Chozick jumps the latest shark!


Badger gets it right:
We never thought we'd see the day we finally saw last night.

We never thought we'd see the day when cable news channels passed on the chance to pretend to report on a storm.

Normally, hurricane coverage constitutes a "snow day" for cable reporters. They get to stop pretending to cover major political news. They get to tackle much simpler tasks instead.

They get to ask questions of this general type: "When you saw the roof of your house blow away, how did that make you feel?" They get to stand where the breakers crash and drag and demonstrate that the wind blows hard in a hurricane, and that it tends to rain hard.

These are among the only skills these TV stars ever master. Remarkably, they abandoned the chance to display these skills when the Trump tape took over last night.

This latest tape featuring Donald J. Trump is indeed quite unattractive. That said, it's instructive to see that our journalists think it's much more significant than all the videotape in which this same Donald J. Trump conducted his years-long birther scam.

The latest tape is an assault on the dignity of half the nation's people. The birther scam was an assault on everyone's intelligence, and on the integrity of the national discourse.

(In fairness to Donald J. Trump, the latest offensive remarks were made in private. That said, the remarks are bad for all children to hear—for boys as well as for girls.)

On cable, major stars reacted instantly to the latest tape. By way of contrast, it took them years to show an interest in the ugly, monstrously stupid Donald J. Trump birther scam.

For the first year of Trump's formal candidacy, these players ignored it completely. Trump said he no longer discussed the scam. Our scribes scurried into the woods.

Why were our journalistic stars so slow to react to that monstrously stupid scam? We include the New York Times, whose front-page report on the birther scam avoided some very basic questions. (Did Donald J. Trump ever send investigators to Hawaii? Did they ever report that they were shocked by what they had found? Or was Donald J. Trump just lying all along?)

Why were our journalistic stars so slow to react to that monstrously stupid scam? It seems to us that the answer is simple:

Our mainstream press corps is itself deeply sunk in The Culture of Phony and Stupid. Starting with the New York Times, our upper-end mainstream news orgs have promoted this culture for decades. (In 1993, Katherine Boo warned the world about this trend, calling it "Creeping Dowdism.")

Career liberals have agreed not to notice or complain, but the Culture of Stupid has dominated the New York Times roughly forever. The Culture of Dissembling has also played a key role at these big "news orgs."

This may explain why the New York Times showed remarkably little interest in that very basic question: Was Donald J. Trump, the birther king, just lying that whole time?

Yesterday, the Blitzers scrambled to react to the latest tape. The videotape which they had acquired did show an extremely unattractive side of Trump. But we'll take a wild guess:

Trump's behavior on that tape is much more common than the conduct he displayed when he made himself king of the birthers. It's just that people like Blitzer actually know about topics like sex, or about the power of such topics, while they don't have the slightest interest in the integrity of the national discourse.

People like Blitzer have made a joke of that discourse for decades. In this regard, they were deeply engaged in Trumpism long before Candidate Trump came along. For that reason, Trump's clowning in the birther days seemed like old hat to them. They had clowned in a million such ways long before Trump ran his scam.

Should Trump's (private) conversation with Billy Bush have provoked such giant coverage? We're going to say that's a matter of judgment, although the banter in which they engaged was extremely unattractive.

That said, Trump's earlier array of scams constituted attacks on the basic integrity of the American discourse. But so what? Our press corps quit on that discourse long ago, a fact they've demonstrated a thousand ways, almost always under the cover of career liberal silence.

This morning, Amy Chozick has jumped the latest shark in the New York Times. That said, her account of Hillary Clinton's speeches will excite little attention. Career liberals all understand that they mustn't notice such things.

We may review that latest shark-jump on Monday. Meanwhile, the analysts came to us yesterday with a question about Emily Badger.

"Who is Emily Badger?" they asked. "And how did she get that intelligent piece into the New York Times?"

As best we can tell, Badger—a 2003 Northwestern graduate—is brand new to the Times. Her highly intelligent piece concerns the concept of "implicit bias."

(We did think it was perhaps a little bit snarky towards Pence.)

We read it yesterday on page A18 of our hard-copy Times. That said, Nexis doesn't seem to know that the piece exists. Nor is it included by the Times in the "Today's Paper" listing for Friday, despite the fact that it's right there on A18.

At the Times site, you have to go to the Upshot blog to find Badger's piece. Yesterday, it jumped out at us as we read the paper because it was so intelligent, and thus so unlike the Times.

"Careful, Badger!" one analyst cried. "You managed to sneak this past the eds. But they aren't likely to tolerate such insolence in the future."

(With apologies to Jackie Calmes, whose work always strikes us as sane.)


  1. Plus, there's the real issue of all the stuff Clinton said about millennials and third-party voters, the idea for Wall Street to self-regulate, and more.

    The hurricane? None of the reporters would have gone to Haiti anyway, with nearly 1,000 dead and counting, and some of that surely due to shoddy post-earthquake housing courtesy the Clinton Foundation.

  2. For Bob it was Birtherism, for me it was the Central Park Five. Whatever, his candidacy was a bad joke that got out of hand. Let us applaud the Republicans who refused to go along and stuck to it. If we can help them rebuild a credible national party, let's help them.

    1. You're an idiot. Let's applaud your titanic ignorance.

    2. Let's ignore douches who can't really respond but only insult. See if you can think of a handle, half wit, then come and play with the grown ups.

    3. For Bob it was Birtherism, for me it was the Central Park Five.

      For me it was the fact that the Republican Party and their media enablers want to establish a plutocracy in which the rich own everything of value and everyone else is a de facto slave.



    4. ummm the plutocracy has already been established duh. look around we are slaves. the two candidates are fighting to lead it. duh.

    5. So long as they're still letting the slaves vote, I always vote against the party that proposes the biggest tax cuts for plutocrats. In my lifetime that has always been the Republicans. They make the decision easy every time.

  3. Bob is usually on target but this time he is way off base. Yes, the MSM should have done a much better job addressing Trump's birther past and should have hounded him about those investigators and what they found, and they should have done so to the point where it could have possibly put a halt to his campaign. That's a great point to make but Bob seems to think this current scandal doesn't rise to the level of Trump's birher past. That's a ridiculous point to attempt to make. Bob seems to think this current scandal is a typical sex scandal, and in framing it that way it's another way to criticize the press because, undeniably, the press has a history of prioritizing sex scandals above all other more substantive scandals. If this were a typical sex scandal Bob would be right but this isn't a typical sex scandal.

    "Trump's behavior on tape is much more common than the conduct he displayed when he made himself king of the birthers."

    Bob doesn't outright say so but he seems to be framing this scandal as a private discussion involving lewd and base comments. That's not what this scandal is about. The crux of this scandal is Trump saying "I don't even wait..." and "Grab them by the p____y." Those aren't lewd comments. That's a description of sexual assault and that certainly is NOT common. Bob doesn't seem to know what the actual controversy is about, or at least he makes no attempt to let us readers know he understands the controversy. A typical political sex scandal doesn't usually involve criminal acts. Trump was saying his celebrity status gave him the right to commit sexual assault on women. This is one case where the MSM is actually giving a Trump scandal the attention it deserves. And in case Bob still doesn't understand this, maybe he should look at how almost everyone outside of the MSM is spontaneously reacting to this. The average person seems to understand that this scandal is about a presidential candidate bragging about sexual assault. Sure, some of the Trump's other scandals probably should have risen to the same level of outrage but Bob shouldn't downplay this current scandal in an attempt to make a larger point.

    1. IMHO Republican leaders are "sickened" not by Trump's vulgarity or sexism, but rather by the thought that Conservative voters might sit this one out, or even worse, tar them with the same brush.

    2. Bob seems to have trouble understanding the concept of "consent."

    3. You are correct, it is beyond simply talking dirty.

  4. There's enough blame for Trump to go around.

  5. Urgent Xmas Love Spell That Work Fast On How To Get Your Ex, Husband, Wife Back
    My life became devastated when my husband sent me packing, after 8 years that we have been together. I was lost and helpless after trying so many ways to make my husband take me back. One day at work, i was absent minded not knowing that my boss was calling me, so he sat and asked me what its was all about i told him and he smiled and said that it was not a problem. I never understand what he meant by it wasn't a problem getting my husband back, he said he used a spell to get his wife back when she left him for another man and now they are together till date and at first i was shocked hearing such thing from my boss. He gave me an email address of the great spell caster who helped him get his wife back, i never believed this would work but i had no choice that to get in contact with the spell caster which i did, and he requested for my information and that of my husband to enable him cast the spell and i sent him the details, but after two days, my mom called me that my husband came pleading that he wants me back, i never believed it because it was just like a dream and i had to rush down to my mothers place and to my greatest surprise, my husband was kneeling before me pleading for forgiveness that he wants me and the kid back home, then i gave Happy a call regarding sudden change of my husband and he made it clear to me that my husband will love me till the end of the world, that he will never leave my sight. Now me and my husband is back together again and has started doing pleasant things he hasn't done before, he makes me happy and do what he is suppose to do as a man without nagging. Please if you need help of any kind, kindly contact Happy for help and you can reach him via email: you can also call him or add him on whats-app +2348133873774