MADNESS: The silence was a part of the madness!

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2025

Also, the Wall Street Journal gone wild: "Back out of all this now too much for us?"

So begins the poem Directive, a "wonderfully mysterious" later effort by Frost. 

You may find the poem "wonderfully mysterious." You may simply find it hard. 

We've cited Directive before. Agreeing to let you skip ahead, we'll show you more of the way it starts:

Directive

Back out of all this now too much for us,
Back in a time made simple by loss
Of detail
, burned, dissolved, and broken off
Like graveyard marble sculpture in the weather,
There is a house that is no more a house
Upon a farm that is no more a farm
And in a town that is no more a town.
The road there, if you'll let a guide direct you
Who only has at heart your getting lost,

May seem as if it should have been a quarry—
Great monolithic knees the former town
Long since gave up pretense of keeping covered.
And there's a story in a book about it...

And so on from there.

"Back in a time made simple?" Here in our warring pair of Americas, whether we're Blue or whether we're Red, that time has now ended for us.

President Biden's endless silence has always been a part of the madness. For the record, the Rachels, the Joes, the Nicoles and the Lawrences chose to ignore that silence.

On the corporate channel designed to please us, they just kept serving this stew:

Trump Trump Trump Trump Jail!

We Blues! We kept disappearing the southern border. We kept disappearing the price of services and goods. 

There were no fireside chats—no explanations. We kept ignoring President Biden's apparent or possible decline. In a remarkable act of imperial arrogance, the silence went on and on, agreed to by many parties. 

Replacing the silence, we now have the bluster—the endless torrent of endless claims, most of them factually bogus in one major way or another. That said, when empires end and experiments fail, the silly stuff often comes first.

This very morning, Steve Doocy jumped out of the clown car at 6 o'clock sharp.  At 6:05, he was already pushing this pail of piddle as he spoke with the show's weatherwoman:

DOOCY (1/22/25): Janice [Dean], I saw something yesterday and it's brand new. The state of Florida put out a winter storm watch advisory about weather along the gulf? They referred to the gulf as "the Gulf of America!"

Which, you know, Donald Trump said he wanted people to start doing it. State of Florida, first to do it!

DEAN: It's amazing! 

Back in a time made simpler, how did that body of water come by its offensive name? For unknown reasons, the leading authority on the matter actually chose, at some point, to assemble this set of useless "facts:"

Gulf of Mexico

The Gulf of Mexico (Spanish: Golfo de México) is an ocean basin and a marginal sea of the Atlantic Ocean, mostly surrounded by the North American continent. It is bounded on the northeast, north, and northwest by the Gulf Coast of the United States; on the southwest and south by the Mexican states of Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatán, and Quintana Roo; and on the southeast by Cuba. The coastal areas along the Southern U.S. states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, which border the gulf on the north, are occasionally referred to as the "Third Coast" of the United States (in addition to its Atlantic and Pacific coasts), but more often as, "the Gulf Coast."

The Gulf of Mexico took shape approximately 300 million years ago (mya) as a result of plate tectonics. The Gulf of Mexico basin is roughly oval in shape and is approximately 810 nmi (1,500 kilometres; 930 miles) wide. Its floor consists of sedimentary rocks and recent sediments. It is connected to part of the Atlantic Ocean through the Straits of Florida...

[...]

Name

The gulf as a whole is known as the Gulf of Mexico, ultimately deriving from Mexica, the Nahuatl term for the Aztecs. French Jesuits called the gulf the Gulf of Mexico (Golphe du Mexique) as early as 1672...

Sure enough! This naming debacle tracks back to the French! 

It was the French who gave it that name! But as a certain "guide" said in his inaugural speech, the day of "liberation" is here.

(Does this particular guide "have at heart [our] getting lost?" We'll report, then let you decide.)

The silly stuff often comes first! At 6:05 this very morning, a 25-year corporate tribune was hailing the great renaming by the great state of Florida. 

Should Wikipedia get locked up for refusing to drop the offensive name? In time, the aforementioned guide will decide.

That said, if Wikipedia has to go, a certain editorial board will have to go too. Over at the Wall Street Journal, the editors have already published this, dual headline included:

Trump Pardons the Jan. 6 Cop Beaters
Law and order? Back the blue? What happened to that GOP?

Republicans are busy denouncing President Biden’s pre-emptive pardons for his family and political allies, and deservedly so. But then it’s a shame you don’t hear many, if any, ruing President Trump’s proclamation to pardon unconditionally nearly all of the people who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. This includes those convicted of bludgeoning, chemical spraying, and electroshocking police to try to keep Mr. Trump in power. Now he’s springing them from prison.

This is a rotten message from a President about political violence done on his behalf, and it’s a bait and switch. Asked about Jan. 6 pardons in late November, Mr. Trump projected caution. “I’m going to do case-by-case, and if they were nonviolent, I think they’ve been greatly punished,” he said. “We’re going to look at each individual case.”

Taking cues from the boss, last week Vice President JD Vance drew a clear line: “If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.”

So much for that. The President’s clemency proclamation commutes prison sentences to time served for 14 named people, including prominent leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, who were organized and ready for violence. Then Mr. Trump tries to wipe Jan. 6 clean, with “a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals.” The conceit is that there are hundreds of polite Trump supporters who ended up in the wrong place that day and have since rotted in jail.

Out of roughly 1,600 cases filed by the feds, more than a third included accusations of “assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement.” The U.S. Attorney’s office said it declined “hundreds” of prosecutions against people whose only offense was entering restricted grounds near the Capitol. Of the 1,100 sentences handed down by this year, more than a third didn’t involve prison time. The rioters who did get jail often were charged with brutal violence...

As they continue, the editors detail seven of the aggressively violent people who the guide has now released from jail. "There are more like this," the editors say, "which everyone understood on Jan. 6 and shortly afterward."

At this site, we recommend pity for sociopaths. We assume that such people never chose to be one of our species' many hosts for the severe personality disorder colloquially known as sociopathy.

That said, sociopaths—if such people really exist—may tend to be violent and dangerous. We're never happy to hear that someone has been locked up, but public safety sometimes requires the separation of such disordered people from the general public.

For the record, here's how the editors end the piece in question:

What happened that day [on January 6] is a stain on Mr. Trump’s legacy. By setting free the cop beaters, the President adds another.

Is it possible that our new guide is himself a sociopath? The "well educated" men and women who staff Blue America's corporate news orgs have agreed that we must never wonder or ask.

Rachel agreed, and Nicolle agreed. Joe and Mika agreed. On rare occasions, Lawrence broke ranks, but he then agreed to ignore what the medical specialists who served as guests had just said about the guide.

According to the largest study, something like 6 percent of adult American men can be diagnosed as (colloquially) "sociopaths." Could our new guide fit into that group? Or should the editorial board get locked up, to shield us from their heresies?

Could it be that they're the sociopaths? Sich matters are too complex for our nation's childish discourse—and that's especially true when we're lost inside the silence which produced the lack of explanation which has now led to the bluster.

Is our new guide a sociopath? Might he just be a gender throwback, a bit like the undisguised apparent misogynists who peddle their porridge on Fox News Channel programs? In this morning's New York Times, we learn about one of his instant moves, designed to protect the public:

Admiral Fagan Is Fired as Coast Guard Commandant

The Trump administration fired the commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, Adm. Linda L. Fagan, within 24 hours of President Trump’s inauguration. The admiral, who was sworn in as the service chief on June 1, 2022, was the first female officer to lead a branch of the American armed forces.

In a message sent to all Coast Guard units on Tuesday morning, the acting secretary of the Homeland Security Department, Benjamine C. Huffman, said he had relieved Admiral Fagan of her duties.

[...]

“She was terminated because of leadership deficiencies, operational failures and inability to advance the strategic objectives of the U.S. Coast Guard,” the statement said.

The statement offered a long list of reasons for Admiral Fagan’s removal from office, including what it called “failure to address border security threats”—specifically saying she had not adequately deployed Coast Guard assets to stop “fentanyl and other illicit substances” from entering the United States.

It also faulted her leadership in recruitment and retention of personnel, and accused her of mismanaging the acquisition of icebreakers and helicopters.

The statement claimed she had an “excessive focus” on diversity, equity and inclusion policies and accused her of failing to adequately address “systemic issues” related to sexual harassment at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn.

She didn't manage the icebreakers well! It's mere coincidence that the fired commander was "the first female officer to lead a branch of the American armed forces."

Question:

Is it possible that the criticisms of Admiral Fagan are valid? Just as a matter of fact, did she “fail to address border security threats?” Also, did she overdo all the DEI stuff?

We the people will never know such things. Our discourse is now an overwhelming welter of signals, accusations and claims. There's no obvious way to get "back out of all this now too much for us"—to travel back out of the complexification which now dogs every topic, every pseudo-discission, every tribal claim and dispute.

The guide has released a gang of violent offenders. Adding to the possible air of riot, we offer this news report from The Hill:

‘QAnon Shaman’ says he’s buying ‘motha f‑‑‑in guns’ after Trump pardon

U.S. Capitol rioter Jacob Chansley, otherwise known as the “QAnon Shaman,” said Monday that he’s going to buy some guns after being pardoned by President Trump.

“I JUST GOT THE NEWS FROM MY LAWYER…I GOT A PARDON BABY! THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!” Chansley, who was photographed inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, with a horned helmet, painted face and bare chest, wrote on X. “NOW I AM GONNA BUY SOME MOTHA FU*KIN GUNS!!! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!”

“J6ers are getting released & JUSTICE HAS COME…EVERYTHING done in the dark WILL come to light!” he added.

In fairness, we should all remember the ancient bromide: 

Guns don't kill people—disordered people kill people!

For the record, Chansley was sentenced to 41 months. Today, for better or worse, he may be out there buying more guns, which of course he may never use.

President Biden's years of silence was a part of this unfolding madness. Inevitably, the unfolding madness does recall the gruesome events which took place when sacred Troy finally fell, back at the dawn of the west:

PROFESSOR KNOX (1990): The whole poem [known as the Iliad] has been moving toward this duel between the two champions, but there has never been any doubt about the outcome...And the death of Hector seals the fate of Troy; it will fall to the Achaeans, to become the pattern for all time of the death of a city. 

The images of that night assault—the blazing palaces, the blood running in the streets, old [King] Priam butchered at the altar, Cassandra raped in the temple, Hector's baby son thrown from the battlements, his wife Andromache dragged off to slavery—all this, foreshadowed in the Iliad, will be stamped indelibly on the consciousness of the Greeks throughout their history....

So it went when sacred Troy died. That had all been angry gender politics too, perhaps like Admiral Fagan.

Luckily, that was all fiction. That said, those are the sorts of things which can occur when events become "now too much for us." As we'll discuss in future reports, President Biden's silence—we wouldn't say it was his fault—was a long-running part of this madness.

The people we Blues were trained to trust agreed to take part in that silence. The corporation served us their work. Thus pleasured, we gobbled it down.

As of this very day, the Journal's editors need to watch out. So too at Wikipedia.

A bunch of French Jesuits named the gulf! The state of Florida (Spanish for flowery) has already corrected this problem!

Tomorrow: Madness wherever you look!


26 comments:


  1. Good, good. This is all good.

    So, not a single negative news yesterday?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Trump told us again and again that it was Venezuela that was emptying its prisons and turning the inmates loose in our country.

    Who knew that was a scheme he planned to emulate?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the J6 pardons set a bad example. Biden did even worse. He pardoned 1500 people convicted of drug-related crimes. How many of these people also committed violent crimes that were plea-bargained down? We’ll never know, because Biden’s people never checked.

      Biden also commuted the death penalties of the very worst murderers — people whose crimes were so horrific that they didn’t just get life sentences.

      Delete
    2. Marijuana crimes. People were prosecuted for non-violent and non-dealing crimes for behavior that is now legal in their states. It makes no sense to keep them in jail (at taxpayer expense) for such convictions. I am sure Biden was also considered humane and empathetic reasons that you, David, do not seem to be troubled by.

      Biden commuted the sentences of murderers to life in prison, not release. They will never get out of jail. He did that because, being deeply religious and Catholic, and considering the ethical problems of the state executing citizens, he does not believe in the death penalty.

      It is the right of the president to exercise the pardon however he wishes. It is not limited to just the people you believe should be pardoned.

      I'm sure you are aware that there is a commission that evaluates applications for pardon, considering the circumstances of the crimes and any extenuating circumstances now (such as being old or sick or having rehabilitated themselves). Trump didn't consider any of that when he pardoned even the violent J6ers, but I would be surprised if Biden didn't have his staff weigh and recommend who should be pardoned and who should not.

      You sound like you believe no one should be pardoned under any circumstances.

      Delete
    3. "Biden also commuted the death penalties of the very worst murderers — people whose crimes were so horrific that they didn’t just get life sentences."

      Biden commuted the sentences from death penalty to life in prison without parole. Trump's pardons put criminals on the street, ready to "buy some motha fu*kin guns."

      Delete
  3. "The state of Florida (Spanish for flowery) has already corrected this problem!"

    Say, you got a good point there. We ought to think about renaming that state now. Can't be calling things by their old Spanish names now, can we?

    How about "Trumpia?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better still, we could sell the naming rights! "The State of Amazing! sponsored by CryptoMania"

      Delete
    2. Or we separate out the red states and call that the United States of the Lazy, since red states laze around living off the work done in blue states/cities and do little more than heckle and taunt the hard working blue areas.

      Delete
  4. The conservative lack of knowledge about anatomy has come back to bite them. Trump issued an executive order defining the terms male and female. Unfortunately, whoever wrote it for him doesn't understand how human development works. The order states:

    "Female means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell."

    As noted at Daily Kos:

    "All fetuses are anatomically female until sexual differentiation begins, approximately seven weeks after conception.

    Since the new executive order defines sex according to what anatomy existed at conception, 100% of Americans are now legally female."

    This is what happens when young people do not learn science in school. They grow up to become conservative idiots, especially our new president.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This would make the ERA especially important!

      Delete
    2. I don’t like that definition. Someone who has undergone a true medical sex change should be treated as their new sex. For me a female is defined by breasts and a vagina. Men are defined by a penis.

      Delete
    3. If you don't like that definition, write to your president. He is the one who signed the executive order declaring these definitions. Too bad he is more ignorant than his staff.

      Is a person who has had a double mastectomy to prevent breast cancer a woman? Is John Bpbbitt male, despite his lack of a penis (his wife cut it off)? Is a woman with large breasts more of a woman than one with small breasts? What if a man has larger breasts (due to obesity) than a small-breasted woman? Is he then a woman? When old women have vaginal atrophy, are they still women? Are any of these "medical changes"?

      Why not just treat people as what they claim to be, instead of getting so deeply involved in their medical histories? What difference does it make to others what is in someone's pants? (Yes, women can and do wear pants, does that make them less women?) Shouldn't the designation of sex be related to practical considerations of why anyone else needs to know, and not some perverted right wing attempt to force people into roles and niches they might not want to occupy?

      Delete
  5. "The images of that night assault—the blazing palaces, the blood running in the streets, old [King] Priam butchered at the altar, Cassandra raped in the temple, Hector's baby son thrown from the battlements, his wife Andromache dragged off to slavery—all this, foreshadowed in the Iliad, will be stamped indelibly on the consciousness of the Greeks throughout their history...."

    The Illiad is a work of fiction. That means that no one knows where Cassandra was raped. No one knows IF she was raped. No one knows whether her name was actually Cassandra. No one knows if she ever existed.

    Somerby has heaped a whole lot of garbage onto a story invented nearly 800 years AFTER the disappearance of Troy. Homer didn't know why Troy disappeared or what it was like when it existed, although there is now some archaeological confirmation that there was a settlement where ancient Troy was thought to have been. How on earth would Homer know dialog from that time, much less the names of anyone living there?

    This is like those future anthropologists in caves wondering how the people of our time managed to civilize animals like Mickey Mouse, and teach him to talk and wear pants. Except, Mickey Mouse is a real fictional character of our time, whereas Homer totally made up whatever he said about Troy and all of the other figures in the Illiad. From scratch, not from remnants of animation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "So it went when sacred Troy died. That had all been angry gender politics too, perhaps like Admiral Fagan."

    Raping and killing women in savage ways is not "gender politics."

    Firing a woman from her job may be gender politics, but only if she was fired for being female. It is equally likely she was fired because she won't go along with Trump's attempt to remake Homeland Security into his private gestapo, since she heads the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard is not part of the military but is part of Homeland Security. Being a Democratic appointee, she most likely is being regarded as a Biden supporter and thus insufficiently loyal to Trump in his attempt to remake our government into an authoritarian state.

    What we do know is that she probably did nothing wrong that would cause her to lose her position.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "The people we Blues were trained to trust agreed to take part in that silence. The corporation served us their work. Thus pleasured, we gobbled it down."

    When I was a child, my father had a favorite saying whenever I made an unlikely statement involving the word "we." He said "We? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?"

    Later, that made me appreciative of the old joke about the Lone Ranger and Tonto surrounded by Indians, "What do you mean we, white man?"

    As I recall, it was Somerby who gobbled down all that right wing and NY Times horseshit about Biden being too old, while "we" told him he was being conned. Somerby was the one who argued that Kyle Rittenhouse was just a wayward boy, and now the MAGA shaman is out buying more guns. Somerby has gobbled down everything Fox has pushed his way, and now he includes us in his delusions, without any apology for the bad things that are happening in the White House. Somerby is not one of us. WE knew what was going to happen and WE did everything we could to prevent it, while Somerby thought Biden should step aside, and then echoed every negative word he could find against Harris.

    Now it is Somerby's turn to stew in his own juices. We are not stupid enough to believe Homer knew anything about modern politics.

    ReplyDelete
  8. With Trump seemingly oblivious to even simple matters, operating at the behest of whoever his minders are, with Musk’s Nazi salute and support for Nazis around the globe while all his products are failing, Somerby seems to be expressing some buyers remorse today, having turned into a Dem scold years ago and daily repeating Republican talking points, yet even today Somerby continues his misinformation, just completely making up a phony story about Biden’s “silence” that never was.

    ReplyDelete
  9. THE DEVIL DONE GOT A HOLD OF TRUMP AND MUSK.

    LETS US PRAY.

    DEAR LORD SAVE US FROM THESE DEVILS.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Guns don't kill people—disordered people kill people!"

    Were the armed forces who fought WWII "disordered people"? Are police who killed dangerous criminals in the line of duty "disordered people"? Is it considered "disordered" for a person to defend themselves against someone trying to break into their home and threaten their family?

    This is not an ancient bromide. It is what conservatives say whenever a domestic terrorist commits murder for a cause. They weren't one of us, the right howls. They were mentally ill. Just as Somerby has said repeatedly about Trump. He isn't an ideological zealot trying to become a dictator or a political loser trying to steal an election via coup -- he is just a disordered man who is more to be pitied than scorned. And Somerby laments why the news doesn't call Trump insane instead of dangerous to our democracy.

    Somerby never wants to take responsibility for his own statements, so he offloads them onto Cassandra or "an ancient bromide" (implying everyone agrees with such a view), when he is making controversial and often wrong remarks that are his own opinions. We on the left (aka "us blues") tend to believe that the presence of guns in our society lead to unnecessary deaths of children, family members, suicides and fear-motivated shootings of neighbors and relatives, because people with guns shoot people, not just disturbed people. The gun makes the deaths way more likely. Without guns, even disordered people wouldn't kill other people (or themselves).

    Given Somerby's fixation on Trump's disorders, why has Somerby never called for mental health treatment, or examination of Trump by a qualified professional, or restriction of Trump's activities so that he won't harm others, or any of the logical consequences of considering someone disordered in our society?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gun deaths are now the leading cause of death for children in the US. While cops on rare occasion may shoot a dangerous person, the majority of the around a thousand or so people they shoot to death every year are not dangerous, but have merely challenged the addled and authoritarian temperament of the overly militarized average cop. Recall that being a cop is not a particularly dangerous job, it’s not even in the top ten, recall that while considering the fact that cops not only kill over a thousand people every year, they send 50,000 people every year to the hospital after causing severe injuries. That’s a lot of harm done by cops, who prevent and solve a tiny percent of crime, some experts say about 2%. Imagine teachers killing 1k students every year and causing injuries that send 50k students every year to the hospital. We wouldn’t tolerate it, yet we curiously do with cops, who do little more than serve as private security guards for the elite wealthy.

      Meanwhile crime, so called blue collared crime, is at a near 50 year low after a spike spurred by Trump’s first reign, not because of cops, but because we offered slightly more crumbs to those in need during the Biden years, that’s all it took, since that kind of crime is primarily a function of poverty. Of course “white collar” crime is surging, with wage theft leading the way, primarily a function of bad parenting by right wingers.

      Delete
  11. Why has Trump not denounced the Nazi salutes given by Elon Musk at his rally?

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Is it possible that the criticisms of Admiral Fagan are valid? Just as a matter of fact, did she “fail to address border security threats?”

    Most Fentanyl is carried across the Mexican border by American citizens reentering the US. Customs and border patrol guard that border, not the Coast Guard, although there may be small boats on the Rio Grande, largely rescuing people drowning.

    And Fentanyl use is way down since she was appointed (not that she did that), so how do the numbers justify making her a scapegoat for American Fentanyl use?

    Trump and the right have clearly decided that they do not need plausible explanations for their actions. Any excuse will do, and it doesn't even have to make sense. And crickets from Somerby about these blatantly ridiculous justifications for actions with obvious other explanations.

    We all know why she is being fired, and it has nothing to do with Fentanyl crossing the border. She obviously let too many seals bother tourists at the beach. Or she didn't serve the right kind of baked beans in the Coast Guard messes, or she once left a faucet dripping in the shower. Any excuse will do.

    ReplyDelete
  13. One reason preferences are so popular is that they’re so easy to evaluate. Merit is hard. We all know that the Coast Guard head was a woman. None of us really knows how good a job she was doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That gives Trump cover to fire her for being female, since the public won't know why she was being fired. Note that she worked her way up from being in charge of the Pacific Coast Guard to 2nd in command and was then appointed in charge. It isn't as if she came from nowhere and lacked any experience.

      When you don't know one way or the other whether she was good at her job, bias appears in whether you side with her removal or not. A neutral person would assume she must have had merit or wouldn't have been promoted in the first place. She was recommended, reviewed and approved for that promotion on the basis of her record. In the absence of actual info, why assume her removal (ON DAY ONE!) was for cause instead of Republicans making a point about diversity? Where was the time needed to review her performance and evaluate her retention? Was this really a priority because of anything she did? If so, wouldn't there have been a scandal?

      Use your head, David.

      Delete
  14. Trump is especially concerned about Fagan's mismanagement of the acquisition of icebreakers because they are going to be needed in Greenland, I suppose.

    Fagan was appointed in 2022. Notably, the reasons given for her firing concern charges that she has made progress on (compared to when she took over) but would not have had reasonable time to address. For example recruiting shortfalls would take 3-5 years to remedy, the icebreaker has been authoritzed but won't be built until 2028 (how would she be able to speed that up), and recent large seizures of Fentanyl suggest she was doing that job. So this seems like a manufactured list of reasons to justify her removal.

    https://news.usni.org/2025/01/21/adm-linda-fagan-removed-as-coast-guard-commandant

    ReplyDelete
  15. THE DEVIL HAS PUT WHITE MEN BACK IN POWER.

    AMERICA HAS NO CLUE HOW TO PARENT, HOW TO RAISE KIDS PROPERLY, THEY LET THE DEVIL IN.

    SO NOW WE HAVE THESE WHITE MEN RUNNING AROUND LIKE PETULANT INSOLENT CHILDREN, WITH THE DEVIL HAVING TAKEN OVER THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS.

    LORD JESUS RUN THESE PIGS OFF THE CLIFF TO DROWN IN THE WATER BELOW, SAVE US!

    ReplyDelete