SATURDAY AFTERNOON: Hannity doctors his explanation!

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2024

Red tribe viewers get conned: Yesterday afternoon, we offered a report beneath this catchy headline:

Comer's star witness crashes and burns!

In our view, Kevin Drum's post about this matter offered the most succinct synopsis of what had occurred. Headline included, Kevin had offered this:

Yet another Biden crime story goes up in smoke

[...]

The informant in question is Alexander Smirnov, who retailed a preposterous story to the FBI about Burisma paying bribes of $5 million each to Hunter and Joe Biden for "protection." James Comer and Chuck Grassley got wind of this and demanded a copy of the FBI interview so they could investigate whether Smirnov's accusation was being taken seriously. The whole thing took the right-wing noise machine by storm.

Today Smirnov was indicted for lying to the FBI. The indictment came from David Weiss, the special prosecutor in the Hunter Biden case. Smirnov was arrested at the Las Vegas airport after arriving from overseas.

Smirnov had been regarded as a star witness in the House GOP's attempt to find a reason to impeach President Biden. 

Just like that, Rep. Comer's star witness seemed to have crashed and burned! But in fact, he wasn't just Comer's star witness. As we showed you, Kevin had linked to a tweet by Matthews Gertz of Media Matters, and Gertz had offered this:

GERTZ (2/15/24): Sean Hannity's Fox News show ran with this informant's claims in at least 85 separate segments last year, including 28 monologues. He said they proved Joe Biden engaged in "public corruption on a scale this country has never seen before.”

According to Gertz, Smirnov had been Hannity's star witness too! For a fuller report on this matter by Gertz, you can just click here.

Sean Hannity's star witness had also crashed and burned! Along the way in our own report, we issued The Alexander Smirnov Challenge:

We wondered if Fox News viewers would ever be told about this arrest at all.

We wondered if Fox News viewers would ever be told. Today, we can tell you this: 

In a segment which started midway through last evening's program, Hannity did tell his program's viewers about Smirnov's arrest. But as he did, he instantly launched a slippery attempt to justify his past reliance on the things the star witness had said.

Just like that, Hannity doctored a quote by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), making it seem that Raskin had also vouched for Smirnov's claims in the past.  Rather, he had "edited" a videotaped statement by Raskin. Hannity had edited the statement in such a way as to make it seem that Raskin had vouched for Smirnov's claims, just as he himself had done.

We probably shouldn't say that Raskin's quote had been "doctored." We actually saw the sort of abrupt "edit" which made us think that the fuller statement by Raskin would likely show something quite different from the impression Hannity was trying to leave.

Sure enough! This morning, we found the fuller videotape of what Raskin actually said on the day in question. In his fuller statement that day, Raskin made it clear that there was no reason to assume the accuracy of what Smirnov had said.

We also found this written press release by Rep. Raskin on that same day (June 5, 2023). As in his videotaped public statement, the press release includes the reasons for doubting what Smirnov had said. 

We may start next week's report with this a look at this familiar type of deception. For today, we'll tell you this:

At least on the Hannity show, red tribe viewers were told that Rep. Comer's former star witness has now been arrested. 

That said, they were instantly misled about the matter thanks to Hannity's ridiculous "edit" of Raskin's longer statement. So it frequently goes (though not always), in the early morning hours and then again in primetime, when red tribe viewers watch Fox.

For the record, those red tribe viewers don't know that they're being misled. They don't know that some or many of the things they're being told are grossly misleading, or may just be flatly false.

They also don't know about the types of information which are being withheld. For better or worse, similar problems sometimes afflict us blue tribe viewers when we watch programs on MSNBC, the "cable news" channel which has been designed to push preferred blue tribe narratives.

That press release by Rep. Raskin was dated June 5, 2023. That was the very day when Raskin made the videotaped statement which Hannity craftily clipped.

Red tribe viewers get misinformed in such way on a regular basis. Once again, an important point:

They don't know that they're getting conned! Indeed, several such callers showed up on C-Span's Washington Journal this morning, angrily repeating the bogus talking points they had been fed last night.

(We're not sure that we've ever heard so many angry phone calls to C-Span, or phone calls which were so angry.)

This is a problem with current arrangements in the realm of "cable news." We expect to discuss this more next week—and for the record, this isn't simply a red tribe thing.

In certain ways, our own blue tribe is involved in this breakdown too. Is there anyone on MSNBC whose conduct is as bad as Sean's?

We can't rightly say that there is, though that's setting the bar quite low.

If you want to see Sean's pseudo-confession on last night's show, you can start by clicking here. You'll quickly see the videotape of (one tiny part of) what Raskin actually said. 

You'll instantly see that bit of tape. Careful—you're being misled!


161 comments:

  1. I don't understand the basis for calling Smirnov a star witness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementFebruary 17, 2024 at 4:21 PM

      Remember how Comer and Jordan widely trumpeted a "whistleblower" who could prove that Biden accepted bribes? They based their claims on a single, slender reed--a statement given to the FBI by someone who claimed to have direct knowledge of payments from Burisma to Joe Biden.

      Smirnov was the supposed witness who offered that statement to the FBI.

      Delete
    2. I understand. I don't feel like that makes him a "star" with all the other verified whistleblowers and evidence. Thanks.

      Delete
    3. "whistleblowers"!!! Bwahahaha!

      Delete
    4. “Verified” LOL

      Delete
    5. “Evidence” LOL

      Delete
    6. 5:11,

      try to limit your discussion to non-imaginary persons and entities.

      Delete
    7. Quaker in a BasementFebruary 17, 2024 at 7:17 PM

      "All the other whistleblowers?"

      That's rather the point. Comer hung his whole accusation on Smirnov.

      Delete
    8. There were two gentlemen from the IRS he asked for and received “whistleblower status” and of course there's tons and tons of evidence in the form of bank records and emails.

      "Comer hung his whole accusation on Smirnov." What is the basis for this claim?

      Delete

    9. Grassley himself said he wasn't certain if the guy's allegations are accurate.
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/20/fbi-whisteblower-biden/

      Delete
    10. Maybe I need to rewrite it for you again.

      "I want to believe Comer hung his whole accusation on Smirnov" is more accurate.

      Delete
    11. He was there whole “case” in spite of what the loser on this thread says.

      Delete
    12. Bank records kept in your imagination.

      Delete
    13. 8z;48,

      "tons and tons of evidence in the form of bank records and emails".

      Huh. None of this has made it into my media bubble.

      Why don't you point me to the most damning written evidence that would support Biden's impeachment?

      Delete
    14. At 5:11, let’s treat you as a serious person. How does Smirnov’s arrest affect your take on the Impeachment case against Biden? Do you think it’s still strong? Do you think Comer has behaved honorably? Do you think the President has been treated fairly?

      Delete
    15. 7:48 Hi. Thank you for being so kind. ;)

      - I doubt if the arrest will end the impeachment inquiry. I don't agree that the case hinged on that witness.
      - I never thought the case for impeachment was strong.
      - I don't have an opinion about how Comer has behaved.
      - In terms of the impeachment inquiry I do think Biden has been treated fairly.

      Delete
    16. I'm not saying this supports impeachment or not but here is some dirt that they dug up where Hunter was paid $5 million dollars by a Chinese company after threatening them and using his father in the threat. Hunter took out 400,000 of the 5 million, put it into one of his accounts and then a few days later wired $50,000 to President Biden's brother who, two weeks later withdrew $50,000 and wrote a $40,000 check directly to the President.

      https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Fourth-Bank-Records-Memo.pdf

      Delete
    17. Here are the cancelled checks from when the president's brother was paid $600,000 in loans explicitly because his connection to Joe Biden could "open doors". On the same day he received $200,000 of the loan, he wrote a check for the exact same amount to President Biden.

      This is troubling because President Biden claimed that he never benefited from his family's business dealings, but in this case even if there's an innocent explanation for the $200,000 payment, he still is benefiting from his brothers use of his name and influence.

      https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-releases-evidence-of-direct-payment-to-joe-biden/

      Delete
    18. All this is going nowhere.

      Brandan's been there, inside the swamp, sucking on the taxpayers' tit, for a hundred years or so. He knows where all the bodies are buried. Obviously he won't be impeached or prosecuted. Remember, Trump was impeached for just suggesting that Brandan needs to be investigated.

      Delete
    19. I agree. It is interesting to see the cancelled checks and get an idea of how the sleaze actually works.

      Delete
    20. Can you believe these robots think Joe Biden is some kind of squeaky clean good guy?

      Delete
    21. @8:42 AM
      "get an idea of how the sleaze actually works"

      With Brandan it's going to be difficult to observe, as there is a huge effort to hide and discredit the evidence.

      But you're in luck: there a much less publicized case unfolding right now: Bob Menendez. Gold bars, cash money, all the good stuff. That should give you an idea.

      Delete
    22. Yes, I read the Menendez indictment.

      Delete
    23. 8:21: You seem to acknowledge something with this:

      “even if there's an innocent explanation for the $200,000 payment”

      And then go on to make an unsubstantiated claim:

      “he still is benefiting from his brothers use of his name and influence”

      It isn’t clear if “he” in that sentence refers to Joe or his brother.

      At any rate, here are fact based reports on this:

      https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/10/31/politics/fact-check-evidence-supports-democrats-case-that-joe-biden-made-a-personal-loan-to-his-brother/index.html


      https://jabberwocking.com/james-comer-lies-his-ass-off-yet-again/

      Just search for “Comer” at Kevin drum’s website, and you’ll see he’s been consistently reporting on this liar. Unlike Somerby, who has barely mentioned a word about a topic that takes up vast amounts of air time on Fox, a network he regularly watches.

      Delete
    24. 9:40 - thank you for the links. Even if the payment from the brother to Joe was for an innocent loan, Joe still benefitted from his family's influence peddling because the money from repayment came from influence peddling. (President Biden made a claim he never benefitted. He also made claim he "never discussed" business with Hunter which he had to walk back, and as Drum points out he lied by saying Hunter was never doing business with China. )

      “he still is benefiting from his brothers use of his name and influence” - this is substantiated in the link I provided.

      Delete
    25. Donald Trump: “Once you became vice president he [Hunter Biden] made a fortune in Ukraine, in China, in Moscow and various other places.”

      Biden: “That is not true.”

      ~~~~

      It was all true. Hunter made millions from all those places. Deals that were made mostly in those countries when his dad was in the country at the same time and they had flown to them together on Air Force Two.

      Delete

    26. "Even if the payment from the brother to Joe was for an innocent loan"

      If that was a loan, it could be proven immediately by producing the transfer from Brandan to his brother.

      Delete
    27. True and yet the Republicans couldn't come up with any evidence in their congressional hearing.

      Delete
    28. 10:49: “producing the transfer from Brandan to his brother.”

      This was discussed in the link I provided:

      https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/10/31/politics/fact-check-evidence-supports-democrats-case-that-joe-biden-made-a-personal-loan-to-his-brother/index.html

      Delete
    29. If this election is going to hinge on the monetary benefits of grifting off a politician parent, I think we know who wins here. The only goal at this point for Comer is to stretch this out until November. He pointed out his game plan way back in the days of H. Clinton smearing. Unfortunately he has got his timing wrong. And Trump, their huge liability, who will likely once again drag down the team with underperformance in November is going nowhere because of his cult following. If Biden decides not to run, albeit unlikely, any democratic candidate less than 60 with some name recognition and a few demographic pluses will demolish him.

      Delete

    30. I will only vote for Joe Biden, our Best President Ever, who is Totally Cognitive.

      I am Corby.

      Delete
    31. Wow , I almost responded to a comment by whatever goes by the name of Colby.

      Delete
    32. Don't get upset, it's Poe's law.

      Delete
    33. Jared with $3.3 Billion from KSA, UAE, and Qatar says hi you dumb as s suckers.

      Delete
    34. That ‘Corby’ comment is fake. 1:30 was right to be careful.

      Delete
    35. The system is not coming to save you from Trump. It needs someone like him to do their dirty work and keep their hands clean.

      Delete
    36. Their hands are dirty.

      Delete
    37. Quaker in a BasementFebruary 18, 2024 at 6:27 PM

      "There were two gentlemen from the IRS [who] asked for and received 'whistleblower status'”

      Ah, Shapley and Ziegler. I had forgotten about those two. They claimed that US Attorney Weiss had asked for special prosecutor status but was turned down by Merrick Garland. Garland and Weiss both said they were mistaken. So if Smirnov doesn't qualify as a "star witness," neither do these fellows.

      Delete
    38. 10:43 it’s amusing in a sad way that you are responding to your own comments as if you are someone else, you seem a bit of a tortured soul.

      To make your false point, you use a misleading quote from a Biden/Trump debate.

      Here, I can do the same:

      Trump: [Some say, you’re] the big man…I don’t know, maybe you’re not…what’s that all about? It’s terrible.

      So Trump here appears to refute the claim that Biden was involved in Hunter’s business dealings and expresses concern that Biden is being falsely accused, which turns out to be true, Biden was not engaged in any substantive way with Hunter’s business affairs.

      In reality, in the debate you referenced, Trump was in the midst of a Gish gallop of accusations, which were all false, to which Biden appropriately responded by saying that it was not true, all those false claims in Trump’s Gish gallop. This includes the claim that as a result of Biden becoming VP that Hunter made a fortune, that is in fact completely false. There is in fact no credible evidence to support this claim.

      When you try to misinform by using a misleading quote, taken out of context, you’ve lost the argument, and you have failed.

      Furthermore, there is no credible evidence any Biden was benefitting from the use of Joe’s name or influence.

      When you whine on and on over unsubstantiated claims that have turned out to be false, while ignoring the more salient fact that Trump and his family made billions while he was president, from countries like China and Saudi Arabia, not only have you lost the plot, but you’ve exposed yourself as an ignorant fool, arguing in bad faith.

      To answer the original question, Smirnov is a troubled person looking for a way out of his quagmire, so one night he went outside and looked up at the sky to make a wish…

      Delete

  2. "Comer's star witness crashes and burns!"

    He didn't crash and burn. He got arrested by the feds. And after Russiagate (and other shit) the feds have a reputation, you know. And consequently, being arrested by the feds makes one, if anything, more credible. In some quarters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just think what a criminal conviction would do for Trump’s chances.

      Delete
    2. 4:14,

      Who did the feds wrongfully arrest during 'Russiagate'? (hint: no one.)

      Delete
    3. 4:14,

      In what quarters does being arrested by the feds make you more credible? (answer: crazy quarters.)

      Delete
    4. “Russiagate” was all true, and this comment was written by a total idiot.

      Delete
    5. Dear Total Non-Idiot,

      I notice you took a pass on the question about arrests, so score one for me.

      Here's another stumper for you: which part of 'Russiagate' was true? Give me anything signficant. Or you can reach deep into your bag of clever insults and call me an idiot.

      Delete
    6. You mean like Trump on the phone demanding dirt on Biden in exchange for weapons? Read the report, you dumb lying Kunt.

      Delete
    7. You lost me there, chief. Sounds like you've mistaken me for your ex-wife.

      Delete
    8. You are my ex-wife.

      Delete
    9. Trump raped his ex wife. Also a minor at Epstein's house. Trump has often expressed sexual desire towards his own daughter.

      Delete
  3. In the book Jurassic Park, the description of a good hoax is it's something "people want to believe." So even if someone is a liar, they can be "more true than truth" not less by lying.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “ For better or worse, similar problems sometimes afflict us blue tribe viewers when we watch programs on MSNBC, the "cable news" channel which has been designed to push preferred blue tribe narrative”

    Examples?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What Bob calls “legal trivia” about Trump’s attempt to overthrow the country.

      Delete
  5. Somerby says that Fox viewers don’t know they’re being conned, but they would know if they got their info from multiple sources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you talk to any MAGA people they will disbelieve anything on Fox that isn’t part of Trump worship. Doesn’t really matter where it is coming from. This is why Fox panicked when Biden won. They are now the message who will be killed for bringing bad news.

      Delete
    2. Right wingers have no ideology, it’s a personality trait defined by an obsession with hierarchy and dominance.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Chuck Mawhinney has died.

    ReplyDelete
  8. From Kevin:

    https://jabberwocking.com/donald-trump-is-mentally-impaired-part-457/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Where’s David after he got severely debunked on this issue yesterday?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Trump went on an insane rant the other day at his half empty rally in SC, some lunacy about Biden having round eyes.

    Biden’s cognitive decline? Brother, please. Doesn’t hold a candle to Trump’s cognitive decline.

    Where Trump resoundly bests Biden is on smell, and it’s no contest. Biden smells like someone who showers daily, whereas Trump has Trump Stench, possibly the worst odor in human history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The world will be interested to hear your opinions when you graduate middle school and can form a coherent argument

      Delete
    2. I dropped out of middle school because it interfered with my trolling.

      Delete
    3. People on average pass gas up to 20 times a day.

      In German, “good ride” is “gute fahrt”.

      Trump farting is not a crime.

      Trump Stench, however, should be a crime.

      Regardless, Trump has committed many crimes, he will be convicted later this year in the DC trial.

      Delete
  11. This article is good and reminds me of a good memory of mine. It occurred just a few months ago....

    My lady-friend Smupa and good friend Pratha and I were adrift on a small vessel in the vast ocean, participating in a journey of the mind, body, and spirit.

    While contemplating the very existence of time and its corollaries, we were suddenly jolted by a series of large and violent bubbles surfacing just beneath our tiny vessel, nearly capsizing us in the process.

    Soon after regaining our composure, a seriously foul odor was realized.

    Within seconds of inhaling the noxious fumes, I began to envision a wildly amusing collage of surreal colors and creatures, causing me to vomit all of my life's frustrations in one major upheaval.

    Pratha reacted to the foul odor by chanting backwards in his native tongue while deep in his trance.

    Smupa began to smile in a most uncontrollable fashion and then proceeded to break wind from her bottom.

    Smupa's gas pass served as the eureka moment. I then posed the question:

    Do whales fart??

    Once back on dry land, Smupa and I did some research and found the following:

    According to Wikipedia:

    “The short answer is yes, whales do indeed fart, flatus or pass gas depending on how you like to phrase it.

    In fact whales, dolphins and porpoises are all marine mammals belonging to the cetacean species and they are all known to fart.

    Today there are around 80 – 90 known species of cetacea currently in existence and they encompass all of the worlds major oceans from the tropics to the coldest of the northern and southern polar hemispheres.

    When it comes to passing gas, farting is a common characteristic that most land and marine mammals have in common with one another.

    Passing gas allows animals to release air that is trapped inside their stomach, which could lead to digestive problems, stomach cramps or other complications if not removed from the body.

    When an animal passes gas or farts the air that comes out of the body comes primarily from two main sources.

    The first source comes from oxygen that is pulled in through the air either while breathing (inhaling and exhaling) or when consuming food or drinking water; and since all mammals eat food and require oxygen to
    survive they all take in air.

    The second source of air or gas comes from food that is broken down by enzymes, stomach acids and bacteria in the stomach, which creates toxic gasses that need to be removed from the body to prevent it from doing harm to the individuals digestive system.

    In order to release these gases animals need a way to expel them from the body and for most mammals this means that the toxic gas has to exit through either the mouth, which causes burping or through the anal tract which causes farting.

    The gases that are expelled from a fart are mostly composed of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane.

    The reason some gasses smell worse than others is because of the breakdown of the foods involved.

    Certain foods can cause obnoxious orders when released as gas while others do not.

    From some of the statements researchers have made about whales farting they have concluded that yes, it stinks when a whale farts.

    When a whale farts or passes gas underwater the sound is believed to be suppressed by the surrounding water making it silent or at least quite compared to the gas that is expelled from land based animals.

    In some cases bubbles or clouds can be seen rising to the surface of the water when a whale passes gas.

    Those most likely to experience whales farting are likely to be researchers involved in following whales and researching their dung or gathering information about their gestation period, habitat, social structure and other
    important factors.

    In some cases this may also be observed by tourists and whale watchers that are hoping to get a glance of these marine mammals in their natural habitat.

    Unfortunately not much research has been done on this topic, however there have been researchers who have experienced and confirmed that yes whales do indeed
    fart.”

    Thank you for your time.

    Propaar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While whale farts may be silent, they are deadly.

      Delete
    2. Odors are not real, per se, it’s just one way our brains interpret substances.

      Delete
  12. Iran decides not to mess with Joe Biden.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iraqi-armed-groups-dial-down-us-attacks-request-iran-commander-2024-02-18/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Afghanistan's child labor industry is going strong thanks to Biden

      Delete
    2. It's "Afganastan" in Biden-speak.

      Delete
    3. Just needed another 20 years and victory would have been possible in another twenty years. Thank God Biden had the strength to follow the Trump Pompeo surrender to the Taliban and pulled us out of that mess.

      Delete
    4. If another county held the gold bars at the Federal Reserve hostage, it would be called an act of war.

      The war in Afghanistan didn't end, it only changed to siege warfare from afar.

      Delete
    5. Since the early 70s most of the currencies in the world are fiat money, therefore holding gold bars hostage is not much of a concern, kind of like Dr Evil demanding one million dollars.

      Delete
  13. With the economy allegedly in the tank, thanks to Joe Biden, it amazes me that Trump supporters can afford to pay $400 for his sneakers, pay his legal bills, and buy Ivermectin kits. Something is not Kosher here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Trump is peddling $400 sneakers. He’s desperate for cash.

      Delete
    2. Trump sneaker cost breakdown:

      $100 for the shoe
      $300 for the shoe being imbued with Trump Stench.

      Delete
  14. Here is more evidence of Russian funding of Republican politicians, this time Mike Johnson:

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/2/18/2224025/-An-American-traitor-Mike-Johnson-pretends-to-care-about-Navalny-while-having-raked-in-the-rubles

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crickets from the “Russia hoax” crowd.

      I gather they are too caught up with coping.

      Delete
  15. Americans go to sleep at night and wake up to find that the trolls never sleep, either that or they operate from a different time zone in Eastern Europe.

    There must be a lot of money to go around in troll-funding because they even haunt an insignificant blog like this one. As I noted last week, when you visit conservative blog comments, you don't find this constant sewage of right wing lies and disinformation, or any liberal comments at all. It is only conservatives agreeing with each other, and talking about revolution and guns. And there are a lot more Cecelias and Davids over there. But no real discussion and certainly no dissent. So why do these Russia-funded trolls only inhabit blogs with non-conservatives? I suppose there is no sense in spending good money to recruit people who are bought and paid for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I operate from a different time zone. I am Dorby.

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 10:56am, what conservative blogs have you perused?

      The only posts you find legitimate are anonymouse posts, full of proclamations and assertions, odes to the virtues of the left, screeds on the balefulness and stupidity of conservatives (and of Bob’s “fanboys”), AND the ENDLESS fatuous and overwrought denunciations of the blogger.

      Your description of conservative blog comment boards is exactly the environment you demand at this site.

      Delete
    3. 10:56 didn’t “demand” anything. The difference in comment sections was noted. And think about this that you said: “ the environment you demand at this site.” 10:56 noted that there was “no dissent” at conservative blogs. That means no dissent from the blogger or other commenters. You are the one demanding absolute agreement with Somerby.

      Delete
    4. Gateway Pundit, Conservative Treehouse

      I am not demanding it at this site. I am wondering why it is so different in the comment sections at red versus blue sites.

      Where are the liberal trolls at the conservative sites? They are moderated out, or they are nonexistent because the left does not fund troll farms as part of its campaign efforts.

      The last Pod Bless America episode mentioned that the traditional media is no longer important in campaigns, dictating a new approach to reaching people who don't watch cable, don't read newspapers, don't watch TV, don't use social media like twitter (X) but do use Tiktok, personal networks for texting, and listen to podcasts or watch youtube.

      Somerby is barking up a dead tree.

      Delete
    5. I hate spamming this disorderly and improper blog. But I must.

      I am Corby.

      Delete
    6. Not 10:59, and that’s exactly what anonymices want. You want a blogger who writes the exact stuff that you write. You want uniformity in thinking and anything else is trolling.

      Delete
    7. Gateway Pundit and Conservative Treehouse? huh? Are you sure that you haven’t forgotten about infoWars?

      Delete
    8. Cecelia is a good commenter.

      Delete
    9. But ‘Corby’ is fake.

      Delete
    10. Anonymouse 12:50pm, what liberal blogs are conservatives frequenting?

      Delete
    11. There's no evidence that any comments here are from Russia-funded trolls.

      Delete
    12. Are these two issues are being conflated?

      An accusation that conservative blogs don't have liberal trolls.

      An accusation that conservative blogs don't have other conservatives that dissent from the blogger.

      Delete
    13. Those issues are rightly conflated because they’re both flatus.

      Delete
    14. Conservatives like:

      Eschaton Blog
      Lawyers Guns Money Blog

      Delete
    15. Cognitive conservatives like Jabberwocking Blog.

      Delete
    16. This is a liberal blog that is critical of liberals and dissents from the prevailing liberal orthodoxy. Other liberal blogs don't normally do that. Routinely, they do the opposite and feed the confirmation bias of their readers. So it's natural that the comments of a liberal blog critical of liberals would have pushback from liberal blog readers who are never exposed to such criticisms. For an accurate comparison you would have to find a conservative blog that routinely criticizes and calls into question conservative shibboleths and dogma. If you can find one, I would bet the mix of comments is the same.

      Delete
    17. Good luck finding a blog where the blogger is a Republican, but bitterly criticizes Republicans the way Somerby criticizes liberals, and where the blogger says “of course we’ll be voting for Trump.”
      It doesn’t exist, and it would be ludicrous if it did.

      Delete
    18. "There's no evidence that any comments here are from Russia-funded trolls." What the hell happened to Mao?

      Delete
    19. Anonymouse 1:15pm, Volokh Report, National Review, and Althouse come to mind as far as differences in support for Trump or the DC establishment. The libertarian site Reason, as well.

      I don’t see anything as to the intensity, preposterous relentlessness, focus, and obvious coordination as is evident here.

      Let me know if you can find a group of conservatives striking out at the errant opinions of a conservative blogger in a way that looks anything like this years long operation and that is what this is. .

      BTW, where’s mh?

      Delete
    20. mh ran off with Mao.

      Delete
    21. Where’s mh? The comments have been particularly rancid lately and Somerby has been babbling about Troy. What is there to interest anyone serious here?

      Delete
    22. The blogger and people making comments is always so troublesome for anonymices.

      Delete
    23. Somerby critics want Somerby, and his fanboys, to back up their goofy claims with credible evidence, which they never do.

      Furthermore, Somerby built this blog and it’s reputation on attacking corporate media for being stenographers for Republican talking points, and then he later shifted to attacking the “blue tribe” for ignoring the nonsense grievances of right wingers.

      Thus, Somerby critics reasonably push back against his unsubstantiated claims, and his flip flopping of his views.

      Delete
    24. Anonymouse 9:37pm, anonymices are all for pushback as long as they’re doing it. If it’s the blogger or someone else pushing back against some anonymouse opinion, it’s rancid troll farm stuff.

      Even Homer is out of order.

      Delete
    25. There’s little to no evidence that Somerby critics are closed minded to credible and coherent arguments.

      Unsubstantiated claims are the name of the game for Somerby and his fanboys - case in point.

      I don’t get your Homer reference, but Somerby is known to express appreciation for the Odyssey and the Iliad; however, there’s no evidence for Homer’s historicity, and those stories are, unsurprisingly considering when they date to, silly and offer no meaningful insight into human nature of any broad value.

      Delete
    26. Homer was a troll. The Iliad and the Odyssey are spam.

      Delete
    27. Homer offers nothing meaningful and there’s no evidence that anonymices are closed-minded.

      She has ten throw pillows embroidered with the above sentence.

      Delete

  16. Mike Johnson is funded by Russia via Iran and Qatar. I enjoy sniffing my fingers. And I enjoy sniffing other people hair, when I get a chance.

    I spam Somerby's blog.

    I am Corby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why don’t you fuck off with this nonsense?

      Delete
    2. Qatar is not involved.

      Delete
    3. Qatar gave all their spare change to Jared.

      Delete
    4. Jared’s penis is smaller than Hunter’s and he can’t paint for shit.

      Hunter’s wife is hot, whereas Jared’s wife looks like a drag queen, and she has some kind of incestuous relationship with her father.

      Enough with the false equivalencies and both sides nonsense, there are clear differences.

      A vote for Biden is a vote for a modicum of progress; a vote for Trump is a vote for decriminalizing a self enriching conman who emits an unrelenting stench.

      Delete
    5. Touching tribute, Judge Engoron.

      Delete
    6. Judge Engoron is hero for withstanding Trump Stench during the brief appearance Trump made, where Trump demonstrated what the term “self own” means.

      Delete
    7. Anonymouse 10:56pm, no, the judge breathed in Trump like a fly on honey.

      Delete
  17. "Hundreds Detained in Russia as Country Mourns Navalny
    February 18, 2024 at 6:22 am EST By Taegan Goddard

    “Over 400 people were detained in Russia while paying tribute to opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who died at a remote Arctic penal colony,” Bloomberg reports."

    Trump has yet to make any statement about Navalny's dealth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How horrible. Now I am convinced I must vote for Joe Biden.

      Delete
    2. Every instance of Trump’s awfulness helps inform the public.

      Delete
    3. Yes, but this one is the most outrageous of all. I am Forby.

      Delete
    4. Or for those so anxious, Ginuwine.

      Delete
  18. Actions are more important than words. E.g., Biden's recent suspension of LNG exports is worth a fortune to Russia, because it makes their energy exports more valuable. That extra income is a real benefit to Russia and Putin. OTOH American comments about Putin's murder of Navalny have no impact on Putin and Russia.

    A step beyond overweighing the importance of words is overweighing the importance of a lack of words.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And now I'm unconvinced again and I will be voting for Trump. I'm Oorby.

      Delete
    2. We are not fighting Russia and we are not trying to hurt them as a country. We want Russia to stop meddling in US politics and to stop its invasion of the Ukraine, which does not want to rejoin a Soviet Union. Your suggestion that we should oppose Biden because he is helping Russia reduces these specific concerns to some mindless opposition to all things Russian.

      Here are some things David has not told you:

      1. Republicans have introduced a bill to stop Biden's actions.
      2. The purpose of Biden's action on LNG is to address climate change concerns.
      3. He has not halted ALL LNG exports but has temporarily paused pending decisions about new exports.
      4. This only affects non-FTA countries. An FTA country is one that has a Free Trade Agreement with the US. Those 20 countries are: Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Korea, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Panama, Peru, Singapore.
      5. Because this pause affects only pending decisions about building new export terminals (and indirectly new exports) and not anything already in place, there is no reason why Russian prices should go up. Biden is maintaining the status quo, not restricting existing exports.
      6. Republicans oppose this because they oppose climate change measures and because they are funded by the LNG industry.

      https://www.eenews.net/articles/bidens-pause-on-lng-export-approvals-riles-republicans/

      Delete
    3. "A step beyond overweighing the importance of words is overweighing the importance of a lack of words."

      In the context of Trump remaining silent on Alexei Navalny's death, I would say the statement above qualifies as the pseudo-profound bullshit of the year.

      Delete
    4. Seems like a perfectly reasonable statement to me.

      But of course demanding from people to demonstrate idiotic outrage is usual liberal bullshit, so carry on, by all means.

      Delete
    5. “pseudo-profound bullshit of the year”

      It’s only February. Certainly there might be other worthy contenders for this title, don’t you think?

      Delete
    6. Are we supposed to keep our record gas production on our shores or export it? I am so confused.

      Delete
    7. Peed Pooper, it’s the best of the last 366 days. Will it be the best of 2024? We’ll see.

      Delete
    8. 2:16,

      Da, Comrade.

      Delete
    9. As someone who works in the NG industry, 12:42 is largely correct and David is just spouting nonsense.

      In reality, overproduction is killing the industry, profits are plummeting because of it.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. As far as overweighting of words is concerned, I would volunteer the words savvy and genius, as used by Putin's biggest fanboy to describe the invasion of Ukraine. The challenge for Trump cultists like DIC is to pretend the words were unspoken. And thanks to 12:42 & 9:58 for some factual content to dispel what likely is nonsense originally emanating from a right wing media outlet.

      Delete
    12. I am a hawk on Ukraine. I think we should give them even more powerful weapons, so they can win.

      Same for Israel. These are both wars of civilization against barbarism.

      Delete
  19. Alvin Moscow has died.

    ReplyDelete
  20. My pay comes from Iran via Russia. It’s enough for me to live in my mother’s basement. I admire Cecelia and David. Bob I can take or leave.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You operate from the forbidden time zone. This is unacceptable, and will not be tolerated. I am Dorby.

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 1:16pm, David and I think you’re the bestest anonymouse of anonymices. Or not.

      Delete
  21. Immigration paranoia killed a five year old boy this week .

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/17/boy-died-sepsis-chicago-migrant-shelter/72643477007/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish Biden had the strength of Reagan and would just grant them immunity like 'ol Ronnie did.

      Delete
    2. American power only uses refugees for politics. Otherwise they're just trash in the way.

      White refugees deserve to have a flag, tanks and universities and houses in Palestine because they serve Washington.

      Everyone darker than a paper bag can just die in a slum.

      Delete
    3. It's not their color. It's their willingness to serve Washington.

      Delete
    4. Hmm but colonialism took money away from everyone who isn't white so what the hell does a Venezuelan have to offer Washington?

      "Fox News’ highest rated evening programs spread white nationalist rhetoric in nearly half of their immigration segments"
      https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-news-highest-rated-evening-programs-spread-white-nationalist-rhetoric-nearly-half

      Delete
    5. "The “Clash of Civilizations” paradigm is a simplistic, reductionist and othering theory from an academic point of view..."
      https://www.e-ir.info/2020/01/29/is-huntingtons-clash-of-civilizations-a-self-fulfilled-prophecy/

      Delete
    6. The critique of “reductionist” is occasionally appropriate (such as the importance of IQ), but generally is fairly weak since it relies on a vague concept unrelated to any specific issue.

      Nearly everything in the universe is uncertain, humans are not able to process every variable; therefore, “reductionist” could be applied to essentially any and every stance or observation.

      Huntington was an islamophobe/xenophobe neoliberal neocon, and he had no understanding of behavioral science.

      Advances in behavioral sciences have made it clear that the fundamental conflict in society is between egalitarianism and hierarchy/dominance. This conflict emerged about 10-12k years ago when humans transitioned from immediate return societies, to societies based on surplus and commodification.

      Delete
    7. The notion that Muhammad spoke for God is ridiculous.

      Delete
    8. The Quran is just a more mercurial and masculinized version of the Torah and Gospels, which are all balanced by sacred feminine or Mary, the sociological process of societal growth.

      Delete
  22. Cheryl Rofer:

    https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2024/02/yet-another-alleged-russian-superweapon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's made up story by the military industrial complex in order to loot more money for the war in Ukraine that Biden started.

      https://www.huffpost.com/entry/white-house-confirms-russia-has-troubling-anti-satellite-weapon_n_65ce6909e4b04daca69639c8

      Delete
    2. The Russo-Ukrainian war started in 1014. When Putin amassed troops to “support” Donetsk and Luhansk, two breakaway states that were Soviet aligned in 2022, prior to the invasion, Trump stated it was genius. Russian sympathizing trolls cannot make up history.

      Delete
    3. 1014 sounded better.

      Delete