BREAKING: In the aftermath of Hurricane Betsy!

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 2018

Indifference, cluelessness pretty much all around:
This past Sunday evening, Betsy DeVos appeared on 60 Minutes.

DeVos is Secretary of Education. She seems to know little or nothing about the nation's public schools. Also, just as a general matter, she doesn't seem massively sharp.

Betsy DeVos doesn't seem to know much about the public schools. In fairness, neither does Leslie Stahl, the long-standing major journalist who pretended to interview DeVos.

Who else doesn't know squat or squadoodle about the public schools? We'd nominate Dana Milbank, who columnized about DeVos in the Washington Post. We're going to guess that Michelle Goldberg, who wrote this column in the Times, may not know a giant amount about the public schools either.

In fact, the public schools are virtually never discussed, in any real way, within the mainstream or liberal press. This is especially true of low-income schools. The truth is, nobody cares about low-income kids, or about the schools they attend, except to the extent that low-income schools can be used to score points in some narrow tribal argument.

Nobody cares about low-income kids; few things could be much more clear. That said, having licked every person in the house, we're going to focus on David Brooks' column in yesterday's New York Times.

Brooks is smarter than the average MSM bear. We'd also assume he's more sincere.

Despite all that, he launched a column about the latest mandated talking-point—the greatness of Chicago's public schools. He attributed this greatness to the latest hot theory—great principals make for great schools.

When columnists write about public schools, they're usually carrying water shaped for them by the so-called educational experts. They're usually pushing the latest official hot theory. It's usually clear that they don't actually know what they're talking about, and that they haven't done even the most basic background research.

We got that impression from reading Brooks' column. The passage in question can be found here:
BROOKS (3/13/18): The solutions to the nation’s problems already exist somewhere out in the country; we just do a terrible job of circulating them.

For example, if you want to learn how to improve city schools, look how Washington, New Orleans and Chicago are already doing it. Since 2011 the graduation rate at Chicago public schools has increased at nearly four times the national average, to 77.5 percent from 56.9 percent...

[...]

How is Chicago doing it? Well, its test scores have been rising since 2003. Chicago has a rich civic culture, research support from places like the University of Chicago and a tradition of excellent leadership from school heads, from Arne Duncan to Janice Jackson, and the obsessive, energetic drive of Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Chicago has expanded early childhood education and imposed universal full-day kindergarten. After a contentious strike in 2012, Emanuel managed to extend the school day. But he and the other people who led this effort put special emphasis on one thing: principals.

We’ve spent a lot of time over the past few decades debating how to restructure schools. We’ve spent a lot of time trying to help teachers. But structural change and increasing teacher quality don’t get you very far without a strong principal.
In fairness, Brooks mentions two other city school systems, New Orleans and Washington. But he focuses on Chicago, whose "test scores have been rising since 2003."

In fact, almost everyone's test scores have been rising since 2003! You'll rarely read that in big newspapers, and you're routinely given a different impression. But that doesn't mean it's untrue.

Meanwhile, Washington may not be the best urban district to cite at this point in time. The system is currently undergoing its latest wave of embarrassing scandals, this time involving widespread scamming of (gulp!) graduation rates.

Whatever! We were struck by Brooks' reference to Chicago's rising test scores. For the past dozen years or so, we've tried and tried, and tried and tried, to get people like Brooks to report the fact that test scores have been rising all over the country, including in our big city districts.

Alas! As Kevin Drum has demonstrated through his work on lead exposure, it's impossible to introduce information into the American discourse. Information simply isn't allowed in our modern pseudo-discourse at this time, though talk about Stormy is.

For this reason, Americans still aren't allowed to know about those substantial score gains, which bumped back in 2015, the most recent Naep testing for which results have been released. (No one has bothered to talk about that either.)

When we saw Brooks' statement about Chicago's score gains, we decided to look to see how large the gains have been in other urban districts. Our finding:

Chicago has recorded strong gains—but the gains in other urban systems have been even larger.

We looked at score gains in Grade 8 reading and math in the systems shown below. All these gains were recorded on the Naep, our one presumptively reliable testing program.

Most urban districts weren't involved in the Naep's urban system project back in 2003, so we were restricted to a bunch of large systems which were. We looked at score gains by black and Hispanic kids, who form the bulk of these systems' student populations. We used the time period from Brooks' column—2003 through 2015.

What do the gains look like in Grade 8 math? We'll start with the gains recorded by these systems' black kids:
Gains in average scores, 2003 to 2015
Black students, Grade 8 math, Naep

National public schools: 8.10
Atlanta: 16.82
Boston: 18.56
Charlotte: 10.08
Chicago: 17.16
Houston: 6.17
Los Angeles: 20.67
New York City: 7.51
San Diego: 9.16
Washington DC: 17.03
Chicago's black kids recorded a large score gain. That said, their peers in Boston and Los Angeles recorded slightly larger gains, and black kids in Washington and Atlanta basically gained just as much.

(It's generally assumed that there's no cheating on the federally-run Naep program, unlike on the widely corrupted annual statewide tests.)

How did Hispanic kids do in Grade 8 math? Let's take a look at the score gains:
Gains in average scores, 2003 to 2015
Hispanic students, Grade 8 math, Naep

National public schools: 11.34
Atlanta: Not available
Boston: 18.51
Charlotte: 13.64
Chicago: 16.65
Houston: 12.48
Los Angeles: 19.00
New York City: 7.49
San Diego: 17.69
Washington DC: 19.41
Here again, Chicago's Hispanic kids have recorded a sizable gain—larger than the substantial gain among Hispanic kids nationwide. But among the eight urban systems we checked, four systems recorded gains which were somewhat larger.

Chicago's healthy score gains don't stand out among these urban systems. The same is true in Grade 8 reading, where the score gains have been substantially smaller across the board.

For whatever it's worth, Los Angeles recorded much larger gains than Chicago in Grade 8 reading. In fact, Los Angeles recorded larger gains in all four measures over this time span, the time span Brooks introduced.

We don't say this to denigrate the efforts being made in Chicago. We say this to denigrate the utter indifference of our upper-end press corps, right across the board.

We've tried and tried, and tried and tried, to ask these people to be more literate in this realm—a realm which is widely discussed, though only to drive preferred narratives. They simply don't care about low-income kids, and it seems they never will.

(They do care about Stephanie Clifford's heroic desire to share her truth about getting "shtupped," as Rachel would thoughtfully say.)

Regarding Brooks' focus on principals, we will only say this. If other districts have made larger gains, why should we privilege the theories coming from Chicago's mayor, who probably doesn't much know what he's talking about?

When crime rates dropped across the nation starting in the early 1990s, every mayor and every police chief had an explanation. Every mayor's particular effort was said to be responsible for the drop in crime in his city. Never mind the fact that crime rates had also dropped as much pretty much everywhere else.

Drum has argued that crime rates have dropped because of lead abatement. Could that be a (tragic) explanation for the rise in the nation's test scores?

In conclusion, Betsy DeVos doesn't seem to know squat. But neither does anyone else.

Please note: Score gains are different from scores. Some systems with smaller gains over this period may have had higher scores in 2015. It all depends on what the system's scores looked like in 2003, when this comparison started.

Example: For black kids and Hispanic kids, Los Angeles' gains were higher than New York City's in Grade 8 math. But as of 2015, New York City's black and Hispanic kids still recorded higher average scores than their peers in Los Angeles, which started way behind.

Maybe Brooks can look this up. Thanks to the federal government's efforts, voluminous Naep data are here.

18 comments:

  1. Jeez, no 'black' and 'hispanic' students again, please.

    "DeVos is Secretary of Education. She seems to know little or nothing about the nation's public schools. Also, just as a general matter, she doesn't seem massively sharp."

    But Bob, think about it: why would anyone sharp (let alone 'massively sharp') work as a secretary? ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now, "Mao", in your country, 'General Secretary" used to be the most important post.

      Delete
    2. Brooks is a hack, who has made a career being incorrect about everything (and lies about it, when called on it). Anyone running a media criticism blog, who can't see that, should stop blogging altogether.

      Delete
    3. Trusted and reliable spell caster here in United States who can help fix your relationship or marriage problems with love spell.. Email him now Spellcasthome@gmail.com or call +1 (402) 892-2486

      My love life has changed for better since the interference of the most powerful spell caster on earth called Dr. Jakiki. My testimony today is in regard of the help that Dr. Jakiki render me when my lover departed from me. My name is Jenna Renee from United States. It gives me joy today in writing this testimony as a way of showing my appreciation to Dr. Jakiki. Happily I can say today I am living a happy life with my lover and also my Relationship life is restored and stable. Dr. Jakiki save my relationship from breaking up to a better relationship. My Boyfriend who break up with me before, is now loving me like crazy and I’m loving it! i am very much grateful for restoring peace in my relationship and at the same time i am use this opportunity to advise those that are finding stress and pains in their relationship or marriages to contact Dr. Jakiki who is the best spell caster in the world through his contact details via Email: Spellcasthome@gmail.com
      Text him or call: +1 (402) 892-2486
      Website: http://spellcasthome.webs.com/

      Dr. Jakiki is the only one that can restore your marriage or relationship with love spell. He can also help to win lottery spell.

      Delete
  2. Since 2011 the graduation rate at Chicago public schools has increased at nearly four times the national average, to 77.5 percent from 56.9 percent...

    That's a deceptive statistic. Schools that already had high graduation rates in 2011 couldn't rise as fast as Chicago did because they had little room for improvement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why you use the national average as a comparison point and not the highest performing schools.

      Delete
    2. Poor, poor stupid David in Cal, missing the forest for the trees yet again even in a subject area in which he claims expertise.

      SAD!

      Delete
    3. I will confess that I ought to have written "higher" rather than "high", but you should have been able to figure that out. Chicago started with a graduation rate that was presumably well below the national average. For that reason the comparison of rates of increase in graduation rate is deceptive. But, really the numbers speak for themselves. An improvement from 56.9% to 77.5% is very impressive.

      Delete
  3. Brooks cites a study by Sean Reardon of Stanford University which does indeed say the following:
    "A comparison of Chicago public school students’ standardized test scores in 2009-2014 with those of public students across the U.S. reveals two striking patterns. First, Chicago students’ scores improved dramatically more, on average, between third and eighth grade than those of the average student in the U.S. "

    (Link is here: https://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/chicago%20public%20school%20test%20scores%202009-2014.pdf
    )

    Why does Somerby not tackle this report? Note that the time frame for the report is 2009-2014, and not 2003-2015 as Somerby has looked at. The report also looks at gains between third and eighth grade, not just eighth grade to eighth grade. The report also considers scores on reading; Somerby only quotes the math scores.

    How does the fact that test scores are going up more rapidly in Chicago from 2009-2014 constitute some nefarious or ignorant press narrative, when according to the Stanford report, it is true?

    Also, Somerby never tells us what was wrong with Milbank's or Goldberg's stories, or for that matter, what was wrong with Stahl's interviewing.

    I also note this: for math "The 2015 average was two points higher than in 2005, the first year a comparable test was given." (Thus comparing scores back to 2003, as Somerby does, is unacceptable)

    And for reading: "the average score in 12th grade in 2015 was 287, down from 292 in 1992, the first year of a comparable test in that subject. "
    (Both of these quotes are from the following: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/us/math-test-scores-decline-high-school-seniors.html)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The same ny Times story cited above also quotes Terry Mazany: “This trend of stagnating scores is worrisome,” said Terry Mazany, the chairman of the governing board for the [NAEP] test.

      Delete
  4. Somerby says: "Brooks is smarter than the average MSM bear. We'd also assume he's more sincere."

    Why assume he's more sincere?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm through messin' around.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It always puzzles me why Somerby thinks the national press should be covering local events. Education tends to be a local issue. That was the whole point of the movement for local control.

    This arguing about whether the journalist should have focused on Chicago or Washington, LA or NY makes no sense and illustrates the problem with trying to discuss a local issue at the national level. You have to pick a school or state or city to focus upon when you get specific.

    Somerby doesn't seem to me to be real immersed in local education either. Does he understand, for example, that NYC's Hispanic population draws on Puerto Rican citizens whereas LA's Hispanic kids come from immigrant and even undocumented children from a wide variety of Central and Latin American countries, speaking a wider diversity of languages in their homes? Does Somerby consider the impact of being immigrant or undocumented on such children's learning? Or the extra burden on the teachers? No one is worried that Puerto Rican children or their parents or relatives will be sent away at any moment.

    Other studies have noted the importance of the principal to school improvement. This isn't Rahm Emanuel's idea. Further, Somerby seems to think that if lead has had an impact on crime, it was the only impact. Improvements in policing cannot have been important if lead was a cause -- there can be only one, apparently. Somerby doesn't know that there has been a sea-change in policing and that more effective strategies are being developed and implemented in many large cities, coincidental with (or perhaps due to having to cope with) the changes caused by lead.

    Kevin Drum is not a criminologist. He should not be anyone's sole source of info about policing or any other subject.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Support the mogul. He sent a reporter halfway across the country to cover Republican efforts to suppress the vote.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/why-you-should-join-prime

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm not entirely sure that Bob Somerby has shown that he knows squat or squadoodle about the public schools.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And now for something completely different:

    https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2018/03/13/Defectors-Rape-is-rite-of-passage-for-North-Korean-women/3961520921040/?spt=su&or=btn_tw

    ReplyDelete
  10. I want to use this opportunity to thank Dr Zuma Zuk for helping me to will the lottery.I have been playing lottery for the past 6 years now and the only big money I have ever won was 7000$ ever since then I have not been able to win again and I was so upset and I need help to win the lottery so I decided to go to a friend of mine call lipa, and she introduce me to Dr Zuma Zuk, there I saw so many good talk about this man called Dr Zuma Zuk of how he have cast spell for people to win the lottery.I contact him also and tell him I want to win a lottery he cast a spell for me which I use and I play and won 50million GBP.I am so grateful to this man just incase you also need him to help you win, you can contact him through his email: spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com anytime or Whatsapp him :+2349055637784 is my part of promise I made, that if I win I tell the word how I win my game.

    ReplyDelete


  11. Henderson Elizabeth
    Dr joy is a trust worthy spell caster and he will be of great help to you. I never believed in spell casting but After 4 years of marriage my husband left me because I lost my womb, and i was unable to give birth to children. I felt like my life has come to an end, and i almost committed suicide, i was emotionally down for a very long time, but thanks to this spell caster called Dr joy whom i met online after my friend Becky Ross told me how he also helped her to bring back her husband in less than 2 days. I believed her and decided to give Dr joy a try and i contacted him on his email joylovespell@gmail.com. and explained my problems to him. He laughed and told me that In less than 2 days, my Husband will come back to me again, and that he will restore my womb and i will give birth to children. At first i thought it was a joke but i took courage and believed as Dr joy has said and it did happen just as this Great spell caster said, My husband called me and was crying, begging for forgiveness. I forgive him and today i am so glad that all worries and problems has gone away, and we are even happier than before, another good news is that i am pregnant now, and very soon we will have our baby. Dr joy is really a gifted and a powerful spiritual man and i will not stop publishing him because he is a wonderful man. I advice you all If you have a problem and you are looking for a real and genuine spell caster to solve all your problems just Contact Dr joy on his email on joylovespell@gmail.com. because he will always help you to solve all problems. Once again thank you Dr joy. Thank you, thank you.
    you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2347088404185.

    ReplyDelete