TRUTH AND TOWN: The standard parts of "Storyline porn"...

FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2021 the case of one recent death: This morning found the Washington Post's Paul Butler—a good, decent person—walking through the streets of Our Town with a rope in his hands.

Butler's a good, decent person. We'll discuss his new column at some later point.

For now, we prefer to discuss a recent shooting death—and the way the facts of that shooting death were parceled out to us the Townies. At issue is a basic question:

Are we able to handle the truth here in the streets of Our Town? Major experts consistently say that the answer is surely no.

Our brains aren't wired for that, despondent scholars routinely  insist. They point to the ways we "novelize news"—the ways we create pleasing, reconfigured stories which drive preferred tribal narrative.

(In truth, the word "preferred" is ours. These experts tend to say "mandated.")

It's hard to believe that these experts are right, but their credentials speak for themselves. At their suggestion, we'll discuss one of the recent shooting deaths which was deemed appropriate for public consumption here within Our Town.

On April 20, Ma'Khia Bryant, age 16, was shot and killed in Columbus, Ohio.

Did we mention the fact that she was only sixteen? Based on videotape of the incident, she was involved in a violent dispute at the time she was shot and killed.

This violent dispute was taking place outside the home where Bryant and one of her sisters were living in foster care. On April 21, the New York Times and the Washington Post offered initial reports about the basic facts of what had occurred.

We were struck by some of the ways this incident was reported. First, though, we note the fact that the Post's David Von Drehle broke every rule in the book.

On April 24, Von Drehle wrote a searching opinion column about this fatal incident. He considered various aspects of what had occurred. 

In a break from current practice, Von Drehle displayed the ability to wonder about Ma'Khia Bryant's life. He also wondered about the many children of Columbus, Ohio, but also of that whole state.

Who was this teen-aged girl—this teen-aged girl who was shot and killed during a violent fight? As one part of a wider column, Von Drehle offered this:

VON DREHLE (4/24/21): Of Ma’Khia, we have this shard that feels important, though we don’t know exactly how or where it fits. She was in foster care. Relatives describe her as an affectionate and loving person with hopes of being restored to her mother’s custody. Even so, any path to foster care is traumatic.

It is to the credit of Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) and the state legislature that improving Ohio’s foster care system has been a priority in recent years. But it has been a priority because foster care in Ohio—like foster care virtually everywhere—falls far short of the needs of its clients.

And while we don’t know the specific needs of this particular child, we know that in 2018, in Franklin County, where Columbus is the seat, nearly 14,000 reports of children in crisis were received. Of those, some 6,000 involved reported physical abuse, more than 2,700 involved neglect, 1,349 involved reported sexual abuse and 1,500 involved multiple offenses. The numbers were rising, according to social workers, as a result of the epidemic of opioid addiction among parents.

Nearly 14,000 reports of "children in crisis" in Franklin County alone! 

Von Drehle had the decency to wonder about those children's lives. But of one thing you can be sure—you'll never hear about this topic as Rachel Maddow chuckles and clowns her way through another prime time hour.

Maddow has been on one of her roller-coaster "highs" of late. The chuckling and the "open mike night" performance style have been endless and obnoxious—disrespectful of the (failing) world in which we all live.

You won't be hearing about foster care on Our Town's favorite TV shows. Or perhaps in the New York Times, though this morning's Washington Post offers a front-page news report about foster care in Ohio.

We haven't read that news report yet, although we certainly will. It may start to answer some of the questions we've had since this recent death occurred.

We've had questions about Ma'Khia Bryant—about who this young person was, about how she ended up in the situation in which she would lose her life. In the first paragraph we've posted, Von Drehle was also wondering about those questions, even as he offered that statistic about the 14,000 "children in crisis" in Franklin County alone.

Fourteen thousand! In one county alone!

In that same first paragraph, Von Drehle also referred to the now-standard assessments from the now-standard family members—the standard reports about what a great kid this young decedent was.  

As he did, Von Drehle linked to a thoroughly standard overview report in his own Washington Post. 

The report to which Von Drehle linked opens in a thoroughly standard way. Credentialed experts describe this mandated journalistic style as uncaring, novelistic, repulsive:

LUDLOW ET AL (4/23/21): Ma’Khia Bryant beams at her mother in a TikTok clip, then throws her arms around her neck. As Beyoncé’s “Dance for You” plays in the background, the teen lip-syncs the lyrics: “I’ma take this time to show you how much you mean to me, ‘cause you are all I need.”

It’s an intimate moment between mother and daughter, who were working hard to reunite after Bryant was placed in foster care, family members said.

“They had a close bond,” said Don Bryant, a cousin of Ma’Khia’s mother. “Ma’Khia was just an all-around good person.”

This ugly report goes on and on, then on and on, with an array of family members describing what a great kid this youngster was. Also, with such "Storyline porn" as this:

LUDLOW ET AL: On Thursday, family members struggled to make sense of the killing, at least the third fatal shooting by Columbus police this year.

Don Bryant said he had a hard time recognizing the teen seen in the police video lunging at others. He does not “condone any violence,” he said, but he called the officer’s decision to open fire disproportionate.

“There are other disengagement techniques that police could have used here,” said Bryant, who has served on the Mansfield, Ohio, city council. “I’m a supporter of police, as former city councilor. I understood their moves, their tactics, what they do. I just don’t understand what happened here.”

Ma’Khia Bryant was loving and affectionate with family, Don Bryant said. When he ran in a recent election for mayor of Mansfield, she texted periodically to see how his campaign was going, he said.


“She laughed a lot,” said Ila Bryant, Ma’Khia’s great-grandmother, adding that the teen did well in school. “Intellectually, she was very intelligent,” she said.

“But she didn’t even have a chance to live her life or make decisions,” Ila Bryant said. “Justice was not done.”

We're sure that Don Bryant is a good, decent person. So of course are the four journalists whose names appeared in the byline to this standardized "report."

The journalists were too polite to ask a slightly awkward question. If this deserving kid was so affectionate and so all-around great, why hadn't she been living with him, or with one of the other relatives who had offered the journalistically mandated standard accounts? 

LUDLOW ET AL: Ma’Khia Bryant’s grandmother Jeanene Hammonds said she raced about 10 minutes to the Columbus foster home after receiving a call from her upset granddaughter late Tuesday afternoon. She said Bryant told her that an adult woman who used to live in the home had returned for a visit and an argument had ensued over the house being messy.

Both Bryant and the woman were holding knives, Hammonds told The Washington Post in an interview. Investigators have not commented on whether anyone on the scene other than Bryant had a weapon or was threatening anyone.

Hammonds said she was devastated by the shooting of her granddaughter. “This was a 16-year-old child,” she said, “a sweet, loving person.”

Officials identified the officer who fired shots as Nicholas Reardon and said he has been taken off street duty while the investigation proceeds.

According to various ranking experts, the various "narrative chunks" were all neatly in place in this standardized overview piece. The decedent was a lovely kid. Ther officer had overreacted.

News reporting by the New York Times exhibited similar narrative elements. Neighbors and family members who had no particular way to know what they were talking about expounded about the injustice the police officer had wrought.

In Our Town, this has become standard practice. But only in the case of the shooting deaths Our Town is told about.

Why had Ma-Khia Bryant,  age 16, been in that foster home? On the evening of April 22, CNN's increasingly gruesome Chris Cuomo seemed to say that he would find out.

He had arranged to stage the standard interview with Ma'Khia Bryant's mother. Midway through his show, he offered this truly ridiculous tease for the upcoming segment:

CUOMO (4/22/21): Look, here's what we know. We're going to talk more about the Ma'Khia Bryant story. Why?

It is not a great case to show police not doing the right thing. But because of that, confusion for people. "I don't get why are—why are people upset about this?" 

Well, one, you lost the kid. Two, because it seems like there's never a good ending, it never goes any other way. And when you lose a kid, a family loses everything, OK?

Ma'Khia Bryant had a mother. She's here tonight. Who was her kid? Why was she in that house? What does her loss mean? Next!

"Next!" he barked, in the trademark manner designed to rope us in.

Meanwhile, hopeless! "It isn't a great case to show police not doing the right thing," Cuomo absurdly said. Weirdly, this fading star seemed to be saying the quiet part out loud. 

In fairness, Cuomo also seemed to say that he'd be getting some answers:

"Why was she in that house?" Cuomo seemed to say that he was going to ask!

After a commercial break, the interview proceeded. To our eye, it seemed that Bryant's mother may be intellectually or emotionally challenged. Needless to say, Cuomo never asked the question he'd teased.

He did the standard interview. But then, the structure of these interviews is wholly mandated by now.

Cuomo even ended with this. He'd like to be a social worker, but the pay isn't quite as  good:

CUOMO: And I am very sorry for your loss.

BRYANT: Thank you.

CUOMO: All right. You know how to get us. If there's any way that we can help, we're a phone call away. God bless going forward.

This is the way Storyline is now performed in Our Town. In fairness, we've come to wonder if Cuomo was damaged by his episode of Covid. To our eye, he doesn't even look like himself at this point.

We were surprised when experts referred to these constructions as a form of "Storyline porn." As for Maddow, she proceeded in her normal way last night:

She staged a version of open mike night for maybe the first twenty minutes. The last twelve minutes of her hour broke down like this:

Four minutes of ads at 9:48, followed by four minutes on Navalny. After that,  four more minutes of ads. 

Experts say the repeated Navalny takes are a version of "sincerity branding" designed to smooth off the clowning. We find these claims hard to believe.

On the TV shows most loved in Our Town, you won't be hearing about all those kids who are living in foster care or worse. You won't be challenged that way on TV—at least, not over here in Our Town.

The death in the road not traveled: According to this news report, another teenager was recently shot and killed. According to that report, he was shot and killed on April 13 while he lay on the ground, already having been shot.

Reading between the lines a bit, it sounds like this teen—he too was 16—may have been having some sort of mental health breakdown.

Was something wrong with that policeman's behavior? We can't answer that question. But we can tell you this: You haven't heard a word about that teen shooting death, and you never will. 

Our Town is pure Storyline now. Our Town is Storyline all the way down, top major experts keep saying. 

We might be able to handle the truth, but there's little chance that we'll be asked to. Our brains are wired for this other game, major top experts have said.


  1. We do know the standard parts of storyline porn, dear Bob.

    Are you going to try to analyze why this Orwellian shit is happening?

    And no, dear Bob, 'humyn beings are like that' is not accepted. Please try to analyze it in terms of political economy.

    1. ma0 ma0 * ,!, ,!,

    2. Five weeks ago my boyfriend broke up with me. It all started when i went to summer camp i was trying to contact him but it was not going through. So when I came back from camp I saw him with a young lady kissing in his bed room, I was frustrated and it gave me a sleepless night. I thought he will come back to apologies but he didn't come for almost three week i was really hurt but i thank Dr.Azuka for all he did i met Dr.Azuka during my search at the internet i decided to contact him on his email he brought my boyfriend back to me just within 48 hours i am really happy. What’s app contact : +44 7520 636249‬

  2. "Butler's a good, decent person. We'll discuss his new column at some later point."

    Why does Somerby do this? He mentions someone or something only to tell us that he is not going to talk about them. He promises to return to them, but often doesn't. This amounts to just a waste of space, which is why it so often seems like Somerby is padding his essays much like someone who is being paid by the word. Another word for this is "self-indulgent" and he clearly has little respect for his readers or he would go back and edit these sorts of remarks out of his draft.

  3. "This ugly report goes on and on, then on and on, with an array of family members describing what a great kid this youngster was. "

    There is something wrong with Somerby when he cannot stand to watch Maddow be upbeat and exuberant. He cannot stand to hear about the loving moments between a mother and daughter. He cannot stand to think about the girl as a human being, with strengths and weaknesses, desires and needs -- as a person. He calls this description of her "ugly", just as he tries mightily to portray Maddow as disfigured.

    This ugliness is coming from within Somerby, not the reports he maligns here daily. A girl in crisis was shot for waving around a steak knife, by an ignorant cop who didn't know how to defuse the situation (or didn't bother trying). And Somerby calls the girl ugly for having a positive side, for having family and friends who will miss her.

  4. "Also, with such "Storyline porn" as this..."

    Somerby much prefers the revenge porn of a film like A Promising Young Woman.

  5. Why are Black people still calling the cops just because someone is trying to stab someone with a knife years after BLM declared that ACAB? Shouldn't they be calling BLM or one of our own Anon cop-haters?

    1. How many foster kids do you have living with you?

      How many teenagers have you raised?

    2. The future de-funded cop force that Anon wants will definitely let "Bryant brandishing a knife and charging two women" kill them. Hopefully they will be members of Anon's family.

    3. When was the last time you heard about any 16 year old killing anyone with a steak knive. Now add the fact that she was an upset girl yelling at the woman and try to figure out whether there was real danger to anyone. If you think about all of that, you will be doing more than the cop did before shooting his gun.

    4. @11:10 AM
      Think of it this way, dear dembot: less greenhouse gasses, less global warming. Always look at the bright side, as they say.

    5. I love that Biden called Mao's bluff, and is shoving tax increases down the throat of the establishment.
      What I don't love so much, is Mao has dropped all pretense, and is relying on the straight-up racism that has made the GOP one of our two most popular political parties

  6. "The decedent was a lovely kid. Ther [sic] officer had overreacted."

    Obviously the officer overreacted. He shot a 16-year-old girl embroiled in a domestic quarrel. Her loveliness doesn't matter. She was 16. She was a girl. She was having the kind of dispute most teens have at that age, but she didn't survive. Unlike nearly every white kid on the face of this earth.

    Somerby objects to the family remembrances of her. No one should be remembered by their worst moments. (Our worst moments shouldn't result in being shot by cops either.) He thinks that if she were less fondly remembered that might justify her killing. Earth-to-Somerby: IT DOESN'T.

    Humanizing the victim is an attempt to undo the wrong done by the police who killed her. If she were a blood-thirsty serial killer, cornered at the end of a police chase, she still shouldn't be killed by police -- she should be tried and convicted by a court before having a sentence executed upon her. Instead, the cops shot her without knowing her side of what was happening, without any attempt to defuse the situation or dearm her. They just shot her. And that is wrong no matter what kind of person she was.

    When Somerby attempts to limit the good things said about a shooting victim, as his complaint today is clearly trying to do, he pretends that there is some justification for the cops based on the goodness or lack of goodness of the person who was shot. That is nonsense. It is not how our legal system works, and it is entirely irrelevant to evaluating the facts of the situation.

    The main question is why trained police cannot prevent a 16 year old girl armed with a 6-inch steak knife from harming herself or others, without shooting her upon first sight.

  7. Referring to Bryant's mother, Somerby says: "To our eye, it seemed that Bryant's mother may be intellectually or emotionally challenged."

    That is another way of calling her stupid and hysterical. This is what he says about a woman who just lost her daughter!

    Then Somerby tries to distance himself from his own ugly remarks, saying: "We were surprised when experts referred to these constructions as a form of "Storyline porn." "

    What experts? This is the way Somerby tries to avoid responsibility for his own opinions. His opinion here is apparently that Bryant deserved to be shot and her relatives are making up good things about her afterwards to try to get the cops in trouble. And Cuomo helped.

    Whatta guy our Somerby is!

  8. Here is some more of Cuomo's interview with Bryant's mother:

    BRYANT: I want to remember Ma'Khia, the good things about Ma'Khia, the loving things about Ma'Khia. That's what God wants me to do. I am in God's hands. Ma'Khia, I believe, is in heaven. She's an angel.

    She repeatedly says that the killing must stop.

    Somerby says she is stupid and hysterical, or in his words "intellectually or emotionally challenged".

    If you read the interview, it would have been especially crass for Cuomo to ask a grieving mother (who was neither present nor involved in the incident), why her child was in foster care. But Somerby complains because he didn't do that. Inquiring minds want Cuomo to ask this mother how she contributed to her daughter's death by failing to keep her daughter out of the foster care system. No doubt, Somerby would have asked.

    Somerby's demeaning term "porn" for the efforts to maintain the humanity of shooting victims reveals his own lack of empathy, his lack of understanding of what life can be like for those in less fortunate circumstances than his own. This lack of empathy is one of the distinguishing hallmarks of their town versus ours. Whatever his problems, Cuomo is a better human being than Somerby, whose callousness is revealed in every word he writes as he tries to blame the victims for police incompetence.

  9. Somerby calls these reports "porn" as if readers got some pleasure out of reading them. I think he cannot imagine that anyone would care about these victims, so he assumes that there is some ulterior motive for reading these stories. This echoes the conservative memes that liberals are "performative" in their virtue, wishing only to show that they are deeply caring individuals and look good in the eyes of others, not that liberal actually feel any empathy for those in trouble. Like conservatives, Somerby implies that liberals are only pretending to be good people, only tsk-tsking over shootings to feel virtuous, not to be virtuous.

    Somerby perhaps thinks this because he himself feels no empathy, does not care about 16-year old Ma'Khia. Has never had a child and thus cannot appreciate the connection a parent, even a flawed one, feels for that child. Somerby cannot understand that each of us who has attachments understands how we would feel upon losing them and thus can resonate to Bryant's mother's loss. It is not faked virtue but a genuine sense of what it would mean to us if we were in that situation.

    To call such empathy "porn" is one of the more deplorable things Somerby has written, among quite a few truly ugly statements in the past few weeks. It is no wonder he feels increasingly more comfortable over at Fox, with Tucker Carlson, who will make him feel like his callousness is "normal" and justified because liberals are all faking it when they call for an end to such shootings.

    If conservatives can portray BLM as nothing more than an excuse to break windows, then they need not rein in the excesses of the police, need not deal with racism in our institutions, and can keep a system that benefits them in place unchanged. This is the position Somerby has been arguing, and his daily attempt to malign liberal concern as nothing more than porn, performative virtue signaling, is just a dressed up version of the conservative line.

  10. Nice first draft, Bob, but it needs way more "that cop was no angel".

  11. Yes, an affectionate and loving person who was just about to stab someone.

    1. You can assume that she was prepared to use the knife aggressively, but do you actually know that to be true? She could also have been brandishing it in self-defense.

      It is entirely possible to be affectionate and loving but also get angry sometimes, especially at the age of 16 and while living in a foster home due to some sort of family dysfunction or trauma.

      But you, no doubt, are always affectionate and loving 24/7 with everyone you meet and under any and all circumstances.

  12. Five weeks ago my boyfriend broke up with me. It all started when i went to summer camp i was trying to contact him but it was not going through. So when I came back from camp I saw him with a young lady kissing in his bed room, I was frustrated and it gave me a sleepless night. I thought he will come back to apologies but he didn't come for almost three week i was really hurt but i thank Dr.Azuka for all he did i met Dr.Azuka during my search at the internet i decided to contact him on his email he brought my boyfriend back to me just within 48 hours i am really happy. What’s app contact : +44 7520 636249‬

  13. Isiyku Abdulahi
    My ex-boyfriend dumped me one week ago after I accused him of seeing someone else and insulting him. I want him back in my life but he refuse to have any contact with me. I was so confuse and don’t know what to do, so I reach to the Internet for help and I saw a testimony of how a spell caster help them to get their ex back so I contact the spell caster and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me and assure me of 2 days that my ex will return to me and to my greatest surprise the third day my ex came knocking on my door and beg for forgiveness. I am so happy that my love is back again and not only that, we are about to get married. Once again thank you Dr Believe. You are truly talented and gifted.He is the only answer. He can be of great help and I will not stop talking about him because he is a wonderful man. Contact this great love spell caster for your relationship or marriage problem to be solved today via email: or WhatsApp: +19713839183

  14. LOTTO, lottery,jackpot.
    Hello all my viewers, I am very happy for sharing this great testimonies,The best thing that has ever happened in my life is how I win the lottery euro million mega jackpot. I am a Woman who believe that one day I will win the lottery. finally my dreams came through when I email and tell him I need the lottery numbers. I have spend so much money on ticket just to make sure I win. But I never know that winning was so easy until the day I meant the spell caster online which so many people has talked about that he is very great in casting lottery spell, . so I decide to give it a try.I contacted this great Dr Believe and he did a spell and he gave me the winning lottery numbers. But believe me when the draws were out I was among winners. I win 30,000 million Dollar. Dr Believe truly you are the best, all thanks to you forever