BREAKING: The things a person can see on Fox!

FRIDAY, JUNE 8, 2018

Gennifer Flowers returns:
On Tuesday night, Gennifer Flowers resurfaced on Fox in response to TonedeafGate.

"I think Bill is afraid," the fearless truth-teller fearlessly told Laura Ingraham. "I am advocating that Bill be prosecuted for his sex crimes just like Harvey Weinstein has been arrested and Bill Cosby is about to be sentenced."

Back in August 1999, the fearless truth-teller fearlessly told Chris Matthews about the many murders the Clintons had staged. Chris was surprised, or at least he pretended. But in the course of his half-hour interview, he didn't miss the chance to tell her how smokin' hot she was.

On Tuesday night, Flowers broke some news. She now regards her alleged relationship with Bill Clinton as a case of sexual harassment. "Back in 1977 when I met Bill, we didn't have the laws to protect us," she bravely said.

This represents a large switch. Back in 1992, when she got rich interrupting a presidential election, Flowers told the world that she and her Bill had enjoyed a torrid, twelve-year love affair. She told the same story in her 1995 book, Passion and Bertayal, in which she thoughtfully recalled the first time she laid eyes on Hillary Clinton:
FLOWERS: I was shocked. She looked like a big fat frump with her hair hanging down kind of curly and wavy. She had big, thick glasses; an ugly dress; and a big, fat butt.
Also, Hillary was just screamingly gay, as Flowers fearlessly confessed on Hannity & Colmes. This is who Flowers is.

At any rate, on Tuesday night, she unveiled her newest story. Forget that torrid twelve-year love affair with "my Bill." As it turns out, Flowers was the victim of sexual harassment. And she wants to lock him up!

Many people actually are the victims of sexual harassment. On the other hand, sometimes we the people are the victims of disordered people who make sh*t up.

The presence of Flowers on the scene helps define an interesting problem. Most people can't imagine going on national TV and simply making sh*t up. This make it hard for us to believe that other people do that.

By instinct, we tend to assume that people aren't lying when they tell the sorts of tales that Flowers told in 1992, making tons of cash (at least $500,000) in the process.

On Tuesday night, Flowers was back with her latest story. Instinctively, most of us are inclined to believe other people when they share "their truth."

On Tuesday night, we watched Flowers sharing her latest truth. Ingraham didn't challenge her none. That's how the game is played.

It's hard for most of us people to believe that other people sometimes invent giant falsehoods. Given the way our modern media work, this is a big giant problem.

The New York Times fluffed Flowers good in October 2016. They even resurrected Connie Hamzy!

Are you sure that front-page report didn't tilt the election all by itself? What makes us so sure about that?

At any rate, it wasn't a torrid, 12-year love affair after all. At some point, we the people will have to decide that we really can't tolerate this.

No more hiding in the bushes. No more "$haring their truth."

Still coming: The things a person can see on Tucker Carlson's program

32 comments:

  1. "Many people actually are the victims of sexual harassment."

    A lot of people are, I'm sure. Though not too many among the upper-class 'metoo' clique, I reckon...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I'm sure. "
      Coming from the guy that's sure Trump siding with CitiBank, Chase, and Wells Fargo over the American citizens proves he's "Anti-Establishment", your "I'm sure" carries little to no weight.

      Delete
    2. More good news for the economically anxious mythological trump voters:

      House Republicans voted overwhelmingly to eliminate funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, after approving a White House budget plan.


      Representatives voted 210-206 — with 187 Democrats and 19 Republicans against — to rescind nearly $15 billion in unspent funding that had previously been approved, including $7 billion for CHIP, reported the New York Times.


      Also, file this under, why Donny the Chickenshit is such a fucking flim flam lying bastard.

      Trump Sides with Ken Paxton to Argue Pre-Existing Conditions Protections are Unconstitutional

      Let's see how many times he campaigned to do the exact opposite, suckers.


      Trump Wants to Ditch Preexisting Condition Protections. Here Are the Times He Promised Not To.

      The president turns his back on years of promises.


      Patrick CaldwellJun. 8, 2018 3:27 PM

      Shortly after he was elected in November 2016, Trump sat down for an interview with 60 Minutes, where he was asked if he would protect people with preexisting conditions. “Yes,” Trump responded, “because it happens to be one of the strongest assets.” (He told the Wall Street Journal the same thing around that time.)

      Delete
    3. "Representatives voted 210-206 — with 187 Democrats and 19 Republicans against..."

      T'would be interesting to know who the four Democratic traitors were are against CHIP. There are 191 Democrats in the House. What's even more interesting is that there are 435 reps. Why only 426 votes? I guess that this is the "sausage" fondly alluded to in the law-making process. And since 19 Republicans voted against the measure, it must mean that there are some “good” Republicans, legislation-wise. Seems unlikely, but it’s a possibility. *cough*

      Leroy

      Delete
    4. "House Republicans voted overwhelmingly to eliminate funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, after approving a White House budget plan"

      Thanks for this, dear. It illustrates perfectly how truly goebbelsian the liberal propaganda machine has become; peddling brazen lies like this.

      Well, on the other hand: hey, it's only zombies on the receiving end; what's the harm.

      "Among the funding to be rescinded is $7 billion for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP — a curious move in an election year, at least from a public relations standpoint. But the budget office said canceling that funding would not change what the government spends on CHIP or affect the number of children with coverage."

      Delete
    5. "Trump Sides with Ken Paxton to Argue Pre-Existing Conditions Protections are Unconstitutional"

      This one is equally goebbelsian: "The U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday that the part of Obamacare requiring individuals to have health insurance is unconstitutional..."

      No one said, obviously, that covering pre-existing conditions per se is unconstitutional.

      But hey, it's zombies on the receiving end. They'll consume anything.

      Delete
    6. "They'll consume anything."

      Not the bigotry. There is nothing for them to consume after Trump voters licked the plate clean.

      Delete
    7. Isn't that lovely, Mao, man of the people is quoting the elitist New York Times. You can almost smell the powdered wigs in the story as told by the old gray lady.

      ...a Gesture of Fiscal Restraint

      Right there in the headline.

      Delete
    8. NYT is promoted by google, another establishment tool (far more efficient than you dembots).

      No worries, next time I'll use yandex. And thanks for paying attention.

      Delete
    9. policy is debatable, of course, among differing points of reference, and you should try to reckon even with the formulation that lowering taxes is income redistribution.

      The NYT piece is behind a firewall in my case, but this is pithy for what I think you wanted to convey, Mao.

      https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53830

      Delete
    10. No one said, obviously, that covering pre-existing conditions per se is unconstitutional.

      You really are an ignorant horse's ass, you would cheerfully provide the rope to this administration which they will use to hang you.

      Here, jackass, let me help you out. The DOJ did indeed say that exact thing in their brief filed in support of the Plaintiff.

      Let's cut to the chase:


      That said, because this is a pure question of law on which the Plaintiffs and Defendants do not disagree, this Court should consider construing Plaintiffs’ motion as a request for summary judgment and then entering a declaratory judgment that the ACA’s provisions containing the individual mandate as well as the guaranteed- issue and community-rating requirements will all be invalid beginning on January 1, 2019.

      What do you suppose the guaranteed- issue is? I'll leave that to you and google to figure out.

      Delete
    11. The plaintiffs (states) argued it was unconstitutional due to the termination of the mandated payments ("tax").

      The DoJ agrees based upon the SCOTUS ruling.

      That ruling wasnt worth hanging your hat on from jump.

      There's incentive to keep tinkering with it because it's a great big Democrat cudgel in the fall.

      Delete
    12. Any news source which mendaciously claims in any way shape or form that the GOP House cares fuck all about "Fiscal Restraint" is lying to you, jackass. Try another meme, that lie has been exposed, it has expired.

      Delete
    13. The plaintiffs (states) argued it was unconstitutional due to the termination of the mandated payments ("tax").

      Yes, first the GOP undermined the ACA by eliminating the "tax" provision when they passed the TCJA, which they clearly understood at the time would undermine the SCOTUS decision in National Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius (NFIB), 567 U.S. 519, 572 (2012).

      And Donny the Chickenshit Coward Traitor is too fucking stupid to understand any of this anyway.

      Delete
    14. I think you can credit the election process, but they have to run again so there will be some tinkering, Tailgunner-Joe-with-Tourette's.

      Delete
    15. "and you should try to reckon even with the formulation that lowering taxes is income redistribution."

      Huh? What the hell are you talking about.

      "but this is pithy for what I think you wanted to convey, Mao."

      I have no interest in becoming expert in a trivial accounting transaction.

      I'll just note that the goebbelsian nature of the above examples of establishment propaganda is beyond dispute, evident to anyone with at least a half of functioning brain present.

      And that's my only point.

      Delete
    16. The bigger point is that your gaslighting only works on mouth-breathing morons, or what we like to call "Conservatives".

      Delete
  2. At one time they called this sort of sexual harassment "the morning after".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cecelia, please call yourself something else. You are embarrassing yourself with this crap. Incel.me wants their playmate back.

      Delete
    2. My mother wanted to name me Cynthia, but my father insisted that people would then call me Cindy, which they both didn't like.

      When I was in grade school I wished I had been named Roxanne.

      I think we both have to settle for this name.

      (burp...scratch...)

      Delete
    3. In your dreams

      Delete
    4. "Olivia Megan"?

      Too WASP?

      Delete
  3. Bob: I put in a salt lick, and some honeysuckle, and I noticed that the quills of the hatchlings changed the sheath of their plumage. Just like grouses and their nestlings. So, can a curved billed fledgling use its dipper to sort of gape its gizzard? Or would a chicklet in fact nourish its breastbone during migration, like scrubfowl or something? Since the culver and its eggs are vertebrates, right? The fluffy shaft expand to form feather pecking, like a turkey follicle, or something. Such as a mandible. Or is the elongated I put in a salt lick, and some honeysuckle, and I noticed that the quills of the hatchlings changed the sheath of their plumage. Just like grouses and their nestlings. So, can a curved billed fledgling use its dipper to sort of gape its gizzard? Or would a chicklet in fact nourish its breastbone during migration, like scrubfowl or something? Since the culver and its eggs are vertebrates, right? The fluffy shaft expand to form feather pecking, like a turkey follicle, or something. Such as a mandible. Or is the elongated membrane of the peafowl, like a crest feather, uh, on a cockatoo, or maybe a rose breasted cockatiel, in the muscular pouch of the gullet there. And so, I noticed the debeaking of a leghorn rousse, was sort of like a flapping mallard hatchling, and the lobular marcipals of a scrubfowl on the elongated membrane of the peafowl. Or a curved billed fledgling or the dorsal ridge of an insectivore, can develop an egg shell, actually, of the incubated chick.membrane of the peafowl, like a crest feather, uh, on a cockatoo, or maybe a rose breasted cockatiel, in the muscular pouch of the gullet there. And so, I noticed the debeaking of a leghorn rousse, was sort of like a flapping mallard hatchling, and the lobular marcipals of a scrubfowl on the elongated membrane of the peafowl. Or a curved billed fledgling or the dorsal ridge of an insectivore, can develop an egg shell, actually, of the incubated chick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Perhaps this will assuage your crazy Romanian impulses. Hope you have good speakers. You'll need 'em.

      Cult of Personality

      Leroy

      Delete
    3. That’s obnoxious, and you’re a traitorous Russian spy if you dont agree.

      Delete
    4. Well, I think that song has the best power chord I’ve ever heard.

      I appreciate your link, which provided this:

      “CBO projects that the rescission from the Child Enrollment Contingency Fund would not affect payments to states over the 2018-2028 period.”

      Apparently, the Federal government has been banking on future needs, and I think that’s appropriate. Rescinding these obligations seems to me a bad idea, since we’re looking at a ten-year timeline.

      I guess that I’m wrong about the hullabaloo over CHIP. Not the first time I’ve been wrong, won’t be the last. Now, for something completely different h/t Monty Python:

      Well it's true just take a look - The cover sometimes makes the book

      Leroy

      Delete
  4. Well, Gennifer, if Bill was so bad, why were you with him for 12 years, or are you just trying to resurrect your 15 minutes of fame?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder how much she is being paid this time around.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Save Your Relationship and Get Your Ex Boyfriend/Girlfriend Back!contact: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com is certainly the best spell caster online and his result is 100% guarantee.
    My Name Olivia Stephen form Tx,USA. After 12years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he would come back to me, I was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a Love spell for me. 28 hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact
    Call/WhatsApp: +2348071622464 ,
    Email: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,
    Website:https://unityspelltmple.blogspot.com .

    ReplyDelete
  7. is this true about Bill Clinton as a case of sexual harassment.?
    Surprised at Gerber Audi Repair

    ReplyDelete
  8. I AM FINALLY FREE FROM FINANCIAL BONDAGE THANKS TO MOORE LOAN COMPANY (mooreloancompany@yahoo.com).

    Good day everyone,I can’t hide this great testimony that took place in my life I will love everyone to know it and be a partaker of this, that is why I want to share it to the whole world by placing this advert on classifieds, I am Mrs Karen Brown by name, I live in Chattanooga, Tennessee United State, I want to thank ROBBINSON MOORE for his kindness upon my family life, I never knew that there is still a sincere and trustworthy lender like this on the internet and on earth. Just some days I was in search for a loan of $ 100,000.00, As I was running out of money for feeding, School fees, My business was really going out of capital and my rent. I was scammed about $15,000.00 dollars and I decided not to involve my self in such business again. But a Friend of mine introduced me to a loan firm due to my appearance and doings and also my complains to her. And I told her that I am not interested in any loan deal anymore but she told me that there is still a sincere lender who she will recommend me to, And she gave me the details of this man who is called MOORE ROBBINSON. And I really put a trial and I am most greatful and lucky today, I was given a loan amount of $95,000,00 Dollars by this great firm MOORE LOAN COMPANY. If you arew in need of a genuine, Sincere, durable and a truth worthy loan lender or financial assistance and also you know you can be reliable and trusted, capable of paying back at the due / duration time of the funds I will advice you to send your contact to them via email @[ mooreloancompany@yahoo.com] OR Text (414) 454-9493 . And you will be free from scams on the internet. Please I am begging everyone on earth to help me thank Mr ROBBINSON MOORE. And I ill always being sharing this great surprise and testimony that happened in my life everyday to all that need loans. Contact them now if you are in need of a loan: AS THEY ARE EFFICIENT,DYNAMIC AND RELAIBLE.....Again there contact email [mooreloancompany@yahoo.com OR Text (414) 454-9493.

    ReplyDelete