THE WAY WE ARE: Hopelessly devoted to "Them!"

FRIDAY, MARCH 3, 2017

Part 4—The concept of some versus all:
On Thursday, February 23, the New York Times' Nicholas Kristof made a set of deeply offensive statements.

Most horrifically, he seemed to say that Those People, the 63 million Trump voters, aren't all exactly alike! We liberals saw this as fake news.

The 63 million people in question aren't all "hateful bigots," the columnist strangely said. (They aren't all "bigoted unthinking lizard brains," he offensively suggested at another point.)

Kristof even said that liberals shouldn't "stereotype" the 63 million as "misogynist bigots." He said we shouldn't "demonize" the 63 million, or even engage in "name-calling!"

At one point, the offensive journalist even claimed that millions of those Trump voters could be won by Democrats in future elections. As evidence in support of these claims, he cited friends of his from his lower-class hometown of Yamhill, Oregon.

According to Kristof, he thinks his friends were "profoundly wrong" in deciding to vote for Trump. But he described Them as "well-meaning people"—and he even said that we liberals have tended to "otherize" such rustics.

The 63 million aren't all alike? Plainly, this was offensive speech. We liberals fought back, the very next day, with three letters in the Times.

We think those letters help us see The War We (liberals actually) Are.

Throw away our reams of self-praise, which we tend to juxtapose with the insults we aim at The Others. Instead of listening to our self-praise, look at the other things we say and do. In our view, those three letters to the Times help display The Way We Are.

They help display how dumb we liberals (frequently) are. They help display how much we love to demonize and stereotype The Others, preferably in very large groups, millions of Them at a time.

Yesterday, we looked at the first two letters of protest which appeared in the Times. In the first letter, the writer agreed that we shouldn't demonize, stereotype and name-call Trump voters. He then proceeded to do little else all through the rest of his missive.

In the second letter, the writer quickly agreed with Kristof. "Clearly," the 63 million are "not all bigots," she said.

Despite this instant admission, the writer said she can't understand why Kristof thinks We should "be magnanimous" to Them. Let us suggest that she was stumped by a simple distinction—the distinction between "some" and "all."

In his column, Kristof explicitly said that some Trump voters really are racists or bigots. ("Yes, the Trump camp includes some racists and other bigots.") He simply said that isn't true of all.

At first glance, this might seem like the simplest distinction on Earth. But when we humans get our loathing freak on, we flee, in remarkably stupid ways, from this simplest of all distinctions.

When we decide to otherize, we cease to think in terms of "some." We insist on thinking in terms of All. We happily take 63 million people and say they're all just alike.

The first letter-writer was quickly explaining what all Trump voters know and believe. This is a very dumb thing to do, but at highly partisan times like these, we tribals instinctively do it.

The second letter writer explicitly said that They aren't all bigots Over There. But even as she made this admission, she instantly lost the thread.

We humans! When we put our tribal shoes on, we long to demonize The Others, preferably in very large groups. We long to say that the members of our tribe are good and smart (full stop), and that the members of their tribe are very bad and stupid.

This unintelligent manner of thinking is wired in our lizard brains. Prehistory bred this in the bone. This thinking was once a survival skill. Today, it's simply ugly and dumb, and it washes all through our low-IQ, self-impressed liberal culture.

We liberals love to loathe The Others, preferably in large groups. Consider the way the third letter-writer responded to Kristof's suggestions.

"What is truth?" Pontius Pilate once said. The third letter was just one sentence long, but its writer played Pilate as he sought to undermine Kristof:
LETTER TO THE NEW YORK TIMES (2/24/17): Assuming that one were inclined to give economically stressed Trump voters a pass, I wonder what justification Nicholas Kristof would attribute to those who voted for Donald Trump who were middle class, wealthy or super-wealthy other than bigotry and greed.
Despite its brevity, that letter is very dumb. It's also filled with insinuations, designed to undermine the suggestions that Kristof directed at Us.

More to the point, the letter seeks to undermine Kristof himself. The writer is willing to assume, perhaps for argument's sake, that Kristof imaginably might have a point about low-income Trump voters. But what would he say about middle-class voters? our own Pilate skillfully asks.

What would Kristof say about middle-class voters? We have no idea! We would say that they aren't all alike—that this self-impressed hater should go and speak to such voters, if he's so curious, and assess them one at at time.

Our own Pilate seems to think he's found the flaw in Kristof's holier-than-Us presentation. We'll give Kristof the low-income voters, he says, but aha! He didn't mention the many Trump voters who are better off!

In one fell swoop, this writer accomplishes two tasks. He undermines the offensive person who failed to kiss the hem of his tribe's flowing robes. Even better, he gives us a way to continue to loathe The Others en masse, tens of millions of Trump voters at a time.

(We can't loathe 63 million? he says. Can we loathe 43 million?)

We humans love to loathe The Others in very large groups. This loathing has been a large part of liberal culture for as long as we ourselves have been alive. (Hooray for Hollywood! Examples below.)

People like these letter writers may be unaware of those facts. But everyone else can see The Way We Are. The Others have known this about Us for a long time. In recent years, our loathing is getting more obvious.

In closing, might we briefly work the numbers in one part of Kristof's brief? We refer to the third part of his column, in which he made these offensive political claims:
KRISTOF (2/23/17): Yes, a majority of Trump voters are probably unattainable for Democrats, but millions may be winnable. So don’t blithely give up on 63 million people; instead, make arguments directed at them. Fight for their votes not with race-baiting but with economic pitches for the working and middle classes.

Clinton’s calling half of Trump voters “deplorables” achieved nothing and probably cost her critical votes. Why would Democrats repeat that mistake?
Are millions of Trump voters "winnable" in future elections? In perhaps his ugliest moment, that's what Kristof said.

The three letter-writers all blew past this offensive statement—an offensive claim which seeks to keep us from insulting The Others en masse. But if you want to win elections, consider how the numbers work.

As Kristof says, a majority of Trump voters are probably unattainable. Those people are Republican voters. They vote that way every time, as do many Dems.

That said, let's imagine that as few as ten percent of Trump voters are "winnable." Imagine what would have happened if Candidate Clinton had won only half those voters last November—had flipped only five percent of Trump's 63 million voters.

Go to this site and do the math. (Warning: Math is hard.) Here's what you may find:

Clinton would have won Michigan by roughly 250,000 votes. She would have won Wisconsin by maybe 120,000 votes.

She would have won Pennsylvania by 250,000. She would have won Florida by 360,000. She would have squeezed through in North Carolina. She even might have won Georgia.

Is five percent a lot of votes to flip? We have no idea. Beyond that, there are other ways to change election results.

Flipping votes from R to D is only one way for Democrats to gain. Dems can also gain by increasing blue voter turnout and depressing turnout among red voters. With that in mind:

One of these times, the Bernie and Nader Bros will perhaps stop hugging defeat and disaster. The black assistant professor crowd may stop telling black voters to stay home based on random, one-time remarks from the mid-1990s.

One of these times, the Hollywood crowd will rein themselves in long enough to stop costing Democrats votes. Susan Sarandon will stop telling folks that it would be better for Trump to win. The rest of the A-team will put a lid on their masterful skill at losing votes through unfortunate jokes.

Still and all, Kristof was making a sensible suggestion about our tribe's persistent, stupid name-calling. Aside from the fact that our sweeping claims are factually wrong, couldn't this be a way to lose votes among those who are winnable?

Inquiring minds might want to know! At times like these, we tribals don't have such minds. Our lizard brains prefer to loathe. We tend to prefer it to winning.

At highly partisan times like these, our lizard brains instruct us to loathe The Others en masse. Over here in the liberal world, we've been inclined to behave this way for a good many years.

Those three letter-writers all sought ways to "keep name-calling alive." It's been an unfortunate part of our "liberal" culture at least since the 1950s.

The Others have their own orgs now. More and more, it's become easy for The Others, and for people around them, to see what we can't see about ourselves—to see The Way We Are.

Hooray for Hollywood: For extra credit, review the 1950s films of William Inge, in which the white working class in the flyover states all turn out to be secretly nuts. Suggestions: Picnic, Splendor in the Grass. We especially recommend Rosalind Russell's crazy meltdown in Picnic. Everyone was nuts in the states where They live.

Also, try the 1950s films in which the white working class all turn out to be nuts as long as they live in the South. Strongly suggested: Baby Doll. Also, try God's Little Acre.

We've tended to do this forever. More and more, The Others have started to notice The Way We Are, even if We ourselves remain a bit barefoot and clueless.

20 comments:

  1. If any proportion of Trump voters were winnable, Clinton would have won them. She did her best to represent her views and present her policies and plans. There was no lack of information available about her and her accomplishments and abilities. It was all out there for any Trump voter to find.

    Those potentially winnable voters chose Trump instead. That does say something about them and their priorities.

    I would not have Clinton turn herself into any semblance of Trump or Sanders in order to "win" those who didn't choose her. She compromised as much as she could.

    Somerby's demands are unreasonable. No one thinks Trump voters are all alike or that they didn't have reasons for their votes or that they don't think of themselves as good people. We do think they made the wrong choice, probably for the wrong reasons, and in so doing they did a bad thing that is already hurting people in our country. They are to blame for their votes and they own them. We don't have to call them "The Other" in order for that to be true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Anderson for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4 pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem. email: drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.

      1) Love Spells
      2) Lost Love Spells
      3) Divorce Spells
      4) Marriage Spells
      5) Binding Spell.
      6) Breakup Spells
      7) Banish a past Lover
      8.) You want to be promoted in your office/ Lottery spell
      9) want to satisfy your lover
      Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution
      through drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com

      Delete
  2. I agree that we should do our best not to demean people. I let their actions speak for themselves. However, why don't we ask the question of the opposition as well. Why do they demean "Hollywood" liberals and alleged elites on the coasts? The question can fairly be asked why do some people clearly vote against their economic interests and don't understand it when they do. Why do many of them blame the government for all of their problems and believe that someone on a white horse will come along, snap their fingers and make everything all better? So, while we on the left are not blameless, I believe many on the other side are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can you not demean a Hollywood blowhard who opposes a wall and lives behind several layers of walls and gates and armed guards?

      Delete
    2. 8:14 those Hollywood blowhards live behind walls to protect themselves and their mostly immigrant staff from mostly white fanboys.

      Delete
    3. "How can you not demean a Hollywood blowhard who opposes a wall and lives behind several layers of walls and gates and armed guards?"

      Easy-peasey. Like this: "Typical Conservative, always disparaging successful business people."

      Delete
  3. People felt Clinton didn't care about them and their situations.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob,
    I can't believe you left out the blockbuster "No Down Payment"!

    ReplyDelete
  5. David in CA is an Other, but, from this day forward, I vow, I shall not loathe him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The way I read it, Somerby's not saying Clinton should've done more to win those Trump votes; he's saying we Clinton VOTERS could've done more to persuade them. If my facebook feed during the election were any indication, I saw many of my liberal friends doing more harm than good in that regard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob says "Dems can also gain by increasing blue voter turnout", this is correct, this is all Democratics need to do, and by small numbers, just 70k votes in those three states. We also should support the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

      Maryland's new excellent representative Jamie Raskin gave testimony at a House hearing (skip ahead to 40 minutes in):

      https://www.c-span.org/video/?419632-1/congressional-forum-focuses-future-electoral-college

      There is no evidence Trump voters could be persuaded to vote Democratic. Bob's joke is a poor one "Flipping votes from R to D is only one way for Democrats to gain".

      Also Bob's third idea is indefensible "depressing turnout among red voters". Democratics in no way want to suppress any voters. Studies indicate Americans support Democratic policies over Republican policies, that aside, Democratics support full voter turnout.

      Delete
  7. I see this as part of a long chain of ways people have used in order to feel superior to others. In my youth, Polish jokes were popular in the US. The Pole did or said something so dumb, it was funny. And, there were blonde jokes along the same line. In fact, there were similar jokes about a woman, who was incompetent in some way. And, of course, jokes about African Americans. In England, they tell (or used to tell) Irish jokes that were similar to the Us's Polish jokes. More recently, there were Southerner jokes and jokes about country bumpkins. Of course, all these jokes would be considered bigoted, non-PC, and unacceptible today.

    But, if liberals can't look down on all these groups, how are they going to feel superior? Fortunately for them, Trump and his followers came along just in time. Liberals should be grateful that there are still people they're allowed to feel superior to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blanche Knott was politically incorrect and I do remember those Polish jokes. MEANWHILE, you just stereotyped all liberals, and Bob does too. David in Cal, you rarely make a good point. This is one. (gamaroc)

      Delete
    2. Nice try, David. Irish jokes were told in the US, any place there were lots of Irish people. I heard them from other immigrants about the Irish.

      Finding devices for feeling superior is needed by people who are not actually superior, who confront ego slights. When people are superior, they don't need to do this because their egos are not being assaulted by the daily problems that arise when you are inferior and confronted by your own inferiority.

      There are studies showing the liberals earn more money, have better, jobs, are better educated, are in better health, are less likely to get divorced, and so on. Those objective measures of superiority suggest that liberals are not as likely to engage in ego-building jokes at other people's expense.

      So much for your theory.

      Delete
  8. When are people going to protest the millions Trump is wasting by going to Mar a Lago every weekend? It isn't a suitable place to work, as witnessed by the way he turned a non-secure dining room into a situation room. It wasn't designed for the purpose of running a country. He needs to do his job and stop taking these vacations (that seem to stretch into most of Monday). It is stealing from the public!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bob continues with his epic straw man; liberals loathe Trump supporters. This is simply not true.

    David, liberals do not desire to feel superior, liberals want to use government to help those in need. Similarly Bob seems to not know what a bigot is: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

    Trump's policies, if they help anyone at all, help only the wealthy and the deplorable - the racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic people. Republicans tend to vote in their own self-interest. Why did Trump voters vote against their own interests? Maybe instead of bigots, they are just plain suckers and chumps.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "...all sought ways to "keep name-calling alive." It's been an unfortunate part of our "liberal" culture..."

    It's quite delusional not to notice how big a part name-calling has played in conservative culture. I last listened to Limbaugh in 2008 during his analysis on the notion that Hillary had a fat ass. His side now dominates government at all levels, but Bob refuses to notice.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My wife is back!!!
    My name is Albert Brown. I had a problem with my wife six months ago,which lead to us going apart. When she broke up with me,i was no longer myself,I felt so empty inside. Until a friend of mine told me about a spell caster that helped in same problem too, that she found on Web page. i emailed the spell caster and I told him my problem and I did what he asked me to briefly To cut the long story short,before i knew what was happening,not up to 48 hours,my wife text me and said she wanted to come back and so she came back to me and told me she was sorry about what has happened, she now tell me every time and every day that she loves and miss me. I'm so grateful to this great spell caster Dr Noble and i will not stop publishing his name on the Internet just for the good work he has done. If you need any help you can contact this great man he will help you any any way you want, you can email him at templeofjoyandprosperity@gmail.com i guarantee you that he will also help you okay

    ReplyDelete
  12. WOW!!!
    This is the most wonderful thing i have ever experience and i need to share this great testimony.
    About how i get my ex back after a breakup.
    I never believed it, because i never heard nor learn anything about it before.
    My name is Cora L. Sanchez from UK
    My boyfriend of a 2year just broke up with me and am 28 weeks pregnant. I have cried my self to sleep most of the nights and don’t seem to concentrate during lectures sometimes I stay awake almost all night thinking about him and start to cry all over again. Because of this I end up not having energy for my next day’s classes, my attendance has dropped and am always in uni and on time. Generally he is a very nice guy, he ended it because he said we were arguing a lot and not getting along. He is right we’ve been arguing during the pregnancy a lot. After the break up I kept ringing him and telling him I will change. I am in love with this guy and he is the best guy I have ever been with. I’m still hurt and in disbelief when he said he didn’t have any romantic feelings towards me anymore that hurt me faster than a lethal syringe. He texts me once and then mainly to check up on how am doing with the pregnancy, he is supportive with it but it’s not fair on me, him texting me as I just want to grieve the pain and not have any stress due to the pregnancy. i was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Ahmed can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a spell for me. 28 hours later, my boyfriend came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my boyfriend are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Ahmed. as it is a place to resolve marriage/relationship issues, do you want to be sure if your spouse is being faithful to you or Do you want your Ex to come back to you Contact.: E-mail: Ahmedutimate@gmail.com or call/Whats-app: +2348160153829 save your crumbling home and change of grades its 100% safe. I suggest you contact him. He will not disappoint you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Anderson for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4 pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem. email: drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.

    1) Love Spells
    2) Lost Love Spells
    3) Divorce Spells
    4) Marriage Spells
    5) Binding Spell.
    6) Breakup Spells
    7) Banish a past Lover
    8.) You want to be promoted in your office/ Lottery spell
    9) want to satisfy your lover
    Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution
    through drogunduspellcaster@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete