WHERE THE CHALLENGES ARE: Where the con games are!

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2016

Part 2—Four paths to denigration:
Even as we worked on this series, the New York Times published a front-page report concerning the educational challenges confronting the Bridgeport, Connecticut schools.

We were struck by several aspects of that front-page report. We drew a general conclusion:

Even as we face educational challenges within our public schools, we face daunting journalistic challenges concerning the way our public schools get portrayed, discussed, reported.

What was "wrong" with that front-page report? It started with a derogatory, yet highly familiar, portrait of Bridgeport's pitiful students. It also suggested an obvious question—a question which went unmentioned.

The derogatory portrait of Bridgeport's students was almost wholly anecdotal. Here's how that front-page report began:
HARRIS AND HUSSEY (9/12/16): The two Connecticut school districts sit side by side along Long Island Sound. Both spend more than the national average on their students. They prepare their pupils for the same statewide tests. Their teachers, like virtually all the teachers in the state, earn the same high marks on evaluations.

That is where the similarities end: In Fairfield, a mostly white suburb where the median income is $120,000, 94 percent of students graduate from high school on time. In Bridgeport, the state's most populous and one of its poorest cities, the graduation rate is 63 percent. Fifth graders in Bridgeport, where most people are black or Hispanic, often read at kindergarten level, one of their teachers recently testified during a trial over school funding inequities.
Do fifth-grade students in Bridgeport, Connecticut "often" read at kindergarten level?

It all depends on what the meaning of "often" is! At any rate, that's what one teacher said!

That anecdotal portrait was good enough for the second paragraph of a news report on the front page of the Times. It painted a very familiar portrait of those pitiful black and Hispanic kids.

Middle-class subscribers have been exposed to that familiar portrait at least since the 1960s. They encounter the same portrait when Donald J. Trump offers his hyperbolic account of life in today's "inner city."

(Key difference: When Trump offers his hyperbolic account, it's treated as the latest example of his ugly racism. When the New York Times presents such an account, it's regarded as the soul of our empathetic education reporting.)

Do fifth-grade students in Bridgeport, Connecticut "often" read at kindergarten level? The statement is so imprecise that it has no real meaning. Let's try to work from some actual data instead.

Based on data compiled by Stanford's Sean Reardon, it looks to us like the average student in Bridgeport is something like two years below traditional grade level when he or she enters the sixth or seventh grade. The average student in nearby, affluent Fairfield will be something like two years above grade level.

That's a very large "achievement gap"—a very large gap between the kids in Bridgeport and their peers in Fairfield. That said, we were struck by the fact that the New York Times never used Reardon's actual data, which the paper had presented and tried to discuss just four months before.

Instead, the Times offered a derogatory, anecdotal account which painted Bridgeport's black and Hispanic kids in the least flattering light.

That said, we were struck by something else as we read that front-page report. We were stuck by the presence of a large dog—a dog which didn't bark that day, and pretty much never will.

An obvious question popped into our heads as we read that report: Given the astonishing achievement gap portrayed by that front-page report, how could the Common Core, or any set of "grade-level standards," possibly be relevant to the kids in both those school systems?

Think of it! In one of these school systems, students in the fifth grade "often read at kindergarten level." (In other words, they can't read at all.) Later, we're told that "[s]ome students arrive at [Bridgeport's] Harding High School reading at a third-grade level." That vague, anecdotal report is attributed to an assistant principal.

In Bridgeport, fifth-graders "often read at kindergarten level," we were told. Beyond the high graduation rate, no attempt was made to quantify the achievement of students in Fairfield's schools. But we were told that a "yawning disparities in results" obtains between the neighboring districts.

Given those yawning disparities—given the haplessness "often" found among Bridgeport's black and Hispanic kids—how could any set of grade-level "standards" make sense for both groups of students? This must be the world's most obvious question, even if we restrict ourselves to the (roughly) four-year "achievement gap" suggested by Reardon's data.

It's a blindingly obvious question. But this basic question will never be raised in our education reporting, which often seems to be provided by the journalistic equivalent of the "Sweathogs" who came to fame in the Welcome Back, Kotter sitcom.

In truth, our education reporting often seems to come from the lovable but slowest kids in the school. Even when our brighter journalists wade into the realm of the public schools, they often seem determined to prove their lack of basic skills.

We think of this recent pro-charter essay by Jonathan Chait, in which he fails to come to terms with the possible effects of one unavoidable but obvious form of "creaming." ("The difference was spectacular," Chait writes. For what it's worth, we support the existence of well-regulated charter schools.)

We think of the Washington Post's annual attempt to draw gloomy conclusions from the decline in average SAT scores. (Even though the College Board encourages scribes to do this, this involves an obvious misuse of statistics.)

We think of the Post's persistent attempt to pretend that Washington's recent cheating scandal never occurred, and to disappear the thought that such conduct could imaginably have happened somewhere else.

We think of those well-intentioned trips to Estonia, or in this case to Denmark, in search of the secrets of the world's greatest schools. We think of endless attempts—from the left, the right and the mainstream or the center—to mangle educational statistics to "prove" some preferred partisan point.

We think of endlessly bungled education reporting in the New York Times. We think of the complete indifference observed at for-profit "progressive" sites, starting with MSNBC, whose hosts would sooner jump off the Golden Gate Bridge than discuss the needs and challenges facing low-income children in school.

It often seems the Sweathogs have been placed in charge of our education reporting! It may seem that a second group of these lovable losers has been serving in the role of our "education experts."

Our reporters and experts have a nearly unblemished track record. They seem to have missed every significant event in the operation of our public schools, including the cheating scandals which recently rocked school districts in several major cities.

On a simple technical basis, our reporters and experts may seem to be an underwhelming bunch. But more than anything else, they seem to display a potent group bias:

They love to paint derogatory portraits of our students, our teachers, our schools.

Tomorrow, we'll inquire into the possible source of this persistent bias. For today, let's list four basic sleights-of-hand at which these purveyors of gloom excel.

Let's not use the term "con games." Let's say sleights-of-hand instead:

They report the gaps, disappear the gains: Large achievement gaps persist on the NAEP, our one reliable domestic testing program. The gaps are smaller than they once were, but they're still quite large.

The persistence of these gaps is routinely reported, as is completely appropriate. What doesn't get reported?

Of course! The large score gains which help explain the persistence of these gaps!

It's true! Large achievement gaps exist between white kids and their black and Hispanic peers. But over the course of the past several decades, all three groups have shown large score gains on these highly regarded tests.

Because all three groups have shown large gains, the large gaps persist. But they persist at a higher academic level. Again and again and again and gain, this highly encouraging fact somehow goes unexplained.

Persistently, the public is told exactly half the story—the gloomier half. It should be taken as one of our journalistic challenges:

You simply can't report the gaps without reporting the gains.

They report the PISA, disappear the TIMSS: Nations of the developed world participate in two international testing programs. American students have tended to do better on the TIMSS, less well on the PISA.

For whatever reason, our education reporters tend to tell exactly half the story—the gloomier half. They tend to report results from the PISA, disappear the TIMSS.

It should be taken as a journalistic challenge. Absent some sort of explanation, you can't report results from the PISA while ignoring results from the TIMSS.

They disaggregate the NAEP, give aggregate scores from the PISA: Quite routinely, our education reporters "disaggregate" results from the NAEP, as is completely appropriate. They tell us how our black and Hispanic kids performed as compared to their white counterparts.

Although the data are available, this is virtually never done when reporting international tests. This deprives the American public of extremely basic information. For reasons we'll explain by the end of the week, it also tends to reinforce preferred gloomy tales about our international standing.

It ought to be adopted as a journalistic challenge. If you disaggregate scores on domestic tests, you ought to disaggregate score on international tests as well.

They won't stop flying to Finland: Over the past dozen years, education writers have persistently taken the trip to Finland, a small, middle-class, unicultural corner of Europe. Upon their return, they reliably churn preferred, gloomy tales about our pitiful teachers and schools.

In part 4 of this week's series, we'll take a final look at the foolishness of this ubiquitous practice. It ought to be a journalistic challenge:

Let's stop making silly international comparisons designed to push gloomy conclusions about our teachers and schools.

Within our education reporting, there exists an obvious bias in favor of gloom-and-doom tales. Tomorrow, we'll discuss the possible sources of this obvious preference.

After that, we'll take a final look at the miracle schools of Finland, which are probably perfectly good. We'll compare test results in that distant corner of Europe to test results in two corners of North America—Massachusetts and Connecticut.

When we do, we'll disaggregate the American scores. We'll look at results from the PISA and at results from the TIMSS.

Will the trips to Finland ever end? Probably not.

The Sweathogs seem to like it there. For whatever reason, their editors seem to like their gloomy conclusions.

Tomorrow: Possible sources of mandated doom-and-gloom

18 comments:

  1. Public libraries support literacy by providing free access to children's picture books, story hours, and adult reading instruction. These are the resources needed to help parents prepare their kids for literacy before preschool and kindergarten. The libraries are also an access point for spreading info about public programs to support parents.

    All communities have seen huge decreases in funding for their public libraries over the past several decades. Hours have been cut, staff laid off, book purchase neglected in favor of digital resources.

    If we were truly committed to increasing literacy and education levels among poor people, we would have supported our libraries over the past hard times. Why don't we do that?

    I believe Somerby when he suggests that liberals are only giving lip service to some of these values.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Given the astonishing achievement gap portrayed by that front-page report, how could the Common Core, or any set of "grade-level standards," possibly be relevant to the kids in both those school systems?

    Partisans support particular issues, independently of each other. Even though educational excellence conflicts with Common Core, liberals support both.

    Another example of support for conflicting aims is the issue of Islamic migrants. Liberals, who support gay rights and women's rights, nevertheless welcome these migrants, even though most of them are homophobic misogynists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Most of them"? Do you mean, "even though they are homophobic misogynists." Because racism.

      Delete
    2. The response at 2:58 PM, illustrates my point. That commenter surely disapprove of how badly Islamic societies treat women and gays. Women have lower rights than men. Gays are punished or executed. E.g., see Muslims throwing gay people off roof while shouting "Allahu akbar" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLK5Zo4kpos

      Yet, s/he thinks it's racism for me to point this out.

      Delete
    3. David, Common Core support is non partisan. Many conservatives and liberals both support and are against Common Core. Everybody supports educational excellence. While there are instances where Common Core is inappropriate (as Bob shows), educational excellence and Common Core are not necessarily in conflict, it depends on how Common Core is utilized.

      Another example of false conflict. Liberals support people in need. Liberals support social safety nets, welfare for example, most people on welfare are white, many are homophobic misogynists. They are all supported by liberals. Conservatives think everyone should be out for themselves. We have learned over the centuries that this is a very poor philosophy for having a healthy and happy society.

      Delete
    4. 6:34 pm

      Women have lower rights in the US too. It has been slowly improving here, but it is an universal issue.

      Islamic societies do not support throwing gay people off roofs; however, muslims are not alone in their violent treatment of gays. There was the recent attack on gay people at an Orlando nightclub, which is the tip of the iceberg. Here is a list to start with:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_violence_against_LGBT_people_in_the_United_States

      Delete
    5. Anon 6:50 -- to equate the rights of gays and women in the US with their rights in Islamic societies is silly. E.g., the US is about to elect a woman President. In Saudi Arabia, women can't drive a car, wear make-up, go for a swim, open a bank account, etc. But, set this aside to get to your weakest argument.

      You cite a murderous attack on a gay club in Orlando, FL to refute my criticism of Muslims. But, this attack was perpetrated by Omar Mateen, a Muslim.

      Delete
    6. Are we not equating things?
      Good.
      How about all those countries with Universal Healthcare for the people?
      Cuba>>>>>>>>USA, per DavidinCal.

      Delete
    7. anon 9:09 -- the US has had universal healthcare since 1986, when we enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA). As a result, many people got routine medical care at the Emergency Room.

      Now, this approach provided mediocre care. But, Cuba also provides medicre care.

      Delete
    8. Try getting a mammogram at an emergency room. Not what anyone would consider "healthcare".

      Delete
    9. Is it impossible for you to post anything without lying?

      EMTALA provides hospital ER access for emergency examination and stabilization, not routine medical care. See www.cms.gov.

      Cuba's provision of medical care, physician training, and surgical protocol is so "medicre" that it has exported its institutional expertise and medical care throughout the world for decades and despite decades of harsh US-imposed sanctions.

      Finally, your Islamophobia conflates the likes of Omar Mateen with "most" of the 1.57 billion Muslims that inhabit 223 countries. You conflate the institutional misogyny of Saudi Arabia with the 232 countries and territories inhabited by Muslims, including 57 countries that have a Muslim majority. You ignore the obvious and pronounced discrimination and misogyny - both institutional and individually - by non-Muslim countries and religions.

      All this rank dishonesty to promote your racist, nationalistic hatred of progressives in what is ostensibly a progressive blog instead of the blogs of your fellow travelers.

      Your hate and rage is duly noted.

      Commenters @ 9:09, 6:50, 6:41, & 2:58, your generosity is noted, but you're wasting your courtesy on this hater.

      Delete
    10. 10:36 I know that Emergency rooms were, in practice, used for routine medical care, because my wife saw the patients with her own eyes at University Hospital in Newark, NJ, where she was on the faculty.

      Cuba's structure for providing care may be a good one, but they don't always provide as good care as we do, because they're poorer. One should distinguish laws providing access to medical care vs. actual medical care provided.

      You reject Mateen as being typical of Muslims. Of course, I didn't say he was. I said he was a poor example for some other Anon to use in order to argue that Muslims aren't biased against gays.

      But, your more general argument is that with Muslims being 23% of the world, a few examples are inadequate. That's true. But, I cannot list thousands of examples here in the Comment box. If you're seriously interested, go to this link https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=muslim%20homophobia%20statistics, and read some of the articles.

      Delete
    11. Muslims biased against gays = bad.
      Conservatives biased against gays = Heartland of America.

      Delete
    12. David, Orlando is not a poor example. You are unaware that you were arguing about Islamic societies. Mateen was an American, raised in the USA, born and bred. Also you ignore how Orlando is just the tip of the iceberg. Indeed it is your arguments that are poor, consisting of misinformation born from bad intentions.

      Delete
  3. Re: Troll at 2:03 PM - yet another illustration that although knowledge has limits, ignorance and arrogance has no limits.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Powerful and real love spell to get your ex gf back stop your bf from cheating on you also work fast Me and my boyfriend were together for 8 months & its been 6 months since we separated. I still love him, but some how feel its unfair. Why love someone who ovb doesnt love you back? Ive prayed & prayed for these months & nothing. He is still with his new girlfriend(whom he lives with) but it doesnt mean I have to look for help The first weeks after the break up I was in my knees praying looking for help, them i fine a comment online how a spell caster help to restored relationship get ex lover back, ” so i decided to give a try coz i love my boyfriend so much. so i contacted Dr happy tell him all my problem and he gave me 100%guarantee that i will have my boyfriend back after the spell so i was gifted and lucky to have contacted him i did every thing he ask of me and to my greatest surprise a day after the spell my boyfriend call me and apology for what he did to me and ask for my forgiveness to come back home for me, I get really hurt & go through those moments in which he left me after all Dr happy did for me, i forgive him and he come back home with more love and happiness all thanks to Dr happy the real Africa spell caster who help to bring ex lover back, restored broken relationship and marriage. plz if you need any help contact him on happylovespell2@gmail.com. You see in conclusion you have to just trust the process, Dr happy is a good real spell caster so call him or add him on whats-app +2348133873774 Jennifer Marian Base in Texas Usa

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of the easiest decision I have ever made was when I accepted to get married to a man I thought was my soul mate, my lover for 2yrs. He was the most handsome and honest man I have ever encountered, he was so kind respectful to me and my entire family. He gave me the reason to spend my entire life with him. I enjoyed 3yrs of love and sweet romance as his wife before the devil came into our home, his ex-girlfriend worked voodoo on him, she made him show me the bad side of him and also caused our divorce. The most annoying part was when she tried to take my life spiritually and physically, fighting to ensure am thoroughly erased from my husband before she takes over. It was getting tensed till the extent that I couldn’t sleep both day and night because she must be there to trouble me.
    Story short, I used the only available options left which was Dr. Wakina @ {dr.wakinalovetemple@gmail.com} before I lose everything including my life. Dr. Wakina was the last option because every other sources failed and his love spell worked wonders after 7days which saw the evil lady flee from us with immediate effect, the divorce case was reconciled within days as well.
    Since after the spell, I finally knew how to treat wicked and jealous people and a whole new lot of thing from Dr. Wakina. Happiness and joy has been in abundance in my family for the past 8months after the love spell. Thanks to dr. wakina’s love spell that works wonders {dr.wakinalovetemple@gmail.com}.

    ReplyDelete