WEDNESDAY: Eggs are down and coffee is up!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 2025

Slowly the New York Times turns: Good news! According to The Hill, the price of eggs is down:

US egg prices fall for third straight month

The average price for a dozen eggs is now $3.77, another step down from March’s record-high carton costs.

The newest numbers mark the third straight month of declining egg prices for American consumers, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

The highest price—around $6.23 in March—has steadily dipped each month, with costs landing near $5.12 in April and $4.55 in May.

Eggs are down for the third straight month. Assuming that report is accurate, that counts as good news. 

That said, here's your bad news! According to the New York Times, the price of coffee has been going up—and it may go even higher:

Tariffs on Brazil Could Leave Coffee Drinkers With a Headache

[...]

President Trump’s plan to impose a 50 percent tariff on all imports from Brazil starting next month would drive up the price of coffee, whether it was served in cafes or brewed in the kitchen.

Such a tariff would put more pressure on the coffee industry as prices have peaked globally this year. Droughts in Brazil and Vietnam, two of the biggest coffee exporters to the United States, have resulted in smaller harvests in recent seasons, driving up prices.

Consumers are already paying more at the grocery store. At the end of May, the average price of one pound of ground roast coffee in the U.S. was $7.93, up from $5.99 at the same time last year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

As of the end of May, the price of coffee was already substantially higher than it was last year. If President Trump decides to hold firm on that threatened tariff, things could get that much worse.

Coffee is up and eggs are down and never the twain shall meet! For the record, these price fluctuations in the past year may have had little to do with Presidents Biden and Trump:

According to the New York Times, coffee is up because of those droughts in Brazil and Vietnam. According to NewsNation, eggs are down because "cases of avian flu [are] more controlled." 

(The report also says that "egg imports [have] increased," helping drive prices down, possibly due, at least in part, to actions by the Trump administration.)

Coffee is up and eggs are down and information is hard to get! In this report from Mediaite, Bill O'Reilly keeps insisting, on a NewsNation program, that Jeffrey Epstein was “convicted under Merrick Garland’s Justice Department."

As NewsNation's host kept noting, he wasn't! As you can see in that report, O'Reilly finally relented on the facts after several on-air corrections. 

Everybody makes mistakes! As if to prove that point, here went President Trump again, speaking in the Oval Office on this very morning:

Trump Surprised ‘Terrible Fed Chair’ Jerome Powell Was Appointed—Forgetting He Appointed Him

President Donald Trump admitted Wednesday during an Oval Office press event that he was “surprised” that Jerome Powell was appointed Fed Chair, apparently forgetting that he was the individual who appointed the “terrible” appointee.

[...]

“He’s a terrible Fed chair,” he continued. “I was surprised he was appointed. I was surprised, frankly, that Biden put him in and extended him, but they did.”

Trump appointed Powell to lead the central bank in November 2017, selecting him to succeed Janet Yellen despite Powell being a sitting member of the Fed’s Board of Governors. 

For ourselves, we're puzzled by two word choices in that report—"admitted" and "despite." At any rate, it was President Trump who nominated the terrible Powell for his position as Fed chair. It wasn't President Biden!

People do make mistakes, especially mistakes which are helpful. On a slightly different tangent, we almost think we see the New York Times expanding the scope of its coverage of President Trump in a new report.

The report was written by Peter Baker. In this essay, the paper seems to be a bit more probing about certain aspects of the sitting president's highly unusual conduct:

WHITE HOUSE MEMO
For Trump, Domestic Adversaries Are Not Just Wrong, They Are ‘Evil’

When the Pentagon decided not to send anyone to this week’s Aspen Security Forum, an annual bipartisan gathering of national security professionals in the Colorado mountains, President Trump’s appointees explained that they would not participate in discussions with people who subscribe to the “evil of globalism.”

After all the evils that the U.S. military has fought, this may be the first time in its history that it has put globalization on its enemies list. But it is simply following the example of Mr. Trump. Last week, he denounced a reporter as a “very evil person” for asking a question he did not like. This week, he declared that Democrats are “an evil group of people.”

“Evil” is a word getting a lot of airtime in the second Trump term. It is not enough anymore to dislike a journalistic inquiry or disagree with an opposing philosophy. Anyone viewed as critical of the president or insufficiently deferential is wicked. The Trump administration’s efforts to achieve its policy goals are not just an exercise in governance but a holy mission against forces of darkness.

The characterization seeds the ground to justify all sorts of actions that would normally be considered extreme or out of bounds...

That's the way Baker begins. In our view, he ventures out of his way as he starts to soften the force of what he's describing. Still, he's examining an increasing bit of highly unusual conduct—the president's increasing assessment that those who make accurate statements he doesn't like should be stamped as "evil" or "very evil," but also as "the enemy."

That's very unusual presidential behavior. Why does President Trump behave that way? And what might a specialist say about this dangerous, unintelligent conduct?

This is dangerous behavior. In our view, it also has the feel of a human tragedy. What might a specialist say, a person with experience and specialized training?

59 comments:


  1. "For Trump, Domestic Adversaries Are Not Just Wrong, They Are ‘Evil’"

    Of course they are evil; everyone who's not suffering from TDS knows it. Because smearing Trump is, without a doubt, their only purpose. They are obsessively hateful, and that's all they are. If anything is "evil", this is it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump is evil. MAGA is evil. You are evil.

      Delete
    2. For Somerby, Trump is not just wrong, he is sick. Pathologizing someone is no better than calling them evil. Somerby calls for a special specialist, presumably one who will call Trump (or whoever) all the names, apply all the labels, Somerby considers appropriate:

      "This is dangerous behavior. In our view, it also has the feel of a human tragedy. What might a specialist say, a person with experience and specialized training?"

      Specialists do not exist to further Somerby's pleasing narrative. The kind of specialists Somerby is hinting at exist to help people cope with problems with living, treat mental illness, and improve the lives of people in distress. None of that means helping Somerby call Trump a sociopath or whatever word Somerby is obsessed with today.

      Unlike the non-specialist name-calling that Trump engages in, those special specialists tend to avoid making value judgments about their clients. For a guy who wants to find a specialist who will explain what Somerby thinks about Trump, Somerby makes a lot of negative judgments here at his blog. Specialists tend not to do that sort of thing.

      (What is wrong with names of specialities, such as clinical psychologist, counselor neuropsychologist, therapist, psychoanalyst, forensic psychologist?) Or is Somerby thinking about hiring a life coach or personal trainer to tell him what he wants to hear? Maybe a spiritualist or palm reader?

      Delete
    3. Somerby asked what a specialist. You twisted that into him wanting to get a particular answer.

      Delete
    4. "What might a specialist say, a person with experience and specialized training?"

      The word specialist does not refer to any particular kind of specialist. Somerby is way too vague with that word. And what is a specialist with experience and specialized training, as compared to a garden-variety specialist?

      When Somerby has referred in the past to a carefully selected mental health expert, he has obviously been seeking someone who will confirm, not contradict his own speculations about Trump's mental health.

      Meanwhile, there have been quite a few specialists who have weighed in, largely in editorials that they have credentials to write, that Trump likely has dementia. It has been a long time since Bandy Lee called Trump a sociopath. Experts these days are concerned that he is showing cognitive decline, even compared to his own low baseline during his first term.

      Somerby ignores what these experts have been saying. He would prefer to find a specialist who will agree that Trump's daddy was mean to him and that's why he behaves so badly. I think Somerby keeps seeking a specialist who will agree with his diagnosis because Somerby identifies with Trump and is preoccupied with his own family dynamics to the point that he wants to project them onto various Republican miscreants, from Tucker Carlson and J.D. Vance to Trump.

      In the world of actual specialists, the idea that childhood disadvantage causes adult pathology is still controversial, even if it seems like common sense to Somerby. It is a discarded legacy of Freud that isn't well-supported by data when you examine what happens with kids who go through difficult childhoods and yet do well as adults. Resiliency contradicts Somerby's deterministic thesis about Trump's behavior.

      Delete
  2. Steven Pinker is innocent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He gave polling data to the Russians. Polling data is super-secret.

      Delete
    2. Russians are illegal.

      Delete
    3. Russians were illegal (except for those of them who identify as "Ukrainian"), under the idiot-Democrat regime. Under the new regime, all of them are legal again.

      Delete
    4. Russians can become legal again if they stop attacking Ukraine.

      Delete
    5. It takes a real bozo to post an anti-Dem comment under the same column that quotes Trump criticizing Biden for an appointment that Trump himself made, and also quotes Trump criticizing Biden for extending Powell's term when Powell has not in fact been extended.

      Is it Day One yet?

      Delete
    6. Actually, Biden reappointed Powell as Fed chair for a second, four-year, term.

      Delete
    7. But I agree with the "real bozo" comment.

      Delete
    8. Powell is also serving a 14 year term as a member of the FED Board of Governors. That will not have expired when his term as Chair ends.

      Delete
    9. Yes, his term as a member of the Fed's Board of Governors extends until 2028. His term as Chair of the Board expires in 2026.

      Delete
    10. Now we are seeing the question arise in the MSM about whether Trump has the plan, not the right, to fire Powell. This kind of reporting is one more example of the media ceding authority to Trump that he does not clearly have.

      Delete
    11. Furthermore, firing Powell would eliminate the scapegoat Trump will need to place the blame on, as inflation, GDP, the shrinking dollar and the jobs market go south under is misguided economic plan.

      Delete
    12. Thanks for the correction DG.

      Delete
    13. Dem “leaders” will keep doing the same things and expecting different results. They will keep imploding, throwing stones, shooting themselves in the feet and alienating mainstream America. They have no credible leaders. They have no message. They have no vision.

      Delete
    14. They will stop attacking "Ukraine" when it's de-nazified and de-militarized. But they are already not illegal, under this current regime.

      Delete
  3. This illustrates the left or anti-Trump slant of the NYT.
    "The characterization seeds the ground to justify all sorts of actions that would normally be considered extreme or out of bounds."
    The Times doesn't say that Trump took any extreme action. Yet, based on a single word they imp=ly that he is going to do so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s not slanted and it’s not leftist.

      Delete
    2. It's a pretty safe bet Trump is going to take action in the future that is either extreme or out of bounds. What exactly is your complaint?

      Delete
    3. To me, the best illustration that the NY Times is of the Left and anti-Trump is that when Trump claimed the nation had an epidemic of post-birth abortions at a Presidential debate, the Times wrote that Joe Biden was suffering from cognitive decline.

      Delete
    4. go fuck yourself, Dickhead in Cal, you whiney ass fucking fascist freak. There is something seriously wrong with you, Dickhead.

      On the very day the Orange Chickenshit gets the Senate Starts “Vote-A-Rama” As It Heads For Final Roll Call On Rescinding Federal Funding For PBS, NPR And Public Media Stations, - delivering to you your wildest wet dream, the end of serious public media, allowing Prince Chickenshit to institute his fascist agenda without being bothered by the public news informing the public, - you come whining like the fucking baby you are about some story in the NYT you consider "anti Trump". What the living fuck is wrong with you? He's the fucking King, stealing billions with every breath. He doesn't need your sympathy, you fucking moron.

      Delete
    5. Quaker in a BasementJuly 16, 2025 at 5:18 PM

      Trump says people who oppose him are "evil." That sounds way worse then saying some might be deplorable.

      Delete
    6. Bringing back the enslavement of black people is a long-time conservative goal.

      Delete
    7. Fair point, Quaker. OTOH Trump only called a few people "evil". Hillary called thirty-one million people "deplorable."

      Delete
    8. The fact that she didn't name names allows you to pretend that you aren't one of them.

      Delete
    9. She was right. You are deplorable.

      Delete
    10. "only a few people" oppose Prince Orange Chickenshit? Really, Dickhead in Cal? You really are a deplorable piece of shit.

      Delete
    11. @5:47 IMO the fact that she didn't name names means that even though she said "half", she was really insulting 100% of the Trump voters. I did understand that I might be one of the 50% she was talking about. That's why I voted for Trump, rather than a third party or write-in. I was dubious about Trump in 2016, until I saw what an exemplary job he's done as President.

      Delete
    12. She was allowing for the possibility that not all Trump voters were deplorable, not specifying exact numbers.

      Delete
    13. "Trump only called a few people 'evil.'"

      Or all Democrats.

      Delete
    14. Clinton made a pretty significant political mistake with that one. And she paid the price for it.

      Delete
    15. David in Cal,
      What makes you think she didn't mean you when she called some Trump voters deplorable?
      Her astuteness?

      Delete
    16. As I said, Hillary certainly might have included me in the "basket of deplorables." But she certainly is astute. She graduated from Wellesley, a top college. And, got a law degree from Yale.

      Delete
    17. Plus she knows math.

      Delete
    18. "I was dubious about Trump in 2016 until I saw what an exemplary job he has done as president." Good, I would like to see you debate that assessment with the over 160 historians and presidential experts that ranked him dead last among all US presidents in history. Quibbling about NYT word choices when the piece is about the fact that Trump fails to acknowledge the simple fact that he nominated Powell as Fed chair is very rich, indeed. For which there are only two possible explanations: that his level of cognition is so impaired that he cannot recall this, or that he is outright lying. Neither of which would cause a thoughtful person to complain about word usage in the NYT and ignore the damning implications of what Trump said.

      Delete
    19. David in Cal only votes for politicians that rape little girls.

      Delete
  4. Bob is being kind to the NYT when he questions the meaning of "admitted" and "despite." Her knows that those charged words make Trump look bad. "Admit" means acknowledging wrongdoing. Trump didn't admit that he was surprised. He just stated that he was surprised.

    The word "despite" doesn't even make sense in that sentence. Still, "despite" implies that one did something wrong by failing to account for some factor.

    I don't know whether those words were intentionally selected to make Trump look bad or whether the reporter has TDS and automatically sees anything about Trump as showing his flaws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The word "admitted" refers to his admission about being surprised about Powell, which showed he had forgotten who appointed him. The word "despite" refers to the fact that even if Trump fires Powell as Chair (or his term ends after this 4-year term), he will still have a seat on the Governing Board which has an unexpired 14 year appointment. There is nothing charged about either word and nothing being implied that isn't obvious from the fact of what was said. There are much more slanted words the NYTimes could have used to describe Trump's public failure to understand the details of Powell's appointment.

      There are a whole lot of other things that Trump doesn't understand either.

      Delete
    2. The word 'admitted' here is simply not used correctly by the NYT. You can only admit something you know to be true: 'I admit I took the candy.' But Trump can't admit something he's forgotten he did.

      So 'admitted' doesn't 'show' that Trump had forgotten who appointed him; Trump's statement by itself does that.



      A better word would have been 'expressed': Trump expressed being surprised

      Delete
    3. A better word is "self-own".

      Delete
    4. Or self-abuse.

      Delete
    5. David, still proselytizing for a guy who rapes little girls. You gross David.

      Delete
    6. Did everyone forget that King Chickenshit insulted the person who signed those trade deals with Mexico and Canada?

      He continued, “I look at some of these agreements, I’d read them at night, and I’d say, ‘Who would ever sign a thing like this?’ So the tariffs will go forward, yes, and we’re gonna make up a lot of territory. All we want is reciprocal. We want reciprocity.”

      Trump praised the USMCA in 2020 as the “best agreement we’ve ever made” and lauded it for replacing the “nightmare” North American Free Trade Agreement ratified under former President Bill Clinton, calling it the “worst trade deal ever made.”


      Why do we put up with this clown bullshit?

      Delete
  5. "WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In a series of rambling remarks on Wednesday, Donald J. Trump said that he was “very surprised” that Joe Biden chose JD Vance to be his vice president.

    “All the people in the world he could pick, and that’s who Biden went with?” he told reporters. “I mean that guy is a stone cold loser.”

    He said Biden made other choices that were “beyond terrible,” adding, “Quite frankly, I was surprised that he married Melania.”

    Trump grew more incoherent as he spoke, at one point referring to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem as “Air Force One.”

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don’t mind paying more for coffee if it means poor people can’t have it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't vote Demoncratic, they will give the filthy poor our coffee. In Sudan Gulags.

      Delete
  7. "Bonus Quote of the Day
    July 16, 2025 at 1:55 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 120 Comments

    “We need to learn from the blacks. The way they were able to remove the power from the n-word word by using it. So from now on it’s: What up, my Nazi? Hey, what up, my Nazi? Hey, what’s hanging, my Nazi?”

    — Greg Gutfeld, on Fox News."

    The real question is why Gutfeld would want to sanitize the word Nazi in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Being anti-fascist is bias against the Right.

    ReplyDelete

  9. Nearly a decade after TDS virus was released from the Democrat lab, TDS-sufferers now very much resemble Romero's zombies. Practically indistinguishable.

    Are Romero's zombies "evil"? Yes, I think they are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love Pittsburgh. You are weird.

      Delete
  10. Hmmm. Was it a fanny-burp?

    ReplyDelete

  11. "Coffee is up and eggs are down"

    An egg is an egg, yet there are countless sorts of coffee, some 2-3 times more expensive than others. If the sort you're usually buying becomes expensive for you, you get a less expensive one.

    In other words, coffee and eggs is apples and oranges, and your dismissal of the decline in egg prices sounds like demagoguery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every egg is a unique individual.

      Delete
  12. Maureen Comey, James Comey’s daughter, prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The Manhattan US Attorney’s Office has now fired her.

    ReplyDelete