TUESDAY: We've been recalling an Oscar winner!

TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2026

But first, three cheers for Hall: We've been thinking today about Driving Miss Daisy. It was awarded the Oscar for Best Picture way back in 1990.

Some progressives had objections. First, though, let us say this:

Three cheers for Colby Hall!

Hall was founding editor of Mediaite, a site at which he's been taking a more active role of late. We remain puzzled by his astounding claim that Greg Gutfeld, the "Fox News prankster," presents a brand of "smart, fun, non-lecturey comedy" on his gruesome "cable news" show.

We're still astounded by that assessment! But that was January 2025, and what you see here is right now:

Opinion
Trump’s Bizarre Behavior Has a Clinical Name: Disinhibition

One of the earliest and most underreported warning signs of certain forms of dementia is not memory loss. It is disinhibition—a deterioration of impulse control, judgment, and social restraint that often manifests as reckless behavior, inappropriate speech, and diminished concern for consequences. By the time forgetfulness becomes obvious, the disease process is often well underway.

That framework matters because it closely tracks what President Donald Trump has been displaying with increasing frequency.

In the wee hours of Tuesday morning, Trump posted private messages from confused European leaders, publicly criticized the United Kingdom’s national security posture, and shared a fabricated image depicting the United States in control of Greenland, Canada, Venezuela, and Cuba. This was the sitting president of the United States conducting foreign policy online, overnight, as allies scrambled to contain diplomatic fallout from his threats to “take” Greenland.

[...]

I am not a medical professional, but I have watched close friends and family endure the slow, painful experience of cognitive decline. Disinhibition is familiar to anyone who has lived through it. The tell is not temperament, but change from baseline...

And so on from there.

Meanwhile, it's true! As far as we know, Hall isn't a medical professional. Neither are we, and we aren't prepared to assume that his assessment here is correct.

It's also true that, in this opinion piece, Hall is discussing "cognitive decline," the safer (and more familiar) of the two conditions with which the president may be afflicted. For ourselves, we would wonder if some version of cognitive decline is now being layered atop a pre-existing "personality disorder," or atop a set of some such conditions. 

We'll also quickly take this guess:

As a general matter, people afflicted with serious "personality disorders" didn't choose to be so diminished. As we've noted in the past, antisocial personality disordercolloquially, sociopathyis believed to be partly heritable. 

The president's niece has joined other medical specialists in suggesting that the president may have suffered from that variety of "mental illness" all along. If that possible diagnosis is actually accurate, the condition of which we're speaking may have been bred in the bone.

We aren't assuming that Hall's suggestion today is right. On the other hand, we definitely aren't assuming that his suggestion is wrong. We offer three cheers for Hall today because he was willing to get off his aspic and offer some serious thoughts about what may seem to be right there before us. 

Along the way, he cites three people who mayor may nothave been trying to do the same thing:

That shift [in Trump's behavior] helps explain why concern is coming from voices that once defended or accommodated Trump. Sen. Ruben Gallego described Trump as “insane” on CNN...Even Trump’s own former deputy spokesperson, Sarah Matthews, believes Trump’s pursuit of Greenland is “mentally ill” and “deranged.” And CNN medical analyst Dr. Jonathan Reiner has called for a bipartisan congressional inquiry into Trump’s mental fitness, citing the behavioral pattern rather than ideology.

Offhand, we can't say that Senator Gallego ever "accommodated" President Trump. Beyond that, we've edited out a pair of voices who don't seem to fit Hall's stated framework. 

Nor is it clear what Gallego was trying to say when he said the things he said. As for Matthews, to see the remark in which she uses the term "mentally ill," you can just click here.

(We'd say that her statement is a bit hard to parse. She says the president has done "a medically-ill, deranged thing." Does the concept of "mental illness" actually work like that?)

Hall's statement today does parsethough no, he isn't a medical specialist. The president's recent behavior has seemed to be increasingly strangeand, in total truth, the president's endless and constant misstatements of fact have been completely unacceptable, dating all the way back to 2011 when he started making himself king of the birthers.

It was hard to get the Times to speak about that misconduct back then! For something resembling fifteen years, our journalists have insisted on refusing to discuss what seemed to be right there before them. 

As we noted in this morning's report, the whole gang on today's Morning Joe were sunk in a familiar brand of avoidance. That's long been a cognitive trait of Blue America's mainstream press.

Today, Hall has explicitly chosen to speak. He has spoken in a clear-cut way which can be clearly understood. This may help others find ways to speak about a possibility which could, of course, be extremely dangerous.

There's much more to say about all this, but we'll quit today with those three cheerslooking ahead to some possible thoughts about what happens in Driving Miss Daisy.

In closing, holy cow:

"Smart, fun comedy"from the Fox News Channel's Gutfeld?  How on earth did today's honored trailblazer ever come up with that?


23 ulasan:


  1. "One of the earliest and most underreported warning signs of certain forms of dementia is not memory loss."

    Pahleez, Bob. I know, you're sufferings from a debilitating form of TDS and all that, but the US Constitution stipulates that after the farcical reign of Dementia Joe, no Democrat is allowed to mention the word "dementia", unless they describe themselves as "demented".

    You know that, Bob. Comply, or face the consequences.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. TRUMP CRASH MARKETS. Now nobody but asshole cultists are defending the fucking demented creep.

      Padam
  2. Psychologists are not medical specialists (M.D.s); they hold doctoral degrees (Ph.D. or PsyD) in psychology, , while psychiatrists are medical doctors (M.D.s or D.O.s) who specialize in mental health

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Clinical psychologists do conduct assessment and testing of people with suspected cognitive dysfunction. For example, someone who has been in a car accident and sustained a head injury would be referred to a clinical psychologist or neuropsychologist to determine whether there is any impairment resulting from the accident compared to normal functioning. They might similarly administer the tests used by a physician or psychiatrist or neurologist to make their diagnosis of dementia or cognitive decline. The psychologist measures the impact on behavior whereas the physician tries to identify the cause (whether organic or a drug side effect for example). A psychologist might determine whether someone is impaired while the physicians figures out why.

      Hall is not a psychologist or a physician. But people get referred for testing and treatment because others around them recognize that they are abnormal. That is Trump's situation and anyone who is not themselves impaired should be able to see that Trump is "not right."

      Padam
  3. It is unclear why Somerby seems to approve so much of Colby Hall, except that a few months back, Somerby began promoting Mediaite like someone paid to endorse a product, just as ads are being incorporated into other podcasts and websites (Political Wire for example). Hall is just another news aggregator with nothing special to attract Somerby's tout.

    But Somerby uses Hall's quote to criticize Gallego, affecting to believe that Hall was referring to Gallego when he spoke about those accommodating Trump now calling him crazy. That accommodation refers to Sarah Matthews, who once worked for Trump, not Gallego. Somerby says Gallego didn't accommodate Trump, but why even apply that phrase to Gallego, when it was obviously meant for Matthews (in context of Hall's quote):

    "Offhand, we can't say that Senator Gallego ever "accommodated" President Trump."

    Somerby's pretended confusion is a smear of a Democrat who does not deserve that remark.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Somerby is almost as old as the felon so probs just as demented.

      Padam
    2. Seems likely to me, especially if you compare him to his own baseline of the stuff he was writing before 2015.

      Padam
  4. Somerby wants to excuse Trump's personality disorders on the grounds that he didn't choose them, but anyone with such a disorder chooses whether to seek treatment or continue to hurt other people.

    If you apply this to alcoholism, a person may not have chosen to be an alcoholic, but they choose whether to be a drunk driver and whether to go into rehab. People are held accountable for what they do as the result of these sorts of disorders. Trump knows what is right and what is wrong. He shows guilty knowledge by covering up his abuse of women during his campaigns, and he hid his business fraud, just as he has hidden his collusion with Russia by holding secret meetings at his golf course. Trump is not an innocent victim but a man who has chosen to be a criminal, because honest people are chumps. That is gangster behavior, not a personality disorder.

    BalasPadam
  5. ""Smart, fun comedy"—from the Fox News Channel's Gutfeld? How on earth did today's honored trailblazer ever come up with that?"

    Gosh, maybe Colby Hall is more of a right winger than a liberal and maybe Somerby is too, given that he has repeated the compliment to Gutfeld TWICE and has smeared Gallego by pretending he might have accommodated Trump.

    BalasPadam
  6. Somerby is incorrect when he suggests that Trump's promotion of the birther complaints about Obama were a sign of mental illness back in the day. They were a blatant racist smear of a Democratic candidate, politically motivated and not a delusion, except among the Republicans who believed Trump and other Republican leaders at the time. Another example of Trump's racism was his full page ad claiming that five young black men committed a rape in Central Park that they were later shown to have been innocent of doing. Today, Trump held up photo after photo of brown skinned men, claiming they were the worst of worst in MN. Some were labelled murderers but others were accused of DUI (if you read the labels yourself instead of listening to Trump's slurred slurs). All were meant to look so scary that they might exonerate an ICE agent who murdered a young mother in cold blood. Trump's racism continues but Somerby doesn't seem to recognize it for what it is, perhaps blinded by his own bigotry.

    Trump is much crazier now than in 2011 or 2015. Trump listened to advisors in 2015. Now he tears down a wing of the White House, without recognizing that it is a historical building belonging to the people. And he threatens to attack Greenland for no good reason, while threatening Norway and claiming the president there could give him a Nobel Peace Prize if he really wanted to.

    If Somerby cannot tell the difference between racism and bonkers threats to invade allies, then there is something wrong with Somerby too.

    BalasPadam
  7. Insanity seems to be rampant these days. People in states like CA and MN go to considerable trouble and expense to prevent violent criminals from being removed from their communities. They feel proud of their bizarre actions.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Squeal louder, bigot.

      Padam
    2. California and Minnesota love criminally violent illegal immigrants so much, you'd almost think they are Fortune 1000 hiring managers.

      Padam
    3. If you didn't watch Trump give another huge tax break to corporations which hire illegal immigrants instead of citizens, you'd think his jokes about immigrants being criminals was serious.

      Padam
    4. Or ICE hiring managers.

      Padam
    5. Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley revealed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have been pulling guns on off-duty officers of color while illegally demanding their citizenship papers.

      At a press conference on Tuesday, Bruley said he opposed abolishing ICE but disagreed with how federal officers were carrying out immigration enforcement.

      "Recently, as the last two weeks, we as law enforcement community have been receiving endless complaints about civil rights violations in our streets from US citizens," he said. "What we're hearing is they're being stopped in traffic stops or on the street with no cause and being forced to show paperwork to determine if they are here legally."

      "As this went on over the past two weeks, we started hearing from our police officers the same complaints as they fell victim to this while off duty," he continued. "Every one of these individuals is a person of color who has had this happen to them."

      Bruley said ICE "boxed in" one officer on a roadway.

      "They demanded her paperwork, of which she's a US citizen and clearly would not have any paperwork," he said. "When she became concerned about the rhetoric and the way she was being treated, she pulled out her phone in an attempt to record the incident, the phone was knocked out of her hands, prevented her from recording it."

      "The officer had their gun drawn during this interaction," he added. "And after the officer became so concerned, they were forced to identify themselves as a Brooklyn Park police officer in hopes of slowing the incident and de-escalating the incident down."

      "The agents then immediately left after hearing this, making no other comments, no other apologies, just got in their vehicles and left."

      Bruley said the anecdote was not an isolated incident.

      "In fact, many of the chiefs standing behind me have similar incidents with their off-duty officers," he remarked. "This isn't just important because it happened to off-duty police officers, but what it did do is we know that our officers know what the Constitution is, they know what right and wrong is, and they know when people are being targeted, and that's what they were."

      "If it is happening to our officers, it pains me to think of how many of our community members are falling victim to this every day. It has to stop."

      Padam
    6. It's called corporate welfare 4:50. Taxpayers pay the benefits to the workers fucking Wal-Mart won't. Trolls like DiC are stupid as fuck, don't belong here, and need to get the fuck out of here.

      Padam
  8. Colby Hall says that the "tell" with cognitive decline is a change from baseline.

    Somerby says:

    "For ourselves, we would wonder if some version of cognitive decline is now being layered atop a pre-existing "personality disorder," or atop a set of some such conditions. "

    This comment shows that Somerby has no idea what Hall means by a change from baseline. For someone like Trump, his preexisting personality disorder(s) would be the baseline. The cognitive decline would be a change from his prior behavior (with all of its personality symptoms and disordered behavior). The baseline is the person's own behavior at an earlier point in time (whether normal or abnormal then), and the symptoms of concern are the differences between the past and present. For example, a person might always have been quick to anger, volatile, but the cause for concern would be that they have become much worse lately, flying into violent rages.

    The people who know Trump best are the ones who would notice that he is now different than his previous behavior, based on what was normal for him (even though he has never been normal compared to most people). Those calling Trump bonkers include people who know what his personality was like and are concerned that it is different now, worse, detached and dangerous because it has changed and is no longer just the usual grandiose attention-seeking liar who grabbed two cookies from the platter, but a guy capable of starting WWIII because he wants to be king of Greenland.

    Somerby needs to understand this important distinction and why it matters. If Trump is now worse, it is a symptom of something very wrong with him. It raises the matter of incapacitation and danger to our nation. What matters is how he is functioning (or deteriorating) and its consequences for the USA, not what label to apply to him.

    Somerby seems disinclined to believe Hall, but Hall has a better grasp on Trump's problems than Somerby does. In this case, his incessant doubting without foundation simply because he holds his own preferred narrative, can wind up being dangerous to all of us.

    BalasPadam
  9. From Harold Meyerson of The American Prospect:

    "25th Amendment time for Mad King Donald

    His narcissism has become psychotically megalomaniacal.

    Act I, Scene 1, of King Lear not only introduces us to the aging monarch, but makes clear that he’s lost his marbles. Rather than subject a hugely important strategic decision—the coming division of his kingdom—to rational calculation, he instead requires his pending successors (his daughters) to tell him how much they love him. The sheer volume of their professed adoration—the more over the top, the better—becomes the sole criterion by which he makes policy. It’s the kind of scene we Americans hadn’t seen enacted very often in our own high governmental circles until Donald Trump’s second term as president, when he chose it as the model for his cabinet meetings, which consist of his secretaries telling him how great he is.



    In Shakespeare’s version, Lear, at least, has one councilor, Kent, who persists in telling him, on pain of banishment, that he’s making a huge mistake. No such councilor can be found in Trump’s circle, or in the Republican congressional caucuses, or, for that matter, in many major American institutions. Corporations, banks, white-shoe law firms, and numerous universities have prostrated themselves before Trump. While elites have disgraced themselves, it’s fallen to the people to take to the streets in opposition.



    During the 2024 presidential race, it was Joe Biden’s mental acuity that became, very understandably, the object of public concern. Trump’s mental and psychological condition was widely understood to be a little off-kilter, but the conventional wisdom was that, well, that was just Trump being Trump.



    Today, which marks the first anniversary of Trump’s reassuming the duties of the presidency, it’s clear that the conventional wisdom was profoundly and disastrously wrong. Age, narcissism, and megalomania now determine Trump’s actions and, alarmingly, the domestic and foreign policy of the United States. When the consequences are confined to his ordering up monuments to his assumed greatness—stamping his face on coins, engraving his name on government buildings, sizing his ballroom to dwarf anything else in D.C.—they can be dismissed as relatively harmless outbursts of ridiculously overindulged self-love.



    But when, as he told The New York Times earlier this month, he views the only constraints on his actions to be his own sense of propriety and morality, rather than the Constitution that presidents are sworn to preserve, protect, and defend, then we’ve been shuttled into a different form of government than the one we’ve assumed we’ve lived in for the past 250 years: a monarchy, at least as Trump himself sees it."

    Compare this essay to Somerby's post today.

    https://prospect.org/2026/01/20/25th-amendment-time-mad-king-donald/

    BalasPadam
  10. From Robert Reich. He is one of the people we liberals consider one of our Blue Stars, unlike Colby Hall:

    "TO: European leaders

    From: Robert Reich

    It is impossible to appease a tyrant.

    You know this better than most. I need not remind you of Neville Chamberlain's interactions with Adolf Hitler in 1938. Chamberlain met Hitler three times, culminating in the infamous Munich Agreement, which allowed Germany to annex Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland in exchange for Hitler's promise of peace. Returning to London, Chamberlain waved a signed Anglo-German declaration, and famously declared "peace for our time.” Instead, Chamberlain had merely emboldened Hitler’s aggression. Hitler soon broke his promise, leading to World War II.

    Today, on his “Truth Social,” Trump reposted a comment saying, “China and Russia are the boogeymen when the real threat is the U.N., NATO and [Islam].”

    This is madness.

    You struck a trade deal with Trump last year. He is now threatening to rip it up and apply economic coercion and even military force if you do not allow him to annex Greenland. He is also on the brink of allowing Russia to annex part of Ukraine.

    Most Americans are as opposed to Trump’s wild and illegal actions as you are. But we have no means of expressing our opposition because Trump’s Republicans control Congress and, in effect, the Supreme Court. You do have means.

    I urge you to activate your so-called anti-coercion instrument, colloquially known as the “trade bazooka,” which will block some of America’s access to EU markets or impose export controls, among a broader list of potential countermeasures.

    The time for appeasing Trump is over."

    BalasPadam
  11. "Meanwhile, it's true! As far as we know, Hall isn't a medical professional. Neither are we, and we aren't prepared to assume that his assessment here is correct."

    There is no reason to assume his assessment is incorrect either. The usual reaction in a position of ignorance is to seek more information, not just reject everything one cannot assess personally out of hand.

    When someone says something and you are unsure about it, thus you seek out other opinions and other sources of info, the result is usually that you learn something more about the topic.

    Somerby instead just rejects whatever does not conform to his preexisting knowledge (and preferred narrative). Thus his understanding never changes but his current beliefs are reinforced when he finds something he already agrees with.

    I am so glad that Somerby is not teaching children any more. This is not the way to model learning behavior. It is what a person lacking curiosity and closed to new info does in life. Couple this with Somerby's decades-long animosity to experts of any kind, and you have a person who is incapable of changing his views, willing to learn nothing new. This is one of the most frustrating aspects of Somerby's essays. It is one reason why I believe his purpose here has nothing to do with increasing his own understanding of anything, nothing to do with gaining knowledge, but only the distribution of propaganda and misinformation by someone who does not care what is true.

    BalasPadam