ELEGY: Why didn't she read what it said on the screen?

THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2024

The tyranny of a tough crowd: When Sandra Smith hired on at Fox News, she fell in with a tough crowd.

That would be the principal finding our analysts now report. As background concerning this local culture, they asked us to consider two recent examples:

Judge Jeanine:

In this morning's New York Times, Annie Karni offers this news report about the various fringe-y Republican congressmen who can't stop advancing the idea that the recent assassination attempt was part of a wider conspiracy.

Needless to say, everything is always possible until a full review has occurred. But it's generally felt that sensible people will withhold such (unfounded) musings until some actual evidence supports their fre-floating theories.

Karni's report dealt an array of fringe-y GOP reps. Then too, there's Judge Jeanine, all-knowing loudmouth star of the Fox News Channel's The Five. She recently peddled this:

JUDGE JEANINE (7/30/24): There is no excuse for the multiple failures of this agency [the Secret Service]. And their inability to explain any reasons points to me. or makes me wonder what the hell was going on. 

It appears that there wasn't just a breach of the protocols, but it's almost like these protocol failures were affirmatively ignored, all right? ...You are protecting a former president of the United States and you don't put a counter-sniper on a roof that is flat within 130 yards? There are some actions that are so negligent, so reckless, that they border on intentional. And they did nothing [at that day's hearing] to alleviate our concern that this may be intentional.

To watch the judge's fuller statement, you can start by clicking here. That said, The Loudmouth says such things on a daily basis. According to our analysts, she's part of the "tough crowd" Smith encountered when she hired on at Fox.

The Fox & Friends Three:

On this morning's Fox & Friends, the trio of friends didn't mention Candidate Trump's visit to a certain journalistic convention until 6:15. They then spent ten minutes pretending to discuss what happened.

In the course of that ten minutes, they showed tape of his pitiful statement about Kamala Harris, but they did so only once, quite fleetingly. They made no attempt to fact check Trump's remark, and they didn't cite the reactions to his remarks from the White House or from Harris herself.

Instead, they focused on how rudely Trump had been treated at the event. They repeated his claim that he had been misinformed about the event as if it was an established fact.  "I can under his perspective," the constantly simpering Ainsley Earhardt simperingly said. 

According to the analysts, this trio is also part of the "tough crowd" Smith has been forced to deal with.

Smith's career has come into question due to a recent bizarre event. We refer to her refusal to read the text of a written statement in which Vice President Harris referred to her political party as "the Democratic Party."

That's the actual name of the party, but Smith refused to read it! Instead, she bowed to a long-standing part of local culture in which thought leaders of Red America must never say the actual name of that political party.

Why did Smith behave in such a childish way—in such an insulting way? As an additional part of their report, the analysts cited the recent best-selling book by Fox News crackpot Mark Levin. Comically and tragically, the title of the book is this:

The Democrat Party Hates America

Yes, that's the actual title! With respect to that book title, we call your attention to Levin's refusal to say the actual name of the party in question—but also to his typically crackpot claim about that party's alleged hatred.

For the record, Levin loves to say the words, "Democrat Party." He also loves to live in the distant political past. For example, here's the opening paragraph of his book's second chapter:

CHAPTER TWO / ANTI-BLACK RACISM & ANTI-SEMITISM

The Civil War was not only a breathtakingly bloody dispute between the North and the South, the Union and the Confederacy, and antislavery and proslavery forces, but a battle between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party—the latter conflict of which is rarely mentioned and certainly not emphasized. Indeed, for major elements of the Democrat Party, the Civil War did not end in 1865. It never ended. Despite the best efforts of its party apparatchiks, academic surrogates, and media propagandists to ignore, spin, or obscure the horrendous story of the Democrat Party’s past from the Ku Klux Klan and lynchings to segregation, Jim Crow laws, voter intimidation, etc.—the Democrat Party had a hand in all of it. In fact, Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy, was a Democrat, as were virtually all the leaders and generals of the Confederacy. Confederate general Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Democrat, became the first grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan after the Civil War, which he helped found to terrorize the newly freed slaves and gut Reconstruction, and which Republican president Ulysses S. Grant sought to destroy by deploying the U.S. Army. Grant’s efforts were stymied after the Democrat Party won a majority in the House of Representatives, which cut his support.

Levin loves the practice of basing modern-day political judgments on events of the distant past. To an even greater extent, he loves the term, "Democrat Party."

(As you can see for yourself at the link provided, the term appears 139 times in Chapters Two and Three alone.)

In fact, Levin's insistence on repeating that phrase has been diagnosed by medical experts as a localized, highly eccentric offshoot of Tourette's syndrome. His inanity seems to know few bounds. Neither does his love of that term. 

Indeed, when Levin's book appeared last fall, he spoke about it with Pete Hegseth on his weekend Fox News program. After a commercial break, the following exchange occurred. 

We present it as comic relief:

HEGSETH (9/24/23): Welcome back to this special edition of Life, Liberty and Levin with The Great One, Mark Levin, and his new book, The Democrat Party Hates America...We talk a lot about politics, a lot about culture. Now it's getting personal, from the Democrats.

LEVIN: And by the way, for people who have a problem with the title, I'm waiting for somebody to write The Democrat Party Loves America. I'd love to know how? Exactly what about America does the Democrat Party love?

Yes, he actually said it! Yes, it actually gets that stupid as denizens of this peculiar land observe this mandated tic.

For the record, no one is going to write a book called The Democrat Party [sic] Loves America. No one else is dumb enough to slap some such title on an unsuspecting book. 

That said, this degree of verbal inanity is a mandate of local culture within the sacred halls of the Fox News Channel. This is the crowd Smith encountered when she hired on at Fox.

It must have been a shock for Smith when she encountered this crowd. She had grown up in a better place—in suburban Wheaton, Illinois, where her father was a commodities trader on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

Smith graduated from LSU, where she was part of a national championship track team. In this detailed profile for a Louisiana publication, she described the way she moved from Wheaton and the CME to the Fox News Channel:

An LSU Tiger at FOX

[...]

Smith studied business at LSU with concentrations in speech and French. “It’s interesting how I actually chose LSU,” says Smith, who hails from a family thick in the financial industry. Her dad worked both exchanges, primarily the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. “I was the youngest of six [children], with four sisters and a brother growing up in the Chicago area,” Smith says. “My dad introduced us all to the business, and I stayed by his side and learned a lot.”

“I wanted something unique in a college,” Smith says. “I wanted to study business, but I loved French in high school. Then I discovered there was a French-speaking area in the United States, so I thought, ‘That’s it—I’m going down to Baton Rouge, Louisiana!’ I started out at Illinois State University, which had a national student exchange program where you could study at another university, so I went down to LSU. After a semester, I called my parents and said, ‘There’s no way I’m leaving this place!’ I fell completely in love with the area and did another semester. That summer I went back home and just knew in my heart that I belonged in Louisiana, so I transferred to LSU.”

[...]

As an LSU student, Smith experienced Southeast Louisiana culture like a local. “I had friends from Baton Rouge, New Orleans and surrounding towns like Amite,” Smith says. “I’d go home with friends or go to church with their families. It was so neat to experience Louisiana that way, and it greatly affected me. Chicago was home base so I spent holidays in Metairie, which was home to lots of my friends. My husband [John Connolly] hears me tell stories about my time in Louisiana, and the food I ate and the songs we sang or heard. I saw some down-home versions of Mardi Gras parades different from the tourist stuff. I really love the way people live life in Louisiana; whether you’re a guy or a gal, everyone can cook and dance. That was so different from how I grew up in the Midwest. Everybody in Louisiana boils shrimp in their backyard and has a musical instrument in their living room, and I just love the appreciation for life and family there.”

Smith’s career began as a research associate at Aegis Capital before working as a trader at Hermitage Capital in New York City. She then became the Director of Institutional Sales and Trading for Terra Nova Institutional before being wooed into the world of television. “I was the only female at an all-male trade desk at Terra Nova in Chicago, which is actually where I met my husband, when I was asked to be the face of the company and offer commentary from the trading floors to Bloomberg Television and CNBC,” Smith says. “I was nervous but agreed to do it; then producers from Bloomberg were calling and saying, ‘What do you think about doing this as a career?’ They hired me to work in New York, so I packed my bags and the rest is history. I was at Bloomberg for less than a year when FOX called to say they were launching the FOX Business Network in Oct. 2007, and I was there reporting from day one.”

Smith was only 26 when she arrived at Fox. She had loved the local culture at LSU. Now she encountered the local culture which obtains at Fox.

It was at that point that this well-raised young person encountered a rather tough crowd.

The analysts say we should understand how tough it has been for Smith. How tough it must have been when a simple twist of fate—and an obvious error by a producer—deposited her in the situation which has now made her a household name and a figure of nationwide ridicule.

Quite plainly, some inexperienced weekend producer made a rookie mistake! Vice President Harris had issued a statement in which she referred to "the Democratic Party." That's the actual name of the actual party, but it's a formulation you aren't allowed to utter at Fox!

Having said that, so what? Some rookie producer put that part of Harris' statement right up on the screen—and Smith was then charged with reading the statement! 

Smith knew she couldn't say those words, and so she made the obvious choice. She bowed to regional culture.

How much is Smith paid to behave this way? Online, we've seen it said that she's paid $5 million per year.

We know of no reason to believe that's true. We know of no reason to assume that it's false.

As she has mentioned in various profiles, she married a Chicago business guy, as was good and completely appropriate. Before she had any way of knowing what she'd be getting into, her husband had uprooted his career and followed her to New York. 

After that, the reckoning! In this passage from the Louisiana profile, she puts the best possible face on what she had been forced to deal with at her current workplace:

Smith lives in Westchester County in New York with her husband, daughter Cora, son John and a German Shorthaired Pointer named Whiskey, and she feels lucky to have a wonderful family and an amazing career. “You can read some unfortunate things about FOX, but I can sincerely say it’s really a supportive work environment,” Smith says. “I have great relationships with many of my colleagues. Recently, FOX sponsored tables at the Susan G. Komen event in New York City to honor Gerri Willis, an anchor at FBN who had breast cancer and thankfully is now cancer-free. It was so nice for us to all come together for such a great person and a great cause. I’ve got an incredibly impressive group of people when it comes to experience, education and smarts to call my colleagues.”

Also, she has a wonderful group of colleagues who aren't allowed to say certain words on the air. She apparently knew what she had to do when some feckless weekend producer made a dumb rookie mistake

It had nothing to do with the salary she draws, or with her ongoing lifestyle. The analysts say it was most likely related to her love for her colleagues—for people like the vintage loudmouth Judge Jeanine and also the crackpot Levin.

She could have read the actual words which were right there on the screen. That's what a journalist would have done—but who knows where it might have led? And so, she insulted her viewers and played the fool in the way local culture required.

Smith loved the local culture at LSU. She bows to the local culture at Fox—to the ways of a very tough crowd.

A rookie producer made a mistake; she was forced to clean it up. Do we hear an elegy for American political / journalistic culture when we see people like Smith dragged down by such regional practices?

As Sartre once wrote, it was Huis Clos—there was no way out. Whether in English or in French, she refused to read what was there on the screen. Such decisions are made at the Fox News Channel on an everyday, round the clock basis.

Viewers don't know that they're getting played. Employees seem to know what's required. 

Tomorrow: It's time for a change...


38 comments:

  1. Wasn't it Newt who initiated this bit of verbal inanity?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, it was old before Newt was born.

      Delete
    2. Ah.

      Well, I am also old so in my mind, the world's history is contained within my lifetime.

      You are correct.

      Delete
  2. Levin tries to draw a direct line from the KKK and Jim Crow to the current Democratic party, without even pausing to recall the Nixon southern strategy. He is not a serious person, he is a grifter making gobs of money feeding his rube audience the red meat they crave. I had to laugh when I saw he even included "voter intimidation" as one of the faults of the "Democrat party". It is like we're living in two different realities where all I see is his party working night and day to suppress the vote of minorities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Projection is an old and well worn tactic of right wingers.

      Delete
  3. What is happening on Fox is a reaction to rest of the media, which is monolithic, get their daily talking points from DNC (Biden is sharp as tack, Vance is weird etc) and are aggressively left-leaning. The cesspool layer of this monolith is MSNBC, The View, WaPo, Colbert, Kimmel, HuffPost, Slate etc. There is a “respectable” layer on top with names like NYT, CNN and Atlantic. Poor Fox has to counter both the cesspool layer and the respectable layer of the leftists. Cut them some slack.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see. We should blame the MSM, which forces Fox to be a deranged clown show. The Red team -- always the team of personal responsibility!

      Delete
    2. PP, I don’t think there would have been a Fox News if mainstream media members had valued objectivity rather than viewing conservatives as a menace that must be subdued. That is the eternal mantra of the tyrant. On the right or the left.

      It led to two cable news networks skewing left and to Donald Trump.

      Delete
    3. CC - So we should blame the MSM not only for Fox but for the rise of Trump! Again - tell me all about personal responsibility, will you?

      Delete
    4. BTW, CC, you've been reading TDH for awhile, so you're well-aware of how the MSM took down Clinton, Gore, and Clinton. I wouldn't call that "skewing left." (Not to mention the MSM coverage of the campaign to get us into a war with Iraq.)

      Delete
    5. PP, this is not blaming anyone. It’s an explanation of why things are the way they are. As Cecilia says, if you want this to change, legacy media has to become more fair and balanced or at a minimum, stop demonizing the other side.

      Delete
    6. And, "Stop Demonizing the Other Side" is a key observation of this blog

      Delete
    7. So the "explanation" for why Fox is a deranged clown show is because the MSM skews left, and the way to cure Fox's status as a deranged clown show is for the MSM to skew right. Fox is not responsible for the way it is; instead, it is just a helpless victim of fate. OK, then.

      Delete
    8. PP, news agencies are comprised of people. . People like you, me, and unfortunately, like anonymices. People with political agendas and capitalist ones. Currently, I think we have a bit of an odd couple love affair between global capitalists and marxists. You let us take over the global market and we’ll finance and enforce your plans to make girls compete with boys in sports and set limits on freedom and lifestyle based upon climate change.

      Delete
    9. PP, I don’t think anyone took down the Clintons. They were political powerbrokers for decades. Gore had to be punished for being a goody-goody, but he could have had a political comeback had that been what he wanted. The Soros cabal and its divide and conquer emphasis on identity has changed the game.

      Delete
    10. You let us take over the global market and we’ll finance and enforce your plans to make girls compete with boys in sports and set limits on freedom and lifestyle based upon climate change.

      You're fucking weird and crazy.

      Delete
    11. Soros is code for Jewish and refers to Q-Anon type conspiracy theories about Jews owning and running the world. When you see someone referring to Soros in a comment, they are signaling antisemitic views in a type of dog whistle to Jew-haters. Cecelia has done this before and is not ignorant of the meaning of her term "Soros cabal" as a form of anti-Jewish conspiracy theory.

      The Clintons are involved in their charitable foundation that is working to improve third-world health and education. It is very odd that they still figure in right wing fever dreams, but their name still evokes an emotional response among right wing voters, so they get mentioned way more often than any involvement in politics justifies.

      Delete
    12. I think Cecelia may have been replaced by someone else at her troll farm. "Anonymices" is a give-away since every native-speaker of English knows that mice is the plural of mouse and doesn't need an s at the end of it. Another give away is that she has already written two comments that are more substantive than anything she usually writes, suggesting a shift in purpose (or greater background knowledge about how America works).

      Delete
    13. So-called legacy media needs to stop selecting our presidential candidates for us. The New York Times clearly revealed what it is, when it pushed Biden off the ticket. Any illusion that this is about journalism instead of power should have been shattered when the campaign against Biden began in the press.

      Delete
    14. Neither Cecelia or PP have a coherent definition for "left" and "right".

      We recently learned that Thomas Crooks was not only a White male Republican gun enthusiast that had Trump signs in his yard, but also engaged in antisemitic and anti immigration discourse - much like the Somerby Sheep do.

      Cecelia is not just weird and creepy because he is a man pretending to be a woman, he also can barely write a coherent sentence without various malapropisms and non sequiturs, and typically just offers lunatic rants full of insults and hate. Cecelia is weird and creepy, yes, but more significantly he is a miserable person, in desperate need of something, anything that can soothe his emotional discomfort.

      Delete
    15. Anonymices, even Russian agents who pose as women hate meeses to pieces. Doesn’t everyone?

      Delete
    16. I’m a Soros troll, and I love my fellow anonymice.

      Delete
    17. Anonymouse 6:31pm, you’re the “blood-sucking Brady Bunch”.

      Delete
    18. 3:27 - When in doubt, sling ridiculous slanders. Then hide.

      Delete
    19. Saying, "so we should blame the MSM not only for Fox but for the rise of Trump!" distorts the argument made by Cecelia, turning it into a caricature that is easier to attack. Cecelia's point is that bias in MSM helped create Fox News and the political climate leading to Trump's rise. Oversimplifying the argument to imply she thinks the MSM is entirely to blame for these phenomena ignores the nuance of the situation and is boring.

      Saying “the 'explanation' for why Fox is a deranged clown show is because the MSM skews left, and the way to cure Fox's status as a deranged clown show is for the MSM to skew right," suggests that there are only two possible solutions - either the MSM skews left or right. This also misrepresents and simplifies the argument (which is about the impact of perceived MSM bias on the rise of Fox News and Trump) and is boring.

      Delete
  4. A Wall Street Journal reporter in Russia has been freed. Meanwhile, the Journal has fired a journalist who fought for press freedom in China.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/china/hong-kong-journalist-group-head-says-she-was-fired-by-wsj-amid-press-freedom-row-2024-07-17/

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is a lot of nastiness in the discourse today. Of all the insults being hurled, why is calling it the Democrat Party such a big insult that deserves this much scrutiny?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymouse 12:00pm, the distinction here is that it’s not just blogboard junkies making cracks, it’s professionals at a news network.

      Delete
    2. CC - That is an astute observation.

      Delete
  6. It’s entirely clear that viewers of Fox News recognize that Sandra Smith is using biased/partisan language when referring to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party.

    Fox views are not being “played” or deceived, that audience is being targeted and accommodated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Somerby may be right to blame Smith's behavior on local culture. There is a right wing culture that is followed by those who wish to be part of it. It is being called "weird" by Democrats because it is strange and abnormal. It is enforced by peer pressure, not by the silly explanations Somerby offers here today. Smith refers to the Democrat party because her peers do it that way. It is trivial and silly to harp on, for days now, as Somerby has done, when all it does is signify membership in Red America, a place Smith worked hard to join, by choice, when she admired and sought out LSU as her community. She may have mistaken the false friendliness of the South for warmth or acceptance (bless her heart). Many groups use love-bombing to recruit lonely or vulnerable converts.

    Last week I drove to Toronto for the North American Bridge Championship. On the way back, I passed through upstate New York, then a series of midwestern and southern states. I saw handmade Trump signs on cars and rural fences. I saw Let's Go Brandon signs and a truck painted with the slogan "Americans are pissed!" No Democratic Party signs at all. It was intimidating for a Democrat, but perhaps makes the locals feel warm and fuzzy to be part of such a visible subculture. It reminded me of how I felt watching the film Easy Rider and knowing that the main characters were being far too visible among hostile locals. I felt conspicuous in my Tesla, even without any bumper stickers, knowing my vehicle was the target of Trump's ire. And I blame Trump for making me feel like a stranger in my own country because he has targeted some of the people in America in order to mobilize the others to vote a certain way. Perhaps this is the way Red America feels when it visits New Mexico and hears Spanish spoken all around them, but they haven't been singled out as a menace the way the Democrat Party has been. So perhaps these forms signal membership to the fringe vigilante mob of gun owners and pissed off assholes that people like Smith find themselves surrounded by.

    I worry about how our Southern and rural areas will be able to return to normalcy after Trump loses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anybody who has spent time in Baton Rouge knows it is a true shithole. It is poor and crumbling and depressing as hell, and the people there are mean and angry.

      Delete
    2. That’s ALL of Louisiana, except the restaurant owners and the maitre d's.

      Delete
    3. There’s no other state like Mississippi.

      Delete
    4. We should keep it that way.

      Delete
    5. Why don’t you want other states to be like Mississippi?

      Delete
  8. Kyle Rittenhouse will not vote for Trump.

    https://tribune.com.pk/story/2485016/kyle-rittenhouse-backs-ron-paul-over-trump-for-president-due-to-second-amendment-stance?amp=1

    ReplyDelete