ARRIVALS: What kinds of troops came over the walls?

SATURDAY, JULY 5, 2025

Trump and Noem declaim: Speaking live and direct from Des Moines, President Trump decided to issue another one of his "Truths."

He was speaking at his July 3 "Salute to America" rally event, The next day, back in Washington, he was going to sign the mega-bill, which had now been passed by the Senate and the House.

Lee Greenwood sang the president onstage at the Des Moines event. For the record, this is the official way the event was being billed:

America 250
A New Era of American Greatness
July 3 Kick-Off Celebration

Lee Greenwood sang the president onstage at the start of this new era of American greatness. "There ain't no doubt I love this land," he sang as the president watched.

(For C-Span's videotape of the whole event, you can just click here.)

We don't question Greenwood's sincerity—but then, the president started to speak. He spoke for an hour and ten minutes—but quickly, at the nine-minute mark, he voiced an important theme.

He praised the bill he was going to sign the next day. And then, sure enough, he said this:

PRESIDENT TRUMP (7/3/25): I got to tell you—I want to thank Republican congressmen and -women because what they did is incredible last night. And the Senate—the Republican Senate. We got not— 

With all the things we did—with the tax cuts, rebuilding our military—not one Democrat voted for us. And I think we use it in the campaign that’s coming up, the midterms. Because we’ve gotta beat them. 

But all of the things we’ve given, and they wouldn’t vote only because they hate Trump. But I hate them too. You know that?

[Cheers] 

I really do. I hate them. I cannot stand them because I really believe they hate our country.

(To view the videotape of these remarks, click here for the report in Mediaite. For C-Span's videotape of the whole event, you can just click this.)

President Trump hates the Democrats! And the reason why he hates the Democrats is because they hate our country!

Who was the president talking about when he made those remarkable statements? 

Was he talking about Democratic senators and representatives—Democratic Party office holders? Or was he speaking of the tens of millions of citizens who are registered as Democrats and who vote for Democratic candidates? 

The president spoke in a sweeping manner. Even as the audience cheered, there was no way to know exactly what he meant.

Lee Greenwood loves the United States—but as we start this era of American greatness, the sitting president may hate roughly half the country's adults. Or so it seemed, this Thursday night, at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on the east side of Des Moines.

In the past week, we've been looking for ways to describe who or what came over the walls when the latest arrival occurred—when Candidate Trump descended the escalator, touching off the ongoing MAGA movement.

One of the things which came over the walls was this free-floating anger and hatred. As we've noted again this week, the same hatred was present at the dawn of the west when the rage-fueled Achaeans came over the walls and took down sacred Troy.

We'd trace that part of the current arrival straight back to the Iliad. For a second part of the current arrival, we'd think instead of the portrait which was comedically presented in the feature film, Men in Black.

Comedically, that film advanced the notion that very strange extraterrestrial beings may be living in secret among us. We remind you of the comical framework as we remind you of Secretary Noem's recent appearance with the Fox News Channel's ludicrous Jesse Watters.

We remind you here of what was said. This too came over the walls as part of the current arrival:

SECRETARY NOEM (6/27/25): Listen, Jesse, you calling these guys "bad hombres"—they really are. I was talking to a U.S. Marshall just yesterday, and he was talking about the fact that they were deporting a planeload of illegals and one of them was a cannibal.

And he kind of said it off-handed, and I said to him, 'What do you—what do you mean, it was a cannibal?" And he said, "Well we put him on the plane, put him in his seat, and he started to eat his own arms, he was such a deranged individual."

This is the kind of people that President Trump is getting off of our streets—people who are murderers and rapists and, and are deranged individuals, that we are working to get out of the country as fast as possible.

[...]

WATTERS: Secretary, was this bad hombre handcuffed to something, and he was trying to chew his arm off so he could escape? Or was he just hungry?

SECRETARY NOEM: No, what bothered me the most was that this U.S. Marshal just said it like it was normal. These are the kinds of people they have to work with every single day when they're deporting people out of this country.

So they had him—put him on the plane and had him in shackles for the flight because he was such a dangerous individual. When he got back to his seat, and put another individual in the seat close to him, he said he was literally eating his own arms—that, for him, that is what he did. He called himself a cannibal, ate other people, and ate himself that day.

That too is part of the current arrival. For a fuller report on this strange event, click here for Wednesday's report.

Are very strange beings hiding among us, as Men in Black imagined? In this case, Secretary Noem showed no sign of understanding how improbable this highly improbable story was surely going to seem. 

Last Friday night, she told this story on the second most-watched TV show in American "cable news"—and no one said a word about it! This Tuesday, she repeated the story at a major press event, with President Trump at her side. 

This time, her improbable story was briefly flagged by several major news orgs—and then was completely dropped. In such ways, the strange cognition of people like Noem is wed to the fury of President Trump, but also to the insouciance of Blue America's press corps.

Two days ago, out in the heartland, the sitting president rushed to say that he hates something like half the country. Earlier, the sitting Secretary of Homeland Security didn't seem to realize that her improbable story was going to seem very strange.

It's amazing to see the way our major news orgs have failed to report the president's statement about his sweeping hatred. Such expressions of hatred have been almost completely normalized at this late stage in the game.

The president's declaration of hatred has gone almost wholly unreported. So did Noem's extremely peculiar story, which she told, two separate times, without even blinking an eye.

With this pair of presentations, the Iliad marries Men in Black. Completing the rule of three, we ourselves will hereby join these manifestations to the silence of the lambs—to the silence of the finer people in Blue America's mainstream press.

Hatred, peculiar cognition, but also insouciance? For better or worse, all three came over the walls as part of the latest storm.

134 comments:

  1. Malala Yousafzai is now promoting sports.

    ReplyDelete

  2. "President Trump hates the Democrats! "

    If you don't like what he's saying, or what his cabinet members are saying, of what Fox comedians are saying, just don't listen, Bob.

    You own a remote for your TV, don't you? Just click; it's that simple. Otherwise, you make it look like you experience some masochistic pleasure from listening to people you hate. Is this how your TDS manifests itself?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Umm...you do know that Trump is president, right? And as such, he has a fairly significant impact on our lives, correct?

      Delete
    2. What's your point, 1:58? Because he has the title, everyone must absorb his every word? You aren't in Zhmerynka anymore, mister.

      Delete
    3. Trump sets an example for his followers. When he says stuff about hating Dems, he gives permission to them to make lists and go assassinate couples and their dogs after midnight because Trump disagrees with their politics. Hate speech inspires the weak minded to commit hate acts that result in deaths of public servants. That is bad. Even a troll should be able to see that.

      Delete
    4. No one listens to anything Trump says.
      He's a moron and a loser. At least that's what the people who voted for him tell me.

      Delete
    5. A president would have to be a moron to make a public statement in a Fourth of July rally about hating Democratic politicians, so soon after a politically motivated right winger made a kill list and then shot two Democratic politicians and their families (and dog). He has a responsibility to his constituents to set a better example.

      This is more evidence that Trump has dementia, because he clearly cannot evaluate the appropriateness of the things he says and cannot inhibit the wrong stuff.

      As has been pointed out by numerous people, Trump's new behavior of calling all women he encounters "so beautiful" and "so pretty" and "I'm not allowed to say this, but you are such a beautiful woman" and so on. This is inappropriate and he is not inhibiting as he clearly knows he should. And no, women do not like to be drooled over by gross old men while trying to do their jobs and be taken seriously. Not even Republican women like that (no matter what they say about it to men). Trump has become an old lech, which is a sign of dementia.

      Delete
  3. The Iliad doesn’t include the Achaeans coming over the walls of Troy. It ends with the funeral of Hector.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Iliad is fiction. What is wrong with a man who treats fiction as if it were fact, as Somerby does?

      Delete
    2. What about the Trojan horse? According to Homer's Odyssey, it was the means of gaining entry to Troy, not going over the walls.

      Somerby claims that Troy/Greece was the "dawn of the West." West is a relative term compared to where you are. CA is west of NY and the USA is way West of Europe. Yes, Harvard designates the study of the classics as Western Civilization but that is out of the ignorance of other cultures and the emphasis on Greeks in European education. And they were only West in comparison with countries to the East of their own continent, such as China.

      In college, I was taught that the fertile crescent in the Middle East was the birthplace of civilization. They created agriculture, urban centers, number and writing systems, and other aspects of culture long before Troy was built or the Greeks wrote about it.

      It seems obvious that Somerby is obsessed with Achilles' rage (the topic of the Iliad). That is his problem, not historical truth (especially given that it is a work of fiction). Somerby was talking about the Iliad years before Trump's foolish statement on July 3, so if that anger is part of being Republican and a red voter, Somerby fits right in over there.

      Homer wasn't the first author to create fiction. His work survived, unlike other oral tradition and works written on flimsier materials or less carefully preserved, but no one teaches that he created literature. He is famous because he was imitated. This proves mostly that men like to hear stories about the topics Homer explored (rage?).

      Delete
    3. The Trojan horse is you idjuts bitching about Somerby while the MAGAT cult burns down the country. Also too, alligators eating the blahs is dumb nonsense, but more importantly racist as fuck you fucking dumb racists.

      Delete
    4. Is this it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UekI-9tioHc

      Delete
    5. the blahs is how Santorum said "the blacks" when backpeddling about social welfare dollars he insinuated only go to those people, like a typical racist republican Nazi bitch. No the fuckers get to say the quiet lies out loud. Progress!

      Delete
    6. I thought it was probably something like that, thx.

      Delete
  4. If he said "not one Democrat voted for us" and "they wouldn’t vote", it would make the most sense he was speaking about Democratic Party office holders who have votes in the matter being discussed whereas the tens of millions of citizens who are registered as Democrats do not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump probably does hate Democrats in general, but I don't think his statement as quoted shows that. It seems limited to the Congress to me. Somerby has broadened it perhaps because it suits his theme about hatred coming over the walls better than if Trump were only talking about votes for his bill.

      Delete
    2. Clearly, he's talking about the party apparatus: "Because we’ve gotta beat them."

      He's not planning to beat voters or office holders; he's planning to beat the party, political entity. And that's also what he hates.

      Delete
    3. What is trivially obvious is that Trump hates his dominance being challenged - that is what he hates, and what all Republicans hate.

      They expect to be dominant, and when their dominance is challenged, they only know how to respond to that with hate.

      Delete
    4. Clearly it has nothing to do with Dem voters when the fat turd references mid-term elections, not. Please start paying attention. The country is toast, just a matter of how much is burnt over the next few decades.

      Delete
    5. If sane-washing Trump's inane, virulent claptrap were an Olympic sport, you'd be competing for the gold.
      Is that what he means? He hates congressional Democrats? It's not at all obvious from his vituperations. Even if it were so, that would be a pretty goddamn bizarre statement.

      Delete
    6. Choosing the worst interpretation of an ambiguous statement is a trick practiced by some partisans on both sides. I do not expect it of Bob Somerby.

      Delete
    7. Why wouldn’t President Trump hate Democrats?

      Delete
    8. This is an example of why context is needed to disambiguate statements. From the context given by Somerby, he only hates the Dems who voted against his bill. We need a bit more of his speech to know if he means he hates ALL Dems. What did he say before and after this excerpt?

      From Trump's behavior, I think he hates all Dems. Otherwise, he wouldn't be punishing blue states by withholding disaster funding and allocated funding for public services. He wouldn't be constantly badmouthing blue cities by calling them hellholes when they are not, and so on. Trump acts like he hates all of us, not just our elected representatives who oppose Trump in Congress. He has been demonizing Democrats by saying we are possessed by satan (etc), are filthy dumb awful people, since he began his campaign. In that broader context, he does not limit his hate to just politicians but hates all of us.

      Delete
    9. I do want to hear your positive spin, David, on "hating" people.

      Delete
    10. Why, for fuck's sake, would a half-way normal person in the position of authority use the word 'hate' towards his political opponents. Is Trump not president?

      Delete

    11. Meh. Pretty much a rephrasing of "They hate me and I welcome their hatred."

      Delete
    12. This the first time a president has said that he's hates the opposition party in a public speech. It's called stoking hate, it's what we've come to expect from Trump.

      Delete
    13. I hate you 3:19, and your welcome. Meh.

      Delete
  5. Geez, only 4 mentions of Lee FUCKING Greenwood.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Hatred, peculiar cognition, but also insouciance? For better or worse, all three came over the walls as part of the latest storm."

    This is peculiar cognition by Somerby. First, we do not have walls and we are not under siege. Second, hatred of immigrants (which was not part of the film Men in Black) did not suddenly arrive. It has been a political theme on the right since the beginning of our nation. The people who hate immigrants are called nativists. They were behind passage of numerous anti-Immigration laws around the turn of the 19th century. Our country has a long history of discrimination against immigrants, which is why "national origin" is one of the conditions enumerated in our anti-discrimination laws. In the 1800s, different nationalities were thought of as distinct races of people, a belief that was bolstered by genetic concepts in the pseudoscience of Hitler's regime.

    Insouciance is an odd word for Somerby to be using today. It means "casual lack of concern; indifference". Those of us on the left have hardly shown insouciance over treatment of immigrants, persecution of minorities, hatred of others by the right, or any of the things Somerby has been discussing today. Does he know what the word means?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Immigrants were one of the targets of the Ku Klux Klan. Catholics were also targeted by the Klan, partly because of the association between Catholicism and immigrants from Ireland and Italy, and later Poland, Germany and other Eastern European countries.

      Delete
    2. America was founded on Enlightenment ideals, but then Christians came and distorted all that.

      However, it turns out, these Christians were in name only, phony Christians using their religion to control others.

      Here is some of the things the Bible says:

      "Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the foreigner."

      "Do not deceive one another"

      "Do not defraud or rob your neighbor"

      "Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind"

      "Do not pervert justice"

      "Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart."

      "Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people"

      "Stand up in the presence of the aged, show respect for the elderly"

      AND HERE IS THE KICKER:

      "When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born."

      Republicans break every single one of these laws from God, every single day.

      Delete
    3. Trump has said "I am the storm." This is a Q-Anon meme. Why is Somerby promoting it here?

      Delete
    4. Correction: turn of the 20th century (late 1800s and early 1900s and following)

      Delete
    5. If your point is that we are sliding back in our societal norms back to the end of the 1800's, then your point is correct. What would be the new flavor of the "Chinese Exclusion Act"?

      Delete
    6. Ilya, Trump is deporting everyone who is an immigrant. I am arguing against Somerby's idea that this is a new assault on our country coming "over the wall" as some kind of arrival. Xenophobia and nativism have been with our country since its founding. It is not coming from somewhere else and it is not an assault on our country. It is not funny, like Men in Black. It is the rise of hatred within our own nation and it must be fought just as it always has been, by ensuring freedom for ALL PEOPLE via our laws and by enforcing our constitution, and be reinstating education. This isn't about "social norms" but about the law of our land, which implements tolerance of diversity and freedom to pursue happiness FOR ALL.

      Delete
    7. Anon@3:00 -- It's new in the sense that we have gotten past such naked xenophobia and now we are sliding back into it.
      To be clear: I don't disagree with you at all that the anti-immigrant sentiment has always been present. At some point, it was no longer polite to vituperate against immigrants. Now, it's back in vogue. Ethnic purity is an acceptable topic of conversation at the highest level of our government.
      To wit: Laura Loomer tweeted that alligators will have 65mil meals -- which is the total number of residents in the US who identify themselves as Latino. Most have been citizens for generations.

      Delete

    8. @1:25
      The real, anti-Pharisees Bible says: God's to God, Caesar's to Caesar.

      Delete
    9. Laura Loomer is one of those weird self hating Nazi Jews like Stephen Miller, Bibi, and David in Cal.

      Delete
    10. "Those of us on the left have hardly shown insouciance over treatment of immigrants, persecution of minorities, hatred of others by the right, or any of the things Somerby has been discussing today. Does he know what the word means?"

      You literally don't know how to read. It's abundantly clear Somerby uses 'insouciance' to refer to the lack of attention paid by the media to Trump's statements that he hates Dems, as well as to Noem's cannibal story.

      Jesus.

      Delete
    11. I don’t know how to read because I never studied phonics.

      Delete
    12. If you go to Ground News, you can see which media have been reporting which stories. Somerby's idea is that Blue media have ignored the stories about self-cannibalism and Trump saying he hates Dems, but that isn't supported by data about how such stories have been presented by media with identifiable biases.

      https://ground.news/

      Delete
    13. Too much effort?

      Delete
  7. I think Trump should’ve continued the last four years of tradition and invited Hunter Biden to come snort cocaine on the balcony during the fireworks like he did for the last four years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Were you invited too? Is that how you know this happened?

      Delete

    2. As resident Soros-bot Hector teaches us: if there is no indictment it didn't happen.

      Delete
    3. I see coke hound Donnie Trump Jr. has entered the chat. His favorite President is Hoover.

      Delete
    4. "As resident Soros-bot Hector teaches us: if there is no indictment it didn't happen."

      Grasshopper Trumptard, you are incapable of grasping even the simplest pearl of wisdom I lay before you.

      The rule is: if there's no indictment it wasn't illegal.

      Delete
    5. Yes, Soros-bot, stashing cocaine in the White House is perfectly legal. Thanks for the correction.

      Delete
    6. Are you aware that Trump has torn out the historic rose garden at the White House? He thinks he owns the place when he is only visiting.

      A tourist or intern left a small amount of cocaine in a public area of the White House and trolls immediately blame Hunter. Meanwhile both Trump and Don Jr. (and Musk of course) are blatant drug abusers. Trump has taken down historic paintings of previous Democrats elected to the highest office and replaced them with blown-up meme images, gilded whatever he could get his hands on and otherwise defiled the Residence. The guy has no class, and neither do people who run around calling others "Soros-bot" as if being George Soros were a bad thing. He has used his money for good worldwide, like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and other philanthropists, while greedy grasping Trump sells a one-size-fits-all fragrance that fails to capture his own adult-diaper reek.

      Delete
    7. Hector,

      He’s a Democrat, lies are all they have. No message or policies people align with. We lived the HELL Democrats put us through under Biden & Obama. They hate our country amd used our tax money giving to NGO’s to fund paid protests etc and line their pockets. We the People said HELL NO!

      Delete
    8. And now you will give all your tax money to fund a police state that may someday come for you or someone you care about.

      You are still alive, so thank Biden for his effective handling of the pandemic. Then thank him again that you made enough money to pay taxes during his improving economy after the covid-fueled recession. Trump didn't do that. And if you saw a doctor during that time and could afford the copay, thank Obama for setting up ACA.

      This idea that protests are paid by NGOs or that people who work for non-profits line their pockets is another right wing lie. I hope you send all of your spare cash to Dear Leader to by fake gold high tops or unisex (trans) fragrance (because his grifters could find two scents or define what a woman would want to smell like. Hats with misspelled words are not "lining" Trump's pockets, I suppose?

      Delete
    9. Ummmm, the Muslim and the doddering old fool steered us away from economic calamity, jeanious. Irony much?, January 6th u Nazi bitch.

      Delete
  8. In the book and film, the phrase "silence of the lambs" was about the nightmares the main character had about lambs being slaughtered and crying in fear. The silence was worse than the crying because it meant the lambs were dead.

    Somerby grabs that phrase not because it fits anything he is talking about here, but because it has the word "silence" in it and he wants to complain that the press hasn't mentioned something he considers important. That is not the way you use figurative language. There need to be more points of similarity between Somerby's concerns and this imagery for it to make any sense at all in this political context. For example, the silence of the press might be terrifying if it meant there was no longer any press to write about Trump's hatred of Dems. But that is not what Somerby is claiming at all. He is just saying the press isn't writing about Trump's hate. That isn't true -- I read about this hate statement in several places -- but that is a different problem with Somerby's essay.

    Meanwhile, we get to hear that no Democrats voted for Trump's bill and we get a repetition of Noem's crazy immigrant story, for free. Somerby has encased this repetition of right wing talking points in a stupid metaphor about coming over walls, that makes no actual sense, in order to present these right wing statements to a liberal audience that otherwise might not care about them. That is called advancing or amplifying someone's message. By presenting no coherent message of his own Somerby directs more attention to Trump and Noem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sincere question: Somerby suggests Noem's story is so improbable that the fact that she repeats it raises serious questions about her cognitive abilities. To you, this is his way of promoting her nutty story so that we liberals will come to believe it. So, and here's my sincere question: Do you think it would be better for Somerby to just ignore what Noem said?

      Delete
    2. Yes, ignore it, or he could refute the info. That takes perhaps more work than he wants to invest.

      If Somerby is seriously concerned about Trump and Noem, he could write useful analyses like Liberal bloggers do. Note how infrequently Somerby looks anything up, when Wikipedia and search engines are so available.

      Delete
    3. When I looked up self-cannibalism I found that the incidence is not known because it is so extremely rare that only 9 cases have been reported, ever. That makes the likelihood that many immigrants are self-cannibals a ludicrous suggestion. Somerby might then suggest the possibility that Noem is trying to justify abuse of detainees by portraying them in horrific ways. Much the way Trump keeps portraying migrants as Hannibal Lecter (another cannibal that is fictitious). Debunking not repeating is needed.

      Delete
    4. BTW -- Are there any liberals out there who have become convinced that shackled deportees have been eating their arms because Somerby repeated Noem's story?

      Delete
    5. No one said that. People need to see most deportees as non-criminal human beings not ghouls, because that what the large majority are. When voters see others as less than human they will approve large expenditures for ICE to fund mistreatment of detainees.

      Delete
    6. Someone who doesn’t support humane threatment and due process for immigrants isn’t much of a liberal.

      Delete
    7. I’m a liberal, and my reaction when Somerby tells me Noem is pushing the story that deportees are eating their arms is that Noem must be a vicious nutcase. But maybe other liberals see things differently: Did any liberal see this story and think, “Hey, I’m glad we’re deporting these cannibals so they won’t be eating me or my family!”?

      Delete
    8. Liberals aren’t the only readers of this site.

      Delete
    9. I am a liberal and my first thought on hearing Nazi Barbie ramble on was what kind of fcking hell are they putting these people thru to make one act out like that?

      Delete
    10. When I first saw the Noem story, I wondered how someone in handcuffs could do this, imagining him being cuffed behind the back. After all, these are vicious criminals. Then as part of the story, there was a video of the detainees milling around casually on the tarmac waiting to board a plane. Completely put the lie to that narrative. As no one has corroborated that story, it can safely be put into "eating the pets" category.

      Delete
    11. Shooting the pet < Eating the pets< Eating himself
      And it's Noem for the win!

      Delete
    12. Surely the Noem's story isn't as absurd as the story of people with dicks and balls who are actually women? Or that Dementia Joe is sharp as a tack?

      Delete
    13. @4:46 AM, your beef is with nature not politics.

      Delete
    14. 4:46 that just proves what a shit technician our Lord is slapping body parts and chromosomes on all over the place. Worse than a 1972 GM auto assembly plant for Christ sakes.

      Delete
    15. One of Christians favorite things to do is hate Jews.
      Which would be a weird thing to do, if it wasn't a First Amendment protected right.

      Delete
    16. I’m a Christian, and some of my best friends are Jewish.

      Delete
    17. And they taste great right out of the oven.

      Delete
    18. That kind of joke may go over big with your white supremacist bros but it is inappropriate here.

      Delete
  9. Somerby was no doubt taught that hate is bad by his Catholic upbringing. It is a cardinal sin (wrath) to carry hate in your heart. It isn't something that comes over any wall, but something every one of us struggles against as we learn self-control and expectations for civil behavior. An adult who behaves regularly in a wrathful way (as Trump regularly does) is showing a symptom of dementia, narcissism (a personality disorder, not mental illness), alcohol or drug use, or some other serious problem.

    I am concerned about the silence of the Somerby, because he never follows his observations to their obvious conclusion. Somerby was not shy about calling Biden too old, by why does he not say the same about Trump?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Somerby has told us that, in his nonexpert view, Trump's pathologies (if they exist) most likely stem from a source other than age.

      Delete
    2. Somerby is wrong about that. Trump is showing dementia along with his other problems.

      Delete
    3. "Digby has a compilation of video clips. Take a look. Each one is another Trump WTF moment. Taken together, you have to ask what it will take before somebody pulls the plug on this ongoing descent into ‘greatness’.

      If he was some guy sitting in a bar ranting like this, the bartender would cut him off and call for someone to take him home.

      Writing about former President Biden’s decline has become a stock narrative of journalism to the point of becoming a cottage industry. So where is a comparable focus on the far greater evidence that President Trump is in far worse shape?"

      https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/5/2331863/-The-story-the-press-refuses-to-cover-Trump-s-dementia-on-full-display?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web

      Here is the link to Digby's evidence of Trump's deterioration:

      https://digbysblog.net/2025/07/04/stable-genius-watch-2/

      Why isn't Somerby calling for more of this kind of coverage of Trump's gaffes? Somerby was all over the Biden-is-too-damned-old campaign, urging us to push the geezer off the ticket. Where is Somerby when we need him to urge the media to tell the truth about Trump's mental state? Crickets and nothing but crickets from Somerby.

      Too much insouciance from Somerby, in my opinion.

      Delete
    4. I’m insouciant,
      And I’m OK.
      I sleep all night
      And loaf all day.

      Delete
  10. According to Cheryl Rofer at Lawyers, Guns & Money blog, there is a longstanding racist fascination with alligators eating brown or black people. She provides pictures of a few ads featuring that trope:

    https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2025/07/week-24

    ReplyDelete
  11. "A Georgia woman seeking a Republican nomination to represent her state in the U.S. House of Representatives is receiving an avalanche of criticism for responding to the tragic loss of life in Texas due to a flash flood as "fake."

    Kandiss Taylor, a MAGA adherent who recently ran to be Georgia's governor, took to X on Saturday and wrote, "Fake weather. Fake hurricanes. Fake flooding. Fake. Fake. Fake," as authorities in Kerr County, Texas continued to search for bodies.

    Needless to say, she was harshly criticized as Texas reels from the flood that coursed through a girls' camp."

    There's that famous Republican empathy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She probably takes that empathy with her to church every Sunday.

      Delete
    2. It's okay, she probably hates you Soros-bots too. Even-steven.

      Delete
    3. DOGE cut meteorologists who would have provided more specific forecasts and prevent this tragedy.

      ""NWS was among the government agencies targeted by the Trump administration in its effort to gut the federal bureaucracy, losing approximately 600 staffers. After the cuts, the agency—which was already understaffed—began to prepare to offer 'degraded' forecasting services, facing 'severe shortages' of meteorologists, according to an internal document obtained by The New York Times in April."'

      The outlet goes on to quote Texas Emergency Management Chief W. Nim Kidd, who pointed to bad data.

      "The original forecast that we received Wednesday from the National Weather Service predicted 3-6 inches of rain in the Concho Valley and 4-8 inches in the Hill Country," according to the chief. "The amount of rain that fell at this specific location was never in any of those forecasts.”

      As has been forecast, people are dying because of the cuts to govt services, not in other countries but in places like TX.

      Delete
    4. The "tree of liberty" was thirsty.

      Delete
    5. The "Tree of Liberty" was washed free from the flood of Trump's BS and is floating down river.

      Delete
    6. A bunch of teenagers and TX stalwarts have drowned and been washed down a river. Show a little respect.

      Delete
  12. Trump will be installed on Mount Rushmore. And liberal donors will pay for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go read something about Mt Rushmore and what it took to create it. Pay special attention to how many workers and how many years it took.

      Delete
    2. A January 6 MAGA insurrectionist who was pardoned by Trump. Just got sentenced to life in prison for plotting the kill over 20 FBI agents. Anybody want to take bets on whether he gets a second pardon?

      Delete
    3. Let me rephrase it for you because I don't think it was clear the first time: Trump's visage will be erected on to Mount Rushmore, and Democratic voters will pay for it out of their own pockets. Period.

      Delete
    4. You clearly do not understand the difficulties involved. Meanwhile Trump will have died before any progress is made.

      Delete
    5. Of course I don’t understand the difficulties. You don’t, either. Only the finest thinkers, men like David in CA, women like Cecelia, understand the difficulties.

      Delete
    6. I’ve been to Mt Rushmore and know what it took to build it. It doesn’t happen just because Trump has a fantasy.

      Delete
    7. We are talking about the what's, not the how's and the when's.

      Delete
    8. Right. And Mexico will pay for the wall.

      Delete
    9. Canada will pay for Mt Rushmore.

      Delete
    10. This is exactly the way to turn a nice red state like South Dakota Democratic.

      Delete
    11. The rock structure will not allow Trump's mug on Rushmore, or anyone else's. This discussion is imbecilic, as usual with the felon. There is only room for his little shroom.

      Delete
    12. Trump will replace Lincoln.

      Delete
    13. Despite the liberal cope, Trump is going onto Rushmore, replacing 2 if not all of the presidents already there. And registered Democrats will pay for it through a new poll tax. You want to vote? 30 dollars is deducted from your bank account for the Rushmore fund first. End of story.

      Delete
    14. "Mount Rushmore was sculpted from a granite mountain by removing large amounts of rock using dynamite and then refining the features with hand-held pneumatic hammers and chisels. The process, which took from 1927 to 1941, involved a team of about 400 workers and was overseen by sculptor Gutzon Borglum. "

      Trump will be dead before the monument can be finished and no one will care about building it after that, so it will remain as is.

      For a comparable example, look how long they have been working on the Crazy Horse monument. It may however be possible to add Trump's face to the rear-end of the horse, if the Lakota don't object.

      Delete
    15. This is why normal people know Magats are weirdos and jaggoffs. End of story.

      Delete
    16. Trump could be cast in concrete on Rushmore, it would look like hell, and not hold up, similar to typical Trump properties. Only problem is there won't be any Mexican contractors to do the actual work...

      Delete
    17. His face will stand erect for all to see. Despite the feminized catastrophizations of flaccid white liberals. Thank you very much.

      Delete
    18. Sherwin Williams doesn't have enough orange paint to glob on that stupid smug mug, so it will never happen. End of story.

      Delete
    19. What's wrong with being feminine? You Republicans complain if women are too male, then complain if men are too female. No pleasing you.

      Trump hasn't done anything to earn his place on a mountainside. Mt. Rushmore is a great monument to guys who were much better presidents. There is no reason to disrupt tourism there just for Trump's vanity. Isn't vanity a feminine trait?

      Delete
  13. I guess Terry Moran would still have a job if he'd waited a few weeks and quoted the man directly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cult have weird fetishes, man.

      Delete
  14. Erich Fromm said that humans are characterized by one of two basic orientations toward the world, “having” or “being.” A person with a being orientation is focused on experience rather than possession and derives meaning from sharing and engaging with people. The having orientation is called materialism.

    I see Democrats as people with a being orientation and Republicans as people with a materialistic having orientation. The being approach is more likely to make people happy, not owning things. These are aspects of personality and identity that are not easily changed.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Today the media is pretending that Democrats regret positions on immigration that they expressed in 2019. I think the mistreatment of immigrants by the Trump administration is pushing voters more toward that 2019 Democratic position, not pushing Democratic politicians more toward Trump's position. Trump is predictably creating more sympathy for immigrants with his atrocities, among those capable of feeling empathy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Calling illegal invades "immigrants" is the best strategy for us idiot-Democrats! This is how we win!

      But wait. Come to think of it, it may only be our second best strategy; the first one being spelling president's last name as "trump". I'm not sure which one of these two will work better.

      Delete
    2. Too many immigrants have been called "illegal invaders". This undermines the rule of law in our country, when people with guaranteed rights are treated like criminals when they are not. That makes all of us feel unsafe, as if our government is trying to hurt us not serve the people.

      Democrats are trying to protect American freedoms. Republicans are trying to take them away. It is that simple and the results at the polls will show where the majority of us stand.

      Meanwhile Trump ignores public feeling while he plays with tariffs and helps Putin murder Ukrainians.

      Delete
    3. The shitheels are ending citizenship constructs. Very ugly Nazi shit picking up speed everywhere all at once. Usual suspects cheering it on the same retarded way they cheered on Shrub; who they now have been taught is a loser. Obedient little Nazi bitches, I'll say that much about you.

      Delete
  16. From Robert Reich:

    "The United States government is no longer able to protect us from real hazards, such as flash floods, because it’s shifting funds to fake hazards, such as a non-existent immigrant crime wave.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency has been stripped down so much it can barely respond to emergencies, yet it’s funding detention centers such as “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Florida Everglades.

    The National Weather Service’s San Angelo office, responsible for some of the areas hardest hit by Friday’s flooding, is missing a senior hydrologist, staff forecaster, and meteorologist.

    The Weather Service’s nearby San Antonio office, which covers other areas hit by the floods, is missing a warning coordination meteorologist and science officer who are supposed to work with local emergency managers to plan for floods, including when and how to warn local residents and help them evacuate.

    The office’s warning coordination meteorologist left on April 30, after taking the early retirement package offered by Musk’s DOGE to reduce the number of federal employees.

    At both offices, the vacancy rate is roughly double what it was when Trump returned to the White House in January.

    It’s the same across much of the federal government. Callers can’t get through to Social Security offices. Hazardous waste sites and drinking water facilities aren’t being inspected. National Park services have been scaled back. There aren’t enough air-traffic controllers to safely guide takeoffs and landings at the nation’s major airports.

    Trump’s newly-enacted Big Ugly Bill will take funds out of Medicaid and food stamps. For what? To finance another giant tax cut for the rich, along with 10,000 more ICE agents and a gulag of detention camps.

    I’d like to believe that this worsening catastrophe may eventually have positive consequences.

    For one thing, it could help us appreciate what our government is for. And why we need a competent and effective civil service rather than Trump lackeys and sycophants.

    It will also push every American to choose sides, between a government that protects us from real dangers or a police state, between American democracy or Trump fascism."

    See the link for more:

    https://robertreich.substack.com/p/sunday-thought-a-national-reckoning

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think weather service staffing impacted the death count in TX much. With so many storms dumping 6 inches of rain in hours (minutes for many) instead of days/weeks there is no system in the world to handle this. How many videos of hundreds of cars floating down the street do you remember from your yute? Common now. Texas Hill country is always prone to flash floods. Hell my buddy Ginny had her home float down the Cozamel a couple times before she gave up on it. Couldn't afford taller stilts. But the frequency and severity is nuts now. Bad enough the weather service cuts, but the bill fucking climate change initiatives is incomprehensible, and a much bigger crime. This country is toast. Literally and figuratively.

      Delete
    2. They are complaining in TX that they got inadequate warning. The warning and coordination after the fact come from the weather service people who were fired by DOGE. Your opinion about what happened on the ground does not take precedence over the statements of the people who were actually involved. I'm sure those affected would be pleased by your dismissive attitude toward their troubles.

      Delete
    3. Idiot Republicans are claiming that previous floods should have been sufficient warning about the current flash flooding in TX. As if there is no difference between saying "hurricanes happen in FL" and "there will be a category 3 hurricane in mid-FL hitting land on Friday." Their attitude seems to be that if you had a hurricane once a long time ago, the next one shouldn't be a big deal.

      Delete
    4. I didn't say anything of the sort. The simple fact is nature can move faster than midnight warnings. Especially with freak storms that are no longer freaky. Sorry if this troubles you. I of course abhor cuts to our safety systems, it's just getting people out of valley campgrounds in the middle of the night is problematic under the best warning with "normal" weather systems.

      Delete
    5. Your contention that having warning does no good is flat wrong. Girls in that camp died because they got no warning. Saying that dealing with extreme weather is hard doesn't mean we shouldn't try to minimize harm during natural disasters. Shrugging and saying "we're all going to die sometime" is what Republicans do, and it is despicable when we had systems in place to deal with this, that they undid in the name of greed.

      Delete
    6. Rapidly rising floodwaters: The Guadalupe River rose about 26 feet in 45 minutes, with one account stating it rose over 20 feet in less than two hours, suggesting a sudden and rapid onset of the flooding that may have limited the time available for a full evacuation.
      County's lack of flood warning system: The county had previously considered a flood warning system but didn't implement it due to cost.
      Unprecedented nature of the flood: Local officials stated that they did not anticipate the magnitude of the flood, despite the flood watch that had been issued, according to AL.com. Some officials referred to it as a "100-year flood event," indicating its rare and extreme nature.

      Local officials have dealt with these floods since forever. Seems they might have invested in a better warning system given their history. Again NWS staff cuts causing death in this extreme instance is minimal for fucks sake. They had flash plenty of advance flood warnings and were not concerned until too late with a wall of water on them. People fail to believe how bad things can get in minutes.

      Delete
    7. @1:27 -- I get it that you are saying that these events are going to be more frequent with warming and that we should support safety systems, but I disagree that those girls couldn't have been removed from their cabins had they been given advance warming of the size of the storm system. Meteorologists can and do provide such warning. They were fired and no longer in place to do that. I think it is extremely callous to shrug and say, well too bad the storm was so big. We humans energetically create ways to make our lives better and prevent tragedies, not save money by cutting govt workers. Republicans have made the costs the focus, not the services that workers are paid to provide. Rescuing even one of the drowned would have been worth the cost of those fired meteorologists and emergency liaison workers. We track weather specifically to cope with these disasters. The loss is unacceptable.

      Delete
    8. It is the job of meteorologists and emergency workers to warn people of the size of a storm, not just that one is coming. To do that, they need info and storm tracking. Weather experts can tell the difference between a regular storm and a 100-year storm while watching it on their screens, but not if weather tracking has been dismantled and there is no one watching how quickly a storm builds, where it is moving, and how big an area will be affected. If you are standing on the ground looking at the sky you won't see it. If you have satellite data you can make predictions, just as they for hurricanes. They fired the guys that do that. They have also defunded a weather satellite to do this kind of tracking and warning. That's because Trump makes cuts without having good info about what is being cut.

      I get it that Republicans and also local people on the ground are scrambling to avoid responsibility for these deaths. That doesn't make them innocent. The time to evacuate is not when the flood waters are rising but before the storm hits.

      Going back to more primitive methods of warning people about major storms, in the face of more frequent storms, is idiotic. There is no excuse for this. Greed and ignorance make a bad combination and Republicans need to admit they made a mistake, not try to shove the blame off onto fate with "who could have known" type statements, or those girls should have run to higher ground, or some such abominable remark. When the air traffic controllers were cut and planes crashed, the pilots were blamed (too much DEI the Republicans said). It sounds like you are saying that those girls in their cabins by the river refused to leave even though they were warned. That isn't what happened and it is wrong to blame the victims like that.

      Delete
    9. I agree with you in warning theory, not at all in my supposed malice. My job entailed assessing exposures to natural disasters and historically folks are really repeatedly dumb about what flash floods can do, even when fully warned and with experiencing their homes being repeatedly swept down the Guadalupe and Cozumel Rivers forever. Key words in this graph - repeatedly dumb.

      Delete
    10. The woman who was the director of that camp was among those killed. If you have evidence that there was warning of a 100-year storm coming and people ignored it, that is a different situation than assuming because some people are dumb, the ones who were killed this time ignored warnings. Most people who are responsible for other people's children go overboard on the side of caution. A house floating away is not the same as a child drowning. Lives are not the same as property damage.

      Delete
    11. "Texas Emergency Management Chief W. Nim Kidd told reporters at a press conference Friday that the NWS did not accurately predict the amount of rain Texas saw."

      Delete
  17. I believe Trump’s lies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That makes you one of the smarter dummies.

      Delete