Did Sessions discuss "campaign-related matters" with Kislyak?

TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2017

Let's start with what Kushner has said:
Did Jeff Sessions get it on with his buddy, Sergey Kislyak, at the Mayflower Hotel?

Let's be more specific. We refer to the April 2016 event at which Candidate Donald J. Trump read a glorious foreign policy speech at the famous hotel.

(Full disclosure: Many of Trump's enemies have said it was the greatest such speech ever given.)

Kislyak was in attendance, presumably vacuuming canapes from the refreshment tables. Sessions was present as well.

According to last Saturday's Washington Post, Kislyak later "told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions" that day.

Was that an accurate statement on the part of the Post? In other words, did Kislyak actually say that to his superiors?

We can't answer that question. We think the Post did a miserable job sourcing its exciting claim in Saturday's news report. We don't know if Kislyak actually said that to his Russkie bosses. More importantly, we also don't know if some such discussion with Session really took place at the famous hotel.

Yesterday, we mentioned a problem with the Post report—the possibility that the Post got caught in a game of Telephone, as has happened before. To start to flesh out this possible problem, let's start with Jared Kushner's written statement about that same event at the Mayflower.

Kushner released his written statement prior to yesterday's meeting with Senate investigators. In this report from today's Washington Post, you see Kushner's account of his own experience at that same exciting event:
BARRET, RUCKER AND DEMIRJIAN (7/25/17): Kushner wrote that his first meeting with a Russian official was in April 2016 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, where Trump delivered a major foreign policy speech, the execution of which Kushner said he oversaw. Kushner wrote that he attended a reception to thank the event’s host, Dimitri Simes, publisher of the National Interest, a foreign policy magazine. Simes introduced Kushner to four ambassadors at the reception, including Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, Kushner said.

“With all the ambassadors, including Mr. Kislyak, we shook hands, exchanged brief pleasantries and I thanked them for attending the event and said I hoped they would like candidate Trump’s speech and his ideas for a fresh approach to America’s foreign policy,” he wrote. “The ambassadors also expressed interest in creating a positive relationship should we win the election. Each exchange lasted less than a minute; some gave me their business cards and invited me to lunch at their embassies. I never took them up on any of these invitations and that was the extent of the interactions.”
According to Kushner, he shook hands with the now-famous Russkie, then exchanged a handful of meaningless words.

Is that what actually happened? We have no way of knowing. But just for the sake of illustration, let's assume or imagine that Sessions also did something like that.

After that, let's imagine how Kislyak might have reported this perfunctory encounter back to his Russkie bosses. For purposes of illustration, we'll assume he was playing it straight.

Finally, let's imagine how Kislyak's report might have seemed after it had gone through two or three layers of "Telephone" on its way to the front page of the Washington Post.

We'll continue this rumination tomorrow. We won't be trying to tell you what actually happened, since we have no way of knowing.

Instead, we'll be trying to show you what could possibly be wrong with the work of the Washington Post. They've lost at "Telephone" before, as we'll remind you tomorrow.


  1. He shook hands with a Russkie, you say?! What else do you need? Roll out the guillotine!

    Anyway, even if we were, in a drunken stupor, accept their bs as an accurate description, how's it that "policy issues important to Moscow" are "campaign-related matters"? Was Mr Obama's recorded pledge to Mr Medvedev "after my election I'll have more flexibility" investigated by 10 different committees and special prosecutor?

    1. No, because he was the sitting President, and Russia had not hacked our election system to benefit him.
      Ironic, isn't it? You can't stand Trump and his gang being investigated by "10 different committees", but you were just fine and dandy with B.Clinton being investigated for 7 years over a nothing business deal, that turned into a fishing expedition, and H.Clinton being investigated 9 times about Benghazi. Shoe on other foot, etc.

    2. Incidentally, with Mr Clinton in the 1990s, as I remember there was pretty much the equal number of presstitutes bullshiting pro and contra - a proper kabuki dance.

      What's happening these days is quite different: clearly, the mofo-ing establishment is panicking. Perfect. Viva Trump!

    3. Trump is a horrible man, a disgrace. Sorry you support this scum.
      And it isn't only the "establishment" who is panicking, buddy.

    4. "...as I remember there was pretty much the equal number of presstitutes bullshiting pro and contra - a proper kabuki dance."

      More fake news from Mao in Cal.

  2. Bob, do you notice the types of people who are attracted to your site these days (like "Mao Cheng Ji")? They are tribal right-wingers who come here to be validated in their long-held belief that the "mainstream media" (as you yourself call it), which of course they take to mean "liberal media", is biased and "fake". Then they go their merry way back to Fox and cling to every word there, secure in the knowledge thst the Daily Howler will never criticize their beloved right-wing tribal news outlets.

  3. The USA finished fourth in the Mathematics Olympiad, behind Korea, China, and Vietnam.


  4. Hey Bob,
    what about this disturbing BS, perpetrated by USA Today and something called (oh, the irony!) 'iMediaEthics':

    "Only about a quarter of Americans believe that President Trump will “definitely" complete his first term as president, according to a new poll released Monday."

    "Definitely", eh? The third one - together with death and taxes...


    I never had a thing nor belief with spell casters until I saw a need for it when someone so dear to my heart left me for another man who doesn't even give a damn about her. Thanks to Dr. Odinani Owelle who used a spell to bring back my girlfriend to me in just two days when she came weeping and asking I forgive her for ever letting go and that she was gonna make up every bit of lost time and make me happier than ever for making me sob one bit
    I came in contact with Dr. Odinani Owelle in a blog and thought of giving it a trial because I could not imagine that someone I love with all my heart was gonna leave me right under my close watch, the and then did I get to know that my close watch was not good enough. Like promised, Dr Odinani Owelle kept to his just words that brought back my love home to daddy and I am gonna love her more.
    Wanna reach out to all the broken homes and relationships via this post of mine to believe that their problems can always be fixed, just get the right person to do it and I testify that there is no other right person as Dr. Odinani Owelle the real spell cast in the world Contact Him on hi's email adders odinanisolutioncentre@gmail.com.
    1. Getting your lover or husband back
    2. Spiritual bulletproof
    3. Training
    4. Money spell
    5. Long life spell
    6. Prosperity spell
    7. Protection spell
    8. Get a job spell
    9. Becoming a manager spell
    10. Get a huge loan without paying any fee spell
    11. Getting your scam money back
    12. Child spell
    13. Pregnancy spell
    14. Freedom spell
    15. Love spell
    16, vanishing spell
    17. Invisible human spell
    18. Success or pass spell
    19. Marriage spell
    20. Avenging spell
    21. Popularity spell
    22. Killing spell
    23. Cancer spell...........