PIECES OF WORK: Is President Trump a piece of work?

MONDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2025

A look at The Big Weekend Show: According to organizers, seven million people took part in Saturday’s “No Kings” rallies.

Stating the obvious, that isn’t a precision census. There can be no precise headcount at such an array of events.

That said, we now riddle you this:

Saturday afternoon, at 5 p.m. Eastern, the Fox News Channel program, The Big Weekend Show, started its three-hour broadcast. And yes, you actually read that right:

The program now airs for three straight hours straight on Saturday and Sunday evenings. from 5 to 8 p.m. Eastern. For the record, The Big Weekend Show is a pure example of heavily varnished corporate messaging. It comes from the channel’s so-called “opinion” (propaganda) shop, not from its “news” division.

The Big Weekend Show is sometimes called The Five without The Punching Bag; the name is entirely apt. At 5 o’clock sharp last Saturday, this is the way this long day’s journey into cultural darkness began its imitation of life:

JONES (10/18/25): Good evening, everybody. I’m Joey Jones, along with Kayleigh McGhee White, Lydia Hu and Dr. Marc Siegel. And welcome to this Big Weekend Show.

We’ve got a big story tonight. It’s a Fox News Alert. Millions of far-left protestors are at anti-American rallies tonight across the country, and President Trump closes out his most successful week ever.

“Things got pretty crazy out there,” Jones said moments later. In support of that claim, producers played three short bits of videotape from those "anti-American rallies."

Now anti-American were those rallies? In the second of the three clips, the people at one of the anti-American events were singing This Land Is Your Land! The chyron beneath the clips told Red American viewers this:

CHAOS ACROSS THE COUNTRY
'NO KINGS' PROTESTS BROUGHT MAYHEM TO MANY U.S. CITIES

There was no footage of chaos or mayhem, but that’s the way the messaging went as this program began its three-hour run. The Fox News Channel was bringing us Jones, who was willing to say what he said.

Jones is Johnny Joey Jones, 39 years of age. He has led an unusual, largely admirable life—but now he’s signed on for this.

Could it be that Jones has agreed to become a “piece of work” in the way Shakespeare once had it? In Saturday’s report, we recalled the famous monologue from Hamlet in which the term appeared:

What a piece of work is a man, How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty, In form and moving how express and admirable, In action how like an Angel, In apprehension how like a god, The beauty of the world, The paragon of animals. And yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor Woman neither; though by your smiling you seem to say so.

Speaking ironically and from a form of despair, Hamlet sees this "paragon of animals" as this quintessence of dust. What a piece of work is a man, the prince despairingly says.

Jones was willing to read the text in which he said that millions of his fellow citizens were at "anti-American rallies." As we saw him accept this scripting, it seemed to us that this frequently genial man had in fact agreed to become a Shakespearean “piece of work.”

As the week proceeds, we’ll have more about what was said on this TV show, and more about Jones himself. For now, we turn to an even more significant player—the sitting commander in chief.

We return to our own report:

On Saturday, we discussed the famous Shakespeare speech—but we also discussed “mental illness.” It’s a somewhat complex concept. Do we even believe that "mental illness" is an actual part of our world?

Is “mental illness” an actual part of the human condition, in much the way physical illness is? As we noted in Saturday's report, Tommy Christopher—a good, decent person—had somewhat strangely erected a wall against that possibility:

CHRISTOPHER (10/15/25): …I want to take care to avoid the pitfall of diagnosing Trump. Mental illness is too serious and important to be trivialized into a hot take—or any other temperature of take. Because whatever makes Trump this way, it can’t be chalked up to mental illness.

According to the leading authority, the term “mental disorder” is now preferred in many venues to the older term, “mental illness.” That said, Christopher seemed to be saying that no such affliction could possibly be afflicting President Trump.

That struck us as a puzzling notion. And then, as if to settle the case, the president produced his bit of bizarre behavior, Joe DiPaolo reporting:

Trump Posts Bizarre AI Video in Which He Airdrops Feces On ‘No Kings’ Protesters

President Donald Trump posted a bizarre AI video to Truth Social, late Saturday, in which he’s seen dropping feces on “No Kings” protesters from a fighter jet.

In the stunning 19-second clip, the president—donned in a king’s crown—is seen flying a fighter jet to the tune of Danger Zone, the iconic song from the soundtrack of Top Gun. The video then pans out to show the plane—which has the words “King Trump” written on its side—dropping massive amounts of excrement on a target which quickly reveals itself to be New York City.

The clip then cuts to a close-up of left-wing influencer Harry Sisson (incorporating real footage Sisson posted from the “No Kings” protest in New York). The airdropped feces is then seen dousing Sisson, and scores of other protesters marching in the streets of the Big Apple.

Yes, that’s what the president (or someone else) posted. As you can see by clicking this link, the 19-second videotape remains on his Truth Social site.

Could something be wrong with the sitting president? In a bit of a break from the norm, the New York Times has published a short report about this latest bit of extremely strange public behavior. 

In its dual headline, the Times only accepts the idea that the president was dumping some sort of "brown liquid" on the landscape below. 

Based on past practice, we can assume that this latest, extremely strange piece of behavior will never be mentioned again. As we’ve noted again and again, the major press organs within Silo Blue have agree to observe two restrictions: 

For better or worse, they refuse to discuss the rather obvious possibility that something is wrong with the sitting president in a way which might imply cognitive decline or some form of what was once widely called “mental illness.”

For better or worse, they refuse to do that. They also refuse to report or discuss the remarkable conduct which takes place, from morning through night, on the various programs of the Fox News Channel. 

Again and again, it simply seems that none of the finer people are willing to tangle with Fox.

Is President Trump a piece of work? Even now, given the rules of the game, there’s no real point in asking.

That said, how about Johnny Joey Jones? Should Jones be seen as a piece of work, in the sense voiced by Hamlet in his famous speech?

Jones opened Saturday’s Big Weekend Show with a poisonous comment about millions of fellow citizens. He likes to say he's from Dalton, Georgia. Is that what he was taught there?

Is Joey Jones a piece of work in the sense meant by Hamlet? How about McGhee White, Hu and Siegel? How about the various people who provide the messaging points which seem to script them?

You won't see such questions discussed at Blue America's finer news sites. This week, we'll be working a bit of pure anthropology as we report the things they say and do, but also as we wonder about what they may be secretly like.

In certain fairly obvious ways, Jones has lived an admirable life. As he adopts a new expanded role at Fox, is he agreeing to become a far lesser piece of work?

Tomorrow: New hosts for The Big Weekend Show


65 comments:

  1. Obviously, Shakespeare did not mean the same thing as Somerby when he put the words "What a piece of work is man" into Hamlet's mouth. Shakespeare contrasts Hamlet's depression with the positives about humanity. That is the opposite of Somerby's meaning. Somerby uses the phrase as an epithet, a negative, as is currently meant when someone is called a "piece of work." As usual, Somerby seems to find it cute to bend and distort other people's words. I find it offensive. Many Democrats are Humanists. Somerby disparages humanity.

    Today, Digby illustrates and discusses the way the resistance is covered by the New York Times:

    https://digbysblog.net/2025/10/19/if-seven-million-people-protest-and-no-one-else-hears-about-it-did-it-actually-happen/

    Somerby whines: "You won't see such questions discussed at Blue America's finer news sites." The so-called legacy or mainstream media are not "Blue America's finer news sites" except for Somerby's purpose of hanging them around the necks of the left.

    Serious discussions of press coverage and other resistance related matters are provided in the alternative media which Somerby never mentions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. if "work" equals "shit", then yes, Trump is a huge piece of work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't. But 1 equals 2, Deal Leader said so. And "up" is "down". Deal Leader told us that too. So you keep on believing and Oceana has always been at war with Eurasia.

      Delete
  3. "Stating the obvious, that isn’t a precision census. There can be no precise headcount at such an array of events."

    Must there be a precise headcount to know that a lot of people were motivated enough to attend public protests nationwide, even in red states and small towns?

    Somerby's first reaction is ALWAYS to undercut the success of such a protest by pointing out the lack of an exact count. It isn't as if the organizers were grossly inflating the counts, as Trump did with his inauguration and rallies. What is the point of such quibbles as Somerby's when there is no doubt that a very large number of people showed up?

    And no, it isn't that Somerby is a stickler for facts or that he wants absolute accuracy in any venue. He makes too many of his own mistakes for that to be the reason why he ALWAYS throws cold water on whatever the left has been doing. It is just part of his perpetual negative tone aimed at we blue voters, at our march and our complaints against Trump and the right, at our attempts to defend democracy and protect our economy and restore our nation to its former place as a leader among nations -- by removing Trump from office. These negative digs are the way Somerby opposes the anti-Trump resistance, the whole purpose of the No Kings march itself.

    If it weren't that Somerby is not one of the marchers, not part of the resistance, not a liberal or Democrat as claimed, then Somerby would be talking about the success of the protest, not advancing the reach of yet another Fox News show. As Somerby himself notes, there is no real point in doing this -- at least not one that helps the cause of Blue America and the American people more generally, the Americans who filled the plazas of cities all over the nation on Saturday.

    This is Somerby's equivalent of dumping shit on his readers. He asks:

    "Is Joey Jones a piece of work in the sense meant by Hamlet? How about McGhee White, Hu and Siegel? How about the various people who provide the messaging points which seem to script them?

    You won't see such questions discussed at Blue America's finer news sites. "

    Shakespeare didn't hate humanity the way Somerby and Hamlet do. But to the extent that these people on Fox are exercising First Amendment rights, they are exemplifying what the first founders envisioned when they wrote and enacted our Constitution. They have the right to blather on and people who watch them are being ill-served but that is their right too. The question is why Somerby bathes and splashes around in the filth pumped out by Fox, why he insists that we read it too (daily), and why he never provides a counter-weight to what Fox presents, never debunks their lies? Somerby is useless as shit but he damages the morale and efforts of the many in Blue America who are trying to resist the evil represented by Trump and Fox. What is Somerby doing? Nothing helpful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are methods for computing the number of people. This can be done by taking a photo, counting the number of people in a square inch of the photo, then multiplying by the square inches in the crowd.

      The size estimates by organizers are probably an undercount because people were constantly coming and going throughout the duration of the march, with new people replacing those leaving.

      Delete
    2. The majority of people signed up for the event so there is a base count. We didn't because of Trump's ever growing Stasi brown shirt police force. They'll be coming for a lot of white folks soon enough.

      Delete

  4. "There was no footage of chaos or mayhem, but that’s the way the messaging went as this program began its three-hour run. "

    You seem terribly upset, Bob, that there is one pro-Trump mainstream media channel -- vs. dozens of rabidly anti-Trump ones.

    Poor, poor Democrats, having to face one pro-Trump mainstream channel against dozens of bullshit generators they own. So, so unfair to you Democrats.

    Poor, poor Democrats. Squeal, squeal, Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! There should be no pro-Trump channels, but also, the supposedly mainstream media channels should not be biased for Trump as they clearly are. We assumed the media would try to remain objective, but they have clearly not done so since Trump's first campaign, when he bought and paid for media services such as suppressing negative stories about his mistreatment of women -- the facts of that came out during his fraud trial (where Trump was convicted by a jury that included some Trump supporters).

      The main squealing I hear so far today is @10:48.

      Somerby's pretense at criticizing Fox while digging at the left is old and tired. Somerby might have felt energized by the resistance had he attended the protest in Baltimore, but obviously he did not. He is misusing Shakespeare's words to suggest that humanity must be judged by its worst people (Trump et al.) and its worst acts. Trump illustrates only that humanity includes dysfunctional people among the healthy, not that all of humanity is a failed species.

      Somerby should have hauled his tired old bones out into the street with the rest of us. Then he'd know how many were there with him.

      Delete
    2. Mao is still a douche.

      Delete
    3. Mao seems disappointed that there were 7 million protesters and "0" arrests. Right wing assholes can never do that stuff peacefully because they are right wing assholes. Right Mao?

      Delete
    4. Anonymouse 11:41am, there have been right-to-life rallies, Promise Keeper marchers, and Tea Party rallies that were not violent, but were the targets of their leftwing opponents.

      Delete
    5. "Tea Party rallies" - bwahahahaha

      Delete
    6. Anonymouse 12:09pm, targets of their adversaries and of the IRS.

      Delete
    7. There are videos of MAGAs physically attacking protesters Saturday. One drove a pickup through the crowd, another chased them down the street shouting epithets and was asked to leave by security.

      Delete
    8. No evidence the IRS targeted right wing protesters.

      Delete
    9. Anonymouse 12:33pm, the IRS not only apologized for targeting the Tea Party organization, but later copped to targeting some pro-Israel groups and leftwing ones as well.

      Delete
    10. Almost complete bullshit as usual Cecelia. All the groups were breaking the law. Only the squealing bitches of the right get away with it. Pussies.

      Delete
    11. Anonymouse 1:19pm— “Summary of legal findings:
      To summarize, official investigations did not find that the Tea Party groups broke the law. Instead, they found that the groups were victims of improper and wrongful scrutiny by the IRS, which was later resolved through legal settlements.”

      AI Overview - Google

      Delete
  5. Anonymouse 10:48am, on the contrary. They did it! We have no kings!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then why is Trump remaking the White House into Versailles while bombing fishing boats in international waters, because he can do whatever he wants? Why is he disappearing our American "peasants" without telling their families or lawyers which dungeon they have been shoved into?

      Delete
    2. They aren’t American peasants and they aren’t fishing boats. And now we have no kings!

      Delete

    3. Only The Autopen should be able to do all it wants.

      All kneel before The Autopen!

      Delete
    4. Trump and most all Presidents used an autopen and Trump can't speak without a teleprompter. Wingers continue to be ignorant assholes.

      Delete
    5. I remember when we treasured the Obama and Biden drones blowing up families and the occasional American in the Middle East.

      Delete
    6. Cecilia. I am curious. I have never gotten a straight answer from you but am going to try anyway. Is it a true fact that those in the boats who were killed drug smugglers? What is the evidence? I ask because I don’t know. This is AC/MA

      Delete
    7. Anonymouse 11:49am, I don’t know if it’s a “true fact” that there are no innocent people on these boats. I know that we have intelligence that says that they are smugglers and that it’s problematic to “tell all” as to how we know. That is and will always be the case.

      Delete
    8. Did Obama give you the evidence on any of the roughly 4000 people he killed by drones?

      Did you agonize much over not having any evidence on roughly 4000 people Obama killed?

      Delete
    9. The king don’t have to show you no stinkin’ evidence.

      Delete
    10. American Prospect says that 170 CITIZENS have been detained by ICE. Why? Most likely because they resemble brown people who are being deported, even with permanent residence and the legal right to be in the country. The Supreme Court gave them permission to racially profile citizens. Or it could be the invented accusations of "interfering" with ICE agents, as they attempted to resist their own arrests, or were legally videoing the actions of ICE toward others. The courts are throwing out such charges but that doesn't prevent ICE from detaining innocent people, CITIZENS, incommunicado, for days or weeks.

      Delete
    11. Anonymouse 11:57am, and presidents don’t have to show the public their entire hand and shouldn’t. But then, you know that.

      Delete
    12. Interviews with family support the claim the dead were fishermen.

      Delete
    13. You mean none of the family members ID’d their relatives as working for the cartels? Strange.

      Delete
    14. "Did you agonize much over not having any evidence on roughly 4000 people Obama killed?"

      1. That 4,000 number comes straight out of your ass;

      2. Obama didn't share videos of the killing to his social media followers, as if it was the highlights from a Call of Duty game, and then joke about how it wasn't such a good idea to go fishing in the Caribbean these days (JD Vance);

      3. The Obama admin claimed, plausibly, that it wasn't feasible to capture the people he was ordering killed because of their location. The people Trump is killing could easily be picked up and then given a trial;

      4 . Those Obama ordered killed were at least alleged to be killers, in most cases threatening or having killed US troops. These 'drug traffickers', if they are in fact drug traffickers', are selling cocaine to people;

      5. Trump and his top lieutenants are all liars. So we can't really know anything about who he's killing and why.

      Delete
    15. I think we need to kill all the asshole white people causing all these problems with their so called drug "addictions." Just say no you white drug addled pieces of shit, or prepare to be killed by the State for your mental rot.

      Delete
    16. Looks like the 4,000 number is a mainstream estimate. My apologies.

      Delete
    17. "I remember when we treasured the Obama and Biden drones blowing up families and the occasional American in the Middle East." Who is we fucktard?

      Delete
    18. Anonymouse 1:13pm, you’re whiter than white and a born a-hole. You should be scared to death.

      Delete
  6. The reaction to the protests has been a flurry of semi-serious articles questioning whether protests really accomplish anything and whether they are effective as a resistance tactic. This is equivalent to the "Democrats" who thought Kamala couldn't do interviews well enough. When these kinds of comments come out in the NY Times, we should recognize them for what they are and know that we are having an impact.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "According to organizers, seven million people took part in Saturday’s “No Kings” rallies."

    According to WaPo, it was "thousands."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A million is just a thousand thousands.

      Delete
    2. All the local news around here used "thousands" across the country. We had thousands in our little suburb. Whatever. Fuck the fascist pricks.

      Delete
    3. Same with the NY Times. My comment where I pointed it out did not get published. In the article about the protests, the NY Times stated that they were not concerned with the numbers, but more with what the protests were about. Of course, the number of protesters is the story.

      Delete
    4. AC/MA. Cecilia. That was me not an “anonymous. I have deep skepticism about the national security exOctober 20, 2025 at 1:29 PM

      By the that was me read to the end. I am deeply skeptical about the “national security” excuse Doesn’t prove anything. If the want to go around killing guys in a boat who pose no immediate threat they have to do better than that

      Delete
    5. I agree with Ilya that, "Of course, the number of protesters is the story." That's the problem.

      When I participated in civil rights demonstrations, the mistreatment of American blacks was the story: lynchings, segregated schools, gross job discrimination, etc. When I participated in anti-war demonstrations, the carnage in Vietnam was the story-- something we watched on our TVs each night. But, the "No Kings" demonstrations have no central issue.

      Delete
  8. FWIW I think the No Kings demonstration will lead to greater polarization. Trump and his cronies will be unaffected. Their policies will remain unchanged (Thank goodness.) But liberal pols and leaders of liberal organizations will resist Trump even more forcefully, because they will be reminded that there's a big constituency our there who wants Trump to be resisted. Unfortunately that means the government shutdown will not end soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. There's no "big constituency our there who wants Trump to be resisted". There's a bunch of Soros-monkeys, paid to "protest".

      Delete
    2. The pay is okay but the benefits keep me on George's payroll. How else could I afford healthcare?

      Delete
    3. Get a real job, Democrat. But then you won't be Democrat no more.

      Delete
    4. Go eat a bag of dicks fascist David.

      Delete
    5. Soros paid me and the missus $50,000 each and we only showed up for ten minutes.

      Delete
    6. I would have loved watching Dickhead in Germany in the 30's. Hey man, I'm not a practicing Jew, you want the "others" not me. What a feckless pussy.

      Delete
    7. Anonymouse 1:05pm, wouldn’t be the first time, Sen. Schumer.

      Delete
    8. The Mrs. and I are taking a European vacation curtesy of Mr. Soros for 1 hour work this past Sat

      Delete
    9. Anonymouse 1:19pm, have fun in Croatia.

      Delete
    10. Dream on, Democrat.

      Delete
  9. Millions of far-left protestors are at anti-American rallies tonight across the country
    I don't mind this; they just show their cards right from the start. It's a propaganda network that got their talking points and off they go.
    What really irked me was a headline I saw from NBC News: "millions of Democrats protest Trump". As a statement of fact, they don't know party affiliation of the demonstrators. Many were Democrats, many were independents, and more than a few were never-Trump Republicans. What the breakdown was, no one knows.

    ReplyDelete
  10. David and Cecelia! Please defend Trump’s video.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymouse 1:10pm, execrable and excretable.

      Delete
  11. Trump's America: "Popping in on smaller protests across northern Virginia, I talked to multiple federal workers who were nervous about appearing on camera, fearing they’d be fired if it got out that they’d come."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Being fired for appearing on camera would be tyrannical. Fear of being fired for appearing on camera is just the result of anti-Trump propaganda. In other words, libs create fear and then say that the fear proves that they're right.

      Delete
  12. Quaker in a BasementOctober 20, 2025 at 1:37 PM

    So Hillary called you a "deplorable"? Trump took a dump on me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She started it, Soros-monkey. You were happy to dish it out then, don't be a snowflake now.

      Delete