SATURDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2025
The New York Times keeps its trap shut: A MAN WAS LYNCHED YESTERDAY, the flag above Fifth Avenue once said.
It flew repeatedly for several years. The leading authority explains:
A man was lynched yesterday flag
A flag bearing the words "A man was lynched yesterday" was flown from the national headquarters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) between 1936 and 1938 to mark lynchings of black people in the United States. It was part of a decades-long anti-lynching campaign by the NAACP that began after the 1916 lynching of Jesse Washington. The flag...was stopped from flying in 1938 after the NAACP's landlord threatened them with eviction if they continued the practice.
[...]
The NAACP first flew the flag on September 8, 1936, to mark the lynching of A. L. McCamy in Dalton, Georgia. The flag continued to be flown at NAACP's headquarters at 69 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan the day after news of a lynching reached the organization. The 6-by-10-foot flag was simple and had the white text "A MAN WAS LYNCHED YESTERDAY" on a black background. The bold typeface is thought to have been chosen to best convey the message quickly to a crowd of people.
It was a stunningly terrible time. We Blues sometimes avoid acknowledging the following fact but on balance, things don't typically reach that level of horror at the present time.
This very morning, the thought of that recurrent sign popped into our heads. At the direction of its CEO, the Fox News Channel had posted a video beneath this comical dual headline:
Something’s off with today’s Democrats: Greg Gutfeld
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' panelists discuss why Democrats are so unlikable.
Too funny! As you can currently see by clicking this link, that's the way the CEO's corporate lackeys decided to summarize the "issues monologue" which occurred at the start of Thursday night's Gutfeld! show.
Each evening, the host's "issues monologue" follows a couple of minutes of insults packaged in the form of jokes. But what made that presentation so funny?
Simple! That summary could be the summary of the "issues monologue" Greg Gutfeld has delivered almost every night over the past few months.
That's been the subject of his monologue night after night after night! Once the termagant has told the world about how weird and unlikable Democrats are, a quartet of stooges then take their turn agreeing with what he has said.
Full disclosure! The termagant's insults don't come to an end when his "issues monologue" starts. Last night, his monologue was a bit more specific than much of his usual fare.
Last night, he issued a screed against the way the Nobel committee had failed to honor President Trump. As you can currently see at the Gutfeld! site, the summary of last night's issues monologue looks like this:
Greg Gutfeld: Trump’s a peacemaker until you piss him off
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the panel discuss President Donald Trump not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize on ‘Gutfeld!'
GUTFELD (10/10/25): ...Some previous presidents certainly won it for doing a lot less than Trump did. Think about it.
Barack Obama? He won it before he even sat down to pee in the White House bathroom.
Should President Obama have received that prize? We can't quite tell you that.
That said, the tortured man who helms this show persistently tells his viewers two things. First, Barack Obama is really a woman. Either that, or Obama is gay.
The host thinks of that garbage as insults.
Each night, the CEO pries the lid off the can and this is the moral and intellectual disorder which comes crawling out. We ask you to pity the many young men who are being encouraged to perceive the world in such ways.
That said, the little guy was far from done last night. He now listed the many peace deals he said President Trump has brokered.
No serious person seriously believes that Trump has brokered that many peace deals. No one believes that the listing is accurate—but on the Fox News Channel, the list the little guy rattled off is mandated corporate messaging.
As for the host himself, he seems to have a monster stuck in his soul—a monster which won't seem to let him go. He can't simply say whatever it is that he wants to say he believes. Instead, he has to say things of this type, as he did last night at 10:07 p.m.:
GUTFELD: That's Trump's [means of] persuasion—[he's a peacemaker] until you piss him off.
Then you wake up with a horse in your bed—or a cow in your Irish pub.
[PHOTO of Rosie O'Donnell]
AUDIENCE: [Applause]
Rosie O'Donnell was cast as the cow. This is who the termagant is. We ask you to pity the "masculine children" who are being taught to behave in such ways.
Nor is it just the guys! At 10:10 p.m., it fell to the former Oakland Raiders cheerleader to offer her thoughts on the topic at hand. At the New York Times, Gutfeld! hacks can now get scored as feminists even as they act out like this:
COMPAGNO: Obama was awarded it nine months after taking office—as you point out, before he even sat down to pee.
The cheerleader wanted to say it too! This is the corporate culture the CEO has chosen
There's much more to say about this heavily watched TV show, and about the rise of right-wing comedy as a messaging tool.
In the realm of political commentary, we'd date the practice to Rush Limbaugh's use of parodic elements on his nationwide radio show starting in the mid-1980s. In the realm of major stand-up comedy, we'd track it to Sam Kinison's comedy of screaming cruelty, but also to Andrew Dice Clay's arena-filling presentation of the angry white working-class man.
(We have a treasured memory about an admirable female comedian with whom we once worked in Atlantic City. She asked us one day, in complete sincerity, why she was being treated so badly as the girlfriend of one of the members of Kinison's posse. That was something like thirty years ago!)
There's also a great deal to say about the way people like Brother Gutfeld (and Kayleigh McEnany) got converted into ardent supporters of President Trump. According to the New York Times, the CEO called Gutfeld in one day, apparently in 2016, and apparently gave him the word about the possible need for that change.
(He may be sincere in his Trump love today. Back in June 2023, the Times seems to say that that's what happened back then.)
We're going to leave it here for today, with President Obama sitting to pee and O'Donnell compared to a cow. We're going to leave you with one other point:
All across the realm of Blue America's timorous and incompetent elites, the better people—the people who "went to the finest schools"—agree that they must never report and must never discuss what actually happens, all day and all night, on this endlessly ridiculous imitation of a "cable news" channel.
It's Suzanne Scott who produces this show. She sits on a massive yacht which bears an unusual name:
Sends in The Angry, Broken Toys, the name on her splendid yacht says.
We get it Bob.
ReplyDeleteGutfeld is funny to standard-issue Right-wing bigots.
Best job to do in part time and start making more than $500 per day. i received $16429 of my last month working. this job does not required any special skills or anything else its just ccd a basic job even a child can do this. join this now by follow instructions here.:)
DeleteHERE—-> Www.Paycash1.site
Nice try, but I'm not going to start liking all Republicans, just because one of them shot Charlie Kirk to death.
ReplyDeleteHa! Spot on.
Delete"Something’s off with today’s Democrats: Greg Gutfeld"
ReplyDeleteOf course there is: they're all retarded. Severely retarded. Idiots.
And this is not a joke, nor an insult. It's a cold hard fact.
Republicans raising kids to shoot assholes, like Charlie Kirk, will save this country.
DeleteHe doesn't exactly think it is worth watching. Watching it allows him to indulge his own hatreds and petty jealousies. Just like it does for the right wingers who watch Gutfeld's show. Somerby loves watching Tarlov be interrupted. He imagines himself speaking up to his own mother like that, talking over her when she did mean things to him, like sending him to Harvard.
DeleteYoung men are not watching Gutfeld. Only old men in mental decline like David in Cal think that shit is worth watching.
ReplyDeleteBob: “No serious person seriously believes that Trump has brokered that many peace deals.” This is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
ReplyDeleteStop and look at the facts instead of applying fallacies. The reason no serious person believes that Trump has brokered that many peace deals is because he hasn't done it. Some of the conflicts Trump touts are imaginary, involving the names of countries half a continent away from each other (because Trump mixes up country names). Others have stated Trump had no involvement in resolving disputes he claims to have settled. As others have noted, even the peace plan proposed by Trump for Gaza was originated by Biden at the end of his term, derailed by Trump/Netanyahu for political reasons, then reinitiated so Trump could win the Peace Prize. There is no Scotsman involved in this at all. People who look at the facts do not believe Trump brokered that many deals because it is a fact that he did not. The people who look at facts are serious people. The ones who believe Trump's own lies are not serious people.
Delete@11:48 - I would love to look at the facts. I wish Bob or some other person would list the conflicts Trump played a role in ending and explain what he did or didn't to to help end each one each one. I wish I could see descriptions of Trump's role from both a supporter and an opponent.
DeleteAs it is, all I know is Trump's claim to have ended the India -Pakistan was by applying economic threats via tariffs.
Trump has brokered no deals, including the conflict between India and Pakistan, and including anything to do with Israel or anything to do with trade.
DeleteEven Trump-friendly Modi sad Trump had nothing to do with it.
This is easily discerned with a few seconds on Google.
Trump is a con artist, a snake oil salesman.
Trump has conned people like 1:35 out of their ability to reason, out of their empathy, out of their integrity.
Sorry 1:35 if I caused you any embarrassment, no hard feelings.
"I wish Bob or some other person would list the conflicts Trump played a role in ending..."
DeleteAs you wish:
QinB: This could also apply to all the good things Trump has accomplished.
DeleteDavid: You don't understand what 'no true Scotsman" fallacy means. It doesn't apply here.
"We Blues sometimes avoid acknowledging the following fact but on balance, things don't typically reach that level of horror at the present time."
ReplyDeleteThere are so many things wrong with this offhand statement Somerby makes today:
1. There are still lynchings. For example Ahmaud Arbery in Georgia in 2020, for the crime of jogging. There have been a spate of young black men found hanging from trees over the past year, all deemed suicides.
2. Does it make a difference if the killings of black men involve trees or guns instead? Cops are still killing black men and women.
3. Is it better if ICE is killing men and women who they suspect of being "illegals"?
4. Is it OK that ICE is targeting people because of their skin color and for speaking other languages, disappearing them and shipping them to other countries without due process? This is more widespread today than lynching was after Jim Crow.
5. Does Somerby think it is unlikely lynchings will increase given Trump's approval of White Supremacist ideology and organizations?
Since when do we measure people's current misery in terms of past atrocities. This grotesque remark displays the lack of empathy for black people embodied by those who have always resisted civil rights efforts. It is another example of his "black people had it worse under slavery so what do you have to complain about?" attitude that led him to say young black people today experience little real racism because racism is over. Never mind the lynching of James Byrd. That isn't as bad as during Jim Crow so if black people are complaining, it is only because the left has taught them to whine over imagined slights.
This attitude is part of what makes Somerby racist. His belief that we blues only care about blacks and not about immigrants is another example of his racism. It is no less awful that ICE is targeting brown-skinned citizens because they have brown skin, detaining them and treating them with violence and disrespect on suspicion, without bothering to look at their passports and birth certificates granting them the same rights as other US citizens. Trump is trying to deny birthright citizenship on the basis of skin color and ancestry. He is rolling back the achievements of the civil rights era in terms of jobs and participation in wider society by black people and other minorities (yes, women too). Those bad old days are on the way back, and Somerby has the nerve to say it isn't so bad, because at least there aren't as many lynchings.
Something is wrong with Somerby. It has always been wrong, but now it is slipping out in words more often and more blatantly. That is the effect Trump has on people everywhere and that is why the climate for minorities is worsening not improving. Blues recognize this. Why doesn't Somerby?
I bothers me that a man with such attitudes was ever allowed in front of a classroom of young black children.
@11:38 - there are also lynchings of whites and Asians committed by blacks. Serious injuries and even deaths have been attributed to the knockout game.
DeleteMost recently Iryna Zarutska was lynched.
DeleteIgnoring the asymmetry is being complicit with all the crimes committed by White males, which is the vast majority of crimes.
Delete1:38 does not care about law and order, he is just a racist.
To be fair 11:38, Somerby has long since been fairly open about his inclinations towards racism, sexism, and xenophobia, as well as his cynicism towards the concept of democracy.
DeleteSomerby is a tragically wounded lost soul - like all right wingers, and you are absolutely right, he had no business teaching kids, and he left the profession as soon as being drafted was no longer a concern.
"Most recently Iryna Zarutska was lynched."
DeleteNo, David. Zarutska was murdered, but not lynched. Words mean things.
Lynching means hanging someone from a tree by the neck until dead. In the past, prisoners who had committed heinous crimes were sometimes broken out of jail and hung for their supposed crimes without due process (no trial, no chance to defend themselves). Applied to minorities such as blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, witches and those enabling them, strangers, horse thieves, lynching was a form of terrorism more than justice.
DeleteIn rural America, a man who sexually attacked a woman with a husband or extended family was more likely to be castrated than lynched.
Delete@3:01 That's not right either.
Deletehttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lynch
Lynching means, in very simple terms, sans looking anything up: a mob action induced by desire for vengeance.
DeleteDavid: are you not embarrassed making such ignorant posts. She was not lynched; she was killed by a deranged person. Why do you feel compelled to shove a square peg into a round hole? It's some form of OCD that you have. No one in their right mind will ever take it seriously.
Doesn't have to be a mob, but it is extra-legal.
DeleteBest job to do in part time and start making more than $500 per day. i received $16429 of my last month working. this job does not required any special skills or anything else its just ccd a basic job even a child can do this. join this now by follow instructions here.:)
ReplyDeleteHERE—-> Www.Paycash1.site
"It was a stunningly terrible time."
ReplyDeleteTHIS is a stunningly terrible time. It does not bear comparison to the decades when the right refused to pass an anti-lynching law, over and over, because that would allow crimes against black people to be investigated and tried at the federal level, instead of by the state and local legal systems infested with racists.
Today's problems are much worse because racists under Trump have been setting aside laws to protect citizens in order to target and mistreat those who racists and misogynists dislike. Black men who spent their careers working up to positions of authority have been summarily fired without cause or redress. The same for black and white women, because misogynists believe women belong only in the home, bearing and raising children and tending to men. That revives the atrocities for women of the same time period as Jim Crow. Somerby ignores the long struggle (including deaths) of women working for their rights and vote. Now Republican men are saying out loud that women shouldn't be permitted to vote. But it is OK, according to Somerby, because at least they aren't being lynched (just dying while denied health care).
These times are already much worse than as recently as the end of Biden's term and these times are headed quickly in the wrong direction. Somerby's failure to acknowledge that makes him very clearly not any kind of blue voter. And his statements today are rubbing blue noses in the gains made by Trump. But that's the kind of thing an ass like Somerby does, in a snide camoflaged way protected by the plausible deniability of words like "possibly" and "on balance" and "typically."
Extrapolation from Somerby's views on lynching:
DeleteEven during the times when blacks were lynched, not every black person was murdered and hung from a tree, so how stunningly terrifying could it have been? Like today, only some brown people are being detained and only two have been shot in cold blood, so why is everyone so upset?
anon 12:04, you ask a question, which I think is disingenuous. Only a small percentage of blacks were lynched, but they were denied the right to vote, they were forced to go to segregated schools, they were prohibited from using water fountains that were reserved for whites, couldn't swim in swimming pools with whites, couldn't stay in hotels, sit on the back of buses etc. Blacks were treated like shit and were subject to racist laws. It's a different world now. Now we have trump making totally bullshit claims like Portland is a "war zone', blaming Democrats en masse when one deranged nut shoots Charlie Kirk, only one example of his ongoing power grabs on numerous fronts.
Delete@1:15, my question is sarcastic, mocking Somerby's suggestion that things are better now when so many civil rights gains are being undone by Trump's administration. It strikes me as him implying that if we don't stop complaining there will be lynchings again.
DeleteYes, Somerby's general take is that we should not poke the bear, we should instead be compliant, acquiesce, and capitulate to Republicans.
DeleteSure Somerby, sure.
Trump's going to need to finish off the United States of America for good, if he wants to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
ReplyDeleteMen sit down to pee too. But how astute of Somerby to recognize that Gutfeld is calling Obama a girl and that it is an insult to be called anything feminine or associated with girls or women, because... why is that again?
ReplyDelete"Should President Obama have received that prize? We can't quite tell you that."
At a minimum, Obama risked his life simply by running for the presidency and having a reasonable chance of winning. Somerby provides the answer in his own review of anti-lynch laws and why the South was so unwilling to pass them. Oh, Somerby didn't explain that? Did he give the impression racists just got tired of lynching blacks and gave up their hatred voluntarily? Did he forget to explain that it was the blue voters joining the civil rights movement that finally encouraged reluctant presidents to do things like segregate the Armed Forces during WWII and to enact federal laws integrating the civil service and prosecuting federal civil rights violations (such as lynching) and the Democratic Congresses that finally passed civil rights legislation integrating schools, protecting jobs, and prosecuting hate crimes, aided by voting rights laws that made black people and women part of the electorate so that they could protect their own rights and pressure their own legislators to do the right thing.
Somerby skipped over all of that to tell blues that we are exaggerating the hate still existing against people of color, women, and other minorities. Trump isn't really dismantling all of the civil rights progress made since Truman, according to Somerby. Things are much better now (cough, cough, cough).
"We ask you to pity the "masculine children" who are being taught to behave in such ways. "
ReplyDeleteNever mind the girls who are seeing themselves portrayed as cows, maligned for succeeding, taught that being fat is so bad that they must starve themselves (even to death) to escape their cowlike fate. What are they being taught?
What were the girls taught in Somerby's classrooms? Were they told that at least Anne Frank had a beautiful corpse, because her picture was worth the price of the book about her death in the Holocaust? Her life (detailed in the book) was apparently not worth the price, at least to Somerby.
DeleteWhat do you expect? She sat down to pee.
Delete"This little guy seems to have a woman hatred which won't seem to let him go. If Blue America had a sexual politics (all too plainly, Blue America doesn't), we Blues might be able to see, report and discuss that fact about this 61-year-old furious soul."
ReplyDeleteNote the passive tense in the first sentence. That nasty old woman hatred has captured Gutfeld and held him prisoner. He wants to escape but it just won't let him go. As if he has no choice about who he hates or even what he says and does.
Many people believe their emotions are involuntary, beyond their control. That is untrue. Emotions flow from thoughts and we have control of our thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, choosing which to hold and which to dispute and reject. If Gutfeld thought differently about women, he wouldn't hate them. For example, if he understood women or empathized with them, he would have less hate.
But does Gutfeld really hate women or does he prepare these sorts of jokes to please a woman-hating audience who the right wishes to keep hating women in order to make the subjugation of women acceptable as it is enacted by the misogynist fascists running the govt? Is this Gutfeld's personal curse or is it a plan to spew propaganda in support of political efforts to make women second-class citizens again? I suspect the latter, because of the other propaganda Gutfeld and his crew disseminate, which is the purpose of their show.
So, Gutfeld is not a victim of his own hatred. He is an accomplice in building a system that harms women, and the hatred is the justification for going along with that plan. Women deserve to be subjugated, because look at them, they sit down to pee. And they get fat and thus displease men who objectify them (turn them into things to be watched and used, without their own agency).
And Somerby excuses Gutfeld, by claiming that he is helpless against his own hatred. As if.
Then Somerby claims that blue America has no sexual politics. Aside from misusing the word again, because he refuses to read any feminist writing on the topic, Democrats have long had a platform encompassing policies and programs that meet the goals and needs of women. It includes civil rights for women (because women's rights are human rights), inclusion of more women in politics, advancement of women in the workplace and elimination of pay gaps and barriers to employment, inclusion of women in health research, inclusion of women in STEM disciplines where they have been largely excluded. Women have made solid gains through the women's movement but also by alliance with Democrats and that is why women favor Democrats when they vote and there is a deficit among women supporting Trump. And it is getting worse for Trump. Democrats have twice run female candidates for President, not Republicans who are eagerly supporting Trump's white supremacist goals to return women to traditional roles, deny them appropriate health care, and kick them out of jobs and other visible positions of authority in our society.
Somerby is lying when he says Blues have no sexual politics when it comes to women. Blues do not have Somerby's misogynistic politics, and that is a good thing (to quote Martha Stewart). Somerby is not only letting it all hang out today in his racist vision for America, but in his sexism. That's why he is far from a blue voter himself and a major asshole, only fit to associate with sit-to-pee guys like JD Vance, Trump and the woman-hating scum on the right.
Somerby doesn't know what Blue America says about anything because he doesn't read actual blue media, just the right-owned legacy (mainstream) media, which he says are blue (but aren't actually). Women are a large part of blue media (Joyce Vance, Heather Cox Richardson, Kate Manne, Digby, Driftglass, Marcy Wheeler, Amanda Marcotte, Masha Geffen and many more who Somerby ignores).
DeleteThere was no passive voice in that first sentence.
DeleteAgree with 12:38 broadly, but we in fact do now know why people like Gutfeld exist.
DeleteThere is no such thing as free will, people like Gutfeld are a product of their toxic environment (bad parents etc) which itself is the product of our warped society.
"This little guy seems to have a woman hatred which won't seem to let him go."
DeleteThe little guy is the object of the sentence, not the subject. He is not acting, he is being acted upon. He lacks agency. He is not doing, he is being done to. His anger, the subject, won't let him go (the object).
I should have said passive sentence construction, not tense.
Also, notice how many times the word "seems" appears. Somerby at his most tentative, refusing to definitely say something, in case someone accuses him of having said anything.
DeleteSomerby always has overused "seems", commenters here have been mocking him for that for years.
Delete"we Blues might be able to see, report and discuss that fact about this 61-year-old furious soul."
ReplyDeleteSomerby calls Gutfeld a furious soul, as if he were always and everywhere angry. But is that true? I believe Gutfeld's show is an act that he puts on for viewers, not the way he is at home. For one thing Gutfeld has been married to the same woman for 20 years. He and his wife just had a baby girl and he doesn't even sound disappointed about that.
I have small doubt that Somerby is angry at women, but I think he is projecting that onto Gutfeld. Probably too late for therapy, or perhaps he is not attracted to them. He tends not to acknowledge that women are competent or accomplished and he is prudish about sex-positive women. He said awful things about Stormy Daniels, for example, but aside from Anne Frank and Malala, it is hard to find anything positive he has said about any woman and no enthusiasm for any female political candidate.
Women tend not to want to be with men who they sense despise them.
DeleteAI says: "According to a search of public records, there is no evidence that Suzanne Scott, the CEO of Fox News Media, owns a yacht. "
ReplyDeleteFacts matter, except to Somerby.
It is OK to say anything you want about someone, if you are a comedian and say "just kidding" after you get caught telling your lies.
DeleteI'll bet Rachel Maddow never stuffed any cash down her pants either.
Why are we supposed to dislike people who own boats?
DeleteFor the same reason we're supposed to dislike people who have cash, or is it pants?
DeleteSometimes you have to sit down to pee on a boat.
DeleteYes, owning a boat is very expensive, most people can not own a boat, and since our current society is largely a zero sum game, with success mostly the result of privilege and happenstance combined with gaming the system, those that own boats generally do so at the expense of the rest of us.
DeleteIt is questionable whether society is a zero sum game. If you regard it as such, you will find yourself hating those who are more prosperous. In some cases that may be justified but in other cases less so.
DeleteI know several people who own boats that they also live on. They are not wealthy, just vagabonds. I don't blame them for that choice of lifestyle. You can have a boat for much less than the cost of a house or apt.
But my point was that Somerby made up the bit about the yacht. I think that is unwise because now we will have to fact check whatever stupid thing Somerby says. I do not plan to watch Gutfeld to make sure he tells every stupid joke attributed to him, but we will have to do that if Somerby cannot be trusted.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it, though, public service, letting ugly liberal old bags know that everyone in the world despises them?
Gutfeld tells his viewers how unlikable Democrats are, for an hour each night. After a while Somerby starts telling his blog readers how unlikable Democrats are, every day. That's how propaganda works when you don't think about the things you're being told. Is Somerby a helpless prawn in Gutfeld's net or is he casting that net here for other gullible people to fall into? I don't think there is anyone left here in comments who isn't a troll. That is sad because Somerby used to have something to say and a community of intelligent readers who discussed political issues instead of sniping all the time.
ReplyDeleteThis is how bad things have gotten here compared to before Trump was hired by Russia to run for president.
Bob’s no prawn. He’s a common shrimp.
Deleteanon 1:14, ok, so I guess "everyone in the world" doesn't "despise . . . ugly [MAGA] old bags" (such as your mother perhaps?)
ReplyDeleteHis mother was a prominent suffragette.
DeleteHis father was an abolitionist.
DeleteMAGA women all cultivate a similar look, exaggerated unappealing features that are very masculine.
DeleteIn part this is because many Republican men are bisexual or homosexual, but also find this aspect of themselves repulsive, due to their warped upbringing.
You can say it. Republican women look like drag queens. The attempt to shut down actual drag queen shows may be in order to prevent others from noticing the similarity.
DeleteBlues claim too much credit for themselves and don't give enough credit to black people for their own advancement. E.g., the long-time leading conservative intellectual leader for is black. He achieved this position through his own achievements. Not only did blues not help him, they actively hindered him. Blues hindered Clarence Thomas's advancement to the SC. Blues are hindering Winsome Sears effort to become a Governor.. Sears and Thomas advanced through their own impressive efforts.
ReplyDeleteDavid apparently thinks Democrats should have helped black conservatives be elected because they are black. Civil rights doesn't mean you help corrupt black people do their corrupt things because blacks should have equal opportunity to commit white collar crime. LBJ appointed Thurgood Marshall, who was a fine justice, not at all corrupt. James Eastland, Sam Ervin, John L. McClellan, Herman Talmadge, and Strom Thurmond were all in opposition to the nomination. Senator Eastland was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee at the time. If Republicans ever appointed well qualified, non-corrupt people to the Supreme Court, Democrats would support them. Despite his sexual harrassment of Anita Hill, enough Democrats supported Thomas to put him on the court. In retrospect, it was a mistake. People gave him the benefit of a doubt he did not deserve, based on his subsequent performance.
DeleteBlues do not claim any credit for the civil rights movement, but we have helped it along in many ways because blacks have not had the power to do the whole job themselves, being a disenfranchised minority. That is why many blacks are still loyal to the Democratic party. There would have been no Obama presidency without Democrats.
"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has said he benefited from affirmative action policies at Yale Law School, though the exact extent of its influence on his admission in 1971 is unknown. Thomas has publicly acknowledged this while also becoming one of the nation's most outspoken opponents of race-based affirmative action. "
DeleteIt sounds like Blue programs, such as affirmative action (now dismantled by Republican efforts) did benefit Clarence Thomas. When he chose to become a Republican, I don't believe there is any obligation to promote him beyond the measures taken to benefit all other black people in our society. Blues did not start advocating against affirmative action simply because Thomas benefitted, as Republicans would have done. Much of the anti-DEI effort under Trump is because Trump is determined that no one like Obama should ever get past the guards again.
Earth to 1:53 most Black people are "blues", to a way higher degree than any other demographic.
DeleteRepublicans only allow Blacks into their cult due to a form of racism called tokenism.
1:53's comment is weird in how moronic it is.
Blues are hindering Winsome Sears effort to become a Governor.
DeleteHow are Blues hindering her effort?
Tiedrich quotes a pastor:
ReplyDelete"far-right Christian nationalist pastor Brian Sauvé: “let’s stay that somebody was coming in to our church and they were black. would they be eligible for membership in our church? yes. of course they would. but would they be permitted to participate in, embody, and practice what I would call ‘black culture’ generally in our church? the answer is absolutely not. why? because the things, the characteristics that mark black culture, they are evil, murderous, violent, bestial people. they steal, they kill, they destroy, they look like Satan.”
But Somerby thinks black people are doing fine today, as opposed to when white supremacists would lynch those black people for looking like Satan, or daring to hold a job and have a life not controlled by white assholes.
The pastor should also reject white supremacist culture.
DeleteNote that the pastor is saying that a black person could only belong to his church by giving up everything black and being a black-skinned white person who believes in white supremacism and Christian nationalism. That seems like a very big sacrifice just to hang out with white dudes with unkempt beards.
DeleteArmatya Sen of India won a Nobel prize in economics in 1998 for demonstrating that the more education women receive and the more they participate in the broader society of a nation, the more prosperous than nation becomes. When women hold jobs and run businesses the entire country does better, not just the families of the women who do such things. This is true in both rich and poor nations, but it is most true of poorer countries, the so-called shithold nations, as Trump refers to them. Education and fuller participation are a route out of poverty for families and their countries. (Sen is also credited with analyzing why famines occur and how to prevent them, and his ideas were enacted by the UN's Development program.)
ReplyDeleteTrump's government wants to send women back to their homes to do housework and raise children. It wants to kick women out of their current jobs, remove them from positions of authority and responsibility, and transform our society into a male-dominated patriarchy in which women are subservient, disenfranchised, and without any control over their lives. If Sen is correct, this will have a strong negative impact on our nation's economy, causing us to backslide in our own prosperity and opportunites (for men as well as women). It will hurt the economy.
Claudia Goldin, who won a Nobel prize in economics in 2023 for her study of the impact of women's employment on our economy, and how changes in society after WWII resulted in changes for women in the workplace, supports Sen's broader theory with findings based on the US economy. She attributes progress for women to the development of reliable birth control which allows family planning and spacing of children. This allowed women to see both education and employment, to have careers not just jobs. She too suggests that if men force women to return to being homemakers, it will harm our economy, reduce our GDP and make life worse for all Americans.
This may have as big a negative impact on our economy as Trump's tariffs, undoing the substantial gains since WWII. Our recovery after covid was not the envy of the world solely because of Biden's stimulus but also because our economic opportunities gave us greater flexibility, and that is because women were already participating widely in our workforce.
See Development as Freedom, Amartya Sen (1999) and Career and Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey toward Equity, Claudia Goldin (2023).
Susie Wiles would disagree.
DeleteHow many Nobel prizes does Susie Wiles have?
DeleteA Nobel Prize doesn't just mean you did some work and published it. It means that top people in your own field agreed that your work was better than anything others in your field had done and wanted to acknowledge and reward that work. Does that apply to Susie?
DeleteSusie Wiles shows that Trump does not want to send women back to their homes to do housework and raise children or to kick women out of their current jobs
DeleteYou said she would disagree with expert economists on the importance of women in the workforce. How does that make her qualified for her job?
DeleteHis failure to fire one woman when he has let go so many others is meaningless.
Termagant definition: a harsh-tempered or overbearing woman
ReplyDeleteIf Somerby is at the age where he cannot tell a man from a woman, he needs to take that special test they gave Trump. Whatever else Gutfeld is, he is not a termagant because he is not a woman. He doesn't claim to be a woman. He doesn't self-present as a woman. He wasn't a woman when he was a little girl, and he is not now a woman.
It isn't funny or clever to demean a man by calling him a woman. Somerby does that nearly every day, thus displaying his own contempt for women. It is sexist to believe that men should be insulted by being called women because it is worse being female than male, women are worse than men, inferior, having traits men wouldn't want to have, etc. When male comedians do this, they are demeaning women, whether they intend it or not. It is implicit in their attitudes, even if they are not consciously aware of their own thoughts.
This continuing need to demean women by calling Gutfeld a woman (termagant, which is a gendered term), shows Somerby's own sexism. That he keeps doing this only makes it worse.
If Somerby were the wisest and most educated man on earth, revered by all others, I wouldn't respect him because he continues to behave like a first class asshole. Maybe this is why he could never get a date, much less find a woman to sleep in the same room with him.
Diane Keaton has died.
ReplyDeleteLoved her.
Delete