From Gruel to Mace, with script in place!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 2024

Our broken American discourse: On Tuesday night, it was Andrew Gruel, an American chef, reciting the script on the Gutfeld! program.

As we showed you yesterday, his claim was already bogus as of Tuesday evening. For the record, this is the mandated tribal message he served:

GRUEL (8/13/24): The funnier piece of this—let's take a step away—is the way in which the media is covering it, right? 

So when Trump came out and said that he was going to remove the tax on tips, it was like, "We're going to lose $250 billion to the federal"—right? It was all about, "This is going to be absolutely horrible for the government."

And then the media comes out when [Candidate Harris] says it, and it's some anodyne approach. "This policy is amazing. No problem at all." 

Thus spake the American chef, reciting mandated script. That said, sad!

As of yesterday afternoon, a wide array of mainstream / legacy / "liberal" news orgs had already published reports saying "No tax on tips" remains a hot mess even though Harris has proposed it.

Andrew Gruel was wrong, and then up jumped Nancy Mace! Last night, as part of an instructive engagement on CNN NewsNight, Rep. Mace (R-SC) came along and thoughtfully offered this:

MACE (8/15/24): [Candidate Harris is] aided and abetted by mainstream media. 

If you saw the headline by a neighboring network a couple days, a couple of weeks ago, days ago, when Donald Trump came out with his no taxes on tips policy, all of the headlines on mainstream media were derogatory. 

Kamala Harris comes out with her policies on no taxes on tips—which is Donald Trump's policy, by the way—all of the headlines on mainstream media were positive and glorious and thoughtful.

That was Mace, in the wake of Gruel. It's as we told you yesterday:

Everyone within the Red American tribe knows they're required to say this. You don't get paid, and you don't get elected, if you don't peddle such scripts.

(Accuracy has nothing to do with it. Little that's said on the Gutfeld! program is tied to such concerns.)

AT any rate, after Harris endorsed "No taxes on tips," all the headlines on mainstream media were positive and glorious and thoughtful?

Last night, that's what the shapeshifter told the world. Just to refresh you, here were the headlines we listed yesterday afternoon, though there are many more:

Hot tip: Both parties should stop bribing voters with tax cuts
Exempting tips from taxes is a terrible idea, regardless of which party is proposing it.

Why Trump and Harris’s ‘no tax on tips’ plans may not help tipped workers
Economists say the proposals are unlikely to have much practical impact, though either could cost the government at least $10 billion to $15 billion a year.

Not taxing tips is a dumb gimmick. Harris is wrong to follow Trump.
The Biden-Harris team dismissed an idea it now embraces. How it went from a waitress to mainstream.

Trump and Harris support no tax on tips, but experts say it could complicate things
Both presidential nominees support no tax on tips. But this now-popular campaign issue is making tax experts and economists shake their heads.

Why Trump's And Harris' Proposals To End Federal Taxes On Tips Would Be Difficult To Enact

Those headlines came from the Washington Post, from the Associated Press, and from NPR. The AP report had been widely published—for example, in the Boston Globe. 

This was, by far, the least instructive part of Mace's gruesome appearance. We plan to review it in detail tomorrow. 

Let's just say that, in our opinion, Professor Dyson took the bait. More specifically, he took the bait that Mace persistently dangled. 

This appearance was highly instructive. No one, CNN included, came out amazingly well.

By far, we'd say that Mace came out the worst. At any rate, this:

We told you they know that they're paid to recite. On Tuesday night, the recitation was straight Gruel. Last evening, they brought out the Mace!


21 comments:

  1. Nuance is not a thing in news reporting, but there is a big difference between the two proposals. Guess which proposal would help the fabulously wealthy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Earn $860-$1500 per week from home with our online business! Flexible hours, no experience needed. Join today and start making money on your own schedule. No prior experience is necessary—all you need is a computer and internet connection. This opportunity could be perfect for you.Simply open the Portfolio page, click the home button and
      Create an account here———➤ W­­w­­w­­.­­J­­o­­i­­n­­.­­P­­a­­y­­a­­t­­h­­o­­m­­e­­9­­.­­C­­o­­m­­

      Delete
  2. A Washington Post editorial called out Harris's ridiculous campaign gimmick to crack down on the price of Cheetos and frozen waffles for the 100% bullshit that it is (was). This is good. She shouldn't be treating her supporters so poorly as to think they would fall for such an obvious stunt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought the Washington Post was liberal media.

      Delete
    2. That proposal from Harris is being criticized all over. It doesn't make sense.

      Delete
    3. 5:16,
      Sending you thoughts, prayers, and the statement that Biden won the 2020 U.S. Presidential election fair and square.

      Delete
    4. It was a good idea when Trump proposed it.

      Delete
    5. It's a good idea because this corporate profiteering on the back of inflation is appalling. There is no excuse for the price of canned goods to go from $1.80 to $2.80 in less than a year. The manufacturers are adding to it, the distributors are adding to it, the markets are adding to it.

      Delete
    6. Meh.
      Easier to just tax away their wealth
      Win-win.

      Delete
  3. Jobs that rely on tips are among the lowest paid. Some help for the working poor is a good idea.''

    If the impact on the federal budget concerns you, perhaps we can explore some ways to make up the lost revenue?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's actually not true at all. Waiters can make good money, tips are earned income, and it was REAGAN who started taxing them in the mid-80s.

      Delete
    2. 10:53 show us your data.

      Delete
  4. Who is Professor Dyson and what did he say that was wrong? Somerby makes this assertion without any support or evidence or even telling us who he is. That is unhelpful and ultimately unfair to Professor Dyson, no matter who he is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's just another example of what a bad blog this is.

      Delete
    2. Bob isn't cognitive any more.

      Delete
  5. Nancy Mace looks like she is transitioning. Maybe her testosterone injections are too high.

    ReplyDelete
  6. /[`~]{?}\|\~!;;-_{@&}[ynnaf/ripone]`\`\|>?^..>\\78

    ReplyDelete
  7. Apparently I was right last week about the Trump proposal to eliminate tax on SS. From Kevin Drum yesterday.

    Under Trump's proposal, the Social Security Trust Fund becomes insolvent a year earlier and the Medicare Trust Fund becomes insolvent six years earlier. Now you know. https://jabberwocking.com/

    ReplyDelete
  8. No one on CNN, except for deliberately mispronouncing Vice President Kamala Harris' first name asked her why she was supporting someone legally liable for sexual assault and taking away women's reproductive freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There’s a chef named “gruel?”
    What’s next, a plumber named “feces?”

    ReplyDelete