BREAKING: Affluent parents do it again!

MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018

So does the New York Times:
The New York Times has published some strange op-ed columns in its time.

This morning, the puzzling paper has published one of its strangest yet.

The essay was written by two sociology professors and one graduate student. It appears beneath this fiery headline:
How Entitled Parents Hurt Schools
Darn those entitled parents! Near the start of their essay, the professors outline the situation—a situation which, at least as described, makes little apparent sense:
LAREAU, WEININGER AND COX (6/25/18): [E]conomic segregation, which is more pronounced among families with children, [sometimes] creates public school districts where affluent families predominate. This can lead to trouble in schools, but of a distinct kind. Motivated by a fierce desire to protect their children and themselves from difficulty, and armed with a robust sense of entitlement as well as ample economic, cultural and social resources, affluent parents can create conflict and interfere with school districts on a scale that is rarely acknowledged.

We saw this firsthand during the research for our recent study of an affluent school district in the Northeast.
We call this district Kingsley, to preserve the anonymity of the interviews we conducted with families and school officials.
Darn those affluent parents, with their "robust sense of entitlement!"

Perhaps you think you already know the shape of the upcoming story. Almost surely, you don't.

As they continue, the professors describe a situation which unfolded in an affluent school district which runs two (2) high schools. (The number is revealed here.)

The district decided to change attendance boundaries for its two (2) high schools. Here's what happened next:
LAREAU, WEININGER AND COX (continuing directly): As of the 2010 census, more than a third of households in the district had an annual income of $150,000 or more, and the median home value exceeded $450,000. More than 70 percent of adult residents had at least a bachelor’s degree, over twice the national average. Kingsley was also extremely successful academically. It was a “destination district,” with average SAT scores nearly 250 points above the state average on the 2,400-point scale.

We started visiting this community...to understand how parents decide where to live and send their children to school. After the study had begun, Kingsley administrators began the process of redrawing boundaries for the district’s [two] high schools to balance attendance numbers. Administrators, of course, don’t want children crowded into one school while there are empty seats in classrooms in another. Since they cannot control where parents live within the district, they sometimes reassign certain neighborhoods’ students from one school to another. This provoked an outcry among many of the parents, which we documented.

At no point was there a suggestion, by parents or administrators, that the educational quality of one of the two high schools was worse. However, the reassignment would have increased some students’ travel time, by an average of about 10 minutes.

The reassignment process lasted for almost a year. Once the district began releasing proposals, there were vigorous protests, which led to revised proposals and new protests.
The irate eggheads continue from there, describing the chaos which resulted from the parents' protests. But why should anyone, including Times readers, care about this alleged string of events? What issues were at stake?

Here's why we ask those questions:

There is no sign in this report that these parental protests involved issues of race or income. There is no sign that one of these high schools was more prestigious than the other.

Why did parents oppose the new attendance lines? The professors describe no reason other than the increase in travel time to and from school each day.

From the professors' report, it's hard to see why parents would have been so upset, if indeed they were. But there is no sign that conventional matters of race or class or other invidious advantage were involved in their actions.

Why then is this the most prominent op-ed column in today's New York Times? (In hard copy, it's accompanied by a visual.) Indeed, why is this puzzling essay in the New York Times at all?

The professors seem to be deeply upset by the "opportunity hoarding" of these affluent parents. But in this particular case, what "opportunity" were the parents "hoarding?" According to the professors' account, there was no apparent difference in opportunity between the two affluent high schools at all.

Why in the world did the New York Times decide to publish this drivel? We'll suggest one possible answer:

The New York Times isn't real sharp.

With that possibility duly noted, we now ask another question. Why were the professors so upset by the protests they describe?

Good lord! To read the professors' overview of their study, you can just click this. Under the bold-faced heading "Findings/Results," the irate professors offer this warning to the world:
District administrators were subject to a torrent of “data” and “research findings” that parents used to criticize the district’s proposed plans. Parents frequently employed their professional expertise to directly challenge arguments put forth by officials in order to justify proposed policies. Furthermore, they drew on elaborate interpersonal networks in order to pool complementary forms of expertise and to mobilize large numbers of like-minded residents. Behind their challenges lay a sense of entitlement that rendered them unwilling to defer to the authority of the administration to make decisions concerning the needs of the system. While no single criticism was decisive, the ongoing challenges to proposed policies forced the district into a permanently defensive posture, resulting in a reduction of the board’s ability to use its own expert knowledge to decide which institutional policies would best serve students’ needs.
Imagine! Parents "employed their professional expertise to challenge arguments put forth by officials!" They even used data to
criticize the school district's plans!

How dare those parents do such things? How dare these parents challenge school officials' "expert knowledge?"

Conservatives routinely cite lunacy of this type to warn voters about the tyranny of the elites. In this case, a couple of pointy-headed professors are troubled because some "privileged" parents dared oppose the judgment of the administrators they employ.

According to the professors, this conduct displayed these privileged parents' "robust sense of entitlement." Only in the New York Times would such piddle make it to print.

Coming this afternoon: The Times helps us learn how to get to sleep. Warning! Extremely strange ideas!

20 comments:

  1. "Behind their challenges lay a sense of entitlement that rendered them unwilling to defer to the authority of the administration to make decisions concerning the needs of the system"

    Hey, The System has needs.

    OBEY, CONFORM, SUBMIT, DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TDH - 10:51
      Mao - 12:17

      Delete
  2. The obvious reason parents don't want to switch schools is that it will disrupt their children's friendships and social relationships, such as athletic team positions, parts in school plays, debate club and class offices, and so on, all of which must be earned by the kids affected, so there would be little opportunity to renew their accomplishments at the new school. Further, many will be close to graduation and will not be able to graduate with their close friends. It is very disruptive to kids to have to move at this point in their lives. Yes, they will do so when they go to college, but that is an anticipated and accepted transition, not starting over at the point where students have achieved some status.

    Parent with effective means to complain certainly can be more disruptive to administration of a school. This is especially true given that many schools have a policy of increased community involvement and parent participation. You cannot expect parents to contribute in other ways if you do not listen when they complain about policies.

    "Why then is this the most prominent op-ed column in today's New York Times? (In hard copy, it's accompanied by a visual.) Indeed, why is this puzzling essay in the New York Times at all?"

    The NY Times has been focusing on changing the admission policies of certain schools in its own districts. It seems obvious that parents would be interested in what has happened in other places. They clearly ran this article because of its relevance to the current controversy over NY school attendance policies.

    Why is that difficult to see? I think sometimes Somerby is deliberately obtuse.

    In my opinion, the administrators faced with this problem should apply the new attendance boundaries only to incoming freshmen or sophomores (whatever year they start high school). It is normal to reorganize friendships at that point and the incoming students will be low status and starting to work their way up anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I think sometimes Somerby is deliberately obtuse."
      Then again, some commenters seem to be deliberately dense.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJune 25, 2018 at 12:42 PM

      Then again, some commenters seem to be fucking assholes, such as yourself. Mazel tov!

      Delete
    3. Well...disregarding the empty snark of @12:42pm...I thought @12:33pm's comments eminently sensible. The same thought about this article being part of a campaign by the NYT in favor of changing the admissions criteria at the city's special schools occurred to me too when I first read the article.

      Delete
  3. 12:43 PM,

    That's putting it mildly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that CMike, very helpful!

      Delete
    2. CMike, are you talking about 12:42 or 12:33 -- there is no 12:43?

      Delete
    3. It was a reference to the comment left by Anonymous- what you're having trouble following along?

      Delete
  4. Powerful Effective Love Spell Get Your Ex Back About a month ago I got back to my ex(after 2 and half years separated).Everything was ok and she was the most adorable woman in the world. she spoke about wedding ceremony, how many kids we would have, said that our relationship was the most important thing in her life and she was 100% sure about it…Then he traveled to work in other country for 3 weeks. she changed his behavior completely. she disappeared every night, was saying she had to do some work and would talk to me later, but disappeared the rest of the day and night… no explanation, when I asked why she was disappearing every night, she stopped answering me. she’s ignoring me since last week, April 15. she ignored even my birthday, that was April 16. Not even a message. I wrote to her a few times trying to understand what happened, she read but just ignored me.I feel so bad cause I couldn’t stop contacting and trying to understand what happened.i loved her so much and wanted to get her back, then i was told to contact happylovespell2@gmail.com who can help out with a love spell to reunite your relationship back, so instantly do contact him and give him a try and trust me he did an urgent effective love spell for me and with in 48hours promise he made to me, my woman was back, today i testify to you all that you should seek and contact Dr happy for his spell result is genuine sure and guarantee unite and get your ex back save your marriage/relationship problem now,
    You can also know more about his spell Blogs site.http://happylovespel.blogspot.com.ng/
    Email him now on.. happlovespell2@gmail.com
    If you want to talk for more info or consultation. Whatsapp/cal +2348133873774
    Assurance and spell gaurantee, his website...happylovespell2.webnode.com/

    ReplyDelete
  5. They've commenced the narrative-making and rattled the sabers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Walk and chew gum at the same time? For some it is possible, for some it is beyond their imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Trump makes untruthful statements without considering truthfulness because he has decided (learned?) that the truth of the statement is less important than the effect of it. If you think calling an untruth a lie is a strategic mistake then find some other words, but Trump is a functional, shrewd and intelligent dishonest politician who incorporates untruths strategically.

    The mental illness baiting here stinks of Soviet dehumanization tactics and also stigmatizes mental illness.

    ReplyDelete
  8. hello,
    Am writing this article to appreciate the good work of DR Abiodun that helped me recently to bring back my wife that left me for another man for no reason for the past 8 months . After seeing a post of a woman on the Internet testifying of how she was helped by DR ABiodun. I also decided to contact him for help because all i wanted was for me to get back my wife happiness and to make sure that my child grows up with his mother. Am happy today that he helped me and i can proudly say that my wife is back with so much love and joy like never before thanks Dr contact email drabioduntemple@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. my name is Veronican SChuler
    hello,
    Am writing this article to appreciate the good work of DR Abiodun that helped me recently to bring back my wife that left me for another man for no reason for the past 8 months . After seeing a post of a woman on the Internet testifying of how she was helped by DR ABiodun. I also decided to contact him for help because all i wanted was for me to get back my wife happiness and to make sure that my child grows up with his mother. Am happy today that he helped me and i can proudly say that my wife is back with so much love and joy like never before thanks Dr contact email drabioduntemple@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. Welcome to AVANT LOANS, Do you need a genuine loan Online to secure your Bills? Starts a new business? Do you need a personal loan? or Business loan, Apply for a quick and convenient loan to start a new financing of your projects at a cheapest interest rate of 2%. Are you in need of a Loan of any amount? Has the bank or Payday Loan Company refused your Loan Application because of your Low Credit Scores or Lack of Collateral Security? and you are in an urgent need of this Personal Or Business Loan to re-finance your business, pay your bills, settle your bad credit problems, buy and own a house of your own? etc. CONTACT US NOW VIA EMAIL:{ avantloan@yahoo.com }

    Avant Loans is the first lending platform to leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning to price credit and automate the borrowing process. Avant has demonstrated strong credit performance and maintains one of the industry’s highest consumer ratings according to leading consumer review sites. Apply for any kind of loan and any amount of your choice today by reaching us through email: { avantloan@yahoo.com }

    Avant Loans believe Everyone deserves a better financial future if they strive for it. We’ve built a marketplace that keeps costs low and opportunity high.

    You can also reach us via our website but for instant reply fill in the application form below and forward to our email address { avantloan@yahoo.com }

    * Full Name:
    * Loan amount needed:
    * Loan Duration:
    * Purpose of loan:
    * City / Country:
    * Telephone no:
    * How Did You Hear About Us:

    Genuinely Interested to get a loan then kindly email us { avantloan@yahoo.com } with the loan requirement above.

    Sincerely yours,
    Etienne L. Audrey
    Company: Avant Loans
    Contact: avantloan@yahoo.com
    +_____+++++________

    ReplyDelete
  11. I got my programmed and blanked ATM card to
    withdraw the maximum of $5,000 daily for a maximum of 30
    days via (wesleymarkhackers@gmail.com).
    I am so happy about this because i got mine last week and I have used it to get $150,000. Wesley mark Hackers is giving
    out the card just to help the poor and needy though it is illegal but it
    is something nice. He also give loans at 3%. get yours from Wesley Mark Hackers today! Just send an email
    to (wesleymarkhackers@gmail.com),
    or watsapp or call +16315383658

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

    ReplyDelete
  12. My name is Handford Ann,i base in canada.i want to share my wonderful testimony on how i got back my ex-lover of my life back, he left me for another woman for no reason and i try to make things work for both of us yet things where getting worse and i love him so much and there is nothing i could do to get my ex back until i met a testimony share by Maria from USA on the internet talking about a powerful spell caster who brought his ex lover back within 48hours and i decide to give it a try and to my greatest surprise he also did it for me just as he did for Maria and i have a lot of people complaining of fake spell caster but this one i met was a real spell caster who help me to solve my problem i have no solution to,i introduce many of my best friends that have a similar problems,and their problem were solve with the great help of Dr.Trust. They get back their ex within 48 hours. I am so happy that my ex is back to me again,and the most surprise,is that our love is very strong,every day is happiness and joy. and there is nothing like been with the man you love.i am so happy my love is back to me with the help of Dr.Trust. If you have any problem in your relationship i will advice you to contact him now (Ultimatespellcast@yahoo.com or Ultimatespellcast@gmail.com) Call or Text him now +1(317) 762-7416

    ReplyDelete
  13. I got separated from my husband 2 years ago. There was no communication between us. I was advised by families and friends to let go, forget the marriage and move on with my life. I didn’t want to marry someone else because deep down, I still love my husband. I was in so much pain and confused, until I read a testimony online on how Dr Odion reunion a broken marriage with the help of his love spell powers. I kept reading so many testimonies on how he helped to stopped divorce and bring back peoples ex-lover's to them, and my faith was renewed. I have to contact Dr Odion immediately, few minutes later, he replied and instructed me on what to do, after meeting up with the necessary requirement, 2 days later after he cast the spell, communication was restored between me and my husband. He actually knees pleading me to forget and forgive him. My relationship is now balance and my husband kept loving me every single day by day. His spells worked wonders and our relationship is now stronger then before, and nothing can separate us again. I visited so many website seeking for help, it looked hopeless, until I came in contact with Dr Odion the real man, who helped me to restore my broken marriage. If you're having similar problem in your marriage, you want your husband or wife to love you again, you have someone you love and you want him or her to love you in return, you are having any challenge in your relationship. Dr Odion SPELL TEMPLE is the solution and answer to your problem, contact him today via Email. odionspelltemple@gmail.com or Call or Whats-app him now +2347038832903..

    ReplyDelete