ONLY ONE QUESTION REMAINS: It all comes down to this one question!

MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2026

But is anyone willing to ask? We'll admit it! 

At the time when this question appeared, we don't think we ever heard about it:

Did Trump's motorcade drive through the newly painted reflecting pool?   

We admit it! Within the endless tsunami of crazy behaviors characteristic of the Trump era, we don't remember being aware of that question at all!  

Having said that, you're right! The bungling of the reflecting pool seems very "June 2026" at this much later point in time. He wanted it done for the Fourth of July. The bungling was a big deal in June.

That said, we're quoting the headline of a report from the Snopes sitea report delivered by Anna Rascouët-Paz, all the way back on June 23.   

Snopes was trying to determine whether a particular crazy behavior had actually occurred back on May 7. Given the nature of the era, the answer turned out to be yes.

Here's how her report began:    

Fact Check
Did Trump's motorcade drive through newly painted reflecting pool?   

In June 2026, a claim spread online that President Donald Trump's motorcade had driven through the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after it was painted and sealed as part of a more than $14 million renovation project.

The rumor circulated as the U.S. National Park Service struggled to maintain the appearance of the Washington, D.C., landmark after Trump ordered it to be repainted to "American flag blue" for the country's 250th anniversary. 

Examples of the claim spread on X and Instagram, while the self-described progressive Facebook page Occupy Democrats posted it on Facebook. That post featured an image of five black SUVs driving through the empty pool, and overlaid text suggesting the motorcade may have damaged the paint and sealant before it had fully set, thus later causing the paint to peel off.   

Several Snopes readers also emailed us and searched our website to verify the veracity of the story.

Back in June, a claima rumorwas circulating about a possible bit of crazy behavior. Snopes exists to examine such claimsand when Rascouët-Paz fact-checked this claim, it turned out that the claim was perfectly accurate!

Her report continues as shown:

[Continuing directly]
In short, the claim is true and the images are authentic. In early May 2026, after the pool was repainted dark blue and before the NPS began to refill it with water, a White House official posted a video showing Trump's motorcade driving though the landmark. 

[...]

[VIDEO INCLUDED]

Various X posts credited the above video to White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, who posted it earlier that day.

"They see me rolling," Cheung's post reads, referencing rapper Chamillionaire's 2005 song "Ridin'." Cheung added, "President Trump rides in the Reflecting Pool at the Lincoln Memorial!"

In real time, the highly volatile Steven Cheung had posted video of the event. You can see Cheung's video by clicking to the Snopes report.   

Did this bizarre behavior play a role in the subsequent failure of the Reflecting Pool project? Rascouët-Paz said she didn't know.  

That said, we don't remember ever hearing about this nutcase behavior at the time it occurred. In part, the reason for that is right there in the Snopes report.   

When this strange event occurred, did major news orgs report the event? The answer seems to be basically no. 

Though she does cite three local D.C. TV stations, Rascouët-Paz lists only CNN, the New York Post and Forbes as national orgs which reported this event. And none of the six links she provides go to classic news reports about this peculiar event. All six links go to brief videos posted on YouTube.

In fact, the AP did report this event, in real time, on June 8. The report includes several photos of Cheung's gonzo act of ridin' and rolling on the surface of the Pool, with the president himself aboard.   

That said, and as best we can tell, this behavior didn't receive a whole lot of coverage. There's been so much weird behavior in this unraveling second termand there's so little interest in coming to terms with the meaning of this state of affairsthat relatively minor acts of inanity have tended to slide between the crackshave tended to be disappeared.   

We'll now admit to a terrible fact. Video of these nutballs rollin' the length of the Reflecting Pool instantly reminded us of video of you-know-who, rolling into various capitals during his seizure of Europe 

For you, flash reactions may differ. Setting our mental flash to the side, Cheung did manage to generate substantial coverage last week with his furious and ugly reaction to What Jon Ossoff Said. 

Should Senator Ossoff have said what he said? Opinions on that will differ. But Cheung responded as he routinely does, with the ugly fury and the ugly rage which have become his trademark.   

That furious conduct is also the trademark of Cheung's more powerful boss. In our view, only one political question remains, and that question is this:   

Is something wrong with President Trump? No, reallyis it possible that something is actually wrong with the world's most powerful person?   

In our view, that's the only political question which remainsexcept for this companion question:

Is there even one journalist in Blue America's Potemkin brigade who's willing to stand, in full public view, and ask that obvious question?

Tomorrow: Goldberg gets it right


46 comments:

  1. I saw this event reported, so it must have appeared somewhere. I don't recall where I read it. Somerby is way too quick to assume no one mentioned it in the media, just because he personally didn't recall it.

    ReplyDelete

  2. Snopes this: is "Snopes" an idiotic Dumbocrat psyop?

    I just did, and the answer is "yes".



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here is what I got:

      "No results found for is "Snopes" an idiotic Dumbocrat psyop?

      AI Overview
      Snopes is an independent fact-checking organization rather than a political operation or psychological warfare program."

      We all knew that, but someone has to educate these wayward trolls. It's a dirty job but...etc etc. Somerby isn't going to defend Snopes, obviously.

      Delete
    2. Sounds like the 'psyop' in this case reported the truth.

      Delete
    3. Educate Mao? That's a good one!

      Delete
  3. "Is there even one journalist in Blue America's Potemkin brigade who's willing to stand, in full public view, and ask that obvious question?"

    Tiedrich has asked this same question at the end of each of his daily substack essays. He has been doing this for a long time. If Somerby doesn't read Tiedrich but Tiedrich asks this question out loud, daily, does that mean no one has been asking it? Tiedrich beat Somerby to this by offering a reward to the journalist willing to stand up and ask Trump "what the fuck is wrong with you?"

    It is very narcissistic to assume that the whole world revolves around what Somerby specifically has experienced, to the point where if Somerby missed something, it didn't happen and whatever others experienced doesn't matter.

    Tiedrich is not a journalist, but he beat Somerby to this punch a long time ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Quaker in a BasementAugust 24, 2026 at 9:47 AM

    "Video of these nutballs rollin' the length of the Reflecting Pool instantly reminded us of video of you-know-who, rolling into various capitals during his seizure of Europe."

    Wut?

    After excusing so many of Trump's offenses against democracy and our Constitution, this is what summons a whiff if fascism for Our Gracious Host?

    Willikers, sir. How about some of that pity you prescribe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lord knows I think most of the criticism leveled at Somerby in this comment section is frivolous and borderline bonkers, but I always pay attention to yours.

      Delete
    2. Quaker used to write interesting comments years back, but lately he has become a snide nit-picker and hostile person who doesn't participate in substantive discussion. I suspect that whoever the original Quaker was, his nym has been assumed by another troll. Of course, it takes one to know one for sure, DG.

      Delete
    3. I suspect the original Quaker disappeared when Kevin Drum died, because he was in the comments at Drum's blog more often than here.

      Delete
    4. I am frivolous and borderline bonkers, but I loved Kevin Drum.

      Delete
    5. Agree. Quaker's comments are too inconsistent these days for it to be one person, unless that one person is mentally ill or a troll.

      Delete
    6. I am a mentally ill troll.

      Delete
    7. How many of these Nonny posts were written by the same person. My guess is three.

      Delete
  5. Somerby has referred to anyone he dislikes as "Potemkin" for years now. Our journalists are not Potemkin. They are doing their work in the manner they think it should be done. If that differs from Somerby's opinion of how it should happen, that doesn't mean they are pretending to be journalists, nor that they don't exist, nor that they are not effective in their jobs. It is both unfair and incredibly insulting that Somerby mischaracterizes blue journalists (whatever he means by that term, since most journalists strive to be bipartisan in their journalism) as fake, frauds, simulating the appearance of journalism without the reality, meant to fool the populace into thinking there is journalism when there is not.

    Somerby is an ugly, fatuous, asshole. He couldn't do the job of journalist back when he submitted essays about cheating in standardized tests by schools. His attempts to criticize the press here were quickly abandoned when no publisher showed interest in his few book chapters. Journalism is a profession and it requires training to be good at it. For starters, someone needs to be able to write in a way that communicates without others, not just filling up space with meaningless quotes and irrelevancies, as Somerby has always done. Somerby has no clue how the job should be done, which means he has no clue whether any journalists are doing that work well or not. That makes Somerby a Potemkin media critic, a fraud himself.

    Somerby missed reading a particular story a few months ago, therefore it was never covered and that makes blue journalists frauds (Potemkin journalists)! This is idiocy and someone needs to ask Somerby "What the fuck is wrong with you?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementAugust 24, 2026 at 10:37 AM

      "If that differs from Somerby's opinion of how it should happen, that doesn't mean they are pretending to be journalists, nor that they don't exist, nor that they are not effective in their jobs."

      I see. It follows, of course, that if the way this blog is run differs from the way you think it should be run, that doesn't mean Our Gracious Host is doing a poor job, right?

      "...an ugly, fatuous asshole..."

      Hunh.

      Delete
    2. I have no complaint about the way the blog is run. My complaint is about its content. I dislike many things about Somerby, as revealed in his own words. YMMV

      Delete
    3. Leftists knew about the story in real time.

      Somerby was unaware because he is right wing, which is also why he pretends to ignore independent journalism, which dwarfs the audience of corporate media.

      Delete
    4. I heard about the motorcade on … gasp … Rachel Maddow.

      Delete
  6. "Our journalists are not Potemkin. They are doing their work in the manner they think it should be done."

    Potemkin journalists also do their work in the manner they think it should be done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Potemkin story is a myth invented to embarrass the Empress, Catherine the Great:

      "No, fully fake, portable cardboard villages did not exist. Modern historians agree that the famous story of Grigory Potemkin building hollow cardboard facades and moving peasants down the Dnieper River to fool Empress Catherine the Great in 1787 is a political myth and exaggeration."

      I'm pretty sure Somerby knows that because of previous use of the term Potemkin to smear journalists and blue America.

      Delete
    2. Russian disinformation.

      Delete
    3. "The Potemkin story is a myth invented to embarrass the Empress, Catherine the Great:"

      The mythical status of the origin of the term 'potemkin' is irrelevant for this discussion. It now has a standard meaning that is widely understood.

      Delete
    4. You mean "widely misunderstood". Why have fact-checkers if you don't care about the facts?

      Delete
    5. There are things that educated people understand differently than those who are uneducated (on history, for example). Such as what kind of car Hitler rode in. Why not get it right, given the chance? Arguing for the right of people to widely misunderstand something is Somerby's ongoing anti-intellectual argument against expertise of all types, such as whether MRR vaccines kill babies. The standard meaning on that depends on whether you ask a red or blue "health expert".

      Delete
    6. Vaccines didn't kill you, just made you a retard.

      Delete
    7. No, Trump says they are fatal.

      Delete
    8. Hitler rode in a Mercedes.

      Delete
    9. Hector endorsing Republican post modernism is a hoot.

      Hitler supported Porsche in developing Volkswagen. "Strength through joy" the psychopath said.

      Many American companies supported Hitler, including Ford and GM.

      Delete
    10. Ford and GM did business in a country with which the U.S. was at peace.

      Delete
    11. Ford and GM did business in a country which was raining hell and fire on all of Europe, fucker.

      Delete
  7. Somerby says:

    "When this strange event occurred, did major news orgs report the event? The answer seems to be basically no.

    Though she does cite three local D.C. TV stations, Rascouët-Paz lists only CNN, the New York Post and Forbes as national orgs which reported this event. And none of the six links she provides go to classic news reports about this peculiar event. All six links go to brief videos posted on YouTube.

    In fact, the AP did report this event, in real time, on June 8. The report includes several photos of Cheung's gonzo act of ridin' and rolling on the surface of the Pool, with the president himself aboard. "

    This sounds like coverage to me, so why does Somerby say that no major news organizations covered it? CNN, Forbes, the Washington Post are all major news organizations. Is there something special about a "classic news report" that hasn't been defined but is missing? Why is a link to video not coverage? What would be said in a report, other than that this happened?

    If Somerby is splitting hairs this finely when he complains about lack of coverage of this or that, then it is difficult to know whether there actually was no coverage or just insufficient coverage of the type and length Somerby demands, when he says nothing has appeared on a topic. It is going to be impossible to believe anything Somerby says about news coverage going forward, because he is apparently ruling out stories that did appear, by ignoring them as insufficient classic (or whatever).

    Somerby has just rendered everything he has written for the past 20 years or more, invalid, due to insufficiently defined terms about what does and does not constitute journalism, especially as the term is applied to "blue" journalists.

    What a huge waste of time and effort culminating in nothing. But perhaps that is Somerby's purpose here, illustrating that nothing means anything and thus his stance of nearly complete nihilism is justified.

    If the coating had not yet been applied to the reflecting pond and it was empty, it could not have been damaged by the motorcade. That makes this report a bit silly. I'm sure that similar motorcades have driven down streets in DC on other days. Did they drive down streets that subsequently needed to have potholes repaired and was that done? Inquiring minds want to know...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementAugust 24, 2026 at 10:41 AM

      "If the coating had not yet been applied to the reflecting pond..."

      You read none of the articles?

      Delete
    2. Apparently not. Reading the articles BEFORE the arrest of Hearn for damaging the pools, before there was any controversy about anything, wouldn't cause the detail about whether the pool had been repainted yet or not to stick in one's mind. Note that Somerby didn't even remember seeing the article at all.

      And no, I didn't go back and re-read them after Somerby discovered them, so I missed the timing detail.

      Delete
  8. Hitler didn’t hide in a black SUV, not even in the 1930s - 1940s equivalent of an SUV. He rode, standing up, in an open car.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't tell Trump or he'll start doing that.

      Delete
    2. And that would be bad because...?

      Delete
    3. Because it would spread a disgusting odor that nobody wants to smell.

      Delete
    4. Hitler farted a lot because he was a vegetarian.

      Delete
  9. Somerby asks why no journalists are reporting certain events when he is not busy glued to Fox.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thousands in northwest Indiana still without power nearly two weeks after storm

    Trump FEMA says, fuck you, what are you going to do about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Donald Trump doesn't care about Black people.

      Delete
  11. Republican voters are reminding Trump they voted for him because of the racism they love, not the high cost of gas and groceries.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Somerby quislings are hilarious today.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Somerby's buyer's remorse over Trump is delightful.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Somerby may be vomiting out nonsense today but at least we get a respite from his usual whining about how Gutfeld is bad for Republican branding.

    ReplyDelete