THURSDAY: Greg Gutfeld won't discuss this tonight!

THURSDAY, JULY 31, 2025

Blue journalists won't discuss him: The Washington Post had published a report about conditions at the gulag-adjacent confinement center in El Salvador—the mega-prison to which United States sent 270 men.

According to the Post, many of the deportees "had entered the United States legally and were actively complying with U.S. immigration rules." Below, headline included, we show you some of the basics from the start of the lengthy report:

‘Welcome to hell’: Inside the mega prison where the U.S. deported migrants

One detainee was beaten unconscious. Others emerged from the dark isolation room covered in bruises, struggling to walk or vomiting blood. Another returned to his cell in tears, telling fellow detainees he’d just been sexually assaulted.

“Let’s hit him like a piñata,” guards shouted amid the beatings, detainees recalled, the blows echoing against the metal walls.

They called it “La Isla”—The Island—the cell where Venezuelans deported from the United States by the Trump administration said they suffered some of the worst abuse of their 125 days in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT.

The matching firsthand accounts across multiple interviews offer the most complete view yet of conditions inside the mega prison, where inmates are denied access to lawyers and almost all contact with the outside world—and where about 14,000 Salvadorans remain incarcerated. Few detainees have ever left CECOT, and fewer have spoken publicly of their experience there.

The Washington Post interviewed 16 of the more than 250 men who were deported by the United States to CECOT, held there for four months and then released this month to Venezuela as part of an international prisoner swap.

The Venezuelans, rounded up in President Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign, told The Post they were subjected to repeated beatings that left them bruised, bleeding or injured. They said prison staff restricted medical care for detainees suffering from diabetes, high blood pressure or kidney failure.

That's the way the report begins. As it continues, it describes sadistic behaviors on the part of prison personnel—sadistic behaviors of a type known to exist within our flawed human population.

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin is quoted issuing her standard mumble-mouthed official deflections. We feel completely sure that McLaughlin is secretly better than that.

Regarding the legal status of some of the brutalized deportees, the Post offers this later passage:

The Post has found that many of the detainees had entered the United States legally and were actively complying with U.S. immigration rules.

Many of the men had fled political oppression and extreme poverty under Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, a U.S. adversary. Some had been granted permission to live and work in the United States. At least two arrived in the U.S. as refugees seeking safety from persecution in Venezuela.

A number suspected they had been detained and deported by the U.S. based solely on their tattoos.

Marco Jesús Basulto Salinas, 35, had temporary protected status shielding him from deportation and worked legally in kitchens and pizzerias to pay for his mother’s breast cancer treatments back home.

Andry Hernández, a 31-year-old makeup artist, entered the U.S. legally with a CBP One appointment, where an official in a preliminary screening determined he had shown a credible fear of persecution as a gay man living and working in Venezuela.

Roger Molina, a food delivery driver and aspiring professional soccer player, had been vetted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and federal law enforcement, flown to the U.S. and conditionally accepted into a State Department resettlement program for refugees.

We don't know what every word means. We'll offer one basic critique: 

Given the fact that the Post was able to speak with only sixteen of the deportees, the Post should have tried to explain the meaning of words like "many" and "some" within such passages as that.

That said, the descriptions of the sadistic behavior are easy to recognize. The United States paid $16 million to El Salvador to pay the costs of such treatment.

Also this:

Greg Gutfeld won't discuss this new report tonight. In a certain kind of way, if you squint your eyes, he's one of the prison guards too.

Meanwhile, our own Blue American journalists won't discuss Greg Gutfeld! They won't report or the things he says and does each night. Nor will they name or discuss the rest of the messenger children at the Fox News Channel—and the list of such strangers is long.

As for Gutfeld, he'll open his show tonight with a few minutes of his "fun, smart, non-lecturey comedy." As we noted in this morning's report, he touched a familiar set of deranged bases at the start pf last evening's "cable news" show, then finished that two- or three-minute, fun / smart segment with this bit of extremely smart comedy:

GUTFELD (7/30/25): Finally, scientists are now dressing pigs in clothes and burying them in Mexico.

Except for one that fled to Ireland.

[PHOTO OF ROSIE O'DONNELL]

AUDIENCE: [Extended yelping and applause]

As a general matter, Gutfeld doesn't agree with O'Donnell's political views. That seems to be the way he prefers to react to women who don't agree with him

A few nights back, the gang was noting that it's hard to get a boner at all if photos of O'Donnell are around. This is the way this collection of idiots agree to conduct themselves night after night, often to loud applause.

For now, we offer this question:

Within the bounds of differing national cultures, who is morally worse?

Who is morally worse?
1) The sadistic guards whose sadistic behaviors are described in the Post's report.
2) An American who is being paid $9 million per year to pretend to discuss news topics.
3) The loftier commentators who refuse to report or discuss the behaviors of people like Gutfeld.
4) The people who swore that the southern border was tight as a drum and that President Biden was sharp as a tack.

That last group got President Trump elected again. Which of those four groups is worst?

There are many strangers among us! Hello stranger, the old song says.  

More specifically, that old American song starts off exactly like this:

Hello, stranger, put your loving hand in mine
Hello, stranger, put your loving hand in mine
You are a stranger and you're a friend of mine.

The evocative lyrics continue from there. At one point, the singer finally confesses to "mourning like a dove."

(That' the way the old song goes. For a transplendent rendition, click this.)

26 comments:


  1. "The Washington Post had published a report..."

    After years of Russiagate and all the other shit, why would anyone believe anything published by the Washington Post?

    You're being ridiculous, Bob. You're embarrassing yourself, and you're wasting everybody's time.

    'nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking of embarassing yourself...

      Delete
    2. Sweet moonly goobly the fucking stupid.

      Delete
  2. Hillary Clinton is guilty of criminal conspiracy, conspiring with intelligence and White House officials to violate the CIA's charter and Executive Order 12333 explicitly prohibiting the agency from conducting intelligence operations against US citizens within the United States.

    Lock her up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What the heck are you even talking about?

      Delete
    2. Don't change the subject with irrelevant questions.

      Delete
    3. Hillary Clinton got the stinky, diaper-wearing old fart, Trump, to squeal, "You're the puppet!", during a Presidential debate.

      Look her up.

      Delete
  3. “ DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin is quoted issuing her standard mumble-mouthed official deflections. We feel completely sure that McLaughlin is secretly better than that.”

    Somerby has no basis for assuming this. When people justify bad acts, that makes them bad people too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Quaker in a BasementJuly 31, 2025 at 7:55 PM

    "We feel completely sure that McLaughlin is secretly better than that."

    She works very hard to keep the evidence under wraps.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mister Fanny? Is that you?

    ReplyDelete

  6. "At least two arrived in the U.S. as refugees seeking safety from persecution in Venezuela."

    One can't "arrive as a refugee"; WaPo is definitely lying here. One can only arrive as an asylum seeker.

    And unauthorized border crossing is a crime even if the criminal poses as asylum seeker. Mexico is a safe country, they should've sought asylum in Mexico.

    Yes, Mexico is a safe country with a perfect socialist left-wing government. Why would they prefer a fascist nightmare? They must be fascists themselves. And every Democrat is happy when fascists are punched in the face. So what's is this commotion all about?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementAugust 1, 2025 at 3:01 AM

      What are you even talking about. Of course one can "arrive as a refugee." Under the Immigration and Nationality Act in US law, the meaning of the term refugee is clearly defined:

      (42) The term "refugee" means (A) any person who is outside any country of such person's nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, or (B) in such special circumstances as the President after appropriate consultation (as defined in section 1157(e) of this title) may specify, any person who is within the country of such person's nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, within the country in which such person is habitually residing, and who is persecuted or who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race,
      religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

      We have laws and agencies for dealing with refugees.

      Delete

    2. I know what the term "refugee" means. What I said is that those people did NOT "arrive as refugees". And I'm right, and WaPo is lying. And you don't know what you're talking about.

      To become a "refugee" one needs to seek international protection, get through the asylum process, and be found to be qualified for asylum. By, in this case, American authorities.

      Unless those people went through this very long (months, if not years) process somewhere outside the US, which I find absolutely incredible, they couldn't "arrive as refugees" in the US.

      Delete
    3. Trump has been deporting such people, including some who worked as translators for our military.

      Delete
    4. Illegal border crossers should be deported; doesn't matter who they worked for. That's the law. If you don't like laws, send your suggestions to your congressperson. Or emigrate.

      Delete
    5. The law? Hahaha! When a unanimous ruling by a federal court says the president cannot unilaterally start capriciously imposing tariffs not authorized by congress, the president tells the court to go fuck itself. He puts his lawyers in charge of the DOJ and on federal appeals courts. What the fuck does the law mean anymore, maggot?

      Delete
    6. Translators in Afghanistan were promised the ability to come to the US in exchange for their service to our military efforts there. They arrived here and were granted asylum. Trump has been breaking prior promises to deport them. What do you suppose will happen to them under the Taliban if they are returned there?

      These people are not illegal border crossers. They are allies. Asylum provisions are already part of our immigration law. That has not been changed. Trump ignores the law.

      Delete
    7. If you hate the President of your country, idiot-Democrat, then emigrate. You love refugees so much, become one.

      Delete
    8. Those who can't hold their promises shouldn't give promises.

      But why does it feel like you're pulling your tearful tales right out of your retarded arse?

      Delete
    9. Call your Democratic Congressperson, if you want to make raping children a crime.
      Republican Congresspeople are too busy raping children, to pick-up the phone.

      Delete
    10. Most refugees at our border are American citizens, who hate the child rapist Republicans elected to be the President of the United States, and love refugees so much, they became refugees.
      Trump is not only a rapist of pre-teens, he also hates American citizens.
      But, of course, everyone already knows that.

      Delete
  7. Which is worse? That is a ridiculous question, but obviously the sadistic guards are the worst. The rest of the options are biased in their phrasing and represent people with different opinions.

    I would place anyone voting for Trump above any but the guards on Somerby's list.

    No Biden was not senile while in office. He had every right to run for reelection, especially based on his accomplishments in his first term. That Somerby portrays Biden as too old to run shows Somerby's bias and his own attachment to Trump's campaign. Somerby has never questioned those fake videos (created by Russia-funded propagandists) of Biden supposedly wandering around when he was doing exactly what he should have been doing, like the others attending various functions.

    I do not give Somerby the benefit of any doubt as a credulous fool, that he bought into the age-related propaganda against Biden (including Tapper's book). I consider Somerby a right winger pretending to be liberal in order to propagate conservative talking points. That makes Somerby list (aside from the brutality of treatment of deportees) specious.

    Somerby's pretence is blown with this list. That is perhaps why Somerby's commenters have disappeared. What is the point of pointing out what is now obvious?

    And yet another day has passed without Somerby mentioning Epstein's connection to Trump.

    Meanwhile, Somerby perhaps agrees with Musk about this kind of bullshit:

    "Just when you think Elon Musk has realized spouting off racist nonsense and giving Nazi-like fascist salutesis bad for business, he goes back to the well for more.

    This time, Musk amplified a bizarre claim from an anonymous social media account that described women as meek objects “built to be traded to another tribe (or captured).”

    “That keeps them safe, even though they are physically weak,” the anonymous account continued, before launching into a longer screed about why women should conform to a culture dictated by white men “because the alternative is not so gentle.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby has called this "sexual politics" when applied to the Greeks' treatment of women in the Iliad. He spent a week gloating over the way women were treated back then, hinting that it was normal because women couldn't fight back (except by committing suicide).

      Delete
  8. Trump is an idiot about economics but they are agitating for him to receive a Nobel Prize in Economics:

    https://digbysblog.net/2025/07/31/stable-genius-watch-3/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, inflation is on the rise, 401k's are taking a hit, and the orange maniac wants a Nobel Prize in Economics. You can't make this shit up.

      Delete