The press corps loves its old tales: Brian Williams will be in action tonight, killing time before and after the ballyhooed Kaine-Pence match.
We were struck by something Brian said to Michael Beschloss after last Monday's debate. We thought the corps had stopped telling this treasured old story.
As it turned out, we were wrong:
WILLIAMS (9/26/16): And Michael, what about the conversation Rachel and I were having at the top of the evening? We were talking about Nixon-Kennedy, and all kinds of aspects of Nixon-Kennedy, Nixon's sweatiness for television viewers, but radio listeners believing that he had won on substance.Nixon won on the radio! It's one of the press corps' favorite old tales. It almost defines the start of the modern era, in which so much of what we hear has simply been made up by the children who pose as our press corps.
Alleged historian Michael Beschloss let Brian's famous old story pass. That said, the notion that Nixon won on the radio has been on the junk heap for years.
On the fiftieth anniversary of that famous first Kennedy-Nixon debate, historian David Greenberg discussed the topic at Slate. Citing the academic research, he shot down the tale, as others had done before him.
Here's a chunk of what he said. Cover the eyes of the children:
GREENBERG (9/24/10): [T]here's almost no evidence to support the claim that it was Kennedy's looks—as opposed to his overall performance—that gave him the edge. For decades, it has become part of the folklore of the debate to say that in contrast to those who watched the debate on TV, radio listeners judged Nixon the winner...it turns out there's no good reason to believe that assertion is true, either.Can David Greenberg say things like that? Not on MSNBC when there are hours to kill!
Virtually all of the evidence for Nixon's alleged superiority on radio is strictly anecdotal—and there isn't even much of it.
Large amounts of what journalists tell us are, to use Greenberg's term, "folklore." That's routinely true about policy matters. It's gigantically true when these giants start spouting off with their favorite campaign/debate tales.
(Remind us to tell you about the way John Dickerson handles the dangerous claim that Muskie wept in his new play-for-pay, please-like-me book, Whistlestop.)
Nixon won on the radio! When Brian and Rachel are forced to kill time, the famous old story's still true, though he wasn't shot down in Iraq.
A few other favorites: George Bush 41 looked at his watch! Dukakis should have punched Bernie Shaw!
Bush was fooled by that scanner machine! The tears were streaming down Muskie's face! Dean screamed, Gore endlessly sighed!
For years I've been muttering aloud in all-night burger joints about how, if Nixon won on the radio, it was because of that FM voice of his. By comparison, sans drug-enhanced good looks, Kennedy's disembodied voice sounded like the latest characterization by Mel Blanc. "Ehhh! What's up, Dick?"ReplyDelete
Does "Whistlestop" (previously titled "Trainwreck" before the movie came out, or was it the other way around?) clear up the age-old rumor that JFK screwed Dickerson's famous mother? A real journalist would tackle the story, letting the hips fall where they may.
Brokaw is brain dead on most other matters. MSNBC is dying a slow death.ReplyDelete
Brokaw is not mentioned. You are brain dead on this matter.Delete
Well I'm on your side, Bob, but Bush 41 DID look at his watch. Not sure what videotape you're watching or not watching that leads you to conclude this is some kind of myth.ReplyDelete
As a Kennedy supporter, I thought Nixon won the debate. He had more specifics. Kennedy had more grand promises. IMHO Nixon came across as far more knowledgable, but evidently the public didn't care. That may be why Trump isn't losing by a bigger margin. Hillary knows far more specifics, but much of the public doesn't care.ReplyDelete
The broken-record troll once again weighs in on the Kennedy-Nixon TV debate with virtually the same shit and ignores the rubbish value of anecdotal evidence as well as the substantive value of factual evidence.
Many people are saying David used anecdotal evidence in his actuarial work.Delete
David, don't let these people stop you from posting. You are a good counter point on this site, whether people want to hear it or not. And I happen to think you are right that most of the public really doesn't care about policy details, they like the bluster and the quick one liners and the stuff that's easy to understand and pick a side...no one wants to hear the gray nuance of touch policy questions. I also agree with you that Hilary knows far more specifics, which is why she has my vote.Delete
Awww, how cute - the troll has a puppy.Delete
AM A LIVING WITNESS AND A BENEFICIARY OF DR OGUDU LOVE SPELL, PREGNACY SPELL AND MARRIAGE REUNITING, CONTACT HIM NOW FOR YOUR MARRIAGE AND RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS SOLUTION WITHIN 48 HOURS OF CONTACTING HIMReplyDelete
My name is CINDY SCOTT am from BELARUS, am a woman who loves and cherish my husband more than any other thing you can imagine on earth surface. My husband was so lovely and caring after 9 years of marriage he was seriously ill and the doctor confirm and said he has a kidney infection that he needed a kidney donor, that was how I started searching for a good Samaritan who can help,doctor has given me a periodic hour that he will live just 2 days left, that was how I ask the doctor if I can be of help to my husband that was how he carried out the test,the confirming was successful, I was now having this taught that since 9years now we got married I have not be able to get pregnant can I be able to get pregnant again after the surgery? That was the question I ask the doctor, he never answer his response was do you want to lost your husband? I immediately reply no I can't afford to loose him. After the operation i and my husband came back home and live happily as husband and wife should. After 7months my husband came home with another lady telling me, that is our new wife that will give us kids and take care of us, that was how I was confused and started crying all day, That was not enough soonest my husband ran away with the new find love and never keep in contact with me. Since then I was confuse don't no what to do that was how I went back to the doctor and tell him everything, he told me that, this is not just an ordinary thing that he have heard of us situation so many times but he knows a man who is a voodoo spell caster who can help me out of my present situation that he has directed more 6 woman to him and they all came back with positive stories and testimonials about him that I should tell him all my problem that he can help me out that was how i contacted him and i did as instructed. After 3days and I have done what he ask me to do, my husband started searching for me that was how we settle he also told me not to worry that I will get pregnant, this month making it the fifth Month I contacted him am now 3months pregnant. These great spell cater is a great man, if you are in any kind of problem you can contact him here on his email OGUDUSPELLTEMPLE@YAHOO.COM...WHATSAPP NUMBER +2348106058254...WEBSITE...http://oguduspelltemple.wixsite.com/drogudu
Am here to testify of a great spell caster who is very straight forward with his words of casting spells. When my Wife left me for another Man i was so confused,but one day a friend of mine gave me the email address of this great spell caster called Awo Babatunde, I contacted this man and explained to him all that i was going through,he then told me to be calm and not worry anymore because my case is a very easy one. At first i never believe all that he was saying until when my wife returned home two days later begging me to forgive him all that he has done to me and to please accept him back into my life,I was so amazed,I never believe it was going to happen that fast.ReplyDelete
This man is truly great indeed. Contact him today for a perfect solution to your love problem, Awobabatunde50@gmail.com or whatsApp him +2349045101972