TUESDAY, JULY 22, 2025
Something we've been withholding: Is it possible that President Trump is serious?
Is it possible that he's serious about pursuing criminal charges against former President Obama? Or is he, for whatever reason, simply playing Director Gabbard's "treasonous conspiracy" card as a way of distracting attention away from the Epstein files, whatever may be lurking in that haunted forest?
We have no idea. We ask that question because earlier today, in the Oval Office, there he went again!
As you can see on this first chunk of videotape, he started off like this
PRESIDENT TRUMP (7/22/25): The witch hunt that you should be talking about is, they caught President Obama absolutely cold—Tulsi Gabbard.
What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016 but going up all the way, going up to 2020 in the election—they tried to rig the election and they got caught. And there should be very severe consequences for that.
[...]
Obama’s been caught directly. So people say, “Oh, you know, a group.”
It’s not a group, it is Obama...And what they did in 2016 and in 2020 is very criminal. It’s criminal at the highest level.
The conduct which Gabbard has uncovered was criminal at the highest level! Moments later, the president added this, as you can see on this second chunk of tape:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: You know what? If you look at those papers, they have him stone cold—and it was President Obama...
The leader of the gang was President Obama—Barack Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? And except for the fact he gets shielded by the press his entire life, that's the one they—
Look, he's guilty!...It's there—he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election...And we have all the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents.
Tulsi has told him all about it! It was treason, the president said. Treason committed by Barack Hussein Obama!
In one respect, it's true! Over the weekend, on one Fox News Channel program after another—serviced by waves of Fox News Channel "messaging persons"—Gabbard charged President Obama with taking part in a "treasonous conspiracy," but also in "sedition" and in "a yearslong coup."
As we noted in this morning's report, treason is criminal at the highest level, with consequences which can be severe.
In spite of Gabbard's absurd presentations, is President Trump actually serious about pursuing such charges? We don't have the slightest idea—but this is why we ask:
Over the weekend, then on into Monday and Monday night, viewers of Fox News Channel programs were swamped with tribal affirmation of Gabbard's absurdly flimsy, conflation-based allegations.
On Saturday and then again on Sunday, Rachel Campos-Duffy was calling for the former president's head. So were the tools on The Big Weekend Show. As of Monday night, so was Laura Ingraham.
(She was helped along by the always gloomy Victor Davis Hanson, then by the comedy stylings of the persistently silly Raymond Arroyo.)
Tens of millions of people in Red America were being propagandized hard. As they kept hearing the caterwauling about Obama's treasonous conduct, our major pundits in Blue America were staring off into air.
Our own cable stars barely mentioned the four-day onslaught. They were still burning time away, hoping that Trump would somehow turn out to be a pedophile, just like his one-time friend.
You can't stop people from pursuing the strategies which badly failed the last time. But as we Blues continue to dream about catching Trump is some such conduct, tens of millions of fellow citizens were being propagandized in a way our stars wouldn't even address.
Can a major nation expect to survive this astounding degree of (unacknowledged) tribal division? We'd say the answer is increasingly obvious.
In a second manifestation, we turn to something Christina Hoff Sommers (no relation) has said. You can read about it in a Mediaite report which starts like this, edited headline included:
Trump White House Roasted Over ‘Cultish and Cringe-Inducing’ Graphic Depicting Trump as ‘The Hunter’
Observers on social media reacted to a graphic shared by the Trump White House on Monday night with equal parts horror and embarrassment.
The graphic, which depicted Trump in the foreground with American flags, eagles, and fireworks in the background included a quote attributed to Trump that read, “I was the hunted—NOW I’M THE HUNTER.”
“They came after the wrong man,” added the White House’s official X account in its caption. On the campaign trail in 2023 and 2024, Trump oscillated between promising retribution against his enemies and insisting that success in office would be his ultimate revenge.
The post provoked a wide range of critical reactions, including from conservatives.
“Cultish and cringe-inducing. Also, insane,” commented The American Enterprise Institute’s Christina Hoff Sommers.
Sommers is a thoroughly intelligent pre-Trump conservative. She was speaking colloquially—but what might a medical specialist possibly say?
"Something we were withholding made us weak!" So said Robert Frost, in a poem which became instantly famous on a snowy day in Washington, D.C. in January 1961.
Back when we were still colonials, Something we were withholding made us weak, or so Frost mused in his poem. Today, we run and hide from the Fox News Channel every hour of every day of every single week.
We also run away from the understandings of modern medical science.
Could something be wrong with President Trump? Is something wrong with the collection of broken toys, Gabbard included, with whom he has littered his playroom?
Is something wrong with President Trump? If so, that's a tragic loss of human capability and potential.
Sommers said the magic (colloquial) word. What makes us refuse to inquire further?
Yes, Trump intends to prosecute Obama.
ReplyDeleteThe
end
DeleteColbert failed because of costs. Stephen Colbert reportedly had 200 people working on his staff. Greg Gutfeld’s evening comedy/talk show has 12, including 2 cameramen.
ReplyDeleteWho the fuck cares fascist David? Explain this Marcy Wheeler timeline for me:
DeleteTimeline:
February 16, 2017: Alex Acosta nominated Secretary of Labor.
July 2, 2019: Jeffrey Epstein indicted.
July 12, 2019: Alex Acosta resigns.
August 10, 2019: Epstein dies by suicide.
June 20, 2020: Geoffrey Berman fired.
June 29, 2020: Ghislaine Maxwell indicted.
March 29, 2021: Superseding indictment.
November 16, 2021: Jury selection begins.
December 29, 2021: Maxwell convicted on 5 of 6 counts.
February 28, 2023: Maxwell appeals.
September 17, 2024: Second Circuit rejects appeal.
January 15, 2025: Maxwell delays appeal.
February 10, 2025: Dan Bongino promises he’ll never let Epstein story go.
February 21, 2025: Pam Bondi claims Epstein client list is on her desk.
February 27, 2025: Bondi orchestrates re-release of previously released Epstein files.
March 4, 2025: James Dennehy forced to retire.
March 14, 2025: Pam Bondi conducts emergency review of Epstein and Maxwell documents.
April 10, 2025: Maxwell files cert petition.
May 7, 2025: John Sauer delays response; Bondi claims there are thousands of videos.
May 18, 2025: Kash Patel and Dan Bongino affirm that Epstein killed himself.
May 22, 2025: Epstein prison video created.
June 6, 2025: John Sauer delays response.
July 7, 2025: Pam Bondi claims there’s no there there.
July 8, 2025: Trump loses it over questions about Epstein.
July 12, 2025: Trump attempts to claim Epstein is a Democratic plot.
July 14, 2025: DOJ defends Maxwell prosecution; David Markus suggests Trump is reneging on a deal.
July 15, 2025: WSJ interviews Trump about Epstein book.
July 16, 2025: Pam Bondi fires Maurene Comey, on Trump’s personal authority.
July 17, 2025: Trump yells at supporters who won’t move on from Epstein. WSJ publishes story.
July 18, 2025: Todd Blanche files to unseal grand jury materials; Trump sues WSJ.
July 21, 2025: Mike Johnson dodges week of work to give Trump “space” to fix his Epstein problem.
July 22, 2025: Blanche announces he’ll meet with Maxwell; Oversight votes to subpoena Maxwell for deposition
Suddenly staff size, which can be adjusted, was the problem. This was about the Paramount / Sky Dance upcoming merger attempt and appeasing an authoritarian regime under Trump. You can't be so dumb as to pretend otherwise. Overhead wasn't a problem until now. Right.
DeleteThe hoax of the Epstein Files is Republicans feigning anti-child rape vibes.
DeleteThey are lying about how many people work on Gutfeld's show. There are not just cameramen and on-screen talent but also writers and producers and people who do the lighting and sound, make up people, wardrobe, assistants and gophers, a lawyer to make sure they won't get sued for libel, drivers, caterers, and all of them are already way more than 12, so they are not telling the truth. Many such shows scroll a list of names at the end of the week (or after each show) so you can count those who put the show together. Of course, they must save a bunch of money by having no fact checkers.
DeleteSomebody gotta write the ignat jokes for the Foxy morons.
DeleteWe are still waiting for Trump's investigators to find...whatever it is that they've been searching for in Hawaii. With that said, they could empanel a grand jury and have them reject their cockamamie claims. But, in all likelihood, they are just trying to divert attention.
ReplyDelete"Is something wrong with President Trump? If so, that's a tragic loss of human capability and potential."
ReplyDeleteWhen Somerby muses and answers this question himself, he comes up with the wrong answer. It isn't that Trump is insane. It is that he is a bad, indecent person, and always has been. As a child, he used to hit his teachers. He ran his businesses into the ground. He stole from charities and committed fraud over and over. He has cheated on every wife. No we hear that it was with underage girls (who he lusted after in public). He ran teen beauty pageants in order to see the teen girls naked (he told Howard Stern), he made up fantasies about Madonna while raping women. And then he sold out to Russia in order to run for president. He has never been a good person and he has always been sane, just a sociopath (which is normal for him).
The waste of potential involves the good decent immigrants that Trump has been abusing. No one should shed a tear for Trump because of all the harm he has done in his life. He should have been stopped a long time ago, but it is urgent that he be removed from power now, before he does more harm in his remaining term.
What’s wrong with wanting to look at naked girls?
DeleteThey should at least be consenting women you weirdo perv.
DeleteNo, I mean just wanting to. Not actually looking if they’re under age or don’t consent. What’s wrong with wanting to look?
DeleteSometimes it leads men to forget that women are human beings and not objects, eye candy, put on earth for their viewing pleasure.
DeleteWhen men forget that, their viewing can come across as socially inappropriate, lewd, leering, an invasion of a woman's privacy and her right to walk around like a person in this world. When men forget, they sometimes go from looking to talking and make unwanted comments to women about their appearance (or worse, the men's reaction to it).
You should have covered all this in your employer's orientation lecture about working with other people in a real life workplace. Or your mommy should have told you.
Before you say this is unfair, consider that most men do not look at each other either. That would be misconstrued as an attempt at dominance. It might make another man feel like you are coming on to him, making a gay pass. It is especially important not to watch other men while they are peeing at a urinal. You can get beat up for doing that. People learn these limits in childhood, so they are second nature to grown men.
DeleteWhen a man doesn't learn how to behave politely toward women and stares too much or leers or even makes unwanted eye contact, he is considered an asshole. Note that women who stare at men are often hookers.
No, I don’t mean actual looking. I mean wanting to look. Is it wrong to want to look? Is there something wrong with a guy who wants to look? Not a guy who stares, not a guy who walks into the girls’ locker room, not a peeping tom. Just wanting to look — is that bad?
DeleteWhat does Lindsey Graham say?
DeletePresident Trump is looking for the real pedo.
ReplyDeleteThreatening to prosecute Obama is a distraction.
ReplyDeleteActually bringing charges? That'll be a challenge. Will they take their evidence to a grand jury? They'll have to cherry pick each and every juror to prevent the inevitable leaks. They'll have no guarantee that the jury will return an indictment.
What venue? They don't dare try this in D.C. Can they finagle it into southern Florida? Texas? I don't see how.
Or can Bondi invent some way to file charges directly without a grand jury? Maybe one of y'all can explain how that could happen.
At any rate, Trump's whole ugly episode with Russian help to get elected is conveniently forgotten now that we're nearly a decade down the road. Does he really want to re-litigate it and call it all into public attention again?
He might be just that stupid.
I don't see any way that Obama could be prosecuted. I'd rather see Obama questioned under oath after he's been pardoned, so he couldn't take the Fifth Amendment.
DeleteI'd like to see Obama roast Trump again, like he did at that White House Correspondents dinner, except this time under oath.
DeleteI’d like to see Trump questioned under oath, DiC.
DeleteOf course, I know Trump lies like he breathes, and has zero problem with perjury, but how about it, DiC? Maybe the actual facts are different than you believe them to be.
But then again, you aren’t concerned with the actual facts, are you?
I thought SCOTUS ruled that a President, even a former one, couldn’t be prosecuted. Or did that decision come with an asterisk *only applies to Republican presidents?
DeleteThat AI generated video of Obama on is knees in front of Trump should go over well in the EU, where they know Trump is a buffoon and was given help from Russia, but may be naive to what a racist he is.
DeleteThe Trump–Russia episode was one of the most extensively investigated, reported, and publicly litigated political controversies in modern American history with not one single person charged for conspiracy with Russia. How can it be said that it has been forgotten? What would Trump be afraid of if they relitigated it?
DeleteObama most certainly can be prosecuted by the Trump dream team of Alina Habba, Pam Bondi, Judge Jeanine, Rudy Giuliani and Alan Dershowitz, the case presented before the honorable Aileen Cannon.
Delete1:24 The squeaky clean campaign of Donald Trump prominently included tis guy, who managed to incorporate Russian favoring wording into Trump's platform regarding Ukraine at the Republican National Convention. Say hello to Paul Manafort.
Delete" The Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee concluded in August 2020 that Manafort's ties to individuals connected to Russian intelligence while he was Trump's campaign manager "represented a grave counterintelligence threat" by creating opportunities for "Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump campaign."
That doesn't answer the question. But I was just asking Quaker why he said that. Why should Trump be afraid if they were to relitigate the Russiagate accusations? Why wasn't Manafort prosecuted for something that has to do with a conspiracy with Russia? If they didn't find anything after the last two enormous investigations, what should they be afraid of? What would be different if it were to happen again? They didn't tie Manafort to any attempts by Russia to influence the election. That statement is just saying that the ties that he had represented a threat, not that any ties that he had were found guilty of conspiring. They went after Trump for 7 years on this. Why would he care if they continued to? They never tied him to one single thing Russia did. It would be worse for Trump's opponents to re-litigate the case because their original accusations were never proved. I'm just asking Quaker why he thinks Trump should be afraid if they were to spend more years on it, what would be different? Why would that be scary for him?
Delete"I'd rather see Obama questioned under oath after he's been pardoned, so he couldn't take the Fifth Amendment."
DeleteAnd after it was all over and every question had been reasonably answered, you'd still insist there was more to the story that hadn't been revealed.
Conspiracy theories never go away.
Why would Trump be foolish to call attention to the 2016 campaign and Russia again?
DeleteBecause regardless of the lack of indictments, the whole episode still looks bad. Trump's campaign manager was cozying up to Russians. Trump's son was meeting with Russians. Wikileaks was getting dirt on Trump's opponent from the Russians and parceling it out for maximum damage.
If he thinks a birthday card to his old friend makes him look bad, he'd really hate seeing all the shady dealings from 2016 in the headlines again.
I mean, seriously. Let's imagine a scenario where Obama is questioned about the events surrounding the Russia investigation. He's asked to explain in detail why the FBI reported to him that the actions of the Trump campaign drew attention from counterintelligence.
DeleteNow if you're convinced that his answer will be, "OK, ya got me. We were trying to dirty up Trump," then you wouldn't see it as a risky move.
Here in the real world, the FBI got wind of attempts by Russia to mess with our election--some involving the Trump campaign, others not. If Obama answers those questions with answers that show he and the FBI were doing their jobs correctly, Trump will look awful.
Delete"Because regardless of the lack of indictments, the whole episode still looks bad. "
It looks bad for Obama&Co now. For Democrats.
You think it looks bad for Trump, but that's only because your human potential is fucked up.
Anybody who witnessed that embarrassing spectacle in the Oval office yesterday and isn't totally ashamed for ever having supported that lowlife punk chickenshit coward felon should forfeit their citizenship and leave this country.
DeleteQuaker, so you feel that the Trump Russia episode has been forgotten and Trump should be afraid to call attention to it because relitigating it looks bad for him, based on your interpretations of issues in the case that had already been litigated for years with no negative outcome for him? Interesting. Thank you for clarifying.
DeleteApart from reliving how cozy Trump and his family were with the Russians , Obama taking the stand would be a stark reminder of what an adult looks like representing the presidency. So bring it on.
DeleteWhy would Trump be afraid of people reliving his and his family's perceived degree of coziness with the Russians when that was extensively litigated in one of the most public ways in modern political history? We all lived through the investigation of his family's coziness with Russia and nothing at all came of it! So it doesn't really make sense why it would look bad for him to do it some more. I don't really get it.
DeleteI will tell you though. One thing you have not done is read the Mueller report, specifically the part about the Trump Tower meeting. You should do it. It will give you clarity on the perceived coziness of which you speak and why there were no indictments for them and perhaps why they may not really be super worried about any kind of relitigation.
It may make sense that a relitigation of the matter would be something he would not want because of the misinterpretations and overstatements about what happened in the blogosphere by people who never took the time to investigate their loaded and cliched interpretations of what happened.. Maybe. But the whole investigation the whole matter yielded nothing at all against him. So I don't see what he really should be worried about.
The squealing from the Right is hilarious.
DeleteLouder, please.
9:05,
DeleteBecause Trump is a snowflake, like the rest of the Right.
Everyone remembers the childish temper tantrum they threw at the U.S. Capitol, just because black people's votes counted in the 2020 Presidential election.
Why are you pretending you don't?
Is one's "coziness with the Russians" a bad thing? Why?
DeleteIt sounds like a very good thing to me. Especially compared to idiot-Democrat's fear and loathing of the Russians.
The Republican Party puts the USA first. If you don't count Russia and Israel.
Delete9:12 I don't understand your interpretation and it seems childish and unserious. Trump has more black support now than any Republican ever has.
DeleteI appreciate all of your responses though. Thank you.
DeleteTo Soros-bot @9:18: if so, it's certainly preferable to idiot-Democrats' wish for a global thermonuclear war.
DeleteTrumpbots love that little cunt that was whining in the Oval Office yesterday.
Delete9:22,
DeleteAs unserious as pretending you are going to imprison Obama for "crimes"?
"Trump has more black support now than any Republican ever has."
DeleteThis.
It should be reported on Fox News and AM talk radio every single hour, along with all the great things Trump has done for the black people in this country, and how they are gaining and will soon be ahead of white people, thanks to Trump.
It's funny. When I go to the Right-wing blogs and write about how great Trump has been for black people, I get called a "Libtard" and then get banned.
DeleteWhat gives?
9:22,
DeleteIn your opinion, why does Right-wing media ignore all the great things Trump has done for black people?
Re-litigating why the corporate media made-up the Russiagate story is a waste of time (we already know they did it, because they wanted to cover-up the blatant bigotry of Trump voters) AND a distraction from the Epstein files which show Trump is a raper of children, bigly.
ReplyDeleteIs this how they do it in Chicago, Dickhead in Cal?
ReplyDelete***********
FBI Agent Feinberg Resigns Amid Alleged Political Targeting
Less than 24 hours after the calls, Feinberg resigned. In his essay, he asserted that his case is not unique, writing that “more and more special agents are driven out of the Bureau on mere suspicion of political unreliability,” a development he warned “should be concerning to all Americans.”
On July 1, Feinberg submitted a resignation letter to Evans. In it, he wrote, “It was never explained what policy, procedure, or institutional norm I had supposedly violated other than communicating with someone whom our current management finds politically undesirable.”
“To anyone who cares about the Constitution and rule of law… this is not right,” he added.
************
Apparently, the leader of the party of "free speech" is in the process of purging all our government agencies for thought crimes.
Bravo, maggots!!!
Fascists only care about free speech when they aren't in power.
Delete