THE SHAPE(S) OF MONSTER: And its cousin, Stereotype!

FRIDAY, MARCH 9, 2018

Part 4—Not a monster, they said:
If we listen to to Hollywood's industry guild, the best movie of 2017 was the one which was built around Monster.

According to various experts, The Shape of Water includes three levels of Monster. Let's define what they are:

First, the film involves a literal "monster," a creature half-fish and (perhaps) half-man. As it turned out, this "monster" was actually lovable—even willing to get it on!

The film also involves a metaphorical monster—Strickland, the lunatic racist sadistic Southern bigot. Strickland is a lunatic all the way down, as his love for his "Alabama howdedoo" cattle prod lets the slowest film-goer know.

So far, that's two types of monster. But below the surface of this film, a third kind of monster is swimming around, a demographic monster. This third type of monster is men—and no, we don't even mean white men, a point which comes clear rather late in the film when the lazy, shiftless, offensive black husband instantly kowtows to Strickland, selling out his deserving wife and the lovable literal monster.

The shiftless black husband never says, "Yassuh, boss." But he comes very close.

(Note: according to this film, a man can be decent and good if 1) he's an older gay men or 2) he's a Soviet spy. Canadian men are Southern bigots too. Meanwhile, government scientists piss on both the ceiling and floor, forcing overnight cleaning women to mop their urine up.)

This is the way the monster del Toro builds his "fairy tales!" In fairness, it was possible to enjoy this film's "unconventional love story" without noticing the monster stories lurking beneath, and quite a few liberals did.

We liberals! We're used to enjoying portraits of monsters like Strickland. How we managed to sit through that black husband scene, which is straight outta racist portraiture—well, we'll call that one for the books.

The Shape of Water is built upon the need for Monster. Out in Tinseltown, the dumbest, least moral people on Earth—the people who wouldn't speak up about Harvey—named it best film of the year.

By all accounts, their runner-up was Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri. This film is built upon Monster too—rather, it's built upon Stereotype, a well-known first cousin to Monster.

Mainstream critics didn't hugely like either one of these films. We'll provide the surprising numbers in an afternoon post.

That said, by all accounts, the guild thought Three Billboards was second best film of the year. We'll guess they thought that because they enjoyed its service to Stereotype, in which a high-minded fellow from Over There helped us enjoy a mocking portrait of what Those People are like.

In this instance, Those People are rural so-called whites. Specifically, the film presents people from the Ozarks—and they're cosmically, comically dumb.

It isn't just the spectacularly dumb (and violent) deputy sheriff, who comes to us via Barney Fife and Sam Wood, the peckerwood deputy sheriff from In the Heat of the Night.

It isn't just the deputy sheriff, who, at various times, seems to be mentally challenged. It's also his dumb bunny mother, or the otrher comically dumb deputy sheriffs, with whom he attempts to work.

It's also the spectacularly stupid but smokin' hot 19-year-old girl friend of the much older former husband. It's the comical dumbness of the kid who runs the advertising agency, along with the spectacular dumbness of his smokin' hot young assistant, who offers the same absurd performance that the 19-year-old girl friend does.

The dumbness is general among Those People in this second-best film of the year. It even exists in the good guy sheriff, who can't stop cussing a blue streak in front of his adorable young daughters. Apparently, Those People are like that!

(Somehow, he has a movie star-looking wife who speaks with an Australian accent and throws off a reference to Oscar Wilde. This is offset by the fact that the town, inevitably, has its own dwarf, a dwarf with a drinking problem! On the brighter side, black people in Ebbing, Missouri all seem to be rural Rhodes scholar types. Such are the joys of Stereotype, first cousin to Monster.)

Does any of this bullshit seem real in this, the second-best film? Forget the three billboards she erected—does it seem real that a grieving mother will assault her dentist with his own drill; will kick two high school kids in the nuts (one of the kids is a girl!); and will proceed to firebomb the police station, presumably burning it down?

Apparently this is just the way Those People behave! The mother doesn't get arrested for burning the police station down. The deputy doesn't get arrested for pistol-whipping the billboard boy, then throwing him out of a (second-story) window.

On Main Street, in broad daylight! It's just the way Those People behave! Or so we're apparently told by the latest "auteur" Over There.

Tinseltown has always had a fondness for these types of Stereotype, second cousin to Monster. Don't miss Rosalind Russell's lunatic breakdown in Picnic, the 1955 Best Picture nominee which teaches us that Those People are generally mentally ill, due to the massive boredom involved in being forced to live their pitiful lives.

(See also Splendor in the Grass—same original author—where life outside The Village is so hard to bear that the young Natalie Wood ends up in a mental institution. Her mother is basically crazy too. Don't even ask about Warren Beatty's lunatic father, who kills himself, or his wacky, overwrought sister.)

Hollywood loves these games. Mainstream critics didn't thrill to The Shape of Water or to Three Billboards, but due to their reliance on Monster, the guild apparently made these films the last two picture shows standing.

The longing for Monster is hardwired into our prehuman brains. In recent weeks, we've seen several decent people suggest that we should stop insisting on Monster.

First, we saw Jennifer Willoughby, second ex-wife (and accuser) of Trump aide Rob Porter. Speaking with Anderson Cooper (and others), Willoughby wisely and decently turned her back on Monster:
COOPER (2/8/18): There was one other thing you wrote, and then I want to take a break for a moment. You wrote, about why you stayed, "If he was a monster all the time, perhaps it would be easier to leave, but he could be kind and sensitive, and so I stayed. He cried and apologized, and so I stayed. He offered to get help and even went to a few counseling session and therapy groups, and so I stayed."

WILLOUGHBY: Yes. You know, this is a question—I specifically wrote that because that's a question I'm asked a lot, is, "Why did you stay if he was a, quote/unquote, monster?" And the reality is, he's not a monster. He is an intelligent, kind, chivalrous, caring, professional man. And he is deeply troubled and angry and violent. I don't think those things are mutually exclusive.
We'd recommend Willoughby's decency and insight.

Willoughby suggested we walk away from our longing for Monster. That very same week, we were revisiting an award-winning book from 1974.

The book in question is Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made, winner of the Bancroft Prize in 1975. It was the successor to the 1969 book, The World the Slaveholders Made.

In truth, Roll, Jordan, Roll is too academic for full popular use. Still, Professor Genovese includes fascinating portraits of "the astonishing effort of black people to live decently as human beings even in slavery," "one of history's greatest recorded crimes."

We're quoting here from the book's preface, in which Genovese explicitly suggests that we walk away from thinking of people as "monsters." Within the modern context, his specific statement is so incorrect that we won't repeat it here, but we do recommend his advice, along with the rest of the book.

Not long after that, we came across another rejection of Monster. We've quoted that rejection before. It comes from the new memoir by Patrisse Khan-Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter:
KHAN-CULLORS (page 15): I will not think of this particular incident until years later, when the reports about Mike Brown start flowing out of Ferguson, Missouri, and he is morphed by police and the press from a beloved 18-year-old boy, a boy who was heading to college and a boy who was unarmed, into something like King Kong, an entity swollen, monster-like, that could only be stopped with bullets that were shot into the top of his head. Because that is what this cop did to him. He shot bullets into the top of his head as he knelt on the ground with his hands up.
Was the late Michael Brown morphed into a monster after his death, by police and by the press? Khan-Cullors gives no examples of this, but she wants Brown to be remembered as someone who was loved.

We think that's good advice. That said, we couldn't help noticing the degree to which Khan-Cullors invents monsters at various points in her book—for example, in the paragraph we've just posted, and through her amazingly selective account of the death of a second young man.

We humans are strongly drawn to Monster and its various cousins, including Stereotype. Tinseltown's flyweights have always loved these games.

In our modern floundering state, we liberals seem to love Monster more and more with each passing day. It's one of the ways we got President Trump. Aside from the dumbness of living for Monster, how happy are we about that?

One last word about Stereotype:

If you've come to love Stereotype, you can't see it occurring. So it went when we liberals attended the past year's best two films.

If you love it, you can't see it! In hideous places like Ebbing, Missouri, Those People frequently can.

34 comments:

  1. May I suggest, Bob, that everyone on this planet is so used to dumb Hollywood stereotypes that they simply aren't paying attention?

    These days, if a movie is even barely watchable, that's already a miracle, an unexpected gift. Take it, and be grateful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Comrade, any kopeks coming your way for your pitiful trolling is a miracle, unexpected gift.

      Delete
    2. Do you need your ex-husband back or you want to save your marriage / relationship from breakup and Divorce? you can contact dr. ugo wonders through email generalspelltemple@gmail.com or call him directly on +13863369876

      I want the world to know a great man that is well known as Dr. UGO, he has the perfect solution to relationship issues and marriage problems. The main reason why i went to Dr Ugo Wonders was for solution on how i can get my husband back because in recent times i have read some testimonies on the internet which some people has written about powerful Dr Ugo Wonders and i was so pleased and i decided to seek for assistance from him through his email (GENERALSPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM) which he did a perfect job by casting a spell on my husband which made him to come back to me and beg for forgiveness.I will not stop publishing his name on the net because of the good work he is doing. I will drop his contact for the usefulness of those that needs his help. CONTACT Dr Ugo via EMAIL: GENERALSPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM You can also Call his mobile number +1(386)336-9876
      Website: https://generalspelltempleblog.wordpress.com

      Delete
  2. Bob, Rob Porter is a monster.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You didn’t quote Willoughby in her WaPo opinion piece today. That would have given all of us a fuller picture of her view of her ex-husband. Shame on you for cherry-picking her quotes.
      You do this all too often to support your arguments in these posts.

      Delete
    2. So to do an acceptable post, in your eyes, he needs to have exhaustively researched each point? Does any blogger alive ever do that?

      Delete
  3. If we should try to see Rob Porter as not being a monster, why not Harvey Weinstein too?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Almost all Hollywood movies are dumb and almost all TV series, network and cable, are dumb.
    Sturgeon’s Law: “Ninety percent of everything is crap.”

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a good movie for Bob (and everyone else) to watch:

    http://thebreadwinner.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, Studio Ghibli Fest 2018!

      https://www.fathomevents.com/series/studio-ghibli-fest

      Delete
  6. "We humans are strongly drawn to Monster and its various cousins, including Stereotype. "

    So, creating Monsters and Stereotypes is a thing that all humans do. Conservatives are humans. Thus, they also do it.
    Yet, according to Somerby, "we liberals seem to love Monster...It's one of the ways we got President Trump."

    If both sides are busy creating stereotypes, why should one side's stereotypes predominate over the other in a political election? Somerby himself says that liberals' love of Monster is just ONE of the ways we got Trump. What are the other ways?

    To put it differently, if both sides are similarly engaged in stereotyping and monsterizing, then the real explanations for the outcome of an election must lie elsewhere, i.e. they must exist beyond or even outside of the stereotyping and monsterizing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe not. Not if one side is a group of elites using stereotypes of ordinary people and the other is a mass of ordinary people using stereotypes of a smaller group of elites.

      Of course, I myself, would say that we got Trump because Trump and co were able to play some angry Bernie supporters like a fiddle.

      Delete
    2. I hear conservatives every day condemning liberals. And they aren't just talking about liberal "elites."

      Delete
    3. Trump, McGahn, Porter, John Kelly, Carter Page, etc are all people that Somerby has defended, and chastised liberals for criticizing. But these are not the unwashed conservative voter...these are the conservative elite. According to Somerby, liberals can't even attack THEM because he construes it as an attack on "The Other." How messed up is that?

      Delete
    4. "According to Somerby, liberals can't even attack THEM because he construes it as an attack on "The Other."

      Bob gets his "news" from Hannity.

      Delete
  7. "Tinseltown, the dumbest, least moral people on Earth"

    Does this make Somerby or his fans feel good when he says crap like this? Is it good to feel morally superior? To cast an entire profession this way? To engage in the exact thing that you have argued against for years, and in this very post, i.e. not to engage in Stereotypes or Monster-Making?

    Somerby asks us to consider the possibility that Rob Porter isn't a monster, yet he exhibits no sympathy at all for Hollywood types or indeed liberals when they (some of them anyway) do that which, as Somerby admits, all humans tend to do.

    I find this Howler post disgraceful.
    It is evidence of an ungenerous nature, and the large cruel streak that runs through Somerby's work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why does Somerby insist that film, an art form, must be realistic? These films are not documentaries.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bob Somerby, the great film historian, cherry-picking a couple of movies with bumpkin characters to "prove" that Hollywood has an anti-bumpkin bias.

    Is it really necessary to point out the hundreds of Westerns where Indians were portrayed as mindless savages, or blacks were depicted as contented slaves or lackeys, or where the city was depicted as a den of crime and immorality versus the idyllic rural areas, etc.

    Is today's Howler post the culmination of 20 years of thinking, writing, and blogging? Doesn't say much for the value of experience.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In another time and place, a woman’s father and brothers and their friends would beat up a man who raised his hand against that woman. If he didn’t learn from that, such a man would be excluded from male society, including losing his job. No one would waste breath calling him a monster. He would be called more colorful names. Porter received the modern equivalent.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Somerby is badly in need of a course in cognition, followed by one in social cognition, because he has no clue how people think. For example, he seems to think use of stereotypes is optional. You might as well try to think or speak without concepts.

    ReplyDelete
  12. For someone who despises Hollywood, Somerby sure knows a lot about movies. He even saw the Shape of Water not once, but twice. For which, Mr del Toro's bank account is grateful.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Selena was a good movie.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "In hideous places like Ebbing, Missouri, Those People frequently can."

    Sorta doubt it, since Ebbing, Missouri doesn't actually exist. Was just a town made up for McDonough's film.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Her book was published in January 2018. Does she REALLY believe that Michael Brown was kneeling on the ground with his hands up and then was shot in the head, twice?

    Really?

    How many other people really believe that?

    Is a book really worth reading when the authors seem to have so little regard for facts or else so little ability to ferret them out? Isn't there a book by a birther or a flat earther I could read instead?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cullors also believes that Trayvon Martin was murdered by Zimmerman. And that Trump is a white supremacist. Beliefs that in the past Somerby has roundly criticized in others.

      Somerby liked the story of her youth, her formative years, but then doesn't like the beliefs those years led her to once she became a fully cognizant human being.

      Delete
    2. "How many other people really believe that?"

      It's "tribal". Believe that, or believe all the lies the cop who shot Brown told in his report/ interview.
      Good luck finding anyone who believes neither of those fantasies.

      Delete
    3. You are forgetting there were also witnesses of various sorts and forensic evidence.

      Delete
  16. 'So it went when we liberals attended the past year's best two films.'

    You mean 'We Trumptards, don't you' ? Since you are a Trumptard now.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This blog was better before Bob got his political acumen from Sean Hannity.

    ReplyDelete

  18. Henderson Elizabeth
    Dr joy is a trust worthy spell caster and he will be of great help to you. I never believed in spell casting but After 4 years of marriage my husband left me because I lost my womb, and i was unable to give birth to children. I felt like my life has come to an end, and i almost committed suicide, i was emotionally down for a very long time, but thanks to this spell caster called Dr joy whom i met online after my friend Becky Ross told me how he also helped her to bring back her husband in less than 2 days. I believed her and decided to give Dr joy a try and i contacted him on his email joylovespell@gmail.com. and explained my problems to him. He laughed and told me that In less than 2 days, my Husband will come back to me again, and that he will restore my womb and i will give birth to children. At first i thought it was a joke but i took courage and believed as Dr joy has said and it did happen just as this Great spell caster said, My husband called me and was crying, begging for forgiveness. I forgive him and today i am so glad that all worries and problems has gone away, and we are even happier than before, another good news is that i am pregnant now, and very soon we will have our baby. Dr joy is really a gifted and a powerful spiritual man and i will not stop publishing him because he is a wonderful man. I advice you all If you have a problem and you are looking for a real and genuine spell caster to solve all your problems just Contact Dr joy on his email on joylovespell@gmail.com. because he will always help you to solve all problems. Once again thank you Dr joy. Thank you, thank you.
    you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2347088404185.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Do you need your ex-husband back or you want to save your marriage / relationship from breakup and Divorce? you can contact dr. ugo wonders through email generalspelltemple@gmail.com or call him directly on +13863369876

    I want the world to know a great man that is well known as Dr. UGO, he has the perfect solution to relationship issues and marriage problems. The main reason why i went to Dr Ugo Wonders was for solution on how i can get my husband back because in recent times i have read some testimonies on the internet which some people has written about powerful Dr Ugo Wonders and i was so pleased and i decided to seek for assistance from him through his email (GENERALSPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM) which he did a perfect job by casting a spell on my husband which made him to come back to me and beg for forgiveness.I will not stop publishing his name on the net because of the good work he is doing. I will drop his contact for the usefulness of those that needs his help. CONTACT Dr Ugo via EMAIL: GENERALSPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM You can also Call his mobile number +1(386)336-9876
    Website: https://generalspelltempleblog.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. Contact Dr Sambo now for Lottery Spell winning numbers Email: divinespellhome@gmail.com

    My name is Adrienne Bernardo I Live in:New Jersey, I am 55 years old,I want you to know how Dr Sambo helped me, he is do generous with lottery winning numbers, early this year 2018 I contacted him for a Canadian lottery number, he gave me and I won $750,000,000 SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS I still can’t believe people could have this kind of powers in this modern days. Dr Sambo is the best, he put a smile on my face and my family is rich now. Everybody must be rich, contact Dr Sambo for lucky winning numbers and be rich all your life. Contact him now, it doesn’t matter where you are ,it doesn’t matter your status in life,just contact him and he will sully help you okay... Email: divinespellhome@gmail.com or divinespellhome@yahoo.com
    Dr. Sambo Whats,App.+2348145810121

    ReplyDelete