico pay for it, his supporters understand that he means he'll make a big effort to reduce illegal immigration. That's good enough for his supporters, because it's better (in their view) than what the Democrats would do.

      Delete
    5. Isn't Comrade DinC so clever! He has the super duper "bullshit artist and lying sack of shit" decoder ring.

      Comrade, too bad the lying sack of shit was caught begging the President of Mexico not to contradict him on his fucking repeated ad nauseam fucking promises that "Mexico is going to pay for the wall" so as not to embarrass him politically. I wonder why the lying sack of shit debased himself in that manner. You got any thought you fucking liar?

      Delete
  3. First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In Casa Grande, first there are the Giants in Spring, then there are no Giants in the Spring, then there is just the Spring.

      Delete
    2. @1:10 PM wait until next year, but seek ye then absolution from the men of the cloth when next they March in Peoria.

      Delete
  4. Hi everyone! I'm so excited, I've gotten back with my ex boyfriend after he break up with me and left me for another girl he meant on social media, Thanks to Dr.Unity the best spell caster online for restored my broken relationship and i highly recommends Dr.Unity to anyone in need of help!.. Me and boyfriend have been together for 3 years, recently i found out my boyfriend was having an affair with another Girl, when i confronted him, it led to quarrels and he finally broke up with me, i tried all i could to get him back but all to no avail until i saw a post in a relationship forum about a spell caster who helps people get back their lost love through Love spell, at first i doubted it but decided to give it a try, when i contacted this spell via his email, and he told me what to do and i did it, Then he did a {urgent Love spell} for me. 28 hours later, my boyfriend really called me and told me that he miss me so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr.Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity is a real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back, or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact: Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,Danele Louw from Washington.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi everyone! I'm so excited, I've gotten back with my ex boyfriend after he break up with me and left me for another girl he meant on social media, Thanks to Dr.Unity the best spell caster online for restored my broken relationship and i highly recommends Dr.Unity to anyone in need of help!.. Me and boyfriend have been together for 3 years, recently i found out my boyfriend was having an affair with another Girl, when i confronted him, it led to quarrels and he finally broke up with me, i tried all i could to get him back but all to no avail until i saw a post in a relationship forum about a spell caster who helps people get back their lost love through Love spell, at first i doubted it but decided to give it a try, when i contacted this spell via his email, and he told me what to do and i did it, Then he did a {urgent Love spell} for me. 28 hours later, my boyfriend really called me and told me that he miss me so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr.Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity is a real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back, or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact: Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,Danele Louw from Washington.

    ReplyDelete