The many nice things Sean Hannity said!

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2024

We'd call this misleading reporting: Michael Grynbaum isn't some inexperienced kid. Also, he went to one of the finest schools!

Let it be said that he's also a good, decent person. He thumbnails himself as shown:

Michael M. Grynbaum

I’m a media correspondent for The New York Times.

I write about the intersection of media, politics and culture: how the news industry shapes and reflects the changing world around us. I am particularly interested in coverage of presidents and presidential campaigns, and the future of television and cable news.

I’ve been writing about media for The Times since 2016. Before that, I served as the paper’s City Hall bureau chief, covering two New York City mayors. Since joining The Times as an intern in 2007, I’ve reported on presidential campaigns, the 2008 financial crash and the New York City subway system.

I grew up outside Hartford, Conn., and graduated from Harvard College with a degree in history and literature. I now live in Manhattan.

There you have it. He's been at the Times since 2007. He graduated from Harvard that very year.

Not that there's anything wrong with it! That said, his analysis piece in today's New York Times may help explain why members of our nation's red tribe place little real faith in the Times.

With today's MEDIA piece by Grynbaum, the Times is exploring the Taylor Swift matter again! On each of the past two mornings, the Times had news report about Swift on the front page of the print edition.

Today, Grynbaum's piece has been dispatched to page A16. Print edition headline included, his report begins like this:

Staying Silent, Swift Sends Fox News Hosts Into Tizzy

Taylor Swift has not uttered a word about the 2024 presidential election. But the mere prospect that the pop superstar could endorse President Biden has sent conservatives on Fox News into conniptions.

“Why would someone as popular as she is alienate your fans, the Swifties?” Jeanine Pirro said on “The Five,” before addressing the singer directly. “So don’t get involved! Don’t get involved in politics! We don’t want to see you there!”

“Please don’t believe everything Taylor Swift says,” urged one commentator, Charly Arnolt. “We’re all begging you.”

And Sean Hannity, using his prime-time soapbox on Tuesday evening, suggested that Democrats were leading Ms. Swift astray. “Does Taylor realize the guy that they want her to endorse is a kind of stumbling, bumbling mess?” he asked. 

So the report began. In Grynbaum's analysis, Swift's possible endorsement of Biden has sent Fox News personnel into a tizzy. Either that, or they've just been sent into conniptions.

In our view, Charly Arnolt is a script-reading empty vessel. Judge Jeanine is an inveterate loudmouth and brawler.

Still and all, based on the examples Grynbaum provides, his language seems a bit overstated to us. It doesn't seem real "journalistic."

It sounds a bit like an entertainment / reassurance package designed for blue tribe subscribers Later, though, we began to wonder what planet Grynbaum is on:

Ms. Arnolt, sounding alarmed, told the Fox anchor Martha MacCallum that when Ms. Swift encouraged her fans to vote in a social media post, it yielded 35,000 new registrations. Voters “need to be careful because she doesn’t do what she says,” Ms. Arnolt said, noting that Ms. Swift flies on a private plane, “yet she constantly talks about climate change.” It was the sort of eco-scolding that rarely turns up on a cable network whose guests often voice skepticism about global warming.

For starters, did Arnolt really tell MacCallum "that when Ms. Swift encouraged her fans to vote in a social media post, it yielded 35,000 new registrations?" 

If so, it's because that's what it said in a front-page report in the New York Times that very day. We would have gone with "noted the fact," rather than with the much fuzzier, more suggestive "told."

Much more strangely, the sort of "eco-scolding" that Grynbaum cites shows up on Fox pretty much all the time! It's an accusation of liberal hypocrisy with respect to climate issues. 

It's an accusation of liberal hypocrisy, or even of liberal dishonesty about climate change. It's not a call for eco-awareness.

This is crappy journalism. Having said that, we were especially struck by this later passage about Hannity, who still plays the role of name-calling king of aggression on Fox's air every night:

Mr. Hannity, who has pronounced himself “not a Swiftie,” drew a connection on Tuesday between Ms. Swift and one of Fox News’s favorite boogeymen: George Soros, the financier and Democratic donor. He aired an old clip in which Ms. Swift said that Mr. Soros’s son Alex helped fund the sale of her song catalog to the producer Scooter Braun. “Does Taylor actually realize that the Soroses, they’re huge donors to left-wing and Democratic causes?” Mr. Hannity asked.

For what it's worth, Hannity's report of what Swift once said was factually accurate, in that he played the videotape of Swift's formal statement

That said:

In that formal statement, Swift specifically referred to "the Soros family," and it was clear that she was criticizing them for what she seemed to regard as some sort of misconduct. It seems to us that Grynbaum aggressively smoothed that part of what Swift once said. 

That said, we were perhaps most struck by the statement that Hannity has pronounced himself "not a  Swiftie"—that Hannity has so declared, full and complete total stop.

We haven't been able to find the place where Hannity made some such declaration. But on his program Monday night, we ourselves saw him say this:

HANNITY (3/29/24): First of all, I like Taylor Swift. I don't like the way some people have been talking about her, treating her. I wish her and Travis Kelce the best.

She's a pretty amazing young woman. I mean, she writes her own songs, she does 40-plus songs in her concerts. She's great to her fans, she gives big bonuses to her crew. She's got a lot of great qualities...

That's what he said about Swift and Kelce, and about their romance. At this point, he transitioned to his standard bombast, saying he hopes that she'll be shown videotape of "Creepy Joe" and "Incoherent Joe," just so she'll know who and what she's endorsing.

Hannity is a warrior of red tribe insult and bombast, not to mention misinformation. But he praised Swift on Monday night, and said nothing negative about her on his Tuesday night program.

She wasn't mentioned on Wednesday night. Last September, when the romance and the trashing began, Hannity even said this about that, Mediaite headline included:

Hannity Defends Taylor Swift: ‘I Kind of Hate People, You Know, Hating On Her’

"I want to say something before we get—ok, you know what? I look at Taylor Swift— if I picked my music based on their politics, I’d have five choices. Let’s be honest. You know, country, Christian contemporary, which are my favorite, but I admire her talent. She writes all her songs, she does these shows that have like nearly 50 songs, you know, sets in them...

"She’s a great businesswoman, seems like a lovely girl, extraordinarily nice to her fans, and I kind of hate people, you know, hating on her."

He also offered this:

"I know that Travis is woke, and he’s Bud Light, and he’s for the Covid shot. I just, you know what, if you want to listen and get advice from a football player, I don’t care. Or a pop star. I don’t care where you get your advice. We live in a free country, they are entitled to their views, as much as I might disagree. But I can also recognize talent and they’re both enormously talented. How’s this? I wish them the best, I hope it works for them."

We thought Grynbaum's reporting was largely misleading. To our eye and ear, it had the definite feel of blue tribe subscriber maintenance from a temporarily flyweight blue rag.

Hannity is an inveterate name-caller and a purveyor of red tribe attack. There's a tremendous amount to criticize, correct and challenge about his nightly conduct. That's been true for the past twenty-five years.

The New York Times rarely plays that role. The Times typically sticks its head in the sand, then peeps out with pabulum like this.

Hannity is a highly unreliable attack dog and a dedicated name caller. But even as he has trashed "Creepy Joe," he's said nothing negative about Taylor Swift. In fact, he's done quite the opposite.

Grynbaum went to one of the finest schools. Sifting the content of his report in a manner designed to please, he writes for our greatest newspaper—for a newspaper of the blue tribe.

Red tribe members who see work of this type will often see it for what it is. We belong to the blue tribe ourselves, but we think this report was largely blue silo, and we don't think this stroking helps.

It makes us think we're in good hands. Just for the record, we aren't.


55 comments:

  1. I mourn the end of the old, stodgy, accurate NY Times that I grew up reading.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right you are, David. They would never have turned Hillary’s emails into a story of galactic importance back in them thar good ole days, and they might not have gone easy on a pathological lying sicko like Trump. Sigh.

      Delete

  2. Wow. Quite unexpectedly for me, Hannity sounds like a far better, more decent person than your tribe's good, decent persons. Not to mention: smarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And more corrupt.

      Delete
    2. 2:40,
      Why is that? Because Hannity jumped the line to get his COVID vaccine, before others who were at much more risk of getting sick and dying?

      Delete
  3. The CDC says syphilis cases are at their highest level since the 1950s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The NY Times does NOT belong to the blue tribe.

      Delete
  4. Ah. Taylor Swift is such a trivial distraction from those violent cop killing videos by asylum seekers that Somerby has now devoted two posts to her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's. The. Point. Of. This. Blog.

      It's media criticism essays, not direct journalism.

      Delete
    2. I see. When MSNBC sheds light on the right wing’s attacks on Taylor Swift, it’s a distraction and doesn’t qualify as media/political analysis. But when Bob does it, it’s AOK. Can you be any stupider?

      Delete
  5. I don’t get why anyone should be outraged if Taylor Swift wants to endorse a political candidate. It’s her prerogative to give her support, talent, influence to anyone she chooses and to do it for whatever reason.

    I think this is more about the media wanting to do stories on her because for their ratings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wrong, Somerby breath. She is dangerous to the right because she has a huge young fan base (largely female), and she encourages them to vote for Biden. That flies in the face of the right’s narrative that Biden is unattractive to younger voters. And she, unlike BeyoncĂ©, who also endorsed Biden, she is white. The horror. Perhaps you’re being disingenuous about your perplexity. It’s your tribe’s MO to attack their opponents.

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 5:35pm, I’m not perplexed af all. It’s a tempest in a teapot in order to get eyeballs. Nothing is more helpful to Biden than this sort of publicity that lets everyone know where Taylor Swift stands. If she never uttered word about this subject and never endorses him, the publicity has done its job in making it look like she wanted to publicly back the president, but it became a brouhaha.

      There’s nothing politically to be gained on the right in this, it’s all for ratings.

      Delete
    3. You are aware that it’s more than just criticism of her political stance, aren’t you? There’s a whole conspiracy theory built around her. You should check it out, to see what your tribe is up to.

      Delete
    4. Why would Fox be talking about her at all? The NY Times is discussing her because the right is throwing a fit about her (no matter how nice Hannity is, presumably to keep her fans from becoming defensive. He implies she will change her mind about Biden when she realizes he is old, but she isn’t stupid. Somerby is trying to pretend this is celebrity worship from the Times, not something actually happening on the right. That’s kind of like gaslighting his readers, or maybe Somerby is stupid?

      Delete
    5. Too soon to endorse. She endorsed Biden in 2020 and that 35,000 registrations figure came from the numbers using a voter registration website she linked to, so it is real — Somerby tries to pretend it is made up. She will most likely coordinate her endorsement with Biden’s campaign. Fox has been trying to generate negative buzz, which Somerby is helping along. This is why he is an asshole.

      Delete
    6. Anonymouse 5:50pm, the conspiracy is that she and her boyfriend are feigning a relationship on behalf of Biden.

      So I suppose that conspiracy fodder that came thru X influencers is supposed to make this less a gift to media, rather than more.

      Delete
    7. It’s…already a media meme, Cecelia, because it’s on social … MEDIA, which the right wing leverages constantly.

      Delete
    8. Anonymouse 6:06pm, partisans of every stripe use social media. Media member accounts are the most influential on the medium. To the point where during the last media mass firing, that cohort backed Twitter into censoring people who advised these people to “learn to code”.

      Delete
    9. Let’s just say that this was a thing long before MSNBC talked about it. Somerby is going on as if it’s MSNBC who should be ashamed, when in fact they are showing you the depths of depravity of the right wing. Shame on them, amirite?

      Delete
    10. Anonymouse 7:23pm, “depths of depravity”….

      There’s not a hair’s difference between you and dumbest and the far rightest of right wingers.

      You’re both fornicating pecans.

      Delete
    11. Glad to know you’re fornicating pecans, Cecelia. TMI, just a bit, though, doncha think?

      Delete
    12. Human and pecan DNA are about 50% similar. One or two percent of their genes are virtually identical.

      Delete
    13. I’ve never fornicated a pecan. Too closely related.

      Delete
    14. This is all fake news.
      No Right-winger would complain about a pop singer, without first calling the Left "snowflakes".

      Delete
  6. Politics is presented to everyone as a choice between brands and personality rather than policy. It's been that way since Ronald Reagan ate candy for the TV cameras to look less elitist (he started his career as a snobby liberal Hollywood elite btw).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right. So let’s all prove our superiority by voting third party, or staying home next November. THERE’S NO POLICY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BIDEN AND TRUMP, says dipshit 5:58.

      Delete
    2. Wow you seem to have mastered the ability of hearing voices in your head then typing them

      Delete
    3. Wow. The original commenter seems to believe that politics is merely about personality.

      Delete
    4. 6:09 when the voices in your head quiet down then try reading the sentence slower

      Delete
    5. No one is required to buy what’s presented. We’re not all dunces.

      Delete
  7. Taylor Swift is too tall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She’s also too pretty, and too successful. Amirite?

      Delete
    2. I’ve been 5’10 since grade school.

      Delete
    3. She’s also too .. what’s the word…female.

      Delete
    4. Taylor is a blue-eye blonde.

      Delete
  8. Sebastian Gorka says the speculation about Michelle Obama is lunacy.

    https://www.mediamatters.org/michelle-obama/newsmax-host-denounces-lunacy-michelle-obama-presidential-speculation-newsmax

    ReplyDelete
  9. Biden and Trump did not have the same policies.

    Sixty-four (64) Executive actions Biden has taken to open the southern border and undo President Trump's actions to seal it
    https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1752895775439310958

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was sad when Biden tore down that massive wall that didn’t build and Mexico didn’t pay for.

      Delete
    2. Correction: That Trump didn’t build…

      Delete
    3. Donald Trump is of course heavily lobbying the GOP to scuttle a bipartisan bill for border security, the contents of which have not been released. But he knows it's got to be bad because it's not November yet.
      https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/25/politics/gop-senators-angry-trump-immigration-deal/index.html

      Delete
    4. That the guy who is crestfallen about the deterioration of the NYT uses Twitter as a source of information is not particularly surprising. The link opens up to a photo of Mike Johnson and nothing else.

      Delete
  10. Interesting opinion piece here on the right wing attacks on Taylor Swift:

    https://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2024/02/adam-serwer-explains-rights-war-on.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
  11. Major story of the day is that Republicans have killed Immigration reform (again) because Trump ordered them to, as he wants to keep the issue alive as grievance.
    Bob, with Taylor on the brain, has nothing to say about this. He only sees immigration as a way to hurt President Biden.

    ReplyDelete

  12. Joe Biden and the Democrats want to secure the border and to deport all illiberal aliens. That is what they always wanted to do. But they couldn't, because Trump. Vote Biden. I am Torby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am Corby. You are Boris, financed by Russia via Iran and Qatar.

      What an asshole Somerby is.

      I don't lack empathy. I did not suffer a childhood trauma. I am driving my imaginary Tesla. I play bridge. I get boosters. It's science.

      I am Corby.

      Delete
    2. Fake. Especially that malarkey about Qatar.

      Delete
  13. Here' the real question:
    Should our political reporters treat politics like entertainment, or is that the job of the GOP?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Are Republicans letting the boarder go to hell because Trump wants it bad down there, so he can run on it?

    ReplyDelete

  15. There is no border mess. The border mess is all Trump's fault.

    Because of Trump we can't have nice things. Vote Biden.

    Somerby is an ass.

    I am Corby.

    ReplyDelete