Maddow embellishes past embellishment!

FRIDAY, MARCH 31, 2017

The story keeps getting better:
At this point, no serious person will be surprised by Rachel Maddow's embellishments. Embellishment has become a basic feature of Maddowism.

Still, it's worth noting when the former Rhodes Scholar decides to embellish a prior embellishment, as she did last night.

Michael Flynn was the topic at hand. Soon, we liberals were thrilling to this report, in which Maddow embellished her prior embellishments with regard to Flynn and the Turkish government:
MADDOW (3/30/17): By the time Mike Flynn had come on board the Trump campaign, investigative reporters like Michael Isikoff were already at the Republican National Convention here asking about that trip to Russia, asking whether he'd been paid by the Russian government for making that appearance. It has since emerged, incidentally, that Mike Flynn was paid tens of thousands of dollars in addition to a free, all-expenses paid trip to Moscow for himself and his son in exchange for showing up at that gala and sitting next to Putin. In addition to that money from the Russian government media, government-supported media outlet RT, in addition to that money, he also received two other five-figure payments from two other Russian companies after he was fired from the Defense Intelligence Agency. But nevertheless, the Trump campaign brought him on board.

By Election Day, it was clear that General Flynn was on the payroll of another foreign government. He was on the payroll of the government of Turkey while he was advising the Trump campaign. Now, he was not registered as a foreign agent, but it was widely reported that he was, that he was, he was taking money from a foreign government—from Turkey—to advance that country's interests in the United States while he was simultaneously advising the Trump campaign.

I mean, one of the unexplained things, one of the things that the official announcement about him just makes no sense, right? One of the things that doesn't make sense about Mike Flynn is how on earth he made it through the vetting process in the first place to become national security adviser, right? After the trip to Russia with those undisclosed payments by RT and by Russian firms, with the then-undisclosed work as the agent of another government, he was taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from the government of Turkey and actively working to promote that government`s interest in the United States, while the administration was supposedly vetting him to be national security adviser?

He's an unregistered foreign agent, getting paid all that—I mean, they didn't pick that up in the vetting?

It wasn't hard to vet that about him. It was like lots of news stories about it. I mean, that didn't trip any wires from him? That has never made any sense. It's never made any sense.

Then he gets into the job, then he becomes national security adviser.
Previously on the Maddow Show, Maddow has routinely claimed that Flynn "was on the payroll of the government of Turkey" last fall. Last night, she embellished that prior inaccurate claim, saying this had been "widely reported" in "like lots of news stories about it" as of Election Day, or at least as of mid-November.

In fact, we know of no one other than Maddow who has ever claimed that Flynn "was on the payroll of the government of Turkey." Regarding Maddow's new claim, we find no sign that there were any "news stories" making that claim last November (or ever), let alone "lots of such news stories."

We've sometimes told you that Maddow reminds us of Donald J. Trump just a bit. We're generally thinking of her vast self-absorption when we say that.

Now, though, consider this:

Back in the day, Trump claimed there were dozens of news reports describing his opposition to the war in Iraq. No such news report was ever found.

Last night, Maddow played a similar game. She claimed there were "lots of news stories" as of last November reporting that Flynn was on the Turkish government payroll. We can find no such reports at all.

What makes Maddow want to embellish her past embellishments? And by the way, one final thought:

Ain't partisan corporate news grand?

Here's what was being said: What was being said about Flynn and Turkey last fall? Here's what the Post editorial board said when Trump named Flynn as his national security tsar:
WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL (11/19/16): Mr. Trump's choice of Mr. Flynn also raises questions of temperament and conflict of interest. The general was reportedly not renewed in his DIA post because of bad management; since then he has accepted payment from the Russian propaganda network RT, and his consulting firm has lobbied for a businessman close to Turkey's autocratic president. His arrival at the White House, and that of Mr. Pompeo at the CIA, could trigger the last thing the incoming president should want: an exodus of the seasoned and capable personnel needed to construct a workable foreign policy.
That's what was being said last fall. The editors chose to make an accurate statement. Maddow has taken the more thrilling road.

The editors didn't like the selection of Flynn. They also didn't make the inaccurate claim Maddow keeps bruiting around.

Last night, she embellished her previous inaccurate claim. She said it was being widely said back then, presumably by folk like the Washington Post.

It wasn't being said back then. Ain't corporate cable exciting?

11 comments:

  1. Creeping Dowdism.
    "It was widely reported"
    It was widely reported in Georgetown cocktail parties, that is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So, when Manafort launders money for a Russian businessman and oligarch who is one of Putin's closest associates, Manafort has no connection to Putin. Somerby thinks these arms length arrangements really create distance, enough to deny what is going on. Was Somerby born yesterday?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep digging for that pony.

      Delete
  3. As two crooks are hauled off to jail we must ask, "Who got Bridgegate right, Bob or Rachel?" It would seem to be the latter. As a truely evil nutecase heads our Executive Branch, good to know Bob is always on the case against the true threat to our Country, Rachel Maddow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave the Guitar PlayerApril 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM

      Just because Rachel guesses right now and again doesn't make her a good source for information. If she truly cared, she would wait for the facts to come out before she spread around her "news".

      Delete
  4. And good to know you are on the case against him. God knows our millionaire commentariat need to be protected from criticism in these dark times. Fucking moron.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey asshat, Bob has no problem keeping the millionaires at Fox safe.

      Delete
  5. There is no lie too big for the corporate-owned media. Didn't the "We don't know why they voted for Trump, but we're sure it wasn't bigotry" lie prove that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think Bob is incorrect in regards Flynn / Turkey news reports.

    There were reports aplenty. Its another thing that the Corporate media did not pursue and highlight. My tweet on the subject at THAT time was due the news reports.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My husband and I have been married for 3 and a half years. In June it will be 7 years that we have been a part of each other lives. Recently he found out about a guy I slept with when we were separated and I did not tell him about. Before we got married we both agreed to let everything out and start fresh. I didn’t tell him. I was embarrassed bc the guy and I never actually had sex…just everything that led up to it. not to mention it was my brothers best friend and a huge mistake. well it came out recently along with some lies. A friend told my husband I cheated on him and I have never cheated on my husband nor would I ever. He is convinced I am a cheater. we have 2 beautiful kids and all I have ever wanted is a happy family. my kids and my husband truly are my everything. I can not see a future where my husband is not in it. I want to do whatever I can to save my marriage but I feel my husband is already set on the divorce. I know I could have been a better wife to him….a wife he deserves but now I fee like I have realized it too late. I look at my kids and I hate myself for allowing myself to break my family apart. I know my husband is not perfect and he has hurt me tremendously these past 5 years we have been off and on but we made it through for a reason. I love him and I want to save my marriage, one day a friend of my introduce me to a spell caster online who lift me up gave me hope and with-in 2 days after his spell my husband who told me he needed a divorce, called me and take me back home to me i must say today we are happily as one big family again all thanks to Dr happy a father and a real spell caster.Contact email address happylovespell2@gmail.com Call and Whats-App him +2348133873774 Also contact and know more about his service at http://happyspelltemple.webs.com/

    ReplyDelete
  8. REUNITE YOUR MARRIAGE, RELATIONSHIP,SUCCESSFUL LOTTERY SPELL RESULTS, CURE ALL KINDS OF DISEASE AND WEAK ERECTION

    Stop asking for another chance, stop questioning what you could have done differently, and – most importantly – stop second-guessing your own self-worth. Once you Come Back To My Spell is performed, the balance of desire will shift and your lover will be begging you to take him or her back. This Love Spell Could Work For You!Bring back the good times. Think about the happiest time in your relationship, and i can make it happen again. You deserve to be happy.

    Are you looking for ultimate spells that works effectively same time on your problems, ranges from Love spells, marriage spells, and carrier related problems, witchcraft spells, charms, portion, talismans, magical oils / powders, protection, legal court cases, business prosperity spell, Gay and lesbian extreme love / attraction spells, women of the night Norton accruing powders and oil for extreme ecstasy and protection with in working ordeals.

    My powerful lottery spells, will bring you the huge wins, and jackpots you desire and need. I work my lottery spells, to bring great luck. The power of my lottery spells, works on you, so there are no special numbers needed to play, or certain patterns. Just play one ticket on the lottery of your choice, and the powerful lottery spell will handle the rest. Whether you play Power-ball, Mega Millions, daily drawings or sweepstakes. I have a powerful lottery spell, to help you. Working with my spirit guides, to clear bad luck, and infuse you with good luck and positive energy energy. The power of my lottery spells, brings luck, and wins fast. Clearing paths with-in the universe, for money and great luck to reach you. These powerful spell castings, will be successful in bringing the lottery wins, to change your life.

    Email: POTENTIALSPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM

    OR


    POTENTIALSPELLTEMPLE@YAHOO.COM

    ReplyDelete