Future Historians Living in Trees explain demise of U.S.!

SATURDAY, MAY 27, 2023

Wallace TV program cited: Centuries ahead of where we are now, Future Historians Living in Trees are already preparing the textbooks, according to sources familiar.

They may be forced to live in trees following the cataclysmic defeat of the West, but the historians in question are highly eminent. 

BREAKING! They're attributing the end of the American experiment to "the democratization of media." More specifically, they're attributing this cataclysmic downfall to the creation and implementation of round-the-clock, profit-based "cable news."

(Full disclosure: Spokespersons for these future scholars communicate through the nocturnal submissions the haters refer to as "dreams.")

Last evening, those spokespersons offered a case in point. They cited a 20-minute "discussion" of the ongoing debt limit crisis on yesterday's Deadline: White House.

At issue was Donald J. Trump's role in the ongoing negotiations. Here's the way the lengthy segment went down:

After MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace introduced three of "our favorite reporters and friends," the pundits conducted themselves in a way which resembled the type of interaction once known as a "discussion."

For twenty minutes, the favorites pretended to conduct a news discussion. Right from the start, the presentation aired above this alarming chyron:

BREAKING NEWS
TRUMP URGING GOP TO LET U.S. DEFAULT ON ITS DEBT

The analysts came right out of their chairs! Has Donld J.  Trump been urging the GOP to do that? Has he been doing that in a way which could be described as BREAKING NEWS?

Granted, Trump had made a deeply worrying set of remarks concerning this matter during his gruesome CNN "town hall" broadcast. We specifically cited those worrying (and childish) remarks in real time. 

But that event had occurred all the way back on May 10. Our question, therefore, was this:

Has Trump been urging the GOP to default in the days and weeks since then? Has he been urging this conduct in a way which can responsibly and accurately be described as BREAKING NEWS?

Has Trump been urging such terrible conduct in the days and weeks since then? We were surprised by the Wallace chyron, because we had read this passage in a front-page report in the New York Times just yesterday morning.

We include the upbeat front-page headline from yesterday' front-page report:

White House and G.O.P. Close In on Deal to Raise Debt Limit and Cut Spending

[...]

Former President Donald J. Trump, who has said Republicans should force a default if they do not get what they want in the negotiations, also was weighing in. Mr. McCarthy told reporters he had spoken with Mr. Trump briefly about the negotiations—“it came up just for a second,” the speaker said. “He was talking about, ‘Make sure you get a good agreement.’”

After playing a tee shot on his golf course outside Washington, Mr. Trump approached a reporter for The New York Times, iPhone in hand, and showed a call with Mr. McCarthy.

“It’s going to be an interesting thing—it’s not going to be that easy,” said Mr. Trump, who described his call with the speaker as “a little, quick talk.”

“They’ve spent three years wasting money on nonsense,” he added, saying, “Republicans don’t want to see that, so I understand where they’re at.”

That was the end of the front-page report. With that in mind:

Has Trump been urging the GOP to let the United States default? A pair of high-ranking Times reporters seemed to be unaware of this BREAKING NEWS.

What was Wallace talking about during her twenty-minute segment? Specifically, in what way has Trump been "urging the GOP to let the U.S. default?"

Early on, she cited this recent report in Vanity Fair—a recent report which makes no such claim about Trump. Exactly ten minutes into the scrum, she offered this trademark bit of incompetence-laced misstatement:

WALLACE (5/26/23): Here's Donald Trump. Oh, I'm sorry, I don't have it, because I—

[LAUGHTER]

[NOW READING]

So Trump says, "I say to the Republicans out there, Congress and senators, if they don't give you massive cuts, you're going to have to do a default."

[LOOKS UP FROM HER PAPERS]

"Do a default?" I don't think that's what anyone says.

[RETURNS TO READING STATEMENT BY TRUMP]

"And I don't believe they're going to do a default because I think the Democrats will absolutely cave because you don't want that to happen."

[STOPS READING] 

Again, with his massive platform that he enjoys there, that is perhaps the loudest voice people have heard from him on the default.

So spoke Wallace, reading a statement by Trump. 

Initially, she seemed to think that she'd be playing videotape of a statement by Trump. Instead, she had to read the text of his statement, a statement for which she didn't provide a source or a date.

Even there, Trump was saying that a default was something "you don't want to happen." In the statement Wallace read, he was recommending a hard bargaining stance by the GOP.  

He wasn't explicitly urging default. But then again, also this:

In fact, the statement Wallace read had been made at the May 10 "town hall" event. Everywhere else, it was sixteen days old. Here, it was said to be BREAKING NEWS.

Wallace's chyron was an inaccurate paraphrase of that statement by Trump. But in no sense did that statement by Trump constitute some sort of BREAKING NEWS.

We're sorry, but that just isn't the case. In the course of twenty minutes, none of her favorites said so.

We'll only tell you what Future Historians Living in Trees have apparently already said:

Nicolle Wallace is a policy flyweight and an instinctive dissembler. She should be on the air two hours a day in much the way that Donald J. Trump should be playing center field for the Yankees.

Now for the apparent history of our disastrous era:

According to the history texts those future scholars have reportedly assembled, blue tribe cable had become almost as disingenuous as red tribe cable by June 2023.

So went "the democratization of media" as the American experiment eventually crashed to the ground.

In our own view, Wallace shouldn't be on the air on anything like a "news channel." 

In private life, she may be a good and decent person—we aren't equipped to tell you. But as a journalist, she and her endless list of (compensated) favorites and friends are, in large part, conducting a daily clown show. 

On the whole, her daily program is two hours of blue tribe comfort food. More and more and more and more, it's propaganda-adjacent.

Journalistically, Wallace is largely a clown; on balance, her favorites and friends are enablers. According to future scholars, blue tribe cable got dumber and dumber, but also more and more phony, with each passing day.

We return you to yesterday's Times report. It included no sign that Donald J. Trump has been behaving in the manner described by Wallace and her friends. 

There was no such BREAKING NEWS to report. That chyron was a deception.

Meanwhile, consider this: 

This childish, friends-based TV format began in the 1950s. It got its start with The Mickey Mouse Club, a Disney program aimed at people who were seven or eight years old.

If you want a modern-day version for adults, tune in to Wallace's show.

Yesterday's segment was full of misstatements by Wallace. On the brighter side, to borrow from Warren Zevon, [her] hair was perfect, which makes for "good TV."

To watch the entire twenty minutes, you can start here. This is the way the west was lost, or so say despondent historians.


126 comments:

  1. Hmm, maybe people in Mississippi can read a bit better, but their cops still can not distinguish between an armed and dangerous criminal and a little 11 year old Black boy. Fortunately, in this case, the “Black Male” survived.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The police officer was a black male, too.

      Delete
    2. Yes, so perhaps in this case, the cops will actually have to face some responsibility; otherwise, your point has no relevancy.

      Delete
    3. Does the child's race have relevancy?

      Delete
    4. Yes, Black people are harassed and killed by cops and multiple times the rate that Whites are.

      Delete
    5. Then it's relevant that the officer was black.

      Delete
    6. No because Black cops suffering from higher rates of harassment and violence from cops is not directly relevant to cops, regardless of skin tone, committing higher rates of harassment and violence against Black people.

      Delete
    7. Do south Asians suffer from high rates of harassment and violence from cops? I haven’t seen reports about that.

      Delete
    8. Yes, they do. They are not broken out as a distinct category in reporting.

      Delete
    9. If they aren't broken out as a distinct category how do you know they suffer from high rates of harassment and violence?

      Delete
  2. So this (DO NOT FOLD!!) shows that Trump is just cannily urging a “hard bargaining stance.” Of course, Somerby trots out his “Trump is insane and deluded” talking point when the subject is his attempt to subvert the 2020 election. Funny how one man can be so canny and clever one minute and a slobbering nutcase the next.

    Does anyone really think the Republicans are going to “get everything they want (Including the ‘kitchen sink’),” as Trump said on truth social? So, unless they are prepared to actually default, they come out looking like weak-willed buffoons.

    Of course Trump and the House MAGA Republicans want a default.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps, but that’s not Bob’s point. He’s talking about MSNBC.

      And he’s right. Like, when do you ever hear anyone on there ever DISAGREE with anyone else?

      Even the on the right-wing channels people will dispute things with each other, or on CNN. Never on MSNBC.

      Delete
    2. 1:55, his point was that Wallace was misrepresenting Trump, so Somerby was trying to tell us that Trump was just urging Republicans to bargain hard. A major part of his point was to explain Trump’s “meaning.” Reading 101.

      Delete
    3. Somerby’s main point seems to be that MSNBC used a lower third saying “Breaking News”, yet the referenced news occurred on May 10th, sixteen days earlier, nearly at the dawn of the universe. How dare they!

      Broadly speaking, whether it’s accurate or not, the blue tribe is not aware of an issue with MSNBC not presenting contrary points of view, largely because the blue tribe, for the most part, does not waste time viewing MSNBC.

      Delete
    4. Somerby’s other main point seems to involve the issue of “perfect hair’’ privilege.

      Balding hair fragility aside, let’s confront the fact that hairstyles are a social construct, and that we should fight to end hairism.

      Delete
    5. @2:24 is joking but I agree with him about hairism. Black hair and women's hair are issues at work and school that involve differential dress standards being applied to individuals based on racial and sexist biases. People should have the right to wear their hair however they please (while complying with health regulations in food service, etc.).

      Delete
    6. a, should the standard be the same for all races and genders?

      Delete
    7. Only if the standard is to let people wear their hair whatever way they want to.

      Delete
    8. So no standard.

      Delete
    9. Corby/Perry/Joe Bob bill - a troll who pretends to be different people.

      Delete
    10. I’m the same person all the time.

      Delete
    11. What is more human than caring about hair?

      Delete
  3. This is why I'm getting excited about Robert F. Kennedy Jr candidacy. Let's get Joe Biden out of there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RFK jr, if anything, will take votes away from Trump, not Biden.

      Delete
    2. We can all rally around him so he wins. He's in a better position than Biden to make meaningful changes. Look at what Biden has done. Basically nothing except more war.

      Delete
    3. Let’s forget about Biden getting us out of Afghanistan, shall we, 12:29?

      Delete
    4. No I did not forget that.

      Delete
    5. Nor did I forget his incredibly magical miracle unemployment numbers.

      Delete
    6. Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan. It was Putin that invaded Ukraine.

      Biden is an old school Dem, an establishment neoliberal, but he has governed better than Clinton and Obama.

      RFK jr is an anti vaxxer who thinks the solution to climate change is free market capitalism; he’s basically 2024’s Tulsi Gabbard.

      Delete
    7. RFK Jr is not an establishment neoliberal. That's the key. Let's get all of the establishment neoliberals out of there.

      Delete
    8. RFK jr aligns more with far right conspiracy nuts, which is way worse than neoliberals. Basically your exemplifying the phrase “don’t throw the baby out with the bath water”.

      Unlike Repubs who can only vote for evil, Dems have to vote for the lesser evil, for a time, as they slowly vote out the old establishment.

      Check out polls and surveys of Millennials, who outnumber Boomers and are becoming the largest cohort of voters; Millennials lean left, half say they support socialism and communism.

      Delete
    9. I don't think voting for RFK Junior would be like voting for someone on the far right or a Republican. I disagree with your logic. But this is why they have races. I'm happy to have you support the candidate you like, and I will support the candidate I like.

      Delete
    10. RFK jr supports free market capitalism, so definitionally a neoliberal at a minimum, but then also engages in far right conspiracies.

      He is just this round’s Tulsi Gabbard, except he is already the darling of right wing media, appearing on Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones etc.

      https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/steve-bannon-alex-jones-love-robert-f-kennedy-jr-rcna82057

      Delete
    11. I saw a photo of Alex Jones the other day, and he wasn't wearing a barrel. What gives?

      Delete
    12. I'll be supporting him.

      Delete
    13. At 6:57, Bernie Sanders acting like a sane person must have really let you down, eh? Kennedy said the terrible cruelty of Covid mask wearing was worse than Nazi Germany. He’s a idiot, but more likely to damage whoever is the Republican candidate.

      Delete
    14. Is Kennedy Putin's bitch, too?

      Delete
    15. Biden cares more about donors than regular people.

      Delete
    16. According to Biden, the biggest issue facing ordinary Americans are the biggest issues facing ordinary Ukrainians. It's like he cares more about ordinary Ukrainians than he does ordinary Americans.

      Delete
    17. Did Biden give Ukrainians their lowest unemployment rate in over half a century, too?

      Delete
  4. Somerby asks: “Has Trump been urging the GOP to let the United States default? A pair of high-ranking Times reporters seemed to be unaware of this”

    Somberly answers, a few sentences earlier, quoting those reporters at the Times: “Former President Donald J. Trump, who has said Republicans should force a default if they do not get what they want”

    Perhaps Somerby should go to Mississippi for some remedial reading education.

    Later Somerby mis identifies Wallace as a journalist - she’s a pundit, a Republican, no less - and then seems to claim she is on tv due to her “good hair”, via a strange paraphrasing of Warren Zevon, of all people. (Mind you, she accurately quoted Trump.)

    The kids are alright, but Somerby seems insane.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A vote for Robert Kennedy, Jr., is a vote for polio.

      Delete
  5. Karen is innocent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps…but not Citi Bike Karen, a grown woman who tried to bully a kid off a bike. She is quite guilty.

      Delete
    2. The young man and his friends bullied her. She rented an available bike, and they took it from her.

      Delete
    3. It's not illegal to bully a kid off a bike.

      Delete
    4. Comrie, a grown woman, approached a kid who was literally holding on to a bike he was about to rent and tried to bully him off the bike, even though there were other bikes available to rent. Then she lied about the incident, just like 12:30.

      Delete
    5. If she's guilty find some authoritative body to charge her then. This is just a drop dead ordinary street dispute over a coveted electric bike, the type of which which happens in big cities all over the world every day. The same exact thing is happening somewhere right now at this exact minute. The only difference is this was blown up into a racial issue by grifters.

      Delete
    6. He wasn't about to rent the bike. He was resting between 45-minute rentals, as were his friends. They were sitting on bikes which they were not paying for, and he was standing next to a bike which he was not paying for.

      Karen, or Comrie, rented the bike, and he then pushed it back into the dock, with her on it, to take it from her. His friends began jeering Karen.

      They, and he, were the bullies. Karen is innocent. And she didn't lie, either.

      Delete
    7. The innocence of either party does not matter at all. These disputes happen by the thousands every hour of every day in every large city. What matters is this non-issue being blown up into a racial issue by grifters.

      Delete
    8. Karen is innocent. And yes, that does matter.

      Delete
    9. It only matters if you're referring to an innocence of racist behavior. Her guilt or innocence in the specific situation of the bike which is really as common as it gets, does not matter. It may matter to you, which is your right and your business.

      Delete
    10. The kid, who is Black, had been using the same bike all day, and was in the process of re renting it to avoid higher rate charges, as the kid is from a poor family.

      He was literally holding on to the bike as he was approached by Comrie, a wealthy grown White woman, who proceeded to attempt to bully the kid off the bike.

      There is video of this encounter, showing Comrie as the aggressor, pursuing a fake victimhood, trying to solicit someone to abet her in wrangling the bike away from the kid. Her attempts failed, so she eventually just rented a different bike, as there were others available, as the kid and bystanders had pointed out.

      Comrie is a highly educated White person, well aware of the historical context of conflicts between Whites and Blacks, particularly White women and Black males. She was well aware a Black male had been choked to death in her city just a few weeks prior, just for being loud on the subway.

      Comrie lied about the incident, and then tried to give a false narrative about what happened by hiring a lawyer, doing a pr stunt with a misleading receipt - with the time stamp redacted, and starting a go fund me account.

      Victimhood via blaming the victim (the kid).

      Comrie lied and is guilty of attempting to bully a kid off a bike.

      Delete
    11. It's not illegal to bully a kid off of bike. You snooze you lose. Welcome to the streets of New York, townie.

      Delete
    12. It may be that Comrie violated a city law, rule, or ordinance; however, that’s not the issue.

      Comrie is factually guilty of lying about what happened, is factually guilty of attempting to bully a kid off a bike.

      Delete
    13. What lie did Comrie tell?

      Delete
    14. Comrie lied to obfuscate the fact that the kid had previously rented the bike and was re renting it to save money and was literally holding on to the bike and explaining this to her as she approached him in order to bully him off the bike. Then she lied by yelling “help” when no one was doing anything to her - indeed she was the aggressor. Then she lied when she said “get off me your hurting my fetus” when no one touched her. Then she lied by presenting a receipt with the time stamp redacted, attempting to give the false narrative that she was not in the wrong.

      These are some of her lies.

      Comrie lied, tried to bully a kid off a bike, tried to solicit someone to abet her in a racially charged circumstance, and generally behaved abhorrently.

      Delete
    15. He was standing next to the bike, holding it, resting. He was not re-renting it but preventing anyone else from renting it until he wanted to start riding again.

      The redacted receipt was stupid but not a lie.

      The video doesn’t demonstrate that he touched her and doesn’t demonstrate that he didn’t. Maybe she felt a touch.

      She yelled for help because he was interfering with her as she rented the bike, which was available, and which he wrongly made unavailable.

      He was trying to use the bike for the forty-five minute rate beyond forty-five minutes — he was cheating. As part of his cheat he maintained control of the bike while not paying for it.

      Once you dock the bike, it’s available. You don’t get to block other people from renting it. If she overcomes your interference and rents the bike, you don’t get to shove it back into the dock.

      Delete
    16. The young men were resting when Karen wanted a bike. Here's the story:

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/citi-bike-sarah-jane-comrie-teenager-new-york-b2347070.html

      Delete
    17. Karen's friend is the hero of the story. If she hadn't convinced Karen to rent a different bike, that kid would most likely have been shot by a police officer.

      Delete
    18. The young man could have rented a different bike. Too bad his friends weren’t as genial as Karen’s friend.

      Delete
    19. I pity the poor immigrant but everything is fair when you're living in the city.

      Delete
    20. The kid had just docked the bike and was about to re rent it, he docked it at 7:19 and the video starts at 7:24 already in the middle of the confrontation, so at most he rested a couple of minutes before being approached by Comrie. Re renting to avoid the higher rate charge is a common tactic of Citi Bike users, particularly ones like the kid that come from poor families. By contrast, Comrie makes over $100k/year. Comrie was not being prevented from renting a bike, as there were other bikes available, and in fact she was attempting to prevent this kid from renting the bike.

      The kid was literally holding on to the bike, since he was about to re rent it, and there were other bikes available, so there was zero reason for Comrie to try to bully the kid off the bike. Her behavior was abhorrent.

      The video shows that the kid never touched Comrie, yet she yelled “get off my your hurting my fetus”. When someone yells a false accusation like this, it is a clear indication they are behaving in bad faith.

      After the incident, Comrie tried to commodify her bullying by falsely presenting a narrative that she had been the victim, in part through lies, in part through a receipt that she had to redact the time stamp of because it exposed her false narrative.

      The video shows that not only did he not touch Comrie nor make any contact, but that in fact Comrie was the aggressor, she grabbed his phone away from him and tried to pry his hand off the handle bar.

      Her yells for help were insincere because he was the one holding the bike as she approached him and tried to take the bike from him. Worse, her yells for help were a solicitation of violence in a racially charged situation.

      Here’s an article covering what happened:

      https://newsone.com/4592993/sarah-jane-comrie-update-citi-bike-teens-mother-speaks-out/

      These morons keep trying to present Comrie’s false and misleading narrative because they are right wing simps stuck in survivor mode such that they are incapable of rational reasoning, and obviously they are lonely and begging for attention.

      Delete
    21. So, 10:22pm, you admit that the young men maintained control of the bikes while resting and not paying.

      Do you admit further that, after Karen rented the bike, the young man shoved it, with her on it, into the dock?

      Delete
    22. The facts have been more or less amalgamated.

      Delete
    23. Karen is innocent.

      Delete
  6. ‘They're attributing the end of the American experiment to "the democratization of media." More specifically, they're attributing this cataclysmic downfall to the creation and implementation of round-the-clock, profit-based "cable news."’

    The ‘creation and implementation of round-the-clock, profit-based "cable news”’ is not what is meant by the “democratization of media."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cable news has been around for several decades, hardly ‘Breaking News”, Somerby.

      Delete
    2. He said more specifically cable.

      Delete
    3. 1:59 yes? He is putting specifically “cable” under the general heading of “democratization of the media.” Reading 101.

      Delete
    4. The way Somerby constructs his sentences, strongly suggests that “cable news” is a subset of the “democratization of media”.

      Regardless, it does seem that Somerby misunderstands what is meant by “democratization of media”.

      Delete
    5. That's a very salient point.

      Delete
  7. One hopes Biden is doing some kind of rope a dope with the Repubs, before hitting them with a knockout punch, like applying the 14th amendment.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Republicans should support statehood for Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The second amendment is evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The second amendment, in large part, functioned as a way to deal with the circumstances that slaves well outnumbered slave owners, and were keen to escape slavery.

      This was made all the more evil by contemporary right wing Supreme Court decisions such as Heller, that made America the gun violence capitol of the world, with gun violence now the leading cause of death for kids aged 1-18.

      You’re darn tooting the second amendment is evil.

      Delete
  10. Defund the Supreme Court.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Harlan Crow owns the Supreme Court. Defund Harlan Crow.

      Delete
    2. Somerby’s crudeness is evident when he calls the statements of future historians in trees “nocturnal submissions” aka “dreams”, an obvious reference to wet dreams. His lack of respect for experts may lead us all to an unpleasant future due to global warming.

      This ongoing affectation is a way to denigrate experts and expertise without any work. Historians would know how to build a sod house. Monkeys live in trees.

      Delete
    3. If any of the coven is expecting a baby boy, the name Harlan Crow is the bomb.

      Delete
    4. Haha it’s so funny that a billionaire can buy the Supreme Court. So funny!

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 10:23pm, quit being a putz.

      Delete
    6. Cecelia, what is a putz?

      Delete
    7. So it's something bad.

      Delete
    8. Anonymouse 11:18pm, it’s someone who constantly feigns indignation and pretends that they’ve never learned to google.

      Delete
    9. Indignation against the Supreme Court is real.

      Delete
    10. You’re not one to give advice about googling, Cecelia.

      To cast doubt on “In the case of Mississippi's Naep scores, we know of zero reason to suspect any fraudulent conduct”, Cecelia posts a link about Georgia, that explicitly debunks the idea that there was cheating on the naep. You can’t make this stuff up.

      Delete
    11. Cecelia,
      Did they teach you that definition in your Third Grade "Advanced CRT" class?
      LOL.

      Delete
    12. mh, except that the link I posted specifically referenced the normal impulse to wonder about cheating where there had been a past history of cheating (Georgia and *MISSISSIPPI).

      The article addressed that concern as being very doubtful as to the NAEP, and then went on to give an example of a way that even the NAEP COULD be finessed!

      The article stated that there was no evidence of that had happened.

      You’re going to determinedly suggest that it was dumb to reference Mississippi’s former cheating scandal as regards the surprising increased achievement scores in a state where scores are generally low and it also being right off the pandemic.

      The experts didn’t think so. They addressed it.

      I’m sorry that this happened to you. Thoughts and prayers.

      Delete
    13. You’re pathetic Cecelia.

      Delete
    14. Harlan Crow may be very rich, but he likes sexual predators on the Supreme Court just like poor Republican voters do. It's good to see someone who hasn't let his money change his beliefs.

      Delete
  11. We live in a barred spiral galaxy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m just glad it turns out we don’t live in a yellow submarine.

      Lordy, the Beatles sucked.

      Delete
    2. The Beatles were fabulous.

      Delete
    3. 3:16 perhaps…but their music was mostly trite, wimpy, simple, boring, and incapable of generating an emotional response. They were fabulous at marketing themselves. 100 years from now nobody will listen to the Beatles, but people will listen to other music from that era, as there were many excellent musicians.

      Delete
    4. Chicago, with Jimmy Pankow on trombone, was and still is excellent.

      Delete
    5. A hundred years from now people will watch Bobby Burgess on the Lawrence Welk Show. They’ll also watch Annette Funicello films.

      Bobby and Annette were Mouseketeers.

      Delete

    6. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_impact_of_the_Beatles

      Delete
    7. Your veiws on The Beatles are dumb at 2:56, but is this idiotic subject changing made in defense of Bob?

      Delete
  12. Quite a few decades ago, US banks had a crisis involving foreign loans. These banks had made loans to Latin American governments which were not being repaid. These governments were not making required interest payments, so the loans were technically in default. Rather than acknowledge the default, the banks just showed the missing interest as an add-on to the amount of the loan. Eventually Stein's Law came into play. ["If something cannot go on forever, it will stop"] The result was a massive loss to these American banks. As I recall, some actually failed.

    US debt today isn't exactly the same, but it's similar. The US is paying off its loans by borrowing more money. Our national debt just keeps rising. The Debt Limit problem will be solved. The two parties will come to some agreement. But, the long term debt problem has no solution, as far as I can see. There's no politically feasible way to stop running trillion dollar deficits. At some point Stein's Law will hit, and there will be an economic disaster, both for the banks that lent money to the US and for the US itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, you could emigrate to a well governed country.

      Delete
    2. I agree with David, the republican mob will not allow a budget surplus. Any hint of a surplus to pay down the debt will immediately trigger another tax cut for billionaires.

      Delete
    3. David,
      What does the word "revenue" mean?

      Delete
    4. Finally in agreement with David on something! Let's start by reversing (and demanding repayment in today's dollars) for W. Bush & Trump's giveaways to the rich and then continue on to taking a machete to the Defense budget.

      Delete
    5. David you are sorely in need of educating yourself on monetary theories, and why debt is actually necessary.

      Your notions on the debt are very misguided.

      No one can do it for you, you need to start reading and learning.

      You’ll actually feel better because you’ll learn that Republican “hero” Dick Cheney was largely correct, deficits don’t matter.

      Delete
  13. Nicole Wallace does not operate the chyron for MSNBC news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it could be a potential side hustle for her, she’ll need to learn After Effects.

      Delete
  14. "This childish, friends-based TV format began in the 1950s. It got its start with The Mickey Mouse Club, a Disney program aimed at people who were seven or eight years old.

    If you want a modern-day version for adults, tune in to Wallace's show."

    This is silly. Relaxed talk show formats didn't originate with the Mickey Mouse Club (which was a children's show that showed serial films and cartoons, like Spin & Marty). They started with morning shows, Steve Allen on the Tonight Show, and Jack Parr, and the format with guests discussing their takes on the news was the McLaughlin Report on PBS.

    Making a stupid joke that takes a potshot at an innocuous kid show on Disney, no doubt, shows Somerby's high regard for children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The show also featured the Mouseketeers, young performers who acted, sang, and danced.

      Delete
    2. Acting, singing and dancing is not what any of today's cable news hosts are doing.

      Delete
  15. “Granted, Trump had made some deeply troubling remarks”…… translation: Trump said exactly what Wallace said he had. So we are going to get a lot of blather where Bob attempts to blow as much smoke as possible around what Trump actually said. Bob has been pulling this shit for years now. It’s silly and sad. You have to wonder if at any point he was ever an honest person.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Want to see the decline of civilization in action? Read the NYT mag article in Serbia, our future society: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/03/magazine/aleksandar-vucic-veljko-belivuk-serbia.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. The question is why does Biden surround himself with such scary weirdos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because he wants you to emigrate to Russia.

      Delete
    2. Exactly! You're accused of loving Russia if you don't agree with everything they say and are not constantly advocating for trans rights.

      Delete
    3. Russia will cheerfully accept you.

      Delete
    4. The Ukraine war highlights the decline of the United States.

      Delete
    5. Russia needs you, and you need Russia.

      Delete
    6. That's a quote from that lady from the Democratic party. She's trying to warn everybody.

      Delete
    7. We've lost every single ounce of moral authority we ever had.

      "Since 1991, the U.S. has seemingly stood alone as the global superpower. But today, after a fraught two-decade period shaped by American-led military interventions and direct engagement in regional wars, the Ukraine war highlights the decline of the United States itself. This decline is relative economically and militarily, but serious in terms of U.S. moral authority."

      Here is her whole speech - how have you been taught to smear her? With what non issue will you avoid the substance of her speech?

      https://news.err.ee/1608977948/fiona-hill-ukraine-in-the-new-world-disorder

      Delete
    8. What about our "All Lives Matter" chants? Why isn't welcoming refugees into the country "moral" enough for Fiona Hill?

      Delete
    9. So that's the diversionary rhetoric? God you guys can do a lot better than that

      Delete
    10. 1:22,
      If "All Lives Matter" was good enough to divert you from the fact police officers shoot unarmed black men, why isn't it good enough to divert you from the fact that Biden has given us the lowest unemployment rate in over half a century?
      #itisallabouthowyouplaythegame

      Delete
  18. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Russia

    ReplyDelete
  19. Re: Russia
    Reminds me of Yakov Smirnoff's best joke: "In Communist Russia, government owns banks. In America, banks own government."

    ReplyDelete