How should news orgs cover this war?

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2023

How should they cover vast suffering? How should this nation's major news orgs cover the vast amounts of suffering involved in this current war?

In this morning's Washington Post, Will Sommer (no relation) ponders one form of that question. In print editions, the headline on his report says this:

Contributor to N.Y. Times criticizes its Gaza coverage

In this case, the contributor isn't just any contributor. The contributor is Mona Chalabi, who recent won a Pulitzer Price for that very same New York Times.

Chalabi has lodged a complaint about the way the Times has covered the war. For the record, she may be right, or she may be wrong. Headline included, Sommer's report starts like this:

Contributor to N.Y. Times criticizes its Gaza coverage

As journalist and illustrator Mona Chalabi sat through the ceremony last month where she would officially receive her Pulitzer Prize, she leaned over to her editor, Jake Silverstein of the New York Times, to show him her latest work.

It was a chart she had posted on Instagram, presenting data to suggest that the Times devotes less attention to Palestinian deaths than Israeli deaths in the ongoing Gaza conflict—and calling out the Times for “bias.”

She told The Washington Post that she was late to the ceremony because she was rushing to post the chart first.

“Before I sat next to my editor at the New York Times to accept this prize, I wanted to publish this critique of the New York Times,” Chalabi said.

There have already been many deaths, and a great deal of suffering, in this six-week-old war. Chalabi seems to think that the Times has been paying more attention to the deaths of Israelis than to the deaths of the Palestinians who live right next door.

According to Sommer, she describes this as a form of "bias." Sommer's report continues as shown:

This week, in the latest flare-up of newsroom tensions over the Israel-Gaza war, the freelance contributor to the Times ramped up her criticism of the newspaper for which she won journalism’s biggest prize, in interviews and social media posts saying she believes the Times coverage of the war has favored the Israeli perspective over the Palestinian. She also took aim at the Pulitzers, saying she felt as if the plight of Palestinian journalists and civilians was overlooked during speeches.

On Thursday, Chalabi announced on Instagram, where she has more than 468,000 followers, that she donated the $15,000 that came with her Pulitzer win to a Palestinian journalists group to help fight what she sees as an “asymmetry” that elevates Israeli voices over Palestinian ones in the media.

Has the Times "favored the Israeli perspective over the Palestinian" perspective? Has the Times "elevated Israeli voices over Palestinian" voices? 

We have no particular view on that.

Is it possible that the Times should favor the Israeli perspective over the Palestinian perspective? Given the circumstances of this particular war, is it possible that the Times should "devote less attention to Palestinian deaths?"

Trust us! Given the understandable depth of feeling involved in the matter at hand, various people will almost surely have different reactions to such questions as those.

For ourselves, we've admired the fact that the PBS NewsHour has devoted detailed segments to Israeli suffering and death, but also to Palestinian suffering and death. We've stated our basic framework before:

We'd like to see Palestinians and Israelis—Israelis and Palestinians—able to live in peace and prosperity. We'd like to see them able to do that, whether they do so together or in those famous "two states." After that, we'd like to see their winning example inspire other populations around the world.

Is the death of the toddler in Gaza City equivalent to the death of the toddler who was murdered by Hamas on October 7? Are they all just a bunch of kids?

Depending on their pre-existing affiliations and depending on their predispositions, many people will have a hard time agreeing to such propositions. It's natural that people will have intense feelings with regard to a matter like this.

Should toddlers of various groups get the chance to grow up in peace and prosperity? We'd be inclined to say yes. In our view, people who want to help should try to state that goal every time, at the start of each discussion.

There has been suffering on various side, but how do we get to tomorrow? Also, is Chalabi right in what she has said?

We have no real idea about that. She could be right—but she could be wrong. As with many things in this life, it may not be easy to tell.


18 comments:


  1. "Is the death of the toddler in Gaza City equivalent to the death of the toddler who was murdered by Hamas on October 7?"

    But is it an establish fact that any toddlers were murdered by Hamas during the Palestinian uprising last month?

    Have you read this:
    https://thegrayzone.com/2023/11/18/video-what-happened-october-7/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They say that there’s only evidence for one baby being killed among the 1200 Israelis killed, caught in the crossfire and accidentally shot by Hamas fighting with Israeli soldiers. They say the intent of Hamas was not mere brutality, but to capture Israelis to use for prisoner exchanges.

      Hedges and Blumenthal (son of infamous neoliberal Sidney Blumenthal) may reasonably viewed with skepticism, aptly seen by many as pseudo progressives/leftists; however, there is likely some validity to their stance on the Hamas attack, even if it is a case of broken watches.

      Delete
    2. Was that the baby that "they say" was beheaded by the Palestinians?

      Delete
    3. No, they (Hedges and Blumenthal) say they can only confirm a single baby was killed by being shot.

      Whether that is accurate is unclear, Snopes goes over the issue:

      https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/10/12/40-israeli-babies-beheaded-by-hamas/

      Delete
    4. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/dozens-of-children-died-in-hamas-oct-7-attack-on-israel-contrary-to-online-claim/

      Delete
  2. A Palestinian is worth three-fifths of an Israeli.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Israel does not have a constitution. It has the Knesset, but I propose conflicts be resolved by something I call Knish Diplomacy. Yum!

      As I worked my way through college, my favorite job was at a pizza place where we had a giant sized bucket of dough that we were free to pull from and make our own pizzas as we liked, I would often grab some dough and make a sort of pinch pot and fill it with toppings and then run it through the conveyer oven - a stylized knish. A key to great pizza, in my humble but expert opinion (so imhbeo), is not a traditional oven, wood burning bla bla bla, but a conveyer oven, heats food perfectly, you just need a lot of space.

      Delete
    2. Israel does have a constitution and it gives equal rights to all citizens.

      Delete
    3. Israel, in fact, does not have a constitution.

      Delete
    4. "Israel is one of five countries (along with New Zealand, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom) that operate entirely or in part according to an uncodified constitution consisting of both material constitutional law (based upon cases and precedents), common law, and the provisions of these formal statutes." Wikipedia

      Delete
  3. Somerby says his basic framework is that he would like to see all people live in peace and prosperity.

    Hard to argue with that, but hardly the realm of moral leadership, being more akin to a Miss Universe response.

    On the other hand, Chalabi notes, on her way to receiving a Pulitzer, that there is assymetry between Israelis and Palestinians that should be factored in, apparently being more agreeable to considering context than Somerby is. And perhaps recognizing the societal downside to self serving awards for adults, Chalabi donates her prize money towards an effort to reduce that assymetry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "How should this nation's major news orgs cover the vast amounts of suffering involved in this current war?"

    Suffering, even vast amounts and even during a war, is not news. There is no reason to cover it. When a news agency does cover it, suspect it is propaganda because it is an attempt to move people emotionally.

    "For the record, she may be right, or she may be wrong."

    Way to take a stand! If Somerby has no opinion about this, why mention it at all?

    In my opinion, counting deaths on each side is not the way to determine whether a war is being won or lost, nor anything else about that war, such as which side has the moral upper hand or which side is correct in its dispute. There should not be this kind of score-keeping because it trivializes the loss or life and is a misleading indicator of everything important to people. Things are hard all over for people involved in war, including journalists and civilians. The point of news reporting is not to cover that inevitable outcome of war. It is to cover current events in the course of the war, such as peace negotiations, advances in territory, finding of combatant tunnels in a hospital serving casualities.

    Chalabi wants to play an advanced game of tit-for-tat, as if bodies were tokens to be counted and weighed against the chips held by opponents. That is abhorrent to me. If armies are going to kill people, own them as lives. But don't expect the newspapers to keep score as if these were some measure of who is most victimized or who is winning. Everyone loses when the fighting begins.

    In my opinion, anyone sincerely interested in stopping the death should be calling for diplomacy, negotiations, not asking for a more accurate body count so the Palestinians will get their fair share of martyrdom (or whatever they started this damned war to get).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least Bob asks the right question today.

      Delete
  5. A better question is why is this relatively small conflict getting so much attention (including from Somerby) compared to, say, the much larger conflict between Russia and Ukraine -- especially given Russia's "importance" (in a negative sense) to U.S. interests?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because Somerby wants to disappear the big win Dems had a couple weeks ago, which disproved his main theory about politics. Also he wants to avoid any discussion of Russia’s failure with Ukraine, and how Russia has been exposed as a paper tiger, possibly because he has minders that would frown upon speaking truth to power.

      Delete
  6. The media shouldn’t cover the war at all. Our elected leaders, the civil servants, and military know what they’re doing, and we shouldn’t bother them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've criticized the Times on it's coverage of many things over the years. After all, Maureen Dowd still works for them. She is not in the paper as much because Hillary Clinton is out of public life and she doesn't have anyone to demean anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lottery is something Everyone wishes to win, not only winning the lottery, but they want to win big bulks, i have been playing the lottery for couple of years now, but i haven't really win big, personally i always think there is something behind all those winners who always win big, because my intense always tell me that so i manage to get in contact with one of the biggest lottery winner in Manchester, i asked him about the success, and he referred me to a very powerful voodoo doctor, (Dr Aziba), he is indeed a great man who i explain to , without no hidden details , (i really want to win the lottery so bad ) he put to work and few days latter he gave me some figures that never failed, i played and i won 50 thousand pounds , (Dr Aziba) is blessed with so much gift, This is the secret and it worked for me. Get in contact with Doctor Aziba via Email Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com or WhatsApp +2348100368288 for Lottery Winning Numbers.






    Lottery is something Everyone wishes to win, not only winning the lottery, but they want to win big bulks, i have been playing the lottery for couple of years now, but i haven't really win big, personally i always think there is something behind all those winners who always win big, because my intense always tell me that so i manage to get in contact with one of the biggest lottery winner in Manchester, i asked him about the success, and he referred me to a very powerful voodoo doctor, (Dr Aziba), he is indeed a great man who i explain to , without no hidden details , (i really want to win the lottery so bad ) he put to work and few days latter he gave me some figures that never failed, i played and i won 50 thousand pounds , (Dr Aziba) is blessed with so much gift, This is the secret and it worked for me. Get in contact with Doctor Aziba via Email Priestazibasolutioncenter@gmail.com or WhatsApp +2348100368288 for Lottery Winning Numbers.

    ReplyDelete