The lonesome death of FDR!

FRIDAY, JULY 5, 2024

The things we the people aren't told: In his new column for the Washington Post, David Ignatius reviews some of the history of presidential health evets in the 20th century.

He starts with Woodrow Wilson:

IGNATIUS (7/5/24): Past presidents have struggled with problems of old age, but public discussion has usually been suppressed. President Woodrow Wilson suffered a pre-stroke breakdown in late September 1919 (“I don’t seem to realize it, but I seem to have gone to pieces,” he said). Then came a debilitating stroke on Oct. 2. But Wilson officially served out the last year of his term, largely invisible. His wife, Edith, took control, writing in her memoirs that she decided “what was important and what was not,” according to biographer August Heckscher.

For well over a year, so it went.

The lonesome death of Franklin Roosevelt is a sadder and richer story. In the middle of the war against the Third Reich, he successfully struggled to election for a fourth term. 

After serving only five weeks of that term, he died at 63 years of age:

IGNATIUS (continuing directly): President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s frailty was obvious a year before his death on April 12, 1945. But, again, it was shielded from public view. Biographer Jean Smith writes that by the early spring of 1944, “the president was slowing down: the dark circles under his eyes grew darker; his shoulders slumped; his hands shook more than ever when he lit his cigarette.”

A doctor examined FDR that spring. His heart was enlarged; his blood pressure was 186 over 108. He was slowly dying, but his wife, Eleanor, and his inner circle pulled the veil of privacy tight. As FDR grew weaker, he made one decisive move: He replaced Vice President Henry Wallace with Harry S. Truman. It was one of the wisest and most consequential decisions of his presidency, for Truman turned out to be a president who could safeguard the future.

This (relatively young) wartime president struggled forward in the face of vast health challenges, and in the face of impending death. The leading authority on this history offers this brief account:

When Roosevelt returned to the United States [in February 1945] from the Yalta Conference, many were shocked to see how old, thin and frail he looked. He spoke while seated in the well of the House, an unprecedented concession to his physical incapacity. During March 1945, he sent strongly worded messages to Stalin accusing him of breaking his Yalta commitments over Poland, Germany, prisoners of war and other issues...

On March 29, 1945, Roosevelt went to the Little White House at Warm Springs, Georgia, to rest before his anticipated appearance at the founding conference of the United Nations.

In the afternoon of April 12, 1945, in Warm Springs, Georgia, while sitting for a portrait by Elizabeth Shoumatoff, Roosevelt said: "I have a terrific headache." He then slumped forward in his chair, unconscious, and was carried into his bedroom.

Continuing: 

"The president's attending cardiologist, Howard Bruenn, diagnosed a massive intracerebral hemorrhage. At 3:35 p.m., Roosevelt died at the age of 63."

What might this history suggest with respect to the matter at hand? Needless to say, you can teach it flat or you can teach it round. Our general impression would be this:

Here in Blue America, the people we're trained to trust have perhaps behaved rather poorly over the past year or so, and they continue to do so today. We know of no obvious way out of the current dilemma.

At any rate, we the people weren't aware of the medical situations involving Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt. Beyond that, a fair amount of secrecy was maintained about some of President Kennedy's health challenges—and, needless to say, about aspects of his personal conduct during his years in the White House.

(More on that below.)

Also, there's the case of former Senator Paul Tsongas (D-Mass.), a major presidential candidate in the 1992 Democratic primaries and by all accounts a good, decent person. He died in January 1997, at age 55, two days before his first term as president would have ended. 

Due to a previous episode with cancer, he had worked quite hard, during Campaign 1992, to tell us the people that he had no serious health concerns. Needless to say, the press corps anointed him as the fearless truth-teller in the campaign, as opposed to the Big Liar Bill Clinton.

(As politicians so favored may tend to do, Candidate Tsongas sometimes seemed to agree with this standard bit of casting.)

It's our impression that the Biden team has perhaps behaved rather poorly in recent years. It's also our impression that it's too late to do anything about the situation which exists, and that Donald J. Trump is quite likely to end up back in the White House.

Many different groups have contributed to this situation down through the many long years. If it's the simple truth you want, we self-impressed denizens of Blue America have been one part of the problem, though the chances are slim that you'll ever convince us of any such fact.

That said, also this: We denizens of Blue America! (Most especially, we refer to the people who have scripted us, down through the years, from their roles within the upper-end mainstream press.)

We Blues! We still love Dear Jack and his glamorous wife! For that reason, we disappear the 19-year-old actual intern he crudely procured and assaulted during his term in the White House.

In fairness, it was a different time, and according to at least one major biographer, he and his brothers had been very poorly raised, with respect to such matters, by their lecherous father. That said, the appalling story was finally told in 2012, in an extremely well written memoir, and we're fairly sure that no one actually doubts the truth of what was described in that thoughtful, well-composed book.

That said, so what? We simply continue on preferred paths, as if Mimi Alford's story had never been told:

For example, we continue to be shocked at the thought of the fictitious "21-year-old intern" who was neither 21 nor an intern during the period in question. 

Most pathetically, we insist that we somehow needed to know if Donald J. Trump had consensual sex, on one occasion, ten years before he ran for president, with a fully grown adult woman who shockingly wasn't his wife.

We continue to love and revere Dear Jack. On the vastly other hand, we very, very strongly feel that we needed to know about that!

The woods are lovely, dark and deep. Our main impressions at present are these:

Cummings got his reporting right about the way "humanity" tends to behave. Also, it's possible that our flawed human race wasn't built for this line of work!

54 comments:

  1. Jil Fil looks at the conservative agenda:

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/26/opinions/no-fault-divorce-conservatives-filipovic/index.html

    ReplyDelete

  2. I don't know about human race, Bob, but I can tell you about your tribe's politburo and its whole apparatus: they have deteriorated, in the last decade, from merely clownish to monstrously grotesque.

    And if you consider yourself part of that tribe, then, sadly, it has to be partially your fault.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Health is defined as private. Even politicians can and do get sick and some die. Biden is fine, no matter what happened to FDR. A doctor said so. I am voting for Biden because it looks like there will be a ceasefire in Gaza emerging from his latest conversation with Netanyahu. That is called being a president where I come from.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dr Sanjay Gupta discusses President Biden:

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/05/health/gupta-biden-cognitive-testing-analysis/index.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. link doesn’t work

      Delete
    2. Gupta says Biden should be tested and share the results. Biden did that after the debate and results were shared with Dem governors, who are standing with Biden.

      Delete
    3. So, 7:07 PM, does the link work?

      Delete
    4. Kenneth, what is the link?

      Yo, 7:12, copy, paste.

      Delete
    5. The link does work. Hence the comment.

      Delete
  5. During the last period of FDR's life, the Soviet Union was able to take over all of Eastern Europe. Given the strength of the US at that point in time, a healthier President likely might have negotiated more favorable deals for the West.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Soviet Union was in physical possession of Eastern Europe. No US President was going to restrain Stalin there. Imagine if Stalin told Roosevelt and Churchill to install a communist government in Italy.

      Delete
    2. True @6:04. OTOH the US economy was booming, whereas the Soviet Union's economy was in shambles. Also. the US alone had the atomic bomb.

      Delete
    3. Not realistic to drop a bomb on Stalin.

      Delete
    4. The US had recessions in 1945, 1949, 1953, 1958...while the USSR's economy was growing faster than the US' and the USSR had the 2nd largest economy in the world from WWII until the 90s.

      The US did well after WWII primarily because of an excellent progressive tax structure (90% for the top margin of the highest incomes) and the GI bill.

      The USSR's original goal was to eventually become a communist society (a society based on worker democracy) but in fact always operated under a form of capitalism called state capitalism. Russia has a long, hundreds years history of being a right wing imperial power, communism never had a shot of taking hold there.

      Stalin was a right wing authoritarian, while FDR believed in a liberal consensus, where the government regulates business, provides a safety net for the needy, and provides infrastructure. FDR helped progress our society, while right wing clowns like Stalin and Reagan worked to spit on society so a few can hoard all the wealth.

      DIC you are woefully ignorant.

      Delete
    5. That’s unfair to clowns.

      Delete
    6. In an early book by Tom Friedman, "From Beirut to Jerusalem," he explained how reporters attached the labels 'right wing' and 'left wing' to opposing parties in the Middle East, whose positions had nothing to do with the differences between conservative and liberal in the US. The good guys were liberal and the bad guys were conservative.

      @7:20 evidently agrees with Friedman. Of course, in the real world, communism is left wing.

      Delete
    7. @7:20 The US GNP in 1945 was $1,475 billion compared with $343 billion for the USSR. The USSR had a larger population 167 million vs 130 million. The US was 5 times as rich in total and 6 times as rich per capita. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1333819/pre-wwii-populations/

      Delete

    8. "Also. the US alone had the atomic bomb."

      I have the impression that the bomb was developed after Mr. Roosevelt died.

      In any case, Jeez, are you suggesting the US should've nuked the USSR, murdering millions of people, to take control over the countries (on the other side of the world) that the USSR liberated from the Nazis just weeks ago?

      Seriously, David? Are you some sort of a savage?

      Delete
    9. David supports Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians.

      Delete
  6. The Dems aren't asking me, but IMHO they'd be better off if Biden resigned now. First of all, Kamala is probably more alert and capable than Biden. Second, she could run for President as a incumbent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have no idea how alert or capable either person is. Plus she would have no time to establish her own track record.

      Delete
    2. She is very attractive. She needs to wear her hair in an updo on occasion and wear blazers with a higher stance.More polish and authority. .

      Delete
    3. Anonymices are too militant and ideological to move swiftly. That’s why they do the ether, not the earth.

      Delete
    4. There are historical precedents for switching candidates being a disaster, which is why Repubs, like the two clowns here, are salivating at the prospect. Apparently, they'd feel a lot more emotionally comfortable with a man who raped and abused various females, including a minor, instead of a man that has overseen one of our best economic expansions and worked to return some of the wealth to the masses that was redistributed to the wealthy by Reagan and latter neoliberals.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 7:35pm, and your forte isn't in looking ahead as to what may be the new lay of the land.

      They don’t pay for for that, they pay you to do this.I get it.

      Delete
    6. Anonymouse 8:18pm, this isn’t your basement bedroom.

      Delete
    7. Cecelia, you find Kamala attractive?

      Delete
    8. The switch from Torricelli to Lautenberg for Senator in NJ worked well for the Dems. Torricelli was shown to be corrupt. He was running behind a lackluster Republican. Torricelli's replacement, Lautenberg, won easily. Lautenberg was a beloved former Senator, who had retired.

      I actually met Torricelli once. My cousin Eugene, Lizzy's father, was active in local politics. He introduced us when we ran into him in a pizzeria in Englewood, NJ

      Delete
    9. Anonymouse, yes, she’s very attractive.

      Delete
    10. You're attracted to her?

      Delete
    11. Anonymouse 9:26pm, do your parents know you’re still up this late?

      Delete
    12. They allow me some independence, but they’re uncomfortable with ladies attracted to ladies.

      Delete
    13. Anonymouse 10:05pm, so you’re saying that you have come by your asininity honestly.

      Duly noted.

      Delete
    14. Your attraction to Kamala is duly noted.

      Delete
    15. Anonymouse 10.46pm, your revulsion to Harris is sad, but not surprising.

      Delete
    16. David thinks Harris is bad because she is black, an affirmative action hire, and would not do a good job, even though she has done at outstanding job in every position she has held in her life. Plus she is 55, so not too old. Her looks are irrelevant. She now has 3 years of on-the-job training for the presidency, which is more than anyone except Biden himself.

      Delete
    17. Anonymouse 11:17pm, and yet you so thoroughly resent her.

      It’s not Harris’ fault that Pres. Biden is declining. You should stop taking that out on her.

      Delete
    18. @11:17 - Harris was put in charge of the border. She failed utterly.

      Delete
    19. I love Kamala Harris. I voted for her in 2020 and I’ll vote for her again. I’m just amazed that Cecelia thinks she’s ATTRACTIVE.

      Delete
    20. Kamala is a brilliant standup comedian.

      Delete
    21. Cecelia, if you think Kamala is attractive, the Republican Party is a poor fit for you.

      Delete
    22. Anonymouse 7:37am, you’re silly.

      Delete
    23. Cecelia, go human. Vote the straight Democrat ticket this year.

      Delete
  7. Biden seems too old.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You probably seem old to him too.

      Delete
  8. The reporter who exposed welfare fraud in Mississippi may go to jail:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/anna-wolfe-pulitzer-mississippi-welfare-scandal-phil-bryant-rcna159936

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm in Red America, and Bob could have just switched out "Blue" for "Red" and his post would have made more sense.

    We in Red America are turning a blind eye to Trump's corruption and decline.

    After voting for Trump twice, I am switching my vote to Biden. The Supreme Court just went too far, and the more we learn about Trump, he is not a patriot, he is a sick person in need of help, and frankly, spiritual guidance.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just watched 2/3 of the Biden-Stephanopoulos interview. I thought Biden did adequately well. He wasn’t dynamic, but he was lucid and spoke in complete sentences. Of course he was self-congratulatory, but that’s to be expected of a candidate. His answers made sense. His facial expressions were a lot better than in the debate. His makeup was better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it’s on tape, it’s a jape.

      Delete
    2. Democratic strategist David Axelrod wrote “The president is rightfully proud of his record. But he is dangerously out-of-touch with the concerns people have about his capacities moving forward and his standing in this race,”

      Somebody named Neil Stanage wrote, "There was nothing disastrous in Biden’s responses — and nothing so stellar as to quell the spreading discontent."

      Delete
    3. Conservative Steven Haywood who writes for the Powerline blog considers Biden's withdrawal from the race to be a certainty. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/07/its-over-only-the-when-and-how-to-be-determined.php

      Delete
    4. Biden makes that decision, not some guy on Powerline.

      Delete
  11. I will vote anyday for a comatose Biden over a convicted felon, sexual assaulter, financial fraudster, and pedophile.

    ReplyDelete