TUESDAY, JULY 22, 2025
Something we've been withholding: Is it possible that President Trump is serious?
Is it possible that he's serious about pursuing criminal charges against former President Obama? Or is he, for whatever reason, simply playing Director Gabbard's "treasonous conspiracy" card as a way of distracting attention away from the Epstein files, whatever may be lurking in that haunted forest?
We have no idea. We ask that question because earlier today, in the Oval Office, there he went again!
As you can see on this first chunk of videotape, he started off like this
PRESIDENT TRUMP (7/22/25): The witch hunt that you should be talking about is, they caught President Obama absolutely cold—Tulsi Gabbard.
What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016 but going up all the way, going up to 2020 in the election—they tried to rig the election and they got caught. And there should be very severe consequences for that.
[...]
Obama’s been caught directly. So people say, “Oh, you know, a group.”
It’s not a group, it is Obama...And what they did in 2016 and in 2020 is very criminal. It’s criminal at the highest level.
The conduct which Gabbard has uncovered was criminal at the highest level! Moments later, the president added this, as you can see on this second chunk of tape:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: You know what? If you look at those papers, they have him stone cold—and it was President Obama...
The leader of the gang was President Obama—Barack Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? And except for the fact he gets shielded by the press his entire life, that's the one they—
Look, he's guilty!...It's there—he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election...And we have all the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents.
Tulsi has told him all about it! It was treason, the president said. Treason committed by Barack Hussein Obama!
In one respect, it's true! Over the weekend, on one Fox News Channel program after another—serviced by waves of Fox News Channel "messaging persons"—Gabbard charged President Obama with taking part in a "treasonous conspiracy," but also in "sedition" and in "a yearslong coup."
As we noted in this morning's report, treason is criminal at the highest level, with consequences which can be severe.
In spite of Gabbard's absurd presentations, is President Trump actually serious about pursuing such charges? We don't have the slightest idea—but this is why we ask:
Over the weekend, then on into Monday and Monday night, viewers of Fox News Channel programs were swamped with tribal affirmation of Gabbard's absurdly flimsy, conflation-based allegations.
On Saturday and then again on Sunday, Rachel Campos-Duffy was calling for the former president's head. So were the tools on The Big Weekend Show. As of Monday night, so was Laura Ingraham.
(She was helped along by the always gloomy Victor Davis Hanson, then by the comedy stylings of the persistently silly Raymond Arroyo.)
Tens of millions of people in Red America were being propagandized hard. As they kept hearing the caterwauling about Obama's treasonous conduct, our major pundits in Blue America were staring off into air.
Our own cable stars barely mentioned the four-day onslaught. They were still burning time away, hoping that Trump would somehow turn out to be a pedophile, just like his one-time friend.
You can't stop people from pursuing the strategies which badly failed the last time. But as we Blues continue to dream about catching Trump is some such conduct, tens of millions of fellow citizens were being propagandized in a way our stars wouldn't even address.
Can a major nation expect to survive this astounding degree of (unacknowledged) tribal division? We'd say the answer is increasingly obvious.
In a second manifestation, we turn to something Christina Hoff Sommers (no relation) has said. You can read about it in a Mediaite report which starts like this, edited headline included:
Trump White House Roasted Over ‘Cultish and Cringe-Inducing’ Graphic Depicting Trump as ‘The Hunter’
Observers on social media reacted to a graphic shared by the Trump White House on Monday night with equal parts horror and embarrassment.
The graphic, which depicted Trump in the foreground with American flags, eagles, and fireworks in the background included a quote attributed to Trump that read, “I was the hunted—NOW I’M THE HUNTER.”
“They came after the wrong man,” added the White House’s official X account in its caption. On the campaign trail in 2023 and 2024, Trump oscillated between promising retribution against his enemies and insisting that success in office would be his ultimate revenge.
The post provoked a wide range of critical reactions, including from conservatives.
“Cultish and cringe-inducing. Also, insane,” commented The American Enterprise Institute’s Christina Hoff Sommers.
Sommers is a thoroughly intelligent pre-Trump conservative. She was speaking colloquially—but what might a medical specialist possibly say?
"Something we were withholding made us weak!" So said Robert Frost, in a poem which became instantly famous on a snowy day in Washington, D.C. in January 1961.
Back when we were still colonials, Something we were withholding made us weak, or so Frost mused in his poem. Today, we run and hide from the Fox News Channel every hour of every day of every single week.
We also run away from the understandings of modern medical science.
Could something be wrong with President Trump? Is something wrong with the collection of broken toys, Gabbard included, with whom he has littered his playroom?
Is something wrong with President Trump? If so, that's a tragic loss of human capability and potential.
Sommers said the magic (colloquial) word. What makes us refuse to inquire further?
Yes, Trump intends to prosecute Obama.
ReplyDeleteThe
end
DeleteColbert failed because of costs. Stephen Colbert reportedly had 200 people working on his staff. Greg Gutfeld’s evening comedy/talk show has 12, including 2 cameramen.
ReplyDeleteWho the fuck cares fascist David? Explain this Marcy Wheeler timeline for me:
DeleteTimeline:
February 16, 2017: Alex Acosta nominated Secretary of Labor.
July 2, 2019: Jeffrey Epstein indicted.
July 12, 2019: Alex Acosta resigns.
August 10, 2019: Epstein dies by suicide.
June 20, 2020: Geoffrey Berman fired.
June 29, 2020: Ghislaine Maxwell indicted.
March 29, 2021: Superseding indictment.
November 16, 2021: Jury selection begins.
December 29, 2021: Maxwell convicted on 5 of 6 counts.
February 28, 2023: Maxwell appeals.
September 17, 2024: Second Circuit rejects appeal.
January 15, 2025: Maxwell delays appeal.
February 10, 2025: Dan Bongino promises he’ll never let Epstein story go.
February 21, 2025: Pam Bondi claims Epstein client list is on her desk.
February 27, 2025: Bondi orchestrates re-release of previously released Epstein files.
March 4, 2025: James Dennehy forced to retire.
March 14, 2025: Pam Bondi conducts emergency review of Epstein and Maxwell documents.
April 10, 2025: Maxwell files cert petition.
May 7, 2025: John Sauer delays response; Bondi claims there are thousands of videos.
May 18, 2025: Kash Patel and Dan Bongino affirm that Epstein killed himself.
May 22, 2025: Epstein prison video created.
June 6, 2025: John Sauer delays response.
July 7, 2025: Pam Bondi claims there’s no there there.
July 8, 2025: Trump loses it over questions about Epstein.
July 12, 2025: Trump attempts to claim Epstein is a Democratic plot.
July 14, 2025: DOJ defends Maxwell prosecution; David Markus suggests Trump is reneging on a deal.
July 15, 2025: WSJ interviews Trump about Epstein book.
July 16, 2025: Pam Bondi fires Maurene Comey, on Trump’s personal authority.
July 17, 2025: Trump yells at supporters who won’t move on from Epstein. WSJ publishes story.
July 18, 2025: Todd Blanche files to unseal grand jury materials; Trump sues WSJ.
July 21, 2025: Mike Johnson dodges week of work to give Trump “space” to fix his Epstein problem.
July 22, 2025: Blanche announces he’ll meet with Maxwell; Oversight votes to subpoena Maxwell for deposition
Suddenly staff size, which can be adjusted, was the problem. This was about the Paramount / Sky Dance upcoming merger attempt and appeasing an authoritarian regime under Trump. You can't be so dumb as to pretend otherwise. Overhead wasn't a problem until now. Right.
DeleteThe hoax of the Epstein Files is Republicans feigning anti-child rape vibes.
DeleteThey are lying about how many people work on Gutfeld's show. There are not just cameramen and on-screen talent but also writers and producers and people who do the lighting and sound, make up people, wardrobe, assistants and gophers, a lawyer to make sure they won't get sued for libel, drivers, caterers, and all of them are already way more than 12, so they are not telling the truth. Many such shows scroll a list of names at the end of the week (or after each show) so you can count those who put the show together. Of course, they must save a bunch of money by having no fact checkers.
DeleteSomebody gotta write the ignat jokes for the Foxy morons.
DeleteWe are still waiting for Trump's investigators to find...whatever it is that they've been searching for in Hawaii. With that said, they could empanel a grand jury and have them reject their cockamamie claims. But, in all likelihood, they are just trying to divert attention.
ReplyDelete"Is something wrong with President Trump? If so, that's a tragic loss of human capability and potential."
ReplyDeleteWhen Somerby muses and answers this question himself, he comes up with the wrong answer. It isn't that Trump is insane. It is that he is a bad, indecent person, and always has been. As a child, he used to hit his teachers. He ran his businesses into the ground. He stole from charities and committed fraud over and over. He has cheated on every wife. No we hear that it was with underage girls (who he lusted after in public). He ran teen beauty pageants in order to see the teen girls naked (he told Howard Stern), he made up fantasies about Madonna while raping women. And then he sold out to Russia in order to run for president. He has never been a good person and he has always been sane, just a sociopath (which is normal for him).
The waste of potential involves the good decent immigrants that Trump has been abusing. No one should shed a tear for Trump because of all the harm he has done in his life. He should have been stopped a long time ago, but it is urgent that he be removed from power now, before he does more harm in his remaining term.
What’s wrong with wanting to look at naked girls?
DeleteThey should at least be consenting women you weirdo perv.
DeleteNo, I mean just wanting to. Not actually looking if they’re under age or don’t consent. What’s wrong with wanting to look?
DeleteSometimes it leads men to forget that women are human beings and not objects, eye candy, put on earth for their viewing pleasure.
DeleteWhen men forget that, their viewing can come across as socially inappropriate, lewd, leering, an invasion of a woman's privacy and her right to walk around like a person in this world. When men forget, they sometimes go from looking to talking and make unwanted comments to women about their appearance (or worse, the men's reaction to it).
You should have covered all this in your employer's orientation lecture about working with other people in a real life workplace. Or your mommy should have told you.
Before you say this is unfair, consider that most men do not look at each other either. That would be misconstrued as an attempt at dominance. It might make another man feel like you are coming on to him, making a gay pass. It is especially important not to watch other men while they are peeing at a urinal. You can get beat up for doing that. People learn these limits in childhood, so they are second nature to grown men.
DeleteWhen a man doesn't learn how to behave politely toward women and stares too much or leers or even makes unwanted eye contact, he is considered an asshole. Note that women who stare at men are often hookers.
No, I don’t mean actual looking. I mean wanting to look. Is it wrong to want to look? Is there something wrong with a guy who wants to look? Not a guy who stares, not a guy who walks into the girls’ locker room, not a peeping tom. Just wanting to look — is that bad?
DeletePresident Trump is looking for the real pedo.
ReplyDeleteThreatening to prosecute Obama is a distraction.
ReplyDeleteActually bringing charges? That'll be a challenge. Will they take their evidence to a grand jury? They'll have to cherry pick each and every juror to prevent the inevitable leaks. They'll have no guarantee that the jury will return an indictment.
What venue? They don't dare try this in D.C. Can they finagle it into southern Florida? Texas? I don't see how.
Or can Bondi invent some way to file charges directly without a grand jury? Maybe one of y'all can explain how that could happen.
At any rate, Trump's whole ugly episode with Russian help to get elected is conveniently forgotten now that we're nearly a decade down the road. Does he really want to re-litigate it and call it all into public attention again?
He might be just that stupid.