SATURDAY, JANUARY 20, 2024
Sometimes a questionable notion: Our car doors opened a few hours later. In a word, there came the sun!
That said:
On the New York Times opinion page (print edition), we found these four headlines today:
In the Shelter of a Weeping Beech (Jesse Wegman)
When the World Feels Dark, Seek Out Delight (Catherine Price)
What Trump Voters Understand About the Economy (Roger Loewenstein)
Trump Just Keeps Doing Appalling Things, and the Ranks of the Disengaged Are Growing (Michelle Goldberg)
The writers agreed—these are terrible times. Even as Roger Loewenstein said that the economic situation is not as good as our blue tribe keeps insisting, he offered this personal assessment of the upcoming election:
"In a phrase, Mr. Trump is unfit for office."
That's Loewenstein's personal view of the current political scene. Even so, he was saying that Trump voters aren't being as irrational in their preference as our thought leaders typically claim.
In the past few weeks, other anti-Trump writers have made similar claims. In short, these are deeply disturbing times.
What else did we see on that opinion page? Within the uplifting half of the page, Catherine Price was suggesting the institution of what she calls a "delight practice." Here's the way she starts:
PRICE (1/20/24): Here’s an idea for the new year: Let’s make 2024 the year of delight.
Does that sound ridiculous, given the state of the world right now? Hear me out.
The basic premise of a delight practice (which I learned about in the essay collection “The Book of Delights” by Ross Gay) is simple: You make a point to notice things in your everyday life that delight you. This could be anything—a pretty flower, a smile you share with a stranger...Nothing is too small or absurd. Then whenever you notice something that delights you, you lift your arm, raise your index finger in the air and say, out loud and with enthusiasm, “Delight!” (Yes, even if you’re alone.) Ideally, you share your delights with another person.
The concept of prioritizing delight may sound silly or almost irresponsible, given the heaviness of current events, feelings of burnout and the upcoming U.S. presidential election, in which it seems democracy itself could be at stake. But this is exactly why it is so important. Far from being a frivolous practice, making a point to notice and share things we find delightful can improve our moods, outlooks, relationships and even physical health.
We're not saying that any of that is "wrong." But on the gloomier half of this morning's page, Michelle Goldberg reports that many blue tribers are beginning to "disengage" in the face of Trump's enduring political success.
Early on, this passage offers a taste of what she's worried about:
GOLDBERG (12/20/24): In 2019, Viv Groskop wrote in The New York Review of Books about how some in Vladimir Putin’s Russia had resurrected the Soviet idea of internal exile or internal emigration, a disillusioned retreat from politics into private life and aesthetic satisfactions. If Trump is re-elected, I’d expect to see a lot of Americans adopting a similar stance as an emotional survival strategy.
Ah yes, the "internal exile." A few months back, we wrote about the impulse toward "internal exile" which forms the heart of Peter Weir's Oscar-nominated 1985 film, Witness.
In that film, the Harrison Ford character seeks an exile in Pennsylvania's Amish country—an exile from his life as a police sergeant in a violent and corrupted Philadelphia.
By the end of the film, he realizes that he has to return and continue his efforts within his own world. But the longing for a form of escape had been strong.
Our blue tribe is beginning to realize that Donald J. Trump could win again this year. We strongly advise against a theme which is currently being pushed around the blue tribe dial.
In that theme, we convince ourselves that Candidate Trump is melting down before our eyes—that he's been displaying the type of senility which is constantly being attributed to President Biden.
Kevin Drum has been advancing this idea, as you can see in this new post. Joe Scarborough has been pushing this notion for weeks.
Yesterday, we got an email from a journalist friend who is apparently going there too. The idea strikes us as a form of wishful thinking in the face of impending defeat, a modern-day blue tribe ghost dance.
We hope to discuss this matter next week. We don't think that Candidate / Defendant Trump is melting down in that way, and we don't think we should start telling ourselves that he is.
On the other hand, our concerns about President / Candidate Biden are quite strong at this site. Our concerns could be wrong, of course.
For members of our own blue tribe, this is a very dangerous time. How can we prevent the worst?
As readers may already know, we're inclined to think it's already too late. There is much, much more to say about this—and we do recommend delight.
Update concerning delight: Two hours later, our car doors opened! "There came the sun," we exclaimed.
Here Comes the Sun, George Harrison wrote, in a brilliantly simple ode to delight.
We play this video when we want to recall how much pleasure there can (sometimes) be in the world, depending perhaps on where you live. Also, though in second place, pretty much any version of the wonderfully simple Colours.
Yes, melting, melting down, definitely.
ReplyDeleteYou'll be alright, Bob, nothing to worry about. Enjoy your life, be happy.
Get lost.
DeleteDid you try to inject some WD-40 into the lock?
ReplyDeleteJamming a pencil point into the lock is another possible strategy. Graphite is a good lubricant.
DeleteThere is speculation that Michelle might replace Biden as the Dem candidate. IMO she would be a strong candidate. Many voters would see her election as a kind of continuation of Barack's Administration.
ReplyDeleteIsn't a candidate usually judged by some previous activities, not limited by marrying a future president?
DeleteBut perhaps this is a thing of the past.
I don’t think the Obamas want to go back into that life again. They have a lot of money and the freedom to do what they want.
DeletePres. Obama, along with his former advisors, may play a big role in steering the Biden Admin, that team would want to do that, but I don’t think Mr. and Mrs. Obama miss the WH.
The Obamas are busy producing films. Malia Obama has a short film appearing at Sundance Festival.
DeleteThe right wing has been spreading this idea about Obama reentering politics in order to mobilize its racist base. The only thing scarier for them than Obama running Biden behind the scenes is Michelle becoming president. These are scare tactics (like Willie Horton).
When Trump "accidentally" refers to Obama instead of Biden in his rallies, he is dog-whistling to the racists who think Obama's involvement is real. But you are correct that someone needs to be massively stupid to take this literally. This is how the right campaigns these days, including David.
David, stop reading that rightwing baloney. You come here and make a fool of yourself.
Delete
Delete@Cecelia
Didn't he boast in 2016 that he could win the third term? Not something you'd expect from a guy who's happy to retire.
Besides, most politicians really hate being separated from the trough.
Polls show that Biden will be a weak candidate in November. Kamala would also be a weak candidate. Democrats who want to win would like to replace Biden, but how can that be done without giving Kamala the nomination?
DeleteOne answer would be to nominate a different black woman.
@3:54 Are you talking about Obama or Trump? Trump did boast that way, but then couldn't win a second term. He is weaker now. Somerby's fantasy that he will win again is not grounded in reality. That isn't surprising given his excessive Fox News watching.
DeleteDavid, from what I've been reading, most voters on the left are not following the election yet and are unaware that Trump is the Republican candidates. The majority of the electorate does not follow politics as closely as we do. They expect that favorability and other polling for Biden will improve once the voters wake up and start to think about the coming election. Usually, primaries in various states would jump-start that process, but there are two incumbents running against each other in this election. Expect the polling to change a lot as we get closer to the general election.
Delete"from what I've been reading, most voters on the left are not following the election yet and are unaware that Trump is the Republican candidates [sic]."
DeleteInteresting theory about "most voters on the left".
The purpose of a vice president is to take charge if the president is unable to serve. Kamala Harris has already been elected to that position. Those who are concerned about Biden's health need to be reminded that there are two eventualities: (1) Biden will continue to serve well in the job, or (2) Biden will be unable to serve due to health issues or death and Harris (who is young) will take over, supported by Biden's cabinet and advisors until she finds her feet in the job. Either of those eventualities would be better than electing an obviously unfit and incapacitated candidate such as Trump to an office whose duties he has already shown he cannot fulfill.
DeleteBeing old like Biden is not as bad as being: (1) a convicted sex abuser, defamer, business fraud and cheat; (2) instigator and participant in an attempted insurrection, (3) violator of his previous oath of office, (4) equally old but unhealthier candidate unwilling to release accurate and truthful health info, (5) corrupt in his previous term havng received bribes from foreign governments and others seeking favor via contributions to his businesses (which he failed to disclose upon taking office), (6) white supremacist and xenophobe who deliberately separated babies from their parents, who could not later be reunited, in the name of immigration, (7) who says he will eliminate non-political govt service and be a dictator on day one, (8) thief of classified documents who may have given or sold US secrets to our enemies, (9) told over 3000 distinct lies in his first term, (10) is becoming more demented with every public appearance and started out as the most ignorant president ever before the current decline.
@4:18 It is based on answers given in recent polls.
DeleteAnonymouse 3:54pm, Pres. Obama can’t run again (though I’ve wondered if that couldn’t be finagled) so I think he was boasting of his popularity and successful presidency, etc.
DeleteObama hadn’t been a politician for very long before he was elected president. I think he’s had all the input and influence on the current admin in his retirement and none of the drudgery.
He's fairly a rockstar still.
@Cecelia
Delete"Pres. Obama can’t run again"
But apparently (at least according to David) he can, using his wife. My intuition is: he would love to do it. YMMV.
Being president turned his hair gray. I'm sure he doesn't want to run again.
DeleteTalking about Obama running again may be an attempt to normalize Trump's suggestion that he should become president for life, or run for another term after 2024 because he was robbed of being president in 2020. No one is going to change the law to allow Trump to be a forever president. It will take the military to make that happen, and Trump doesn't have them behind him.
But it IS suspicious when the right talks about Obama running for an illegal office or wanting to take over via Michelle. That is fear-mongering for those who fear black people, and it is normalizing an illegal act so that Trump can do it himself, by those who are done tolerating the way democracy gets in their way. Either way, there is nothing benign about such speculations and it surprises me to hear David advance such outrageousness.
An actual Republican would be as resistant to a three-term president and a Democrat would, so when you hear this stuff coming from the right, it isn't coming from those who care about democracy and our country's political health. It is from those who want to break rules on behalf of Trump, secede from the union, or take over and run roughshod over our freedoms and protections.
"That is fear-mongering for those who fear black people, and it is normalizing an illegal act so that Trump can do it himself, by those who are done tolerating the way democracy gets in their way. "
DeleteEvery right wing accusation is a confession. And DiC is first in line with this one.
I am struck by commenters who claim Biden will be a strong candidate. No matter what you think of his ability, he is objectively a weak candidate. I acknowledge that Trump would be a weak candidate. Why don't Democrats acknowledge the same about Biden?
DeleteBTW why do some commenters say that talk about Michelle is "fear-mongering?" I didn't say I was afraid Michelle would run. I just said it was conceivable.
It is not conceivable. She hasn’t shown any interest in it, so why would anyone else, especially on the right. It was like when the right said Hillary would run, just scare tactics.
DeleteWeak Biden was 7M votes stronger than weak Trump. And the Biden Admin has done a lot of good stuff, not just cut tax on the wealthy. Biden is not a weirdo like Trump.
DeleteThe rumor that MO would run was sprung in right wing outlets that are as unreliable as Maria Bartiromo. Biden is a weak candidate. He has shown no signs of dementia, however, whereas Trump has made several statements lately that are nonsensical. We do not know how he did on a mental status exam 4 years ago nor why it was given. Between now and November is ample time for many more bizarre statements to emerge from his mouth, peeling off independents loosely favoring him, and maybe some republicans who care that their leader is not demented. Voter turnout will be an issue given the unpopularity of these candidates. This is one election in which a third party candidate on the ballot who is not fringe could win, since 40% of the population surveyed do not identify as Democrat nor Republican, and neither of these two are popular.
Delete3rd party candidates are by definition fringe.
DeleteIs it me or does Trump look younger & seem more energetic than he was 4 years ago?
DeleteTrump is less cognitive than he was four years ago.
DeleteI recommend too Van Dyke Parks’ version of Colours on his album Song Cycle. And the whole album, from 1968!
ReplyDelete"In that film, the Harrison Ford character seeks an exile in Pennsylvania's Amish country—an exile from his life as a police sergeant in a violent and corrupted Philadelphia."
ReplyDeleteHere is an actual summary of the plot of that film:
"After witnessing a brutal murder, young Amish boy Samuel (Lukas Haas) and his mother Rachel (Kelly McGillis) seek protection from police officer John Book (Harrison Ford). When Book uncovers evidence of police corruption involving narcotics lieutenant James McFee (Danny Glover), Book must take Rachel and Samuel, and flee to the Amish countryside where Rachel grew up. There, immersed in Amish culture and tradition, Book and Rachel begin a cautious romance."
So, this is not a film in which someone becomes Amish as a form of reflection or existential retreat, as Somerby misremembers it. The Amish community provides witness protection, hence the name of the film.
But what do facts matter when Somerby is rewriting someone else's work to suit his own agenda? This distortion of reality to fit political purposes is a very right wing trait. They only care about other people's work when they are trying to push some hapless black female college president out of her job. Then there is outrage, but who cares how wrong Somerby gets an old movie? Not Somerby, that's for sure. This is not the first time he's made the mistake, been corrected, and ignored the correction, because who cares what commenters say either. As long as Somerby has his figurative fingers in his ears, he can say what he wants about anything and pretend he is telling the truth about it. Like he did with those reading scores in MS.
This is one of the things that has polarized me, leading to intense dislike of the folks who disregard important values in the creative and academic communities, while right wingers do whatever they please to whoever they want, and don't care who gets upset about it. Not caring about others is the essence of lack of empathy, and that seems to be what divides the right and left at this point in history.
"By the end of the film, he realizes that he has to return and continue his efforts within his own world. But the longing for a form of escape had been strong."
ReplyDeleteThe conflict in the film is that the Ford character falls in love with an Amish woman whose life is in the Amish community, not in the city. This is not about Ford choosing between escape and confronting the problems on his job, it is about giving up his secular life and adopting the Amish way of life in order to stay with the woman and child he has been protecting.
It is pretty obvious why Somerby ignores the relationship aspect of the film. But by doing so, he distorts the meaning of the film for the rest of the audience, those who love, have children, and belong to families and communities of our own.
Somerby apparently subscribes to the cafeteria approach to film viewing. He picks out the parts he relates to and ignores the rest, including the vision of the person creating the film. So too with Bob Dylan lyrics, short stories by Chekov, novels by Willa Cather and everything else he touches, including Washington Post articles (only the headlines matter). That is no way to consume media of any kind.
Kelly McGillis had a nice pair of boobs.
DeleteI've always admired her footwear too.
DeleteA foot man.
DeleteWay to spoil a joke.
DeleteAnonymouse 7:01pm, you’re giving yourself too much credit
Delete"Witness" is a fine film, and its most memorable moment is Kelly McGillis's topless scene.
DeleteIf that is what is most memorable for you, it must not have been much of a film, or you are 12 years old.
DeleteIt’s a key scene, essential to the plot. It’s the turning point in the story of John Book and Rachel Lapp, and it’s visually pleasing. I’m fourteen years old.
Delete"We don't think that Candidate / Defendant Trump is melting down in that way, and we don't think we should start telling ourselves that he is.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, our concerns about President / Candidate Biden are quite strong at this site. Our concerns could be wrong, of course."
Notice that Somerby says his concerns about Bidern are quite strong at this site. "At this site"? What can he mean by that? Are his "concerns" website specific? Do they change depending on where he is writing? That might explain a lot -- why Somerby says he is liberal but writes like a conservative here.
I am less concerned by Trump's occasionally name substitution gaffes (which could be deliberate, to conflate Obama with Biden and Haley with Pelosi) than by his lack of energy, his body posture and shuffling, his inability to control himself in court, his inability to string several connected sentences together to make a point during his recent speeches, and his demented social media posting. None of this seems like mental illness (as Somerby has previously claimed) but it does seem like depression, dementia (cognitive decline) and ongoing unfitness for office. He cannot focus on anything except his own problems, for example, not even to get elected.
For those who may not be aware, impulse control is another symptom of dementia. It is why so-called dirty old men make crude remarks to their grand daughters (they have the impulse but not the knowledge that their sexy remarks are inappropriate or the ability to suppress them). Trump is letting it all hang out, even when it is self-defeating.
But Somerby dismisses concerns about Trump and emphasizes his concerns about Biden. What liberal does that? It isn't as if Somerby has come out in favor of some other Democrat, or called for a real primary to find a different candidate. He hasn't done that. He only maligns Biden and claims that Trump is going to win (again, without argument or evidence). And he pretends to worry about that, while doing everything he can to boost Trump's candidacy. Today, he says Trump is not declining (defending Trump), without answering or speaking to any of the evidence widespread on other sites about Trump's bragging about a cognitive test that he cannot clearly remember (and thus makes up) and his confusion about Nikki Haley running security at the Capitol building. Those are real problems, along with his inability to stop defaming E.Jean Carroll.
When will Somerby stop pretending to be liberal and come out as a conservative who is working to elect Trump? He might find telling the truth a big relief, less stressful than his current masquerade. Trump IS going to lose -- the last two election results are favorable to Democrats. Things are only going to get worse for Trump. Somerby is meanwhile dissipating whatever good will he had on the left with this ongoing series of lies in his old age. Wouldn't he be happier rewatching Witness to see what it is really about, than lying about Biden having some terrible terrible (unspecified) defects worse than Trump's dementia?
This comment is suggesting Somerby is exhibiting bias in his assessments yet it is written with a distinct bias in how it perceives and describes Trump's behaviors and mental state, as well as its assumptions about Somerby's political orientation.
DeleteUnlike Somerby, the author is probably liberal.
DeleteI’m a liberal troll.
DeleteI highly recommend listening to podcasts such as Pod Save America, which discuss the mechanics of polling, primaries and elections. The panel consists of people who have been involved in previous elections, including some of Obama's campaign staff. They explain the details of how caucuses work, what the results in Iowa meant, what the various candidates are doing, and so on. The details are fascinating and it is better to be informed than to be taken in by propaganda, biased opinion pieces, or untethered speculation (like Somerby's above).
ReplyDeleteI suspect that Somerby might be confusing his own medical issues with Biden's life. Biden and Somerby are both old, but Biden isn't having the same problems as Somerby, even if Somerby feels old himself and assumes someone his age must feel like he does. I am Somerby's age too and the only pills I take are for allergies.
Biden takes the preventative pills for blood pressure and cholesterol, as most people over 50 do, but nothing for a specific condition. I know this because he published his doctor's report as president. Trump has never done that. I would bet that Trump takes those same pills, plus something for diabetes (Metformin if not insulin). Trump gets less exercise and doesn't sleep well (a serious problem when it comes to cognitive ability). Trump looks like he is struggling lately and doesn't speak coherently (disregarding differences of opinion and lies). I would feel sorry for Trump if I didn't dislike him so much as a person. Biden is surrounded by a warm family and by friends. Trump appears to be stranged from Melania (who comes across as cold anyway) and Barron and the rest of his family. He hangs out at Mar a Lago, crashing weddings for attention and meeting with fawning sycophants seeking his endorsement or favors. In other words, Trump has a weak social support network, something important to both health and longevity. In the past several days, pictures have appeared showing red abrasions on his hands and a bandage on Trump's neck. These could be photoshopped or they could have resulted from some physical accident related to balance or inattention. Not a good sign. So I think Somerby's concerns about Biden are misplaced and he should be worried about Trump instead.
estranged -- living separately
DeleteThis comment criticizes "untethered speculation," but engages in speculative commentary itself, particularly regarding the personal health and family dynamics of Biden and Trump.
DeleteAs far as the family, I would love to have a son who is one of the greatest abstract painters in history.
DeleteJoe Biden is so, so lucky to have a genius son.
Everything I said about the personal health and family dynamics comes from things I've read about both men in the media. I read the actual physician's report that Biden released to the public, for example. It has been reported that Melania and Trump do not share a bedroom and that Trump is up at all hours watching TV and posting on social media. These things are common knowledge. My interpretations of them are based on medical knowledge. Anyone can read about the effects of lack of sleep on health, or symptoms of dementia, via articles in the NY Times (the ones Somerby complains about).
Deletehttps://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1950-0
Mobility as a predictor of all-cause mortality in older men and women: 11.8 year follow-up in the Tromsø study
"Lack of sleep is detrimental to humans and animals. Over the past decade, an important link between sleep and cognitive processing has been established. Sleep plays an important role in consolidation of different types of memory and contributes to insightful, inferential thinking."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831725/#:~:text=Lack%20of%20sleep%20is%20detrimental,contributes%20to%20insightful%2C%20inferential%20thinking.
Trump eats hamburgers and drinks diet cokes all day, is majorly overweight, gets little exercise (riding in a golf cart right up to the green and not walking the golf course). He couldn't keep up with the other attendees at international meetings while president, riding in a golf cart to meetings then too. Of course he has prediabetes (at a minimum) and more likely is diabetic. Dementia is being called Type III Diabetes by doctors these days, because it emerges in people who similarly have bad diets are overweight and diabetic (suffering from metabolic disorder). This doesn't go away just because you fail to publish your annual physical results while president. It would be worse if Trump also drank alcohol, but there have been rumors of drug use (uppers). Trump could also have chronic heart problems, unrevealed to the public. He was seriously ill when he contracted covid, having to be hospitalized (unlike Biden).
DeleteIf Trump were honest, he would have published his own physical report results while president and also as a candidate. He is dishonest, so we must guess what is going on with him. He doesn't look good these days. His complexion is off, he shuffles and does not carry himself with any energy. He cannot put together multiple sentences to follow a chain of thought, switching from topic to topic in a disorganized way, and his memory is bad. His bragging about the cognitive test he took shows ignorance (which was always true going back to when he took the test), but the fact that he keeps referring to it shows he is trying to ally concerns about his mental status. Where there is smoke, there is often fire.
Yes, this is speculation, but it is grounded in evidence available to anyone who follows the news, coupled with general medical knowledge about health in old age.
allay concerns
DeleteCriticizing speculation and then engaging in it, especially without solid evidence, should always be avoided if one wants others to take them seriously. News reports are not always accurate sources for making specific medical assessments about individuals. This attempt to rationalize the speculation doesn't mitigate this issue.
DeleteYes, it would be better if Trump would release his medical records, as others have done, but he refuses to do that and he is obviously lying about his health. I am more interested in assessing the comparative health of the candidates than adhering to some hurdle you are posing about consistency.
DeleteI look forward to your assessments and hope your evaluations will be grounded in verifiable information and not again veer into hypocritical speculation.
DeleteHypocritical or hypothetical?
DeleteTrump's Adderall addiction isn't doing him any favors.
DeleteDianne Feinstein has announced she is dead.
ReplyDeleteNot funny. This is the kind of joke only Cecelia would laugh at.
DeleteI’m not an all glad Feinstein is dead, but the post did bring a chuckle.
DeleteAfter my father died my brother told people who called that we were burying him in his much loved old and huge record player/radio/tv cabinet that had embarrassed us all our lives.
He would’ve have gotten a kick out of that.
Cecelia, do you not understand that your family jokes about your father were told with fondness about something he would have found funny, whereas this cruel joke about Feinstein was told by a political operative in order to malign her, and she would not have found it funny at all, nor do any other of her many supporters. She was a historic figure in our Party, did her job well for most of her life, and does not deserve to be mocked this way.
DeleteI am correct that you would find this funny because (1) it is mean-spiritied and partisan in the same way you are, and (2) you lack empathy and cannot understand that the joke was meant to hurt liberals. This is why your assessment of the mean-spiritedness of the right wing cannot be fair. You don't see how you affect other people. It takes empathy to see that, and you either have none or refuse to exercise it in these situations.
None of this attack on me makes you a nice person.
DeleteAnonymouse 6:14pm, you’re not god at the “turn it back on them” maneuver either.
DeleteCecelia is a good decent person.
DeleteThank you.
Delete"Appearing on MSNBC on Saturday morning, conservative attorney George Conway was asked how the jury in the E.Jean Carroll defamation trial is likely viewing Donald Trump in the flesh as opposed to just seeing clips of him on TV.
ReplyDeleteIn a word, the attorney said they are being exposed to a "psychopath."
Getting right into it with the hosts of MSNBC's "The Weekend,' Conway explained, "When you see little clips of him, you kind of think you know, it's reality TV. He's silly, he's harmless, it's just nonsense and he just does his thing, he does his schtick. But when you see him up close and in person you start to realize there's something seriously wrong with him."
This is the kind of reporting that Somerby says we shouldn't be concerned about with Trump.
Somerby: "We don't think that Candidate / Defendant Trump is melting down in that way, and we don't think we should start telling ourselves that he is. "
Somerby says we should be more concerned about President Biden, but he quotes and cites no reason to worry about Biden. Nothing. Meanwhile there are reports of Trump gaffes all over the internet.
When will Somerby give us some reason why we should worry about Biden, besides his age, which is incidental to his functioning in a job he has been performing well?
"No reason to worry about Biden" mistakenly equates the absence of evidence with proof of a claim.
DeleteWhen it comes to people's health, the absence of evidence is proof of health, especially since Biden has made public the results of his health exams. No news is good news, when it comes to health.
DeletePart of Bob;s "What-Me-Worry?" take on Trump is the necessary element of not really paying much attention. So his take here can't really be worth much.
ReplyDeleteTrump objectively seems worse than he was before, ie, he’s “losing it.”
ReplyDeleteBut pointing this out is “wishful thinking in the face of impending defeat”, says Somerby.
Or maybe, it isn’t wishful thinking. Maybe it’s just documenting Trump’s clear decline, whatever that bodes for the election.
Perhaps one of the Somerby whisperers can formulate it like this: “pointing out Trump’s clear cognitive problems is a distraction from getting out there to help Biden get re-elected, which Somerby supports by forecasting Biden’s imminent defeat.”
Somerby likes to portray the “blue tribe” as clueless, as he does here. Oddly, though, he continues to quote mainstream journalists who seem rather morose about Biden’s chances. Like, most mainstream journalists.
DeleteJoe Biden is more cognitive than I am.
I am Corby.
You’re the fake Corby, and you’re barely cognitive at all.
Delete
DeleteI am more cognitive than you are, Boris. I am as cognitive as any Warren Buffett's manager.
I am Corby.
Then cognite this: I am the one and only real Corby.
Delete