NEW NORMALS: "The American people are pretty sharp!"

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2024

Except actually, nowe aren't: For at least a generation, it's been a standard bit of messaging from "highly educated," high-profile American pundits:

The American people are pretty sharp!

That has always made for excellent messaging. Whatever else may have been involved, repetition of this bromide helped pundits remain well liked.

The American people are pretty sharp? Actually no, we aren't! That includes this gaggle of "highly educated," high-end journalistsand who knows?

 In some cases, it's possible that some of those tribunes even believed what they said!

Last night's outcome wasn't a revolutionexcept to the extent that it may become one. Numbers changed in a limited wayin a way which makes total sense at a time when people feel, by a very wide margin, that the nation is on "the wrong track."

Tens of millions of neighbors and friends believe that we're on the wrong track. Having said that, so what?

In Blue America, we kept ignoring the still-unexplained, manifest strangeness which was allowed to transpire, for more than three years, at the southern border. To this day, we're still conflating the cost of living with the current inflation figure.

Our tribunes kept insisting that President Biden was sharp as a tack. Over on the Fox News Channel, they kept playing the pieces of videotape which seemed to debunk that claim.

Are we the people actually sharp? This morning, the C-Span web site has joined that of the Internet Archive. For a reason we can't explain, C-Span's website seems to be down. 

Has C=Span been hit by a cyberattack, like the Archive before it? We have no idea! But C-Span's failure to respond robs us of the chance to transcribe a trio of phone calls the network received during Sunday morning's broadcast. of Washington Journal.

How sharp are we the American people? Based upon our notes, the three calls were received, one after the other, starting at 8:55 a.m. Eastern.

The American people are pretty sharp? Here's what three callers said, one right after another:

Caller One: Caller One said that she would be voting for Candidate Harris. She cited the fact that Candidate Trump has had three wives as the defining point of concern.

Caller Two: Caller Two said that he would also be voting for Harrisand he was predicting a blowout. He noted the fact that Candidate Trump doesn't have a pet, while Candidate Harris has a dog.

Caller Three: Caller Three said she'd be voting for Candidate Trump.  Who was in office when the Dobbs decision was reached? "The Democrats," she sagaciously said, plainly suggesting that the Dobbs decision was therefore the Democrats' fault!

You'll think that we're inventing these calls. You'll think that, but we aren't.

To our ear, there was no sign that these callers were anything other than fully sincere. We can't link you to the audiotape of these calls because C-Span, like the Internet Archive, is now, for some reason, down.

When we listened to those phone calls, we heard America singing, if only in very small part. Rather, we were hearing the voices of three fellow citizensthree of the well over 100 million neighbors and friends who would be going out there to vote.

In all honesty, we the humans aren't especially sharp, and there's exactly zero sign that we ever were. That includes the class of experts who get dragged into Blue America's messaging venues to feed us the porridge we like.

Last night's outcome wasn't a revolution. Candidate Trump will almost surely end up winning the nationwide popular vote, but only by maybe three points.

That's a change from four years ago. On the other hand, it isn't a giant change, given the circumstances under which this campaign took place.

How did we Blues approach this election? Let us count (a few of) the ways:

For starters, we operated under an amazingly braindead bromide:

Don't ask, don't let them tell!

Please don't interview Trump voters, we said again and again. Please don't ask them how the world looks to them. Don't ask them why they're supporting Candidate Trump.

Any time a major news org dared to do some such thing, we Blues begged them to stop. It's hard to be much dumber than that, but we (highly educated) Blues were constantly willing to try.

We didn't leave things there. Starting at 4 o'clock Eastern each afternoon, Blue America's "cable news" channel focused its attention on this pleasing porridge:

Trump Trump Trump Trump jail!

Lock him up, our tribunes said, all day and then into the night. In the process, they completely ignored the facts of life which were driving the outlook of The Others.

They ignored the outlook of the deplorables who went out and voted yesterday, even possibly of the "garbage" out there.

(Once President Biden had blurted that latter term, we insisted that Red America had blown right past his implied apostrophe! It's hard to be more pathetic than that, but as a tribe, we've always been willing to try.)

In the end, one of those deplorables called C-Span with that ridiculous claim about the Dobbs decision. That said, this is who we the people areand at some point, those of us in Blue America have to ask ourselves this basic question:

Do we like other people, or not?

All through the annals of human history, the general answer to that question has generally been no. We humans are wired to like our own, to refer to the Others as "trash."

That's where Candidate Vance just went, in the campaign's dying days. In part due to the landlocked nature of our own Blue American world, we are now looking ahead to rule by a gaggle like this:

The brain trust which has emerged: 
Donald J. Trump
Elon Musk
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
JD Vance
Tucker Carlson

Next in line will be fellows like Bannon. It was Bannon to whom Carlson made his latest confessionhis claim that our problems with hurricanes stem from our many abortions. That followed his account of the way he was bloodied in bed by unseen demons, even as his wife and his four dogs soundly slept.

We've now purchased rule by that peculiar crew, and on downward from there. To us, those people all seem to be disorderedbut the mental giants in Blue America all agreed, from beginning to end, that any such medical possibility must never be mentioned or discussed.

So it was decided by Usby the plainly brighter class among us the rational animals.

Are we humans "the rational animal?" Is it possible that we ever were?

Isn't it pretty to think so! A decade ago, writing for the New York Times, Professor Horwich shot that notion down.

Interpreting the later Wittgenstein, the professor brought in the mail. The highest achievements of western world thought were really "the misbegotten products of linguistic illusion and muddled thinking," the professor said that the later Wittgenstein had said.

We think the professor got it pretty much right! Over here in Blue America, we motored ahead into an era when we pleasingly wiped away the age-old distinction between misstatements and lies.

So it went with our own muddled thinking, with a thousand examples to follow. Over there in Red America, the others were routinely able to see what our tribunes kept choosing to do.

On our side, we wanted to lock him up. The business types inside our own tribe's "cable news" channel kept using that as the pretty idea which would keep us returning for more.

On and on and on we went. On our side, we're so dumb that we somehow managed to convince ourselves that Stormy Daniels was a "feminist hero," based on the way she struggled and strained to shake Trump down for cash.

It's hard to be much dumber than that; we were willing to try. Over there, in Red America, the lesser breed was persistently able to see what we, the finer people, were haplessly trying to do.

What will President Trump do this time around? We have no way of knowing.

If he goes ahead with his apparently lunatic tariff plan, the economy may get very bad. If that happens, it will take a lot of violent rhetoric and action, in other areas, to keep us the people in line.

(Or he may just dismiss Jack Smith, then go play golf for four years. We have no way of knowing what the fellow will do.)

That said, there will likely be a lot of new normals in the days ahead. Almost surely, there's one thing which will never change:

We Blues will never understand the way we look to Others. According to a handful of actual experts, our human wiring doesn't equip us for some such task.

We humans aren't built for that task! Is a new beast slouching toward Bethlehem now, as one anthropologist foretold?

We the humans just aren't super-sharp! At some point, we Blues may have to ask ourselves this. It's a question straight outta Bill Clinton:

Do we like other humans, or not?

51 comments:

  1. I, too, would have like to see our cable news stars tie Trump's crimes to our need for Prison Reform.
    Imprisoning the rich and powerful when they break the law, is the quickest way there. Don't kid yourself, when the rich and powerful complain, things get done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We lost because Somerby couldn't bring himself to ask his readers to vote for Harris, because his mealy-mouthed bothsides cover-his-ass approach to life could place him squarely behind the best candidate, and because Somerby is a racist, misogynist asshole -- just like men all over the country.

    You guys wanted Trump, well you're going to get him until he dies and leaves you with Vance. Enjoy your victory.

    Today Somerby is saying we should blame ourselves. No thank you. I voted for goodness but evil has triumphed. This is on Somerby and his bros.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Somerby is a racist, misogynist asshole -- just like men all over the country."

      Have you considered the possibility that you're a misandrist asshole?

      Delete
  3. "We Blues will never understand the way we look to Others. According to a handful of actual experts, our human wiring doesn't equip us for some such task."

    More lies. 1. There are no experts saying any of the stuff Somerby puts in their mouths. 2. We blues didn't do or say anything that swung this election to Trump. Trump won in spite of our best efforts, not because of them. 3. Human wiring gave us the Enlightenment and democracy. The encouragement by the media and big business of greed and self-interest is what put Trump into office. Believe it or not, altruism is part of human wiring too. Somerby's jaundiced view of humanity has no place this morning when we liberals (excluding Somerby) must mourn our country's fate. We don't need Somerby rubbing this loss, which we did not create, in our faces and making us feel worse. Humans comfort each other. They don't stomp on dreams and hopes, the way Somerby does. Somerby is in the wrong place if he wants to blame the victims today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "We don't need Somerby rubbing this loss, which we did not create, in our faces and making us feel worse"

      Yes we do. Today more than ever.

      Delete
    2. It’s people like Hector that led to Trump winning.

      And Vance is next.

      Enjoy having no abortion, no contraception, massive amounts of deportation of the people who thanklessly do our dirty work for us.

      Welcome to the rise of the Russian empire, the death of all Palestinians.

      Thanks Hector, you’ve been a big help.

      I hope y’all like recessions, a big one is coming.

      Delete
  4. "On and on and on we went. On our side, we're so dumb that we somehow managed to convince ourselves that Stormy Daniels was a "feminist hero," based on the way she struggled and strained to shake Trump down for cash."

    This is what misogynist gloating looks like. Somerby thinks that because Trump won, that makes him right about his own feelings toward women, including that Trump's attempt to cheat on his wife undiscovered and then evade consequences is all Stormy's fault.

    We lost because men like Somerby voted for Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How about the women who voted for Trump? Where do they fit into your equation?

      Delete
    2. If women voted their own interests instead of those of their husbands, Harris would have won.

      How bad are Republican mothers that their sons will do absolutely anything and elect a pig like Trump simply to avoid being governed by a female president?

      Delete
  5. Shorter Somerby: “I tried to warn you!”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby has said the same thing before every election. Even a stopped clock...yada yada yada.

      Delete
    2. Bob nailed it.
      Turns out Trump voters are crying out for civility in politics.

      Delete
    3. “AnonymousNovember 6, 2024 at 10:36 AM
      How about the women who voted for Trump? Where do they fit into your equation?”

      They’re all really men pretending to be women.

      Delete
    4. I do not understand the depth of evil that some people are willing to stoop to. That includes you, Cecelia. You are a truly awful person.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 10:58am, come on. You have an experience with the depths of evil every day of your life. It happens every time you encounter dissent.

      Delete
    6. PP, I don’t think Bob knew that Trump’s support among Hispanics and black men would increase as it did or that the media plot device about white women falling all over Comma La was fairy tale.

      Delete
    7. PP, Cecelia has posted several comments today without using her nym. Where is your tirade against her?

      Delete
    8. Anyone can claim that Trump will win -- look at Bill Maher for example. That doesn't make him right. Only the election determines who has won.

      Delete
  6. This is "own the libs" taken to its ultimate conclusion. How do you think it feels to be the hated (immigrant, black or brown or Hispanic, poor, female, liberal, educated, a journalist) and wake up to this result this morning? We will be on the receiving end of whatever they dish out. Somerby's fatuous words this morning will not stop the bloodbath Trump has promised.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought they promised us that the election wasn't over until all the votes were counted? How is it that the NY Times has declared the election over so soon?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why would I need others to ask Trump voters why they support Trump?
    "The Daily Howler" reports their grievances on the regular.

    ReplyDelete
  9. From twitter (via Digby):

    "He was the worst President in history. And when he got voted out, he tried to stage a coup. Then he stole national secrets and sold the ones he didn’t store in the bathroom. He was convicted of fraud, found liable of sexual assault and convicted of 34 felonies. He is half a billion dollars in debt, owned by God only knows who, and the biggest national security risk the nation has ever had.

    But at least he’s not a Black woman."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “But at least he’s not a Black woman”

      Wow. SO now we know that Digby isn’t just your coven’s high priestess, on TDH she’s an anonymouse flying monkey.

      Delete
    2. Cecelia, you moron, you still cannot read despite winning an election. This came from twitter and was posted on Digby's site. She didn't write it herself. What is wrong with you?

      Delete
    3. Anonymouse 11:02am, Digby has a Twitter account where she is currently bellyaching similarly.

      Delete
    4. Digby didn't say the words she reposted on her blog. Yes, she almost certainly has said other things, you moron.

      Delete
  10. "Remaining silent and surrendering to despair is exactly what fascists want us to do. So let’s not."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymouse 10:57am, speaking of which, Comma La has yet to concede. She also didn’t go out to her supporters last night to thank and encourage them. That was the case with Hillary too in 2016.

      Would that sort of concern and maturity be too indicative of being manly?

      Delete
    2. Harris is expected to concede in a speech tonight. In case you are too stupid to know, the votes haven't been fully counted yet.

      Delete
    3. Cecelia,

      is that a reference to the manly concession Trump made in 2020? Oops! He didn't give one.

      Kind of completely undercuts your argument, huh C?

      Delete
    4. Anonymouse 12:17pm, he thanked the people who had stood for hours waiting on him. It’s taking Comma La and took Hillary a while to do even that.

      Delete
  11. Trump's victory represents a significant historical event. It sends a message that a majority of voters want to redefine existing establishment power structures—the kind our host has been criticizing for years and continues to criticize today. It’s a purposeful rejection of “blue media” and other entrenched institutions, including banks, Congress, and healthcare systems, etc. Last night, Trump shifted from being a disruptor in 2016 to now being an agent of political retribution against these institutions, like blue media. Historically, this makes perfect sense.

    This is an interesting take that describes it well:

    "Before Mr. Trump came along, power was in the hands of a political cartel, which, like the market cartels that Adam Smith had warned about, involved institutions that should have been in robust competition but were instead cooperating to exclude rival “products” or ideas. The cartel’s overpriced, shoddy goods failed to satisfy the public’s demands.

    Perhaps Mr. Trump and the movement he brings to Washington will not meet them either. It’s worth remembering that most new companies that break up established market relationships do not last long — they only discover an opportunity that someone else later makes the most of."


    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/06/opinion/donald-trump-2024-election.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "banks, Congress, and healthcare systems"

      Are you kidding? What kind of changes to any of these institutions did Trump bring about in his first term? Other than to insist that GOP Congressmen toady up to him?

      Have you already forgotten Trump's 'concepts of a plan' healthcare proposal this time around? You're spouting gibberish.

      Delete
    2. That is not the point. The point is he has been given a mandate to destroy those institutions, not change them. History would show that he won't be able to rebuild them effectively. That will happen later on by some other movement by the right or the left. This is the point:

      "Those who see in Mr. Trump a profound rejection of Washington’s present conventions are correct. He is like an atheist defying the teachings of a church: The challenge he presents lies not so much in what he does but in the fact that he calls into question the beliefs on which authority rests. Mr. Trump has shown that the nation’s political orthodoxies are bankrupt, and the leaders in all our institutions — private as well as public — who stake their claim to authority on their fealty to such orthodoxies are now vulnerable."

      Delete
  12. Bob says we'll ruled by a "gaggle" of Donald J. Trump, Elon Musk, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., JD Vance, and Tucker Carlson. "Gaggle" is a flock of geese. Synonyms of "goose" include ninny, doofus, ding-ding, fool, nincompoop, and lunatic. One can argue that these terms should apply to Kennedy, Carlson and Trump. But, Vance is super-smart and Musk is in another league altogether.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David, the irony is that we don’t really know who has ruled over us for the last four years. We know that it wasn’t Biden or Comma La.

      Delete
    2. Cecelia, that is a total lie. Are we now going to enter a four-year period where pieces of shit like you are allowed to say whatever they want without pushback? I wouldn't count on it.

      Vance may be "super-smart" as David claims, but he is majorly screwed up (borderline personality disorder), unmoored, and unethical. Musk is gonzo crazy and out of control. Trump needs to rein him in now that he has served his purpose, but he may not be able to do it. We are all in for a difficult four years, and Republicans may find out they've unleashed forces that are as destructive to themselves as to anyone else.

      You, Cecelia, serve no purpose here any more. Go crawl back under your rock. Putin no doubt has other uses for you.

      Delete
    3. Regarding Bob's "gaggle", I don't think Carlson will one of our leaders. I am appalled that RFK Jr. will have a big role in health care. I admire Vance, but VPs generally are not significant. However, Musk's ability outweighs all the others' negatives. Musk seems to be the most capable human being on the face of the earth.

      Decades ago I worked for Henry Singleton, a brilliant scientist and entrepreneur. I remember wishing that people of Singleton's caliber were running our government. Now, I am thrilled to be getting my wish.

      Delete
    4. Like we don't know who ruled us the last 4 years. It was George Soros C. Ask any QANON Trump supporter, they'll you.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 12:23pm, they’re not going away.

      Delete
    6. "Musk seems to be the most capable human being on the face of the earth."

      This will go way over your head, DiC, but I'll state it for others:

      people have varying capabilities and can be skilled in one area but mediocre in another. The differences between technical accomplishments such as rocket design and crafting public policy are vast, as we may soon learn.

      Delete
    7. "'Gaggle' is a flock of geese."

      You may be surprised to know that some words have more than one meaning.

      Delete
  13. Trump's election has already made the world a better place.
    Houthis Declare Immediate Ceasefire Against IDF as Trump Leads in U.S. Polls
    https://www.oneindia.com/videos/houthis-ceasefire-idf-trump-us-polls-011-4193494.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russia may do the same in Ukraine, waiting for Trump to take office and achieve his military goals for him without further effort. Is that a good thing? It depends on whether you live in Ukraine or not.

      Delete
    2. David, will you ever learn to use even an atom of skepticism when you come across these obvious fakes? "One India News" is the only source for this breathless report. Look a little deeper before you get too excited.

      Delete
    3. No. He won't. DiC is a con, a mark, a rube. People like Trump count on him to obtain and hold on to power.

      Delete
  14. All over the internet, left wing blogs and substacks are offering condolences but what is Somerby saying? He is gloating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymouse 11:50am, the people offering you condolences are doing that because they were wrong and they’re sad about that too. Bob wasn’t wrong and wasn’t wrong while you were in the throes of castigating him for being wrong.

      Delete
  15. I am full of joy.

    I'm thinking of the great significance of the passage of time. Somerby is an ass.

    I am Corby.

    ReplyDelete