SCRIPTED, ARROGANT, DUMB AND TOWN: Did Ohio's foster care system fail?

THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2021

Let's take a look at the "research:" Did Ohio's foster care system fail the late Ma'Khia Bryant  and her three younger siblings?

Did it fail her "in critical ways?"

We can't answer that question! In fairness, the front-page report in the New York Times didn't exactly make that claim, though it certainly seemed to make that claim. As we noted yesterday, here's what the Times report said:

BOGEL-BURROUGHS ET AL (5/9/21): Ms. Bryant’s tragic death was also preceded by a turbulent journey through the foster care system, which had cycled Ma’Khia through at least five placements in two years—after her own mother was found to be negligent—despite efforts by their grandmother to reunite the family.

Ohio places children in foster care at a rate 10 percent higher than the national average, and child welfare officials here are considerably less likely than in the country as a whole to place children with their relatives. Black children, like Ma’Khia and her sister, account for nearly a third of children removed from homes—nearly twice their proportion in the population.

A review of Ma’Khia’s pathway through foster care shows that it failed her in critical ways.

Research has demonstrated that children fare far better when they remain with family members, a practice known as kinship care. It also shows that each successive placement causes additional trauma, further setting back a child in crisis.

“Everybody knows and the research has proven over and over and over again that the best placement for children is with their kin,” said Ronald R. Browder, the president and chief executive of the Ohio Federation for Health Equity and Social Justice. “But the focus has always been on foster care.”

"Research has demonstrated that children fare far better when they remain with family members," Bogel-Burroughs and his fellow reporters said.

(Their editor or editors went unnamed.)

“Everybody knows and the research has proven over and over and over again that the best placement for children is with their kin,” one local activist was quoted saying. “But the focus has always been on foster care.”

(Was he speaking about foster care in the state of Ohio, or was he speaking about foster care nationwide? There's no way to tell from the way he's quoted. So it goes at the New York Times.)

At any rate, whatever! Despite the fact that everyone allegedly knows these things, "Ohio places children in foster care at a rate 10 percent higher than the national average," the young Timesman thoughtfully said. And not only that:

:"Black children...account for nearly a third of children removed from homes—nearly twice their proportion in the population." 

Is that in Ohio, or is that nationwide?  There's no way to tell from this front-page report, but the whole compendium sounded quite bad for Ohio.

Please note: Bogel-Burroughs never explicitly said that the Ohio system "failed [Bryant] in critical ways." He merely said that "foster care" failed her in critical ways, but he plainly seemed to be pointing the finger at the Ohio system.

Speaking very frankly, this presentation by the Times' "diaper dandies" struck us as arrogant, but also as strikingly dumb. It also struck us as scripted—as the kind of easy, Storyline-derived novelized work which spills from the soul of the Times.

Where does Storyline enter this picture? We would suggest starting here:

In the case of this fatal shooting, it was hard to blame the police officer, who arrived at the scene of a violent fight in which it seemed that Bryant was about to stab a young woman. With that avenue closed down, why not blame the foster care system, employing the kind of underfed analysis which gives Times readers an easy-reader novel but explains nothing in the end?

In our view, it's plain that Ma'Khia Bryant and her three younger siblings have all received insufficient help in their young lives—have been failed in various ways. 

Tomorrow, we'll try to sketch that story for you. But no, we won't be inclined to start with Ohio's foster care system.

That said, is something wrong, in some systematic way, with that state's foster care practices? We don't have the slightest idea, in part because we read the New York Times' front-page report.

How weak was the journalism these "dandies" provided? Let's take a look at the research!

The passage we have posted above came right at the start of the Sunday front-page report. We've posted paragraphs 7-12 of a lengthy, 81-paragraph report.

Right at the start of this front-page report, the diaper dandies take their shots at the Ohio system. But just how strong were there analytical skills? 

How strong were there analytical skills? Let's take a look at the record:

We'll start with the initial claim about the Ohio system. That initial, foundational claim goes exactly like this:

"Ohio places children in foster care at a rate 10 percent higher than the national average."

For all we know, that claim may even be accurate! That said, the intrepid Timespersons offered no source for this foundational claim, nor did they offer a link to any data source.

Meanwhile, and it ought to be said—we aren't entirely sure what that claim specifically means. 

Does it mean that, after adjusting for population, Ohio has ten percent more kids in foster care than the national average? Does it mean that, among children referred to child care services, the state sends ten percent more into foster care as compared to other states?

Whatever the claims specifically means, might we note a basic point? That particular claim, even if true, doesn't strike us as recording a mind-blowing level of difference: 

Does our nation condemn 1% of our kids to foster care, while Ohio banishes 1.1%? That would be ten percent more. Is that the magnitude of difference which we're talking about?

Meanwhile, is it possible that there could be local reasons for some such ten percent difference? As we noted in Monday's report, when the Washington Post assigned two veteran reporters to profile the Ohio system, they started by mentioning this:

CRAIG AND LUDLOW (4/30/21): Over the past decade, Ohio has been hit hard by the nationwide opioid crisis, leading to a surge in the number of foster children, officials said. The number of children in the state’s care has grown from 12,000 in 2012 to about 15,000 today.

That construction is a bit clumsy, but has Ohio been hit especially hard by the opioid crisis? If so, might that explain why the state has been exceeding the national average of banishments to foster care by ten percent, if it actually has been?

Also this:

Might other demographic factors explain the state's alleged divergence from the norm? We don't have the slightest idea, but you can make the following bet:

The diaper dandies at the Times don't have the first idea either! Almost surely, such fundamental statistical questions never entered anyone's head, including those of their editors. In one major area after another, that simply isn't the way reporting is done at the modern Times.

If Ohio exceeds the national foster care rate, does that mean it's failing its children? We don't have the slightest idea, and neither does anyone who read the Times' pleasing report.

That said, the Times report tracked familiar contemporary ground. Too many kids are being condemned, and too many of those kids are black! We can't easily blame the policeman this time, and so we'll find our scapegoat in this other available place.

In these ways, Times subscribers are reassured about their moral goodness. The Times subscriber is better, far better, than the troglodyte rustbelt types who are bungling their state's foster care in the ways the Times has described!

Ohio is condemning too many children to foster care! Indeed, "research has demonstrated that children fare far better when they remain with family members, " we're instantly told—although we aren't told whether it would have been better to leave these particular kids with their particular family members in this particular case.

At any rate, the diaper dandies did offer a link when they referred to the "research." Hungrily, we clicked the link, eager to learn what we could.

When we clicked the dandies' link, we found what we often find in such cases, given the way Our Town's biggest news orgs work. We found a single opinion column—a single column which simply says that "research" has made that demonstration.

Here is the passage in question. No further link is offered:

EPSTEIN (7/1/17): Research confirms that compared to children in nonrelative care, children in kinship homes fare better, as measured by several child well-being factors. Children in the care of relatives experience increased stability, with fewer placement changes, decreased likelihood of disruption and not as many school changes. Relatives are more likely than nonrelatives to support the child through difficult times and less likely to request removal of problematic children to whom they are related. The children themselves generally express more positive feelings about their placements and are less likely to run away.

On average, the highlighted statement may be perfectly accurate! (Or not.)

That said, we note that the passage only says that children "fare better" when they remain with family, not that they fare far better. In fairly typical fashion, the diaper dandies—or their unnamed editor—decided to spin this claim up one additional notch.

That one claim, by that one person, is the only source the dandies provide in support of their foundational claim. Again, we aren't saying the claim made by that source is wrong. We're merely saying that the dandies show no particular sign of knowing whether the claim, which someone chose to embellish, is actually correct.

That claim, about what "research confirms," may be perfectly accurate! Having said that, we'll also say this:

The opinion column to which the Times links was published by the American Bar Association. The ABA isn't a fly-by-night social media site, but we can't help noting the fact that the ABA appended this disclaimer to the opinion column:

ABA (7/1/17): The views expressed herein have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association, and accordingly, should not be construed as representing the policy of the American Bar Association.

That doesn't mean that those views are wrong. But again, if those views are actually right, they're only right on average. They can't tell us whether officials in the state of Ohio made the right choice in deciding that the Bryant kids wouldn't "fare far better" if left in their family's care.

The ABA was careful to note that the views expressed in that column don't represent ABA policy. We found something far more comically awful when we fact-checked the sources of Petula Dvorak's recent claims about the gender wage gap in the Washington Post.

We expect to return to that column in Saturday morning's report. For today, let's offer the following overview about the New York Times front-page report:

We've referred to the Times' listed reporters as "diaper dandies." We've done so because Bogel-Burroughs, the lead reporter, is just completing his second year out of college, and he was joined by another reporter who's at the Times for one year as part of the program which recently replaced the paper's intern program.

These cubs were joined by Ellen Barry, a fully experienced reporter.  Helped along by their editors, the trio presented an instant critique of Ohio foster care which came straight out of clown school.

Is something wrong with Ohio's system? We have no idea. Neither does anyone who drew that conclusion from reading this front-page report.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But the dandies' critique of Ohio foster care should get any college journalism student a flat-out failing grade.

As a general matter, is something wrong with the way Ohio condemns kids to foster care? Does the number of kids so consigned suggest that something is wrong?

Does the fact that black kids get consigned to foster care at a disproportionate rate suggest that something is wrong? Under current rules,  that judgment comes close to being required! But let's leave that for tomorrow.

Also tomorrow, we'll examine the central question in this tragic case. Was the state of Ohio wrong to send Ma'Khia Bryant and her siblings into foster care? 

Who actually failed this teenaged girl, who died at age 16? Could it have been the state of Ohio, or might it have been someone else?

By the current rules of the game, only one answer was possible. 

Scripting and Storyline may have kept the diaper dandies from speaking freely to that point. For our money, though, we will say this:

The Times assigned two diaper dandies to handle this very important topic. In this way, the famous newspaper may suggest that it loves Storyline, and low labor costs, more than it actually cares about kids like Ma'Khia Bryant.

Beyond that, Times subscribers are routinely failed when this newspaper plays this way. Can Our Town survive this culture?

Major experts suggest it cannot!

Tomorrow: Who seems to have failed these kids?


  1. Here is Somerby's quibble for the day: "Is that in Ohio, or is that nationwide? There's no way to tell from this front-page report, but the whole compendium sounded quite bad for Ohio."

    Because the report is about Ma'Khia Bryant, who lived in Ohio, the quotes are about her situation and foster care in Ohio, not nationwide. If the stats quoted were national, they would still apply to Ohio because Ohio is part of the nation. Why would Somerby think Ohio would be an exception to a national statistic? The report says they are placing more kids in foster care compared to the nation, not fewer. And why should every sentence about Ohio have to contain the words "In Ohio" when the reference is obvious from the context?

    But hey, any stick will do to beat a dead horse.

    1. Isiyku Abdulahi
      My ex-boyfriend dumped me one week ago after I accused him of seeing someone else and insulting him. I want him back in my life but he refuse to have any contact with me. I was so confuse and don’t know what to do, so I reach to the Internet for help and I saw a testimony of how a spell caster help them to get their ex back so I contact the spell caster and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me and assure me of 2 days that my ex will return to me and to my greatest surprise the third day my ex came knocking on my door and beg for forgiveness. I am so happy that my love is back again and not only that, we are about to get married. Once again thank you Dr Believe. You are truly talented and gifted.He is the only answer. He can be of great help and I will not stop talking about him because he is a wonderful man. Contact this great love spell caster for your relationship or marriage problem to be solved today via email: or WhatsApp: +19713839183

  2. "Speaking very frankly, this presentation by the Times' "diaper dandies" struck us as arrogant,"

    Isn't it kind of arrogant to refer to Times reporters as "diaper dandies" simply because they are young? This kind of remark doesn't help Somerby's case much.

  3. "If Ohio exceeds the national foster care rate, does that mean it's failing its children? We don't have the slightest idea, and neither does anyone who read the Times' pleasing report."

    Well, actually, the Times report does suggest that the Ohio foster care system is failing children. But doesn't the situation of Ma'Khia Bryant also suggest failure? It is not normal for 16 year old girls to get into knife fights. The foster care system may not have caused her acting out, but it doesn't seem to have helped her much.

    Why is Somerby so resistant to the idea that foster care needs reform? For that matter, why is he so resistant to improving policing? He never tells us.

    No liberal considers this Times report to be "pleasing." Why would Somerby imagine that liberals revel in the need for improvement in foster care. We would be more pleased if foster care were doing a better job and girls such as Ma'Khia didn't require 5 different placements, but could stay with family, as she and her sister plainly wanted to do.

    It is an ugly charge that liberals enjoy reading about family dysfunction and tragedy. We don't. Somerby never provides any basis for this accusation. It is just another insult hurled by conservatives at liberals, another way of calling us bad people. I, for one, am sick of Somerby's disparaging remarks about us.

  4. "Who actually failed this teenaged girl, who died at age 16? Could it have been the state of Ohio, or might it have been someone else?"

    Obviously, Ma'Khia's grandmother failed her. If she had been rich, none of this would have happened.

  5. Somerby loves the phrase "diaper dandies" so much that he used it four times!

    Just like Trump when he invents ugly nicknames for his political enemies! Conservatives just love that kind of name-calling.

    1. Somerby is just like Trump and Conservatives when he calls names. Somerby is an asshole.

    2. Then why do you come to this blog?

    3. The color scheme for one.

  6. There are lots of statistics about foster care available online. Here are some:

    While there are criticisms of foster care, there is also some boosterism because of the constant need to recruit foster parents. As mh pointed out yesterday, foster parents are paid insufficient amounts to fully support the children placed in their care.

    Instead of actually considering the pros and cons of the foster care system, Somerby piles on these reporters and tries to shift blame for what happened to these two young girls. Ultimately, the kids are not to blame for the problems in their family. A system that exists to help dysfunctional families is there because of that dysfunction, so saying that the flaws of the system can be cured by eliminating family dysfunction is unhelpful to discussion. So who does Somerby plan to blame? It won't be the cop who shot Ma'Khia and it won't be the foster care system -- that much is pretty plain from today's mess of an essay.

  7. I have confidence that the "diaper dandies" from the Hamptons-based guild will solve the USA's foster care problem. They are well on their way to solving our race problem through the cop-hating crusade they launched. I trust billionaire-owned media to solve all our problems. They always have, that's what makes America great!

    1. Great news!
      Although Republican -led states are making it criminal to use your First Amendment Rights to protest police actions, they are letting the people use their 2nd Amendment Rights to do so.

      BTW, using your 2nd Amendment Rights isn't "virtue-signaling" like kneeling during the Anthem.

  8. Do the diaper dandies mention her parents or guardians? Maybe they failed the girl more than anyone and maybe that wasn't represented proportionally or at all in their story.

    1. Duh! What do you think family dysfunction is? Of course the parents were not doing their job, but the foster care system is supposed to help kids with problematic parents, not drive them to knife fighting.

      If you are going to suggest that bad parenting makes it OK for cops to shoot 16 year old girls, you are climbing way out on Somerby's limb with him.

    2. Why is anyone talking about blame instead of how to prevent these situations?

  9. Don’t forget that the billionaire-owned mass media supported our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and dutifully kept dissenters off the airwaves. The Middle East is now solved, and it only cost us $6,000,000,000,000 (six trillion dollars) with only 7,000 soldiers killed and tens of thousands more horrible maimed. Thanks to that corporate-media crusade, the Middle East is now a peaceful place and G W Bush is rehabilitated as a hero. It’s only a matter of time before we get similar wonderful results from their crusades against evil foster care systems and evil police forces.

  10. Don't blame foster care. Blame the dysfunctional families they come from. If we didn't have so many children in foster care in the first place we would have fewer problems.

    1. Those damned human beings are so darned imperfect!

      In this case, it wasn't the parents who were shot, it was the child. Shouldn't the foster care system be better than the parents it replaced?

  11. "Black children...account for nearly a third of children removed from homes—nearly twice their proportion in the population."

    1. Giving the % by race is not what I want to see. Every one of these children is in a tough situation, regardless o of race. I deplore the current practice of providing race-based statistics.

    2. What is the significance of black children being more likely to be in foster care? In today's world where being the biggest victim was desirable, this statistic is favorable to blacks. In the old days, this statistic would be seen as evidence that blacks do a poorer job of parenting, on average.

    1. The significance is that black parents are more likely to be poor, more likely to be targeted by law enforcement and incarcerated leaving their kids parentless, more likely to be unemployed, more likely to have health problems that prevent parenting, less likely to have a support network and resources for coping with problems.

      Are you talking about the old days before people knew that correlation is not causation?

  12. The only person who is scripted, arrogant and dumb here is Somerby.

    It is a very hard situation when playing the lottery and never won, or keep winning low fund not up to 100 bucks, i have been a victim of such a tough life, the biggest fund i have ever won was 100 bucks, and i have been playing lottery for almost 12 years now, things suddenly change the moment i came across a secret online, a testimony of a spell caster called dr emu, who help people in any type of lottery numbers, i was not easily convinced, but i decided to give try, now i am a proud lottery winner with the help of dr emu, i won $1,000.0000.00 and i am making this known to every one out there who have been trying all day to win the lottery, believe me this is the only way to win the lottery.

    Dr Emu can also help you fix this issues

    (1)Ex back.
    (2)Herbal cure & Spiritual healing.
    (3)You want to be promoted in your office.
    (4)Pregnancy spell.
    (5)Win a court case.

    Contact him on email
    What's app +2347012841542
    Website Https://

  14. LOTTO, lottery,jackpot.
    Hello all my viewers, I am very happy for sharing this great testimonies,The best thing that has ever happened in my life is how I win the lottery euro million mega jackpot. I am a Woman who believe that one day I will win the lottery. finally my dreams came through when I email and tell him I need the lottery numbers. I have spend so much money on ticket just to make sure I win. But I never know that winning was so easy until the day I meant the spell caster online which so many people has talked about that he is very great in casting lottery spell, . so I decide to give it a try.I contacted this great Dr Believe and he did a spell and he gave me the winning lottery numbers. But believe me when the draws were out I was among winners. I win 30,000 million Dollar. Dr Believe truly you are the best, all thanks to you forever