COMING: Did the Times deliver a bombshell report?


Everyone certainly said so:
On Thursday night, did the New York Times deliver its latest "bombshell"—its latest "bombshell report?"

We refer to the news report which topped the paper's front page the next morning.

To read that news report, click here. In hard copy, the report appeared beneath these front-page headlines:
President Relented After the White House Counsel Threatened to Resign
That news report, by Schmidt and Haberman, appeared online Thursday night. By now, it has been described as a "bombshell" at least three million times.

More cautious pundits have called it "explosive." That said, we have two questions:

Was that front-page report in the New York Times a genuine bombshell report? Was it even a sound news report?

Starting Monday, we plan to examine those questions. For now, we'll recommend the opening segment of last evening's Last Word.

Lawrence's guest was Michael Wolff. He's the somewhat slippery, unreliable author of Fire and Fury, the current bombshell best-seller.

For the first twelve minutes of Lawrence's program, Wolff offered his take on the Times' bombshell report. In our view, Wolff's statements are well worth considering. You can watch the Last Word interview here.

Was Schmidt's report a bombshell report? Was it even a competent, sound news report?

We think each question is well worth exploring. Monday morning, we'll start.

Some bombshells may be unreliable: For the last four minutes of Lawrence's interview, he questioned Wolff about the claim that Donald J. Trump has been getting it on with his U.N. ambassador.

Wolff triggered that exciting rumor one week ago, in a pair of public forums. We will assume that his slippery remarks also triggered additional sales of his best-selling book.


  1. Today’s entire post is nothing but a tease. Somerby questions whether Trump tried to fire Mueller, but provides no evidence. He also calls Wolff slimy etc, again with no evidence. I suppose he is going to complain about sourcing but he didn’t say anything substantive today. Guess we’re suposed to take on faith that this is fake news, just like Trump claims. Good thing Somerby has Trump’s back. On Monday, more defense of Nassar.

    1. "Somerby questions whether Trump tried to fire Mueller...." Your reading comprehension is somewhat deficient.

    2. Either that or Somerby is questioning whether the news reported is important enough to be considered a "bombshell". I think it is, because it is pretty strong evidence of obstruction of justice.

      Given that Somerby dumps a lot of doubt on the report without saying exactly what his criticism is, the reader is free to draw whatever conclusion he or she wants to.

      You cannot call someone's reading comprehension deficient when what Somerby has said is ambiguous. As if your reading were the only possible conclusion and everyone else is wrong.

      Somerby says: "Was it even a sound news report? "

      That means he is questioning the truth of the report. That means he is questioning whether Trump tried to fire Mueller, which is the content of the report.

    3. 12:37 - stop acting like a stupid faggot loser.

    4. What he's saying here is that - all bullshit wording aside - even if Donald The Greatest did discuss firing Mueller with his counsel (and why wouldn't he?), and then decided against it, that's nowhere near any 'bombshell'.

      It's about as much a 'bombshell' as reporting that Donald The Greatest took a dump yesterday.

    5. It is a bombshell because it shows Trump guilty of obstruction, not because it is so typical of our idiot president.

    6. "Today’s entire post is nothing but a tease."

      Perhaps that is why the first word in the title is "Coming:".

    7. (and why wouldn't he?)

      No you dumb shit, the question is, why would he? Work on that one.

    8. 1:08 you can get some clues about what he is trying to say from the Wolff interview with O'Donnell where Wolff criticizes the NYT report not by questioning the claim that Trump tried to fire Mueller but by saying Trump tries to fire everyone 10 times a day. He implies that it's an overblown a claim.

    9. At this point, the public doesn't know that Trump tries to fire everyone 10 times a day, so that too is news.

      This won't get him off the obstruction of justice hook because why would he even care what Mueller is doing enough to almost fire hin if he weren't involved in the Russia business? Trying to fire Mueller is obstruction, no matter who else he tries to fire every day.

      But I doubt that will be Somerby's argument. Somerby will claim Trump is innocent of all speculation because the N.Y. Times didn't name its sources. He probably thinks Trump didn't have an affair with Stormy Daniels either.

      Somerby cannot base his criticism of the Times' sourcing on something Wolff said when everything Wolff has written is supposedly hearsay and unreliable.

      Somerby would never have approved of Deep Throat or Woodward or Bernstein. The whole story of Watergate wouldn't have emerged because the first stories wouldn't have been printed and the whole unraveling by the press would never have happened. Maybe then we would never have gotten Ronald Reagan as president and we wouldn't be where we are with Trump, another damned celebrity president who presents a façade of competence while deteriorating behind the scenes. Maybe that's Somerby's point.

    10. Haha. Far out man.

    11. God bless Dr Alabi for his marvelous work in my life,my name is Ella
      sharon I was diagnosed of HERPES since 2015 and I was taking my
      medications, I wasn't satisfied i needed to get the HERPES out of my
      system, I searched about some possible cure for HERPES i saw a comment
      about Dr Alabi how he cured HERPES with his herbal medicine, I contacted
      him and he guided me. I asked for solutions, he started the remedy for my
      health, he sent me the medicine through UPS SPEED POST. I took the medicine
      as prescribed by him and 10 days later i was cured from HERPES, Dr.Alabi
      truly you are great, do you need his help also? Why don't you contact him
      through and you can also contact me to
      know more about him on my email
      you can also visit his blog page
      DOCTOR Alabi
      4. ALS 5. Hepatitis B 6. Diabetes Athrux, scabies

  2. I would love to know if any of the Times's sources actually heard Trump issue a direct order to fire Mueller. If none of their sources directly witnessed the alleged firing, then the headline is essentially based on a rumor.

    Note that the article itself makes some weaker allegations, such as Trump wanting to fire Mueller. This version is hardly newsworthy. Trump has made no secret of the fact that he would like to get rid of Mueller.

    1. The speculation is that the main source is Trump's attorney, McGahn. That would mean that yes, he did in fact hear Trump issue a direct order to fire Mueller.

      Many of the people who are routinely leaking this kind of information about Trump are doing so in order to try to control Trump's actions when he is reportedly too headstrong to listen to reason. This is their way of coercing Trump into behaving in a less self-destructive way.

      The amount of leaking is unprecedented. That suggests it is instrumental, in the sense that it is designed to accomplish some goal. Initially, the goals involved jockeying for power among Trump's advisors, who were split into factions. Now that Kelly has that under control, the leaking is for other purposes -- you have to ask yourself what interest is being served by each leak. Sometimes it is CYA -- Gahn comes off well in this story because he talked Trump out of doing something rash.

      Palmer Report speculates that Gahn has been interviewed by Mueller. He also pretty routinely suggests that Trump's staff know he is going down and that they want to avoid being taken down with him. So some of these leaks may be self-serving in that way.

      Does anyone really think this report is unlikely to be true? It is entirely consistent with everything we know to date about Trump and how he operates.

    2. Your points are interesting, in at least they convey some knowledge of the facts. But then you come up with this:

      "That suggests..."

      See, that's the kind of wishy-washy thinking that Somerby deplores. It's the whole point behind this website.

      I appreciate the sharing of information, that happens a lot here. But the site is mainly constructed around mainstream media criticism. When will you get used to that fact? And start a weblog? I'd check it out. You're a passable writer.


    3. "That suggests" could be paraphrased as "People are leaking for their own reasons" which seems pretty uncontroversial to me.

      There are no blogs, including this one, that don't contain the authors' opinions. Somerby isn't confining himself to facts either.

      Why should comments only contain facts? No good reason.

    4. Leroy, I disagree that Somerby's purpose is mostly criticism of the mainstream media. That is one aspect of it, and may have been the original impetus for the blog, but you can't ignore the criticisms of liberal thought and politics that he routinely engages in, like his blasting of what the right-wing calls "identity politics."

    5. 6:32, thanks for your thoughtful reply. Some people are hung up on Bob's lumping of “liberals” with the views of those reporting the news, but that’s a long-time hook, and admittedly perhaps outdated, with the explosion of alternative news sources.

      I am curious about your specific take on Bob's criticism of liberal thought. And whether or not it's justified. I know – the Republicans are absolutely shameless, and have a massive advantage in “launching the propaganda” with Fox, Rush et al, not to mention voter suppression and on and on. But the fact is, we're losing in the arena of ideas, despite liberal ideas being very mainstream.

      What of “liberal” MSM reporting? Could it be that it sucks, in terms of informing viewers? I don't watch it, so I ask you, how often is Bernie Sanders, reportedly the most popular politician in America, invited to air his views?

      Looking forward to your reply. Sorry for my late one.


  3. Somerby no doubt will suggest on Monday that no newspaper reports should ever be based on anonymous sources, even multiple ones. That is something that has never been a journalistic standard or requirement since the beginning of newspapers.

    Newspapers can be sued for libel. That is the citizen's protection against what is printed. Journalists try to get it right. Insisting that there be no protection for sources means it will be impossible to do any investigative journalism at all, that newspapers will no longer perform a muckraking function, no longer be able to keep the powerful in check.

    Or maybe he'll say something else on Monday. Who knows? That's the problem with this stupid waste of space tease he insists on writing periodically.

  4. Wolff never named the person having the affair with Trump. People speculated it might be Haley. That's on them, not him.

  5. Here is BooMan's take on things:

    "It's already clear to me from watching Jonathan Turley defend the president against obstruction of justice charges that the criminal defense for Donald Trump is going to rely on the fact that a person who doesn't know right from wrong doesn't necessarily have criminal intent if they do wrong. Turley, for example, blandly explained that the way that Trump acted towards Mueller isn't much different from how he acts against any number of officials who he fires or threatens to fire. He's always pissed off. He wants to fire John Kelly and Don McGahn and Jeff Sessions, but he doesn't. He's always doing improper things that violate norms, so it's not necessarily true that his intent is to intimidate career FBI officers into not testifying against him when he names them publicly and sends his goons after them. "

  6. Joseph Cannon speculates that McGahn leaked that story to the NY Times in order to prevent Donald Trump from lying under oath and denying any attempt to fire Mueller when Mueller interviews Trump down the road. Trump tends to deny the most blatantly obvious things. If he denies something like this under oath, he will subject himself to perjury, so revealing this to the NY Times preempts Trump's attempt to lie and protects him from a perjury prosecution. It makes a sort of sense.

  7. "Was that front-page report in the New York Times a genuine bombshell report? Was it even a sound news report?"

    No, obviously it's not a news report. Just their usual goebbelsian shit, no more no less.

    1. A prime characterstic of being a Russian bot like "Mao" is to ignore facts and stick to Kremlin propoganda.

    2. Uh oh...Trump may be about to lose his 'populist' cred with his zombie fanbots here:

      Will Trump end NAFTA? Trump's ag secretary says not to worry

      By Catherine Boudreau, Helena Bottemiller Evich | Jan 26, 2018

  8. Kevin Drum lists only 3 blogs by women and oddly Digby is missing.

    1. It was an oversight, apparently. He added her now.

  9. "Wolff triggered that exciting rumor one week ago, in a pair of public forums. We will assume that his slippery remarks also triggered additional sales of his best-selling book."

    Well, at least you're getting somewhat closer to the truth of what the mainstream press corps is all about--PROFITS for plutocrats. All activity --every word spoken or printed-- has only that concern in mind.

    I’m so excited! Thanks to Dr.Goodluck. for bringing back my Ex-husband and brought great joy to me today! is certainly the best spell caster online,if you need your Ex lover back fast!and his result is 100% guarantee..
    After 12years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he would come back to me, I was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr.Goodluck. can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a (Love spell) for me. 17 hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr.Goodluck. . he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Goodluck. real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact: Email him at:
    Call or Whats-app him: +2348138654465

  11. Kevin Drum's blog list brings out two things:
    1. Many of us moved from the blogs we liked to the blogs that were commentable. Disquis has had a bad influence on the blogging community. That is true for me certainly.
    2. Several people lamented that Echidne wasn't on the list either. Drum did add Digby but he apparently doesn't read women much. And he didn't notice that they were missing. What does that say about his view of the world?

    Personally, I like Sky Dancing, TalkLeft and the Confluence. Leaving off TalkLeft is about as bad as overlooking Digby.

    Oddly, in the comments discussion, people don't seem to be aware that Andrew Sullivan started out at The New Republic.

    Kevin Drum doesn't seem to read 538 or David Neiwert or Boing Boing or any of the conspiracy blogs. Hard to call him a true wonk.

    But the whole discussion did make me feel old.

  12. Maureen Dowd is back again, writing another column ostensibly pro Melania but using it as a cover to once again attack Hillary.

    In comments, people questioned her belief that Biden was not permitted to run (instead of making his own decision) and that Bernie would have won. No one believes that except die-hard bros.

    Elsewhere there is a long discussion of left-wing misogyny and its encouragement by the Bernie campaign in 2016. The worst is at HuffPo:

    Note that the complaint against Clinton's campaign is that the abuser was ultimately hired by another entity that the national campaign had no control over. The complaint against Sanders' campaign is that they permitted a culture of misogyny that was never addressed and they never did anything about any abuser except deny that any allegations were true. Bernie denies there was any sexism on his campaign in response to this column too.

    Talk about false equivalence!

    Anyone who supported Clinton during the 2008 or 2016 campaigns knows how they were treated by the bros in blog comments. Sexist harassment was a campaign tool used against anyone daring to say anything enthusiastic or positive about Clinton in public.

    Now MoDo pretends Bernie was blameless while Clinton permitted sexual abuse. Gack!!! When is the NY Times going to finally get rid of this woman?

    Melania is not a victim. She holds political views similar to Trump's. She married him willingly, knowing who and what he is. She turned a blind eye to his earlier infidelities. It doesn't matter where she sleeps now or how she feels about him. She is useless as a First Lady (just as her husband is useless as President). The press should leave her alone and let her live her life, just as it ignores what is happening with Barron. MoDo doesn't know whether Melania attended the Holocaust Museum to tick off her husband or to show respect to some personal relation, and it doesn't matter. The Holocaust Museum is not a prop in the Trump's personal drama. It is an important memorial to Jewish people and shouldn't be used as a prop in MoDo's assault on the Clintons. In her haste to give deliberate offense, MoDo has given inadvertent offense to people who do not deserve additional affront. MoDo should be ashamed, but she won't be.

  13. Probably Somerby is going to quibble over the difference between conflicting NY Times and Post reports that McGahn stood up to Trump and refused to fire Mueller or that McGahn never said anything directly to Trump and Trump just changed his mind somehow or never said anything when McGahn didn't obey Trump's order.

    The bombshell part is that Trump ordered Mueller to be fired. It doesn't matter how that wasn't carried through. What matters is the intent to obstruct justice evidenced by the order. That order appears in both versions of the story.

    How then can Somerby claim this isn't a bombshell report?

    Personally, I don't care whether McGahn talked Trump out of this rash action, whether he just engaged in passive disobedience and Trump chose not to push it, or whether McGahn did give Trump an ultimatum. How Mueller escaped firing doesn't matter. Trump's order matters.

  14. Somerby needs to read this:

    It will explain the wrongness of his current campaigns against identity politics, his insistence that women's complaints about earning less than men are incorrect, his belief that tribes shouldn't exist, his channeling of David Brooks and those so-called anthropologists he has invented to give his ideas heft.

    I don't know whether Somerby has been reading Jordan Peterson, but if he has, he needs to read an effective critique of his pernicious right-wing attack on respect for identity.

    Misguided Bernie supporters need this too. They need to understand where their worship of Chomsky intersects with the alt-Right. They need to read about how this has been corrupted into an attack that supports conservative and right wing interests. Because they are headed down the wrong path with some truly noxious fellow travelers.

    1. Cited in the comments are these two sources:

      I am a cognitive/experimental psychologist and Jordan Peterson is a careerist and the newest Dinesh D'Souza. The only way members of a profession can protect the public from charlatans is to issue critiques like these. It is up to the public to read them and use their brains. He is a blot on my field (thankfully he is clinical and doesn't claim to be a scientist).

    2. 5:48, your link actually does a pretty good job of pointing out weaknesses in some of Peterson's assertions. Of course, it chooses the weakest ones to dispute. But it's an impressive effort.

      I cannot resist quoting one howler from your cite: "...I don't believe trans activists do in fact presume that group identity is paramount. As you'd expect with a list of 71 genders, they seem to think people tend to be unique..."

      Of course, this statement precisely says that group identity is paramount, as long as you have the right groups. The real opposite belief is that there are 330 million Americans and each of them is a unique individual. They are unique because of enormous number of different characteristics, not just nationality and gender, not even inclouding 71 different genders.

    3. Peterson is expecting that the opposite of collectivist identity must be no identity at all, not the slightly less collectivist but still group identified identities typical of most Americans, of which sexual identity is a small part.

      We think of ourselves as parents, musicians, fish enthusiasts, romance readers, world travelers, redheads, dog owners, snow boarders, millenials, blog readers, Bronco fans who like sushi, not merely Dems or Trans activists. Petersen is a jerk.

  15. Thanks for that link 5:48. I will read the entire thing later, when I have more time, but I was tickled by something early on. Conor Friedersdorf of the Atlantic (and many others) complained that interviewer Cathy Newman frequently inaccurately "restated" something Peterson had said so as to make it seem as if his view is offensive, hostile, or absurd. The cited article disputes that assertion. Yet, the cited article inaccurately restates something Peterson said, so as to make it absurd.

    Peterson said both Mao and left wing activists share a fundamental philosophy:
    "The first thing is that their philosophy presumes that group identity is paramount. That’s the fundamental philosophy that drove the Soviet Union and Maoist China. And it’s the fundamental philosophy of the left-wing activists. It’s identity politics. It doesn’t matter who you are as an individual, it matters who you are in terms of your group identity."

    Your cited article extends what Peterson actually said into something he didn't say:
    "Peterson merely said that [Trans activists and Mao Tse Tung] are the same in every important respect"
    (italics added)

    1. Irregardless of whether or not Peterson is misinterpreted or not, he is a crackpot and it's no mystery why you are offering an outlier article in the alt-left Atlantic magazine to support your obsessive confirmation bias.

      Also, "you're too busy" to read a relatively short article but not too busy to grab the first thing you can grab from it to troll here.

    2. David and Peterson are both confusing individualism vs collectivism with the source of identity formation, a process that occurs in early childhood. A person can consider himself African American, for example, and be either individualist or collectivist.

      That is what Peterson misunderstands in his stupid analogy. Since he has psych training I have to assume this is deliberate and thus intended to manipulate by equating trans people with Mao, a historical villain. That is ugly.

  16. Anon 9:15 "We think of ourselves as parents, musicians, fish enthusiasts, romance readers, world travelers, redheads, dog owners, snow boarders, millenials, blog readers, Bronco fans who like sushi, not merely Dems or Trans activists."

    I don't. Yes, I am parent, a musician, a 75-year old, an actuary, etc., but that is not how I think of myself. I think of myself as me. Another person would all those characteristics would still not be the same as me. And, I think of others the same way -- as individuals, not as a collection of group memberships.

    Anon 8:54 I have now read the entire article. Given that I disagree with its thesis, I think it's pretty well done. The writer put a big effort into it and did identify some areas where Peterson's position was not as strong.

    Note that I didn't bring in the Atlantic magazine. It was the cited article that did so. I don't think that article was an outlier. On the contrary, I have seen quite a few articles that made the same points about that Channel 4 interview.

    1. The problem was not the interviewer. It was Peterson's intellectual dishonesty.

    2. "I think of myself as me."

      Now, that's a bit much, I think, although I can understand it as a reaction to liberal-totalitarian categorization of human beings.

      No man is an island. Obviously, only a zombie would identify with its whole 'race', ethnic group, gender, or generation (as assigned by liberal commissars), but you probably do identify with your friends, neighbors, family. People you've known for a long time, with shared memories and interests.

      Here's what Kurt Vonnegut wrote about it, back in the 70s:

    3. Крайне важноJanuary 29, 2018 at 10:34 AM

      One troll taking issue with another troll to earn a couple more kopeks from "The Agency."

      Very clever, comrade.

    4. What is this "USA", you speak of Mao?

  17. You need entertainment. Refer to our website. hope you get the most comfortable


  18. I go through all of your article and I actually really like it, I understand your point of view.

    My name is Hidago Daniel. I made a promise to tell others the wonderful work of he who brought my ex girlfriend back to me. He is doctor UZOYA who is a spell doctor and was able to bring back my ex. My ex left me the very day she met her friend in my place, of which, unknowingly to her, I had nothing to do with her. She grew furious at the very sight of her friend and I was confused if she was initially mad with her. Days into weeks and weeks into months, my ex girlfriend did not speak a word to me as she went away. What was I to do? That was how i contacted doctor UZOYA on the Internet who after some procedures and progress, brought back my ex. Words are not enough to express my feelings and what doctor UZOYA has done for me. He really lifted a heavy load off my chest. To all those out there, please, don't think your situation is too primitive or too hard and complicated for anyone to understand. Contact doctor UZOYA and find joy once again, contact him on; also talk to him on +1(301) 909 8775

  20. My name is Antonio Jefferson Cole, I'm in Salt Lake City, Utah. It is a pleasure for me to write this testimony about how I got healed from genital herpes 12 hours ago. I have read so many comments from some people who have been cured of HIV by Dr. Ekpiku, but I never believed them. I was hurt and depressed, so I was very curious and wanted to try Dr. Ekpiku, so I contacted him on his email when I get in touch with him, he assured me 100% that it will heal me, I begged Him to help me. My treatment was a great success, he healed me as he promised. He sent me his medication and asked me to go for check-up after 2 weeks of taking the medication. I agree with him, I took this medication and went to the check-up after 2 month, to my greatest surprise my result was negative after treatment, I am really happy that I am healed and healthy again. I waited for four months to make sure I was completely healed before writing this testimony. I did another blood test today and was still negative Herpes, so I think its time I tell someone out there with Herpes HSV-1 or HSV-2, HIV, HPV, hepatitis B, diabetes, cancer and so on, Dr. Ekpiku in the email: . Your phone number is +2348073673757, He is also on whats app. I completely understand how you can feel skeptical about it, because it happened to me, it can be expensive for you, but I'm telling you now that there is a cure for these diseases and I am a living witness firsthand.or you can email me on for any assistance.

  21. An urgent notification to anyone looking for ways to get back his or her else lover is to contact Dr. Peter on or call +2348073141298 Because he has all it take to bring back ex lover and re-unite broken relationship within the space of 48hours. I confirmed that when I contacted him for help and now my ex boyfriend that left me 8 months ago is back into arms again, this was made possible with the help of the love spell Dr. Peter did for me.


  22. Has a guy ever given you mixed signals?

    One minute he’s crazy about you and the next minute you have no clue if he ever wants to see you again?

    And it’s especially hard when there’s something special between you and you have no idea what went wrong.

    I assure you it’s nothing that you did.

    In fact, he may even care about you a great deal and still not be able to stop himself from acting this way.

    But why does this happen?

    There’s one BIG reason why men do this...

    And I discovered this eye opening video that will shed some light on this bizarre behaviour.

    Insert subject line here and link it to: <=========> Your ex won’t be able to resist?

    It all comes down to a missing “secret ingredient” that not one in a thousand women knows about...

    And it’s the biggest factor that determines whether a man just “likes” you...

    ...or if he sees you as “The One.”

    You see, this “secret ingredient” is so important to a man that no matter how attracted to you he is, or how strong your chemistry is...

    If it’s missing, he’ll never be able to truly give his heart to you...

    And he will always have an unshakeable urge to seek out a woman who has this one “secret ingredient.”

    Here’s what I’m talking about: <=========> The difference between “like” and “love” (most women miss this)

    On the other hand, when you know this powerful “secret ingredient”... won’t believe how effortless, passionate and bulletproof your relationship can be.

    Trust me, this is going to blow you away.

    Discover it here: ==> Men fall in love with women who have this “secret ingredient”

    Thanks again.

  23. Have been suffering from (HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS) disease for the past four years and had constant pain, especially in my knees. During the first year,I had faith in God that i would be healed someday.This disease started circulating all over my body and i have been taking treatment from my doctor, few weeks ago i came on search on the internet if i could get any information concerning the prevention of this disease, on my search i saw a testimony of someone who has been healed from (Hepatitis B and Cancer) by this Man Dr ehizele and she also gave the email address of this man and advise we should contact him for any sickness that he would be of help, so i wrote to Dr Ehizele telling him about my (HERPES Virus) he told me not to worry that i was going to be cured!! hmm i never believed it,well after all the procedures and remedy given to me by this man few weeks later i started experiencing changes all over me as the Dr assured me that i have cured,after some time i went to my doctor to confirmed if i have be finally healed behold it was TRUE, So friends my advise is if you have such sickness or any other at all you can email: or call him +2347063715104 or call me or whattsapp me to hear from me +16625721737. He told me that he also help people to cure HIV VIRUS and also help people to bring their ex lover back. contact dr Ehizele if you have any problem. email:


    My Wife divorce me for no reason, Thanks to Dr. Trust for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again, My name is Bobby Foret. i live in US, I`m happily married to a lovely and caring wife,with two kids A very big problem occurred in my family seven months ago,between me and my wife so terrible that she took the case to court for a divorce she said that she never wanted to stay with me again,and that she did not love me anymore So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get her back,after much begging,but all to no avail and she confirmed it that she has made her decision,and she never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my wife So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my wife back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited. So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my wife back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my wife who did not call me for the past seven {7}months,gave me a call to inform me that she was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how she came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and she apologized for her mistake,and for the pain she caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit the same Doctor ,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to "bringing your ex back. Thanks you sir, for bringing back my wife,and brought great joy to my family once again. His spell is a 100% Guarantee for your situation. Email him now. or Call or WHATSSAP him now: +2348156885231

    View his website for more testimony:

  25. I have been suffering from Herpes for the past 1 year and 8 months, and ever since then i have been taking series of treatment but there was no improvement until i came across testimonies of Dr.Isai on how he has been curing different people from different diseases all over the world, then i contacted him as well. After our conversation he sent me the medicine which i took according to his instructions. When i was done taking the herbal medicine i went for a medical checkup and to my greatest surprise i was cured from Herpes. My heart is so filled with joy. If you are suffering from Herpes or any other disease you can contact Dr.Isai today on this Email address: or WhatsApp him on this Tel.Number +2349034352176. He said he also have a cure too all these diseases.

    Hepatitis A AND B
    Chicken Pox
    Human Papilloma Virus(HPV)
    Cerebtospinal Meingtitis
    Chagas Disease
    Alzheimers Disease
    Schizophrenia. E.T.C.

  26. i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Larry contact him on email: Dr Larry TEMPLE.. or Whats-app +1(424)-261-8520

    i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Larry contact him on email: Dr Larry TEMPLE.. or Whats-app +1(424)-261-8520

  27. hello,
    Am writing this article to appreciate the good work of DR Abiodun that helped me recently to bring back my Husband that left me for another lady for no reason for the past 8 months . After seeing a post of a woman on the internet testifying of how she was helped by DR Abiodun. I also decided to contact him for help because all i wanted was for me to get back my Husband happiness and to make sure that my child grows up with his father. Am happy today that he helped me and i can proudly say that my Husband is back with so much love and joy like never before thanks Dr contact email

  28. I was searching for advise on what to do to get back my EX Husband, My story is about a woman who used to work with my husband in the same office, they were having secrete affair and i caught them, for that reason my we had to split, but i still love him but it seems he was deeply in lover with the other lady and he left me useless, after few weeks of searching for help, I came across Dr.Alli who can help me, i contacted Dr.Alli for help due to the fact that i needed my EX lover desperately because he is my everything and my life. To God be the glory, my EX husband came back to me within 12 hours and he swore never to cheat on me again and promised to love me forever, Viewers reading my article that also need his help should contact him with his email : ( ) call or Whatsapp +2348100772528 he will solve your relationship problem.....