MAKE THE WORLD GO AWAY: A topic which doesn't exist on TV!


Part 4—The children whose lives don't count:
Not long ago, an amazing event occurred. A person could read, in the Washington Post, about improved test scores in the nation's public schools!

Granted, the discussion occurred in an op-ed column by a guest columnist, not in a news report. That said, the analysts were almost excited by the discussion—until they saw the metric the guest columnist used:
WHITE (2/9/18): [I]t's inaccurate to claim that there's been little progress since the Reagan administration's seminal report "A Nation at Risk."...[T]his line of thinking threatens the bipartisan push for change in America's schools, including the principles of verifying what progress students are making and holding school systems accountable for that progress.

Let's take the claim of failure first. The most widely trusted yardstick of American students' learning is the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Over the past quarter-century, the share of American fourth-graders fully proficient in math on the NAEP increased by 27 percentage points. The share of proficient fourth-grade readers increased by seven percentage points. Over that time, proficiency among African American fourth-graders increased by 18 percentage points in math and 10 percentage points in reading, and Latino fourth-graders' proficiency gained 21 points in math and nine points in reading...

This is no claim of "mission accomplished." Other nations have strengthened their schools faster and more profoundly than we have. Reading and math skills in middle and high schools, as well as knowledge of civics and science, are deplorably low. Learning gaps by race and income level remain tragically wide. But this country has made important improvements over a generation, with real implications for the lives of families and the economic health of our states and communities.
John White is the Louisiana state superintendent of education. In saying that public school performance has improved, he bucks the standard preferred party line, in which the public has long been told that nothing has worked in our public schools thanks to our ratty public school teachers with their fiendish unions.

That gloomy line has long been standard within the mainstream press. In his recent column, White said the familiar claims which drive this gloomy picture are untrue.

That said, White bowed to the gloom-and-doom lobby with his claim that reading and math skills in middle schools are "deplorably low," and with his gloomy assessment of the international picture. Beyond that, he chose to measure progress on the NAEP in a way which made us gnash our teeth—by recording "the share of American [students] fully proficient in math and reading."

In fairness, that's one statistic a person can use to measure improvement on the NAEP over time. But for various barely technical reasons, we wouldn't say it's the best single statistic to use, and it results in a rather underwhelming set of claims:

The share of proficient fourth-grade readers has increased by seven percentage points since the 1980s? That has the unmistakable sound of a massively underwhelming claim.

Still, given the way this topic is normally discussed, this underwhelming presentation is about as good as you'll ever see in a newspaper like the Post. It's very, very, very rate to hear claims about progress at all.

That said, where does a modern liberal turn for information on a topic like this? More specifically, to whom can liberals or progressives turn for information about the progress recorded by black or Hispanic kids?

Alas! That liberal can't turn to Rachel Maddow, or to Chris Hayes, or even to the morally swaggering Lawrence, or to any of the seven- or eight-figure "corporate liberals" hired to perform on MSNBC. The lives and interests of black children simply don't exist on that channel until such time as someone gets shot, though only by a policeman or a "vigilante."

At least in her seven- to eight-figure professional capacity as a cable news entertainer, Rachel Maddow doesn't give a flying fig about the lives and interests of black kids. Their lives and their interests don't exist on her high-rated TV show.

At present, her TV show is devoted to The Chase—to the entertaining, pleasure-providing hunt after Donald J. Trump. Viewers are immersed in the minutia of that chase to a degree that borders on the pointless and the insane.

Black kids can go play in the yard. So can Patrisse Khan-Cullors and her intriguing new book.

What's the true state of the nation's schools? Of the nation's low-income schools? Of the service those schools are providing to the nation's black kids?

You won't hear a word from Maddow about that or any similar topic. Those children don't exist on her show. Neither does Khan-Cullors, or a group of people like her.

Who the Joe Hill is Patrisse Khan-Cullors? She's one of the founders of Black Lives Matter, a semi-organization our corporate liberal TV stars happily pretend to support.

Khan-Cullors' new book is called When They Call You A Terorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir. The book appeared on the New York Times best-seller list on two recent Sundays, but its author hasn't appeared on MSNBC and most likely never will.

(So far, Khan-Cullors has done the full hour on C-Span's After Words, and she's been interviewed on NPR's Weekend All Things Considered. According to Nexis, that's it. Full and complete total stop.)

In her book, Khan-Cullors describes her life as a child who grew up poor in the Los Angeles of the wars on drugs and crime. Among the intriguing stories it seems to tell is the story of Khan-Cullots' education in the Los Angeles public schools.

Although she lived in Van Nuys, Khan-Cullors went to Millikan Middle School in Sherman Oaks, a school she improbably describes as being "all-white." She then went to Cleveland High, where it sounds like she received a fascinating, challenging education. The leading authority on Cleveland High describes the school as follows:
Grover Cleveland Charter High School is a public school serving grades 9-12. Cleveland Humanities Magnet is part of Cleveland Charter High School. The school is located in Reseda, in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles, California.

Cleveland, a part of the Los Angeles Unified School District, was named after President Grover Cleveland. Cleveland Charter High School is LAUSD's only comprehensive high school that holds the title of being a California Distinguished School.

Cleveland High School was honored as a 2005 California Distinguished School
and as of 2010 was ranked the 703rd best high school in the nation by Newsweek, up from 854th the year before. It has a student population of about 3800. The school is divided into small learning communities.
So the school is described. Khan-Cullors would have graduated around 2002. According to the leading authority on her life, she holds a degree in religion and philosophy from UCLA and was a Fulbright scholar.

As with much of her memoir, Khan-Cullors' description of her education is fleeting and somewhat impressionistic. Her description of other aspects of her childhood is more detailed and more pointed. This includes her accounts of the interactions of her brothers and her father with the Los Angeles police and the California prison system.

Khan-Cullors has been involved in prison reform for a good long time. That topic doesn't exist on "liberal cable" either. For this reason, people like Khan-Cullors aren't invited to appear on the channel. That channel is deeply invested in The Chase, and in increased corporate revenue.

When Maddow mugs and clowns and discusses herself and exclusively hands you The Chase, she makes us liberals feel moral and pure inside. We may not realize how many topics are being kept from view.

When Maddow wallows in The Chase, she makes the rest of the world go away. Tomorrow, we'll finish our discussion of the many topics you won't encounter on that cable channel—about the many people you won't see there.

Cable keeps making the world go away. On the brighter side, it helps us make it through the night knowing that We are the good ones.

Tomorrow: Which terrorized children don't count and other disappeared topics


  1. Yesterday Maddow described Trump's recent actions loosening gun control, in contrast to his suggestions after the Parkland shooting. Seems to me that shows an interest in the wellbeing of school children.

  2. Why doesn't Somerby fill the gap and actually be that liberal voice on education? Instead, he reacts to an op-ed he happens to see in his newspaper, criticizes it in some unclear way, and then reverts to his usual main point: that those bad hacks on tv won't talk about this, because they don't care etc etc. Most of us know that you don't get much information about these kinds of topics from cable tv. Certainly, long time readers of the Howler have had that pounded into their heads.

    Somerby's kind of critique is just taking the easy way out on these topics.

    1. I believe you misunderstand the purpose of his blog. As stated at the top of the page, "musings on the 'mainstream press corps' and the American discourse." Discussion of the "topics" can be found elsewhere.

    2. As I said, taking the easy way out. Somerby will not mention "education" again until he sees an article or op-ed in one of the two newspapers he subscribes to. Then, when he does, he will tell us that " cable tv doesn't care about education " for the billionth time. It's intellectually lazy.

    3. You are missing Somerby's main goals in life
      1) Attack Maddow
      2) Attack liberals
      3) Defend Trump
      4) Defend Trump minions such as Moore

      If a particular news item cannot be made to fit into that category, he'll ignore it, like the Trump enabler he has become.

  3. "...Patrisse Khan-Cullors and her intriguing new book."

    And what's so intriguing about it, Bob, if I may ask? She sounds like a garden variety ethno-nationalist; there ain't nothin' intriguing about that...

  4. Don't worry, Mao. Somerby neither agrees nor truly respects Khan-Cullors. His past blogging on the topics of race and gender makes any claim to the contrary ridiculous. He just wants to use Khan-Cullors to criticize lib-zombies: Lib tv stars should care about Khan-Cullors and Black Lives Matter, but don't (because she isn't a guest on their shows); hence, libs only pretend to care about Black Lives Matter and thus are giant hypocrites. Simple.

    1. Why, I'm sure they (liberal bosses, that is) do care about BLM: it's a very useful organization. As I remember, it disrupted a Sanders rally in Seattle (I think?) during the campaign. If they feel BLM needs more attention, they'll bring it. Hey, it's politics.

    2. Plus it's a great push back on out of control police departments, racism, and inequality in the criminal justice system. (Not the least because it really exposes the number of Americans who are okay with all that).
      But, yeah, I'm sure BLM is useful elsewhere as well.

  5. There is a long tradition of rallying around prison reform as a focal point for activism in LA and NYC. The radical leftist political groups of the 60s that became violent in the early 70s, white and black, left statements about prison reform at their bombing sites or issued demands for prison reform in their threat letters. The left still organizes around the release of convicted criminals believed to exemplify prison abuse (Mumia for example). Their own brief arrests during protests perhaps give them a shared experience that helps along their radicalization.

    It is nothing new that a middle class black woman attending high quality white schools in the Valley might feel insufficiently black on her own account and might borrow a cause to build an activist career around. Obama used community activism in Chicago to develop his own identity as a black man, build street cred and gain visibility. Khan-Cullors has become a professional activist and made a name for herself that is now capable of selling books.

    This may be Somerby's clever way of demonstrating that identity politics is bogus. The more we question Khan-Cullors' status as a champion of reform, the more we undermine the left's focus on identity defined by minority status and/or oppression, by what separates and divides people.

    Anything can be viewed in terms of either similarities or differences, including people, but that isn't relevant to a debate about what the Democratic party ought to focus upon in its platform and talking points. It doesn't matter how Khan-Cullors chooses to spend her time. What matters is whether the Democratic party will continue to champion change toward a level playing field for ALL people, including support for civil rights, or whether it turns into the Bernie Sanders version of anti-Capitalist economic reform that ignores all other social issues in favor of neo-Marxist change.

    I believe that Somerby has no more interest in Khan-Cullors and her book than he has in black school children or media criticism. And he certainly doesn't care about improving our society or he would have supported Hillary. Too late to pretend to care about any terrorized children, Somerby. Time to retire this blog, in my opinion, or won't the Russians let you do that?

  6. "The lives and interests of black children simply don't exist on that channel (MSNBC) until such time as someone gets shot, though only by a policeman or a "vigilante.""

    FU Bob.

    The lives and interests of black children simply don't exist on that channel until such time as someone gets shot, though only by a policeman or a "vigilante."

  7. The lives and interests of black children simply don't exist on that channel until such time as someone gets shot, though only by a policeman or a "vigilante."

    It's not just MSNBC; it's the entire liberal media.

    After years of improvement, the number of black murder victims exploded between 2014 and 2016. The murder rate of black Americans increased by around 2,000 a year! This horrendous development has been pretty much ignored by the liberal media, because the murderers of these black victims were mostly blacks, not policemen or vigilantes. BTW note that justified killings of blacks by policemen or vigilantes have gotten much more coverage than clear-cut murders by other blacks.

    1. FU 2 DinC.

    2. You are a old pin head.


    Bob tells us coverage by Rachel Maddow of Mo. Governor's indictment is "underwear sniffing."

    My name is Jessica Jack, from united States, i'm so excited my broken Marriage has been restored & my husband is back after he left me and our 2 kids for another woman. After 5 years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and the kids for another woman. thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he would come back to me, I was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Purity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a (Love spell) for me. 2 days later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before,All thanks to Dr Purity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr Purity is a real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact: Email him you can also call or whats app him (+2348070980389) thanks for reading...

  10. Here is my story. greatful

    My wife was diagnosed with a cancer, ( before i learnt of Rick Simpsons oil
    / RSO ) the hospital said to do chemotherapy and radiotherapy.. she did..
    and went through a lot.. but no cure, after a while the doctors said the
    cancer was spreading and we could look for alternatives.. i searched the
    internet and found out about the oil.. asked alot of questions.. watched
    the videos etc.. we made the oil our selves but it couldn't just work out
    we were doing more harm than good and the cancer was still there spreading,
    i searched more on the internet i found a testimony on how a lady got the
    oil via an email,
    immediately copied the email: i wrote to this very email and in an hour later i
    got a reply back asking me some few questions, and enlightened me on how to
    get the oil in the next 48hours, i placed my order and in the next 48hours
    the medication oil got to us. immediately my wife started using the oil, it
    been two months now, since my wife has been using the medication oil and
    the cancerous problems are gone this very fact was clarified by the doctor.

    i put up this piece of testimony for the sake of those once who need this
    oil to please don't die in silence their is a cure for your cancer today
    email:,,add on whatssap or call +15183519824 and get the oil.


    My Wife divorce me for no reason, Thanks to Dr. Trust for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again, My name is Bobby Foret. i live in US, I`m happily married to a lovely and caring wife,with two kids A very big problem occurred in my family seven months ago,between me and my wife so terrible that she took the case to court for a divorce she said that she never wanted to stay with me again,and that she did not love me anymore So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get her back,after much begging,but all to no avail and she confirmed it that she has made her decision,and she never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my wife So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my wife back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited. So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my wife back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my wife who did not call me for the past seven {7}months,gave me a call to inform me that she was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how she came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and she apologized for her mistake,and for the pain she caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit the same Doctor ,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to "bringing your ex back. Thanks you sir, for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again. His spell is a 100% Guarantee for your situation. Email him now. or Call or WHATSSAP him now: +2348156885231

    View his website for more testimony: