Two reports from the Times' front page!

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2019

It's narrative all the way down:
Do voters maintain an invidious double standard in the case of female candidates?

It's a very important question. That's especially true right now, as talent begins to emerge from all the demographic branches of the Democratic Party.

That said, how well does the New York Times do with that important question today? Is the paper presenting a careful analysis, or is it running a familiar type of report? Is it narrative all the way down?

This morning, on the paper's front page, Maggie Astor devotes 1800 words to the important topic. Before long, though, Astor is writing this:
ASTOR (2/12/19): How much sexism ultimately influences votes is a matter of debate...

What is not a matter of debate is the array of ways that sexism can manifest on the campaign trail, affecting not only how voters perceive candidates but how candidates present themselves to voters.

The likability trap

The very first question of Ms. Gillibrand's campaign was about her likability. ''A lot of people see you as pretty likable,'' a reporter told her. Did she consider that a ''selling point''?

Ms. Warren's evaluation arrived with similar speed, in a Politico article that asked how she could ''avoid a Clinton redux—written off as too unlikable before her campaign gets off the ground.''
Might we note a problem here? Astor seems to be discussing the way voters react to female candidates in sexist ways. But in her first two examples, she describes the conduct, appropriate or otherwise, of two mainstream reporters—two members of her own guild.

As we've noted over the years, our journalists routinely do this sort of thing. In earlier campaigns, journalists routinely attributed their own braindead attacks on certain disfavored candidates to "late night comedians." In this instance, Astor describes the conduct of two reporters, but seems to be sliming the voters as she does.

Our journalists routinely find ways to attribute their own guild's behavior to someone else! Three paragraphs later, Astor's slip-slide continues:
ASTOR: Women also tend to be viewed as unlikable based on their ambition. Harvard researchers found in 2010 that voters regarded ''power-seeking'' women with contempt and anger, but saw power-seeking men as stronger and more competent. There is often some implication of unscrupulousness in descriptions of female candidates as ''ambitious''—an adjective that could apply to any person running for president but is rarely used to disparage men. Within 24 hours of Ms. Harris's campaign kickoff, some critics were bringing up her onetime relationship with a powerful California politician, Willie Brown—a common tactic faced by women that sexualizes them and reduces their successes to a relationship with a man.
In that passage, Astor describes a research finding that is specific to the reactions of voters. Meanwhile, were "some critics" bringing up Harris' past relationship with Brown?

We challenged that stupid critique ourselves, but those "critics" weren't American voters. Instead, they were the eternal flyweights of Astor's own upper-end press corps!

Meanwhile, the notion that male candidates aren't criticized, by journalists, for being unlikable or ambitious is utterly absurd. Disfavored male pols have been battered that way, within the press, for a great many cycles now.

During the twenty months of Campaign 2000, mainstream reporters and pundits generated and promulgated endless scripts about the way Candidate Gore had allegedly been running for president since he was 6 years old. In line with prevailing press corps preferences, reporters and pundits said, again and again, that Gore "would so and say anything" to become president.

In September 2000, Chris Matthews formally apologized for having said, for more than a year, that Gore "would lick the bathroom floor" in order to reach the White House. Matthews was apologizing because Gore had shot ahead in the polls and seemed on the way to a win. But Gore had been trashed for his alleged ambition for quite a few years at that point. Disfavored male candidates are trashed by journalists, all the time, for allegedly being too ambitious and/or not likable enough.

Astor summarizes some studies which claim to demonstrate the differential ways voters react to female candidates. That's a very important topic, but she handles those studies in the flimsy way familiar to reporters who are simply advancing a Favored Press Corps Narrative.

Meanwhile, she complains about all sorts of conduct which afflict male and female candidates alike. Consider the types of bellyaching found in this pointless passage:
ASTOR: Perhaps the most obvious way female candidates are judged differently is on their appearance: not only how ''attractive'' they are and how they dress, researchers say, but also their facial expressions, their body language and their voice. Accused in 2015 of ''shouting'' about gun violence, Mrs. Clinton responded: ''First of all, I'm not shouting. It's just when women talk, some people think we're shouting.''

Women are conscious that small elements of how they present themselves are subject to scrutiny. Representative Madeleine Dean—one of four Democratic women elected to the House last year from Pennsylvania, whose congressional delegation was previously all-male—said an aide would stand in the back of the room during her campaign events, holding up a cardboard sign with a smiley face to remind her to shift the serious expression she naturally wore while listening to voters.

She was also coached, ''though I did not take his coaching, not to cross my arms in front of myself because then you look mad,'' Ms. Dean said.
We hate to provide the buzzkill here, but Rep. Dean is hardly the first candidate to receive such advice about body language. Stating the obvious, male candidates are routinely coached, and judged, in all those ways as well.

Meanwhile, how about the way Candidate Hillary Clinton was criticized for "shouting?" As everyone but the youthful Astor recalls, Candidate Howard Dean was almost driven from the 2004 for an alleged shouting incident after the Iowa caucuses. Five years earlier, when he made his formal announcement speech. Candidate Gore was savaged all across the pundit corps for the way he had allegedly shouted during his speech—but only after that strange criticism of the mild speech emerged from a spokeswoman for the RNC.

When the complaint emerged, the children stampeded, as their sub-rational souls are always eager to do. Here was the terrible Lady Collins, right in Astor's own newspaper, though Astor, 8 or 9 at the time, may not fully remember:
COLLINS (6/21/99): Al Gore has been trying to be more exciting on the stump—trying so hard that if he keeps it up, he'll rupture his vocal cords before the New Hampshire primary.

The new Al Gore yells quite a lot. Caught between Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, two natural campaigners, the Vice President is trying to make up in decibels what he lacks in spontaneity. ''I am not satisfied! INDEED I AM RESTLESS!'' he cried in New York, announcing his candidacy for President with a list of promises about what he would do to move the country TOWARD AMERICA'S NEW HORIZONS, a goal that will involve eliminating EVERY LAST DIME OF WASTE, fighting GLOBAL WARMING and making our public schools THE FINEST AND BEST IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

This is our fault. We have been carping about how boring Al Gore is, and the poor man is all but howling at the moon in an effort to sound more compelling. We are being forced to watch him go through an enormous effort to look effortless, and it is as discomfiting as looking at the underside of a swan swimming on the lake. Voters are not going to elect a President who makes them feel like nervous parents at the second-grade class play. Mr. Gore has to give up this futile attempt to become Kennedyesque and embrace the boredom.

Let Gore be Gore! Where is it written that the American people want a fun guy for President? Most of our chief executives were not people you would necessarily want to pal around with. No one ever accused George Washington of being the life of the party. ''Today I dined with the president, and as usual the company was as grave as if at a funeral,'' reported one of his supporters.

Certainly it is a disadvantage to have to campaign in the age of mass media when the only TV star you resemble is Howdy Doody...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Meanwhile, children are dead all over Iraq because people like Collins behaved this way all through the 2000 campaign.

("Even his hair looked less stiff," Collins went on to say in her column, thinking about an earlier appearance when Gore wasn't yelling so much. In the passage posted above, you'll note that she's correctly blaming the press corps for saying that Gore wasn't sufficiently fun—that he wasn't likable enough.)

In fairness, it wasn't just Collins. Everybody shouted the claim about Gore's alleged shouting once the RNC put the claim in play. On CNN’s Capital Gang, Margaret Carlson called Gore a "flailing, shouting person." On that same show, Al Hunt and Robert Novak also complained that Gore had "shouted" when he delivered his speech.

"The shouting is terrible," Novak declared. But then, by time of the weekend shows, pundits were widely complaining about the way Gore allegedly shouted and yelled as he made his announcement—a complaint which is stunningly hard to sustain if a person simply views the tape of the rather tepid speech.

On The McLaughlin Group, the Chicago Tribune’s James Warren called the speech "a little bit screechy, a little bit loud;" he compared Gore to a "Baptist minister on amphetamines." Two days later, the Collins column appeared. In the next campaign, Candidate Dean was widely mugged for his own shouting, which seemed to have been electronically enhanced.

To what extent are female candidate treated differently by voters? With impressive talent arising from female pols in the Democratic Party, it's a very important question—but the New York Times tends to run on narrative all the way down.

On its front page, it will tend to blame the press corps' conduct on voters. It will mug and clown and gambol and play, and it will hand you Pure Script.

"Man [sic] is the rational animal," Aristotle is said to have said. In fact, we humans are the plainly sub-rational animal which routinely runs on the rocket fuel of novelized tribal script.

Such script is the typical meat of the Times, our laziest, dumbest newspaper. In fairness to Aristotle, he'd never read the New York Times and possibly couldn't imagine its lazy, script-driven work.

Tomorrow: This second front-page report

Try to believe that a journalist said it: Here is Astor, with a remarkable post on journalistic method:

"Speaking of men, I don't quote any of them in my latest article, an in-depth look at the double standards women running for president face"

These journalistic kids today! And no, we aren't making this up.

14 comments:

  1. All the lonely people




    Where do they all come from?






    All the lonely people






    Where do they all belong?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Only liberal zombies care about 'race', gender, 'sexual orientation' and other irrelevant (and mostly meaningless) shit.

    Normal people -- in the US, and everywhere else on this Earth -- vote for the political program.

    Irrelevant characteristics of the clowns associated with the program don't enter the equation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do looks matter more for female candidates? Consider Senator Sinema. https://www.google.com/search?q=sinema+kyrsten+pictures&rlz=1C1GGRV_enUS751US751&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=PBdgLL3tbeuNPM%253A%252ChdYhnOj-l6XaEM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kSCdXf-AYA3rTtWok9BhgtkPF7wCQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwim3NCY6bbgAhUNCXwKHbgvBy8Q9QEwBXoECAIQDg#imgrc=DVxQW2VnYqxbzM:

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps the greatest gossip ever conceived by humans is the gossip of religion. As Hitchens said, “it infects everything,” and I believe that’s true. But one must distinguish between religionists who embrace humanism, such as the Berrigans (who are not representative of the former Nazi- loving Catholic Church) and Evangelists, who want us to rush towards the End Times.

    Any discussion of rationality (as opposed to rationalizing) must include religion. Because what religion attempts to do is to make every individual the center of the universe.

    Here’s a bumper sticker I read, on a humongous SUV, whilst driving through New Jersey: “God is in Control. Why Worry?” I almost ran off the road.

    Hopefully, Bob will address this issue. Because as far as I can tell, most religionists operate on that basic assumption, including our dreadful millionaire pundits.

    Leroy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem you'll have with that argument is that Christianity is based in truth.

      Delete
    2. Religion has nothing to do with rationality, it's an expression of a moral ideal or perfection. Think about religion, like poetry, as an idealization of human experience. It's not dealing with matters of fact. Its function is rather to draw from reality an image or feeling of that ideal to which reality and rationality don't quite conform and to make us fleetingly, by anticipation, partake in the ideal world we all crave.

      Ironically, had you run off the road and fell over a cliff the last thing you would say before you crashed and died would be "Jesus!"or "God(damn)!"

      Delete
    3. Religion gives people a place to go where rationality and empiricism cannot thus far take them. Farming at one time was a totally religious issue. Then we learned about weather and seasons and development of technology to control it, in other words we understood it. As soon as we understand everything on the planet, we won't need religion. Why are we here? What is the point? Why am I lazy when I should be working? Why can I not control my desires? Hitchens was just a dumb, self-hating alcoholic. His complaints are about corrupt institutions not the concept of religions. He never even addressed the difference. And it doesn't matter anyway. Look where he is now. Religion will be with us always, far past all of our lives.

      Delete
  5. What a load of junk. When NYU did an experiment reversing the Trump Hillary debate roles it showed that sexism worked to the benefit of Hillary and when she said the same things as a man she was perceived as unlikable and Trump was perceived as likable when he said the same things as a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joy and happiness is all i can see around ever since i came in contact with this great man. i complained bitterly to him about me having herpes only for him to tell me it’s a minor stuff. He told me he has cured thousands of people but i did not believe until he sent me the herbal medicine and i took it as instructed by this great man, only to go to the hospital after two weeks for another test and i was confirmed negative. For the first time in four years i was getting that result. i want to use this medium to thank this great man. His name is Dr Oyagu, i came in contact with his email through a friend in UK and ever since then my live has been full with laughter and great peace of mind. i urge you all with herpes or HSV to contact him if you willing to give him a chance. you can contact him through this email oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com or you can also WhatsApp him +2348101755322
    He also cured my friend with HIV and ever since then i strongly believe he can do all things. Don't be deceived thinking he does not work, i believe if you can get in contact with this man all your troubles will be over. i have done my part in spreading the good news. Contact him through his email and you will be the next to testify of his great work.









    Joy and happiness is all i can see around ever since i came in contact with this great man. i complained bitterly to him about me having herpes only for him to tell me it’s a minor stuff. He told me he has cured thousands of people but i did not believe until he sent me the herbal medicine and i took it as instructed by this great man, only to go to the hospital after two weeks for another test and i was confirmed negative. For the first time in four years i was getting that result. i want to use this medium to thank this great man. His name is Dr Oyagu, i came in contact with his email through a friend in UK and ever since then my live has been full with laughter and great peace of mind. i urge you all with herpes or HSV to contact him if you willing to give him a chance. you can contact him through this email oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com or you can also WhatsApp him +2348101755322
    He also cured my friend with HIV and ever since then i strongly believe he can do all things. Don't be deceived thinking he does not work, i believe if you can get in contact with this man all your troubles will be over. i have done my part in spreading the good news. Contact him through his email and you will be the next to testify of his great work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Can't still believe that i got cured from Genital Herpes through herbal treatment from Dr LUCKY  who I met through the internet, I actually couldn't believe it at first because it sounded impossible to me knowing how far I have gone just to get rid of it. Dr LUCKY send me his medicine which I took as instructed and here I am living a happy life once again, a big thanks to Dr LUCKY , I am sure there are many herbal doctors out there but Dr LUCKY did it for me, contact him on Email him; { drluckyherbalcure@gmail.com }  

    ReplyDelete
  8. How I Got My Ex Husband Back..Am so excited to share my testimony of a real spell caster who brought my husband back to me. My husband and I have been married for about 6 years now. We were happily married with two kids, a boy and a girl. 3 months ago, I started to notice some strange behavior from him and a few weeks later I found out that my husband is seeing someone else. He started coming home late from work, he hardly care about me or the kids anymore, Sometimes he goes out and doesn't even come back home for about 2-3 days. I did all I could to rectify this problem but all to no avail. I became very worried and needed help. As I was browsing through the internet one day, I came across a website that suggested that Dr Aluya can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and and told him my problems and he told me what to do and i did it and he did a spell for me. 48 hours later, my husband came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my family are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Aluya Powerful Love Spell that really works. If you have any problem contact him and i guarantee you that he will help you. He will not disappoint you. Email him at: aluya.48hoursspelltemple@gmail.com. or whatsapp him on: +2348110493039 

    ReplyDelete
  9. I was diagnosed of herpes virus, I have tried all possible means to get cure but all my effort proved abortive, until a friend of mine introduced me to a herbal doctor called Dr Agaba, who prepare herbal medicine to cure all kind of diseases including herpes virus (Herpes), when i contacted this herbal doctor via email, he sent me herpes virus herbal medicine via courier service, when i received the herbal medicine he gave me step by step instructions on how to apply it, when i applied it as instructed i was totally cured from the virus within 3 weeks of usage. Contact this great herbal doctor today to get your cure. 
    Via Email: Dragabasolutionhome@gmail.com or WhatApp: +2349074536486    

    ReplyDelete
  10. LOTTO, lottery,jackpot.
    Hello all my viewers, I am very happy for sharing this great testimonies,The best thing that has ever happened in my life is how I win the lottery euro million mega jackpot. I am a Woman who believe that one day I will win the lottery. finally my dreams came through when I email believelovespelltemple@gmail.com and tell him I need the lottery numbers. I have spend so much money on ticket just to make sure I win. But I never know that winning was so easy until the day I meant the spell caster online which so many people has talked about that he is very great in casting lottery spell, . so I decide to give it a try.I contacted this great Dr Believe and he did a spell and he gave me the winning lottery numbers. But believe me when the draws were out I was among winners. I win 30,000 million Dollar. Dr Believe truly you are the best, all thanks to you forever

    ReplyDelete