THURSDAY: We continue to beat a dead horse!

THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 2026

Ty Cobb is plain spoken: Ty Cobb isn't a medical specialist. He's a high-end Washington lawyer who worked under President Trump for a bit less than a year, though he says he never voted for him.

That's how Washington lawyering frequently works. The overview goes like this:

Ty Cobb (attorney)

Ty Cobb (born 1950) is an American lawyer. He was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland in 1981–86. He has been a partner at Hogan Lovells in Washington, D.C. From July 2017 until May 2018, he was a member of the Trump administration legal team, though he has stated he never voted for Trump.

[...]

For nearly a year, Cobb managed White House matters related to FBI Director Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Having been recommended to President Donald Trump by John Dowd (a member of Trump's private legal team), Cobb joined the White House internal legal team on July 31, 2017 and reported directly to Trump. Cobb said he accepted the assignment because "it was an impossible task with a deadline" and because "I have rocks in my head and steel balls."

[...]

On May 2, 2018, Cobb announced that he was retiring as White House special counsel at the end of the month. He issued a statement that "it has been an honor to serve the country in this capacity at the White House. I wish everybody well moving forward."

Cobb stated on October 22, 2018, that he did not think the Mueller investigation was a "witch hunt," as Trump repeatedly called it in the press. He repeated that assessment in an ABC News interview on March 5, 2019, adding that he thought that Mueller was "an American hero."

That gives you some basic background. Cobb reported directly to President Trump, then seems to have beaten a bit of a hasty retreat. (There could always be more to the story.)

Stylistically, we'd say that Cobb is plain spoken. Last night, speaking to CNN's Erin Burnett, he offered a striking assessment of President Trump. We'll highlight his most striking claim:

COBB (1/21/26): You know, he can’t get into a sentence without raising a grievance. And he can’t get in, get into a sentence and find his way out without either, you know, asserting some revenge-based point, you know, some fantasy, delusional fantasy such as the alleged rigged election, which Bill Barr made clear to him was not the case before having to resign because of the coup that Trump wanted, or without drawing glory to himself, suggesting that, you know, he ended eight plus wars. You know, nobody knows what they were. 

You know, this is. this is a—this is a man who is who is demented, and his narcissism has run amuck. And I don’t think there’s anybody outside the boundaries of the United States who believes for a second that Trump is sane at this stage of the game, and those in the United States are merely in denial or [are] so invested in him, they can’t, they can’t accept what their lying eyes tell them.

Including physicians. Dr. Jonathan Reiner, one of our, you know, leading cardiologists in the country who’s a frequent CNN guest, you know, calling on Congress to have hearings on his fitness.

So spoke the barrister Cobb. He isn't a medical specialist, but he is familiar with President Trump. His most striking assessment was this:

I don’t think there’s anybody outside the boundaries of the United States who believes for a second that Trump is sane at this stage of the game.

"Sane" is not a technical term. Other words in that ruminationnarcissism, delusionalactually are, at least in the hands of a specialist.

This was not the first recent occasion on which Cobb held forth like this. CNN is willing to hear this sort of thing from a barrister, but under prevailing rules of the game, they won't be willing to interview carefully chosen medical specialists about this state of affairs.

Our guess would be that this is a tragic situation in which some sort of cognitive decline may be layered on top of a pre-existing (technical term) "personality disorder." No one chooses to be so afflicted, but the outcome can be very bad.

We're beating a dead horse with this topic. In closing, please notice this:

CNN has plainly mis-transcribed what Cobb plainly said. Below, you see what he actually saidand you see the CNN transcription:

What Cobb actually said:
I don’t think there’s anybody outside the boundaries of the United States who believes for a second that Trump is sane at this stage of the game.

What the CNN transcript says: 
 I don't think there's anybody outside the boundaries of the United States who believes for a second that Trump is saying at this stage of the game.
What the news report at Mediaite says:
 I don't think there's anybody outside the boundaries of the United States who believes for a second that Trump is saying at this stage of the game.

The videotape is available at Mediaite; you can hear what Cobb plainly said. But as you can see by clicking this link, the outlet failed to correct CNN's transcription mistake. Cobb's most striking assertion is also mis-transcribed there!

Everybody makes mistakes. Also, this is the world we have chosen.

35 ulasan:


  1. "Ty Cobb isn't a medical specialist. He's a high-end Washington lawyer who worked under President Trump for a bit less than a year, though he says he never voted for him."

    Oh whoa, a lawyer, nay -- a Washington lawyer! -- said something about Our Greatest President? How incredibly boring.

    By the way, do you know one about a thousand of Washington lawyers chained together at the bottom of the ocean?

    BalasPadam
  2. As a gay, Latinx Democrat, I wasn't a fan of JD Vance, but for the first time in a while he is saying something that I have been saying for weeks now. Every bit he said is common sense. Even Sen. John Fetterman (D.) has been saying the same thing too.

    JD just won my my respect and vote in 2028.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Can you tell us what he is saying that he agrees with?

      Padam
    2. Watching VP JD Vance, stand taking questions by media, answering without hesitation and NO teleprompters, is impressive. Considering our last two Democratic Presidents could not speak without a script or teleprompter. They hid from media in most cases.

      Padam
    3. This is a lie.

      Padam
    4. When all you do is make up shit that bears relation to reality and is offensive to every person with an ounce of decency or common sense, you don't need a teleprompter.
      Also, your trolling is lame.

      Padam
    5. As a gay, Latinx Democrat
      You forgot to add: in the country illegally and receiving SNAP benefits. That would've made your story so much more poignant.

      Padam
    6. The liberals say trolls in the glen don't exist but I know that they do.

      Padam
    7. Even Sen. John Fetterman (D.) has been saying the same thing too.
      Fetterman suffered a stroke and has been battling mental illness. Perhaps, that's why it make sense to you. There's a good article about his struggles and how he's changed in Mother Jones.

      Padam
  3. Cobb's point is wildly exaggerated. He claims to know what all 8 billon non-Americans believe And doesn't identify any non-American who holds this belief, let alone all of them. Cobb's Trumpian exaggeration is just a pretentious way of saying that he personally doesn't think Trump is sane

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. He's using hyperbole--effectvely!--to make a larger point.

      Padam
  4. Trump is succumbing to dementia rapidly. It's entirely unrelated to his personality disorders. Trump is addled and his connection to reality is tenuous. It's quite apparent. How much damage he's going to inflict before he's finally 25th-ed -- hard to say.

    BalasPadam
  5. ""Sane" is not a technical term." Somerby says.

    Sane is a legal term, which makes it technical to the field of law. It can also be used colloquially, but Cobb is an attorney. When he calls for hearings on Trump's fitness, it is more likely he is using the term in the technical sense.

    Somerby just loves to keep repeating his own belief that Trump's decline is layered on his personality disorders, but that is for an expert to determine, not someone like Somerby. When you talk about a person's cognitive decline, it is from a previous baseline that includes those preexisting personality disorders.

    Here is a reasonable definition of personality as the term is used by psychologists:

    "...the unique, enduring pattern of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that distinguishes an individual, representing their characteristic way of adjusting to life, shaped by genetics and environment, and generally stable but evolving."

    Note the words enduring, characteristic and stable. The persistence of traits over time and context is part of the definition of personality. The term decline implies a change for the worse compared to previous functioning. So, this assumes those stable characteristics as a baseline and measures current functioning compared to what was typical for that person.

    It is not necessary for Somerby to claim that Trump's decline is layered over his personality, because that is assumed by the previous baseline -- how that person functioned before the suspected decline.

    This mistaken idea of Somerby's is as glaring as a math error would be to a statistician, and it reveals Somerby's lack of understanding about psychology and how abnormal behavior is assessed. I wish he would stop repeating it because I find it embarrassing for him.

    The error that Somerby points out in the CNN and Mediaite transcripts are obvious errors by the voice recognition system used to produce the transcripts. These are very frequent now that so many news services are using software without having human beings review and correct errors. This isn't earthshaking and most people can see that the mistake makes no sense, and then figure out what Cobb probably said instead. Sane and saying sound similar.

    There was a similar increase in spelling and other kinds of errors when publishers stopped employing copy editors. As Somerby says, this is the world we've chosen. Actually, I don't recall voting on this, but we do live in a capitalist society in which profit takes precedence over other values. Only immigrants have actually chosen to live here -- the rest of us were born here and we just put up with circumstances. Some of us are now choosing to leave. But Somerby's glib remark about choice is offensive in the context of who has the right to live where. I'm sure it was just a bit of thoughtlessness, but it is another reason why I dislike him.

    BalasPadam

  6. Deporting criminals reduced crime. CBS reported Murders plummeted more than 20% in U.S. last year, the largest drop on record
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/murders-plummet-crime-trends-2025/

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. You're kidding, right? No, you're that deluded.

      Padam
    2. Too bad you can't trust any of the statistics coming out of the Trump administration. Note that the comparison is to the last year of Trump's first term. One might ask why murders were so high then. The CBS graph shows that they were already on the way down during the last year of Biden's term. That suggests it wasn't the deportations but other factors causing the abrupt decline (or perhaps Biden was deporting more murderers than he has been given credit for?). Murders decline steadily in each year of Biden's term, from the high during covid. Compared to 2019, covid produced a huge surge in murders that then decreased dramatically during Biden's years and only continues to decline along that same trend line during Trump's first year. If his deportations were making the difference, you would expect the slope of the trend line to change, because something new was being done to decrease murder. But that isn't what the graph shows.

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/murders-plummet-crime-trends-2025/

      Padam
    3. The largest drop in history of murders never happened before.

      Padam
    4. The fact of that drop, which began under Biden, does not mean the cause of Trump's deportations. In fact, it seems much more likely to be the result of improvements in policing. Look at the City of Baltimore. Their steep decline in murders had nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with working hard on the problem and implementing better policing.

      Padam
    5. typo correction: cause was Trump's deportations, not cause OF Trump's deportations

      Padam
    6. Data is useless without competent interpretation of what it means

      Padam
  7. How can Somerby call this a "dead horse" when every day more people come out and call Trump insane and ask for a hearing on his mental competence?

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Removing a President via the 25th Amendment would be remarkable. It has never happened. It would require a huge Senate majority as well as a House majority. In order for that to happen there would have to be very widespread agreement, including lots of Republicans, that the President was too far gone to do his job.

      However to all intents and purposes he appears to be doing his job. He sets policy, signs bills and EOs, holds pressers, gives speeches, talks to foreign leaders, etc. As long as he does these things there is no chance of the 25th Amendment being used to replace him.

      Padam
    2. While the 25th Amendment has never been used to involuntarily remove a president, Nixon was persuaded to resign and then replaced with Ford (as VP) who then pardoned him. There have been voluntary and temporary removals, as when presidents have undergone medical procedures during which they would be unconscious. The Amendment also guides the transfer of power when a president dies, the line of succession. That has been used several times, most recently when JFK was shot.

      If Republicans are smart, they will convince Trump to resign for health reasons and then work with Vance to carry on as president. If Trump continues to decline, there will be growing support for removing him, and there may be serious disruption and division within the Republican party. That is partly why Nixon resigned instead of insisting that he be removed, but he was more mentally competent than Trump appears to be, so he cared more about his party and the welfare of the country.

      It is unacceptable to allow an insane man to continue to hold nuclear codes and the power to harm the nation. That fact will convince Republicans to do something permanent about Trump once he gets bad enough to make that outcome inevitable.

      So, never say never, David.

      Padam
  8. The Trump administration is full of lying liars who distort the truth to produce propaganda that deceives voters, including Trump supports. Here is a blatant example:

    "The White House used its social media presence to share at least one image of an alleged anti-ICE protester, which was altered by artificial intelligence.

    In an announcement on Thursday, Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed that the DOJ "arrested Nekima Levy Armstrong, who allegedly played a key role in organizing the coordinated attack on Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota."

    Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shared a photo of Armstrong being arrested on X.
    The White House's social media team later altered the image to make Armstrong appear to be crying."

    https://www.rawstory.com/nekima-levy-armstrong/

    Note the original image and the altered one side by side shown in this article.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. This is the kind of thing they did to portray Biden as old and wandering, altering actual footage to make Biden appear to be sitting onto a non-existent chair or walking in the wrong direction.

      Somerby believed these deep fake videos because it was in his own political interest to knock Biden, refusing to acknowledge that these were proven fakes. Now we are seeing them emerge in the context of ICE activities, to muddying the facts and promote preferred narratives (Somerby's term) in support of right wing activities.

      Meanwhile Somerby writes a vacuous column about a transcription error, ignoring the presence of deliberate AI-generated fakes created by the right.

      Padam
  9. Here are Robert Reich's axioms for interpreting Trump's statements:

    "As Trump’s dementia worsens, several axioms are useful for interpreting his increasingly incoherent bloviation.

    Axiom #1: Whatever he asserts to be a fact is either a wild exaggeration or a bald-faced lie. Always disregard.

    Axiom #2: Whatever he blames on anyone else is something he’s done. He projects like mad, so his accusations are always windows onto what he’s worrying that others will discover about himself.

    Axiom #3: Whatever he criticizes as being fake news is a fact he doesn’t want you to know. So pay special attention to it.

    Axiom #4: Whenever he attacks some source of information — a survey, poll, or report — it’s come up with some truth he fears. So look at it and share it."

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. I'm sorry. Hearing you talking about Democrats versus Republicans, tells me that you haven't the faintest clue of neither the status quo, or the future agenda. Both parties are heads of the same snake. Both parties will take us to the exact same end result. Trump is ushering the New World Order with Agenda 2030, The Great Reset, and a global world government.

      There will be no elections anywhere. Global technocratic governance with AI Surveillance and Control of the masses. The world will be divided into regions, maybe with some level of limited symbolic autonomy. But the nation states states will have less power and influence, than a county has in the USA today.

      Trump is ushering in everything he claims to fight, including the one world government. His private board of peace, is the start of the world government.

      Enjoy! MAGA is winning.

      Padam
    2. Why are these trolls here today? Why here at all? This is a sad little blog with very little traffic. Why is the right targeting it like this?

      Padam
    3. I'm sorry. Hearing you talking about Democrats versus Republicans, tells me that you haven't the faintest clue of neither the status quo, or the future agenda. Both parties are heads of the same snake. Both parties will take us to the exact same end result. Trump is ushering the New World Order with Agenda 2030, The Great Reset, and a global world government.

      There will be no elections anywhere. Global technocratic governance with AI Surveillance and Control of the masses. The world will be divided into regions, maybe with some level of limited symbolic autonomy. But the nation states states will have less power and influence, than a county has in the USA today.

      Trump is ushering in everything he claims to fight, including the one world government. His private board of peace, is the start of the world government.

      Enjoy! MAGA is winning.

      Padam
  10. "Less than a third of voters think the country is better off than it was when President Trump returned to the White House a year ago, with a wide majority saying he has focused on the wrong issues, according to a new poll from The New York Times and Siena University.

    A majority of voters disapprove of how Mr. Trump has handled top issues including the economy, immigration, the war between Russia and Ukraine and his actions in Venezuela. And significantly, a majority of Americans, 51 percent, said that Mr. Trump’s policies had made life less affordable for them.

    All told, 49 percent of voters said the country was worse off than a year ago, compared with 32 percent who said it was better.

    [See all of the latest polls measuring President Trump’s approval rating.]

    The survey also revealed the extent to which Mr. Trump has polarized the nation into its furthest partisan corners, with more voters seeing him as on track to be historically bad or good than merely below or above average.

    Some 42 percent of voters said he was on track to be one of the worst presidents in American history — and 19 percent said he was headed to be one of the best.

    Only the most hardcore cultists (19%!) see him the way he thinks people see him from the way the GOP establishment treats him. No wonder he’s having a breakdown today." [Digby]

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. 32% said better off
      19% said "about the same"

      That's over half who said same or better.

      Murders at lowest rate since 1900 thanks to President Trump.

      Independents and Republicans support the crackdown on illegals.

      Economy booming.

      We're getting Greenland.

      What Democrats think doesn't matter, so not worth mentioning.

      Padam
  11. "Recently I asked many of you what you believe to be the most important strategy for stopping Trump’s reign of terror. I offered several alternatives based on what I’ve heard from prominent people and organizations in the resistance, along with some skeptical responses to each.

    So many of you responded and want to discuss these further that today I’m posting a revised version of my query — including the top three alternatives, as edited to reflect many of the responses sent to me.

    The list is hardly exhaustive, so please feel free to offer other ideas in the comments. (Also please share your preference in the poll, below.)

    1. Target a few Republican senators and House members to switch parties and thereby give Democrats a congressional majority in at least one chamber.

    Several of the people I contacted said the single most important thing we can do now is target a few Republican senators and representatives to switch sides or become independents who caucus with the Democrats — giving Democrats a majority in at least one chamber. That will be stop or at least slow Trump.

    Republican majorities are razor-thin in both chambers, but as long as they’re in the majority, it’s extremely difficult to stop Trump. Yet some Republicans represent purple districts and states and are struggling to keep their Republican supporters behind them. They’re also struggling with their own consciences in continuing to support Trump’s authoritarian fascism. They’re “gettable,” I’m told.

    I recall in 2001 when Vermont Republican Senator Jim Jeffords became an independent and caucused with the Democrats — thereby giving Democrats control of the Senate. Jeffords was a principled man who thought George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were destroying the GOP. Trump is far worse than Bush and Cheney.

    Skeptics tell me this won’t work because the forces holding Republican senators and representatives in place are way stronger than they were in 2001.

    2. Undertake the largest demonstration against Trump in American history, aiming for at least 10 million marching in the streets, along with a national strike.

    Some of the people I spoke with believe that the two No Kings demonstrations last year generated a powerful wave of solidarity and that a third, far larger, would shake the GOP and Trump to the core. They also cite research showing that when 3.5 percent of a population takes to the streets, even the most intransigent regimes begin to fold.

    They also recommend that such a demonstration be coupled with a general strike, lasting perhaps several days or a week, during which no one goes to work (if necessary, they call in sick) and no one purchases anything (stocking up in advance).

    The demonstration and general strike would be designed to reveal the depth and breadth of the opposition to Trump. (Several people and groups in the resistance are aiming for May 1.)

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. (Cont.)

      "Skeptics say a giant demonstration will only cause Trump to dig in and send even more ICE and Border Patrol agents into places where the largest demonstrations are occurring in hopes of provoking violence, which he’d use to justify even more repression. And a general strike would mostly hurt workers who take part in it, who’d be docked sick days or potentially lose their jobs.

      3. Let Trump overreach to the point where Americans are so disgusted they overwhelmingly repudiate him in the midterms — resulting in a Democratic takeover of both chambers of Congress by wide margins, which severely limits what he’s able to do after January 2027.

      Others I contacted tell me nothing more can or should be done over the next year, beyond organizing and mobilizing for November’s midterms. They say we should aim for an overwhelming vote against Trump’s Republicans — so large as to constrain Trump’s every move from then on.

      Skeptics tell me that if Trump senses a huge midterm wave election against congressional Republicans, he won’t allow a free and fair election in November. They also say that unless action is taken between now and then to stop Trump, irrevocable damage will be done to America, so by January 2027 our democracy will be in tatters." [Robt Reich]

      Padam
    2. There is no secret opposition to Trump. He won the election with every swing state. Democrats are hated. He is just getting started.

      Padam